Judge Jeanine goes to Washington
Former Fox News host Jeanine Pirro, D.C.'s new interim U.S. attorney, is leaping from one spotlight directly into another as she helms the investigation into the capital's most high-profile crime in years.
Pirro — who President Donald Trump hosted for a ceremonial swearing in at the Oval Office Wednesday — made an abrupt departure from her longtime position at Fox earlier this month after Trump tapped her for the position in Washington, making her the latest in a string of former personalities at the president's favorite network to join the administration.
Pirro was one of Fox's most visible stars, co-hosting the network's talk show 'The Five' since 2022 after an 11-year stint hosting her own program, 'Justice With Judge Jeanine.'
But the television veteran found herself in front of the cameras again not two weeks after starting her new role — this time with a far more serious mission.
Pirro has quickly become one of the faces of the prosecution against 31-year old suspect Elias Rodriguez, who was charged last week with the killing of two Israeli Embassy staffers. Pirro visited the Capital Jewish Museum with Attorney General Pam Bondi just hours after the shooting outside the downtown Washington building left Israeli Embassy staffers Sarah Milgrim and Yaron Lischinsky dead.
She appeared again at a press conference about the shooting beside D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser and Metropolitan Police Department Chief Pamela Smith the following day, where she announced murder and felony firearms charges against Rodriguez and promised to 'vigorously pursue' the case.
Trump tapped the longtime Fox News host and stalwart MAGA supporter to the role on May 8, after Ed Martin's nomination for the job faltered in the Republican-controlled Senate, a rare loss for a Trump nominee.
While Martin had never worked as a prosecutor and drew criticism for his defense of Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol rioters, Pirro has an extensive legal resume, serving as a district attorney and a judge in Westchester County, New York, before her shift to network fame. Her history on the bench earned her the TV-friendly nickname 'Judge Jeanine,' which followed her throughout her television career.
Pirro was also a booster of Trump's unproven claims about a stolen 2020 election. She was a central character in the defamation lawsuit Dominion Voting Systems brought against Fox News, in which the voting machine company alleged that the network pushed falsehoods about its systems as part of a broader conspiracy theory that the 2020 election was rigged.
Pirro, who had repeatedly made false claims that Joe Biden's election win was fraudulent, was named several times in the suit. The network ultimately reached a $787.5 million settlement with Dominion in 2023.
But, in contrast to Martin's support for Jan. 6 rioters, Pirro denounced the Jan. 6 attack as 'deplorable' immediately following the attack, setting her up as a less controversial pick for the job than her short-lived predecessor.
Pirro's office did not immediately provide a comment for this story.
Pirro also has a long history of mutual support with Trump. She has been a frequent guest at Trump's Mar-a-Lago, and used her television platform to vociferously defend the president over the years.
And Trump has delivered in return.
Trump issued a pardon for Pirro's ex-husband, Albert Pirro, who had been convicted on conspiracy and tax evasion charges in 2000 as one of his last acts in office in 2021.
After Trump tapped her for the interim U.S. attorney job, gushing in a May 8 Truth Social post announcing the move that Pirro is 'in a class by herself,' Pirro quickly jumped to serve her longtime ally.
The then-Fox host quickly left her post at the network without a final farewell to her viewers, leaving a major hole on one of the most-watched shows in cable news and setting off a game of musical chairs to replace her.
Pirro's new role in the U.S. Attorney's office is also not her first political rodeo. She launched — and soon abandoned — an unsuccessful bid to unseat then-Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.) in 2005.
Switching gears shortly thereafter, Pirro launched a bid for New York attorney general, but that campaign quickly derailed after she came under federal investigation for planning — with former city Police Commissioner Bernard Kerik — how to covertly record her husband to determine whether he was cheating on her. She was never charged, but ultimately lost the race to Andrew Cuomo.
Pirro has already been on the job, even before Wednesday. But the ceremonial swearing-in ceremony at the White House put on display the bond between her and Trump, as the two exchanged flatteries in the Oval Office.
'She's been very, very successful at a thing called television,' Trump joked, going on to say that 'to me, she'll always be known as a great lawyer and great prosecutor, which is what she's doing now.'
Pirro returned the favor, thanking Trump in her remarks for the move to 'bring me back to my roots,' before vowing that the killings of the two Israeli Embassy staffers 'will not go without just accounting' and promising that the nation's capital would 'become a shining city on a hill' under her watch.
But the road to that gleaming city is long, particularly for Pirro, who is undergoing the trials of transitioning from network fame to the life of a federal worker.
In a video posted to her X account last week — captioned 'the federal government has money for everyone but us' — Pirro made a pointed speech about the budgetary constraints of her new workplace.
Standing by a water cooler in the U.S. Attorney's office, Pirro complained that attorneys and staff in the office must pay dues to join a 'water club' in order to stay hydrated.
'And today they asked for our patience,' Pirro waxed on. 'Why? Because we couldn't get water delivered today. Today there was no water delivered to the United States Attorney's office — and remember, it's only for those who pay $7 a month. Now ain't it grand to be part of the government? And I'm just thrilled to be here.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
5 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Senate Republicans revise Trump's policy bill, scrounging for votes to pass it
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Republican leaders in the Senate are rushing to shore up support for the legislation so they can quickly pass it and send it to the House for final approval in time to meet the July 4 deadline Trump has set. An initial vote in the Senate could come later Saturday. Advertisement Party leaders are trying to appease two flanks of their conference. Some, including Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, said they could not support it without greater reassurances that the Medicaid cuts it contains would not hurt rural hospitals in their states. And fiscal hawks, including Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, have said they do not want to back legislation that would only increase the deficit. Advertisement The core of the bill remains the same. It would extend tax cuts passed by Republicans in 2017 and add some new ones Trump campaigned on, while slashing spending on safety-net programs, including Medicaid and food assistance. The biggest tax cuts and the biggest changes to those anti-poverty programs remained intact. Taken together, the bill would likely increase federal debt by more than $3 trillion over the next decade, though lawmakers are still shaping the bill and waiting on an official estimate from the Congressional Budget Office. With Trump demanding quick action, Republicans in Congress have intensified their efforts to push it through to enactment even as many of them — including several who voted for it in the House — have been open about their reservations about a measure they are concerned could be a political loser. The revisions released early Saturday were designed to allay some of those concerns. Senators, including Tillis and Susan Collins, R-Maine, had pressed for the inclusion of a rural hospital fund to help health care providers absorb the impact of a provision that would crack down on strategies that many states have developed to finance their Medicaid programs. Despite their pushback, that provider tax change remains in the bill, though lawmakers have delayed its implementation by one year. It is unclear whether a $25 billion compensation fund will be enough to win their votes. Collins had suggested that she wanted to provide as much as $100 billion to ensure that rural hospitals, which operate on thin margins, were not adversely affected. Advertisement But it appeared to be enough to win over at least one Republican holdout who had expressed concern about the Medicaid cuts — Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri, who said he would vote for the bill and was confident that changes benefit his state at least in the short term. A new provision allowing 'individuals in a noncontiguous state' to be exempt from enforcing new work requirements imposed on SNAP, formerly known as food stamps, appeared aimed at mollifying Murkowski of Alaska. Her state would be hit with billions of dollars in nutrition assistance costs as a result of the legislation, and she had cited the provision as one of her chief concerns. The bill also includes new health provisions designed to benefit Alaska, as well as new tax benefits for fishers in the state's waters. Some of the changes were aimed at appealing to members of the House, where Republicans from high-tax states like New York have threatened to sink the bill if it does not include a substantial increase in the state and local tax deduction, currently capped at $10,000. Senate Republicans, skeptical of the deduction, still ultimately decided to match the House plan to lift the cap to $40,000. But while the House made the increase permanent, the Senate keeps it for only five years, allowing it to snap back to $10,000 in 2030. The newest draft makes even sharper cuts to subsidies for wind and solar power, something that Trump and other conservatives had explicitly called for this past week. It remains to be seen whether those changes could cause friction with Republicans who have publicly supported green energy credits, including Tillis, Murkowski and Sen. John Curtis of Utah. Advertisement Previously, the Senate proposed allowing companies that were building wind and solar farms to claim a tax credit worth at least 30% of their costs if they started construction this year, with a phaseout over two years. But the revised bill would require companies place their projects 'in service' by the end of 2027 to claim the tax break. The bill would also impose additional taxes on renewable energy projects that receive 'material assistance' from China, even if they don't qualify for the credit. Because China dominates global supply chains, those new fees could affect a large number of projects. The new Senate measure would more quickly end tax credits for electric vehicles, doing away with them by Sept. 30. It would also slow the phaseout of a lucrative tax credit to make hydrogen fuels, allowing such projects to qualify if construction were started by the end of 2027, instead of by the end of this year. The bill also includes a provision written by Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, to sell as much as 1.225 million acres of federal land across the American West in order to build housing. Earlier versions of that proposal that would have auctioned off even more acreage had drawn fierce opposition from conservative hunters and outdoorsmen, and Republican senators from Montana and Idaho had said they would not vote for it. This article originally appeared in
The Hill
8 minutes ago
- The Hill
Nikki Haley hails Trump for US strikes but warns ‘Iran is not done'
Former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley offered her first praise for President Trump in several months in a Monday op-ed in Israel Hayom, an Israeli right-wing newspaper. She congratulated his decision to strike three Iranian nuclear sites but warned of further retaliation from Iran. 'Those in America that worry about why these strikes took place should understand that those strikes were a move to keep Americans safer. That was a move to take out one of the threats that Iran has used against Americans for years,' Haley wrote in the outlet owned by Republican megadonor Miriam Adelson. Israel Hayom is distributed in Hebrew and is also available online in English. The op-ed is a rare public appearance for Haley, who has largely faded from public view since the 2024 election. When she has spoken on Trump's foreign policy decisions in recent months, she has often criticized them, panning him for a phone call with Russian President Vladimir Putin and slamming his acceptance of a Qatari jet. In the opinion piece, however, Haley praised Trump's decision as 'very well done' while arguing that the United States should continue to be hawkish on Iran for the sake of both America and Israel. 'A safe and secure Israel helps us have a safe and secure America,' she wrote, arguing that the chance of diplomacy with Tehran was thin. 'They always say they want to talk, but the action doesn't match what they want to do,' she wrote. 'Trump was right that while you could kick this can down the road if you wanted, the threat would only get bigger.' She also took aim at the United Nations after Secretary-General António Guterres said he was 'gravely alarmed' by the strikes, accusing the international arbiter of failing to condemn Iran's moves on ballistic missiles and nuclear weapons. Haley finished by warning that America and Israel both needed to remain on guard. 'Americans need to be vigilant of our military bases in the region. We need to be vigilant of cyber attacks that could come our way through Iran. Iran is not done,' she wrote. As Trump's ambassador to the United Nations during his first term, Haley made the case both to him and to the global stage that the United States should back out of its 2015 nuclear deal with Iran. In the 2024 Republican presidential primary, during which she attempted to criticize the president, she also positioned herself as both a staunch defender of Israel and a Middle East hawk. After being the last of Trump's primary challengers to bow out, Haley failed to secure a place in his administration (she claimed she wanted no part in it). She is currently at the Hudson Institute, a conservative think tank, and making her way around the speaker circuit.
CNN
8 minutes ago
- CNN
Senate braces for first big vote on Trump agenda – with support still unclear
Senate Republicans are about to face a major test of loyalty to President Donald Trump, as the chamber braces for its first vote on whether to advance the president's giant tax cuts and spending bill. Senate Majority Leader John Thune and his team have been fiercely lobbying their members to get in line behind the measure, with Trump and White House officials also leaning heavily on the remaining GOP holdouts. Trump met with two key holdouts — Sen. Rick Scott of Florida and Ron Johnson of Wisconsin — on Saturday, just hours before GOP leaders hoped to hold the vote, according to those senators' close colleague, Sen. Mike Lee of Utah. He has also spoken to other critical votes, like Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri, who earlier Saturday declared his support for the bill. Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, another critic of the bill, golfed with the president on Saturday morning, according to Sen. Lindsay Graham. But it's not yet clear whether Thune will be able to limit defections on a procedural vote, to start centrists like Sen. Thom Tillis and a small group of GOP hardliners — Lee, Scott and Johnson — still pushing for changes to the bill. But GOP leadership believe they will ultimately succeed, thanks, in part, to immense pressure from Trump. Already two Republicans, Tillis and Johnson, have said they would block the bill from moving ahead. That leaves Thune just one more vote to lose. It all amounts to an intense Saturday scramble for Trump and GOP leaders, who are intent on passing the president's agenda as quickly as possible. Trump has told GOP leaders he wants to sign the bill at the White House on July 4 – but that would still require approval from the narrowly divided GOP-controlled House, which is also no guarantee. This story is breaking and will be updated.
