logo
Alan Grieve obituary: last of the Victorian entrepreneur philanthropists

Alan Grieve obituary: last of the Victorian entrepreneur philanthropists

Times30-06-2025
In the late 1950s Alan Grieve was a bright young lawyer making his name in company and tax law at the legal firm Taylor & Humbert. Among its clients was John Jerwood, an enigmatic British millionaire living in Tokyo who had made his fortune in the postwar years through one of the world's largest cultured-pearl dealerships.
Senior partners regarded Jerwood as 'a little difficult' and were delighted to palm him off to Grieve. He began travelling the world with his client, who was soon also his friend and confidant. The pair bonded over the arts and in 1977 Jerwood, advised by Grieve, started the Jerwood Foundation as a personal vehicle for supporting music and educational projects. 'He had no children but he had money and liked education and the arts,' Grieve told The Independent, adding on another occasion: 'He wanted to give people that next step up.'
When Jerwood died in 1991, Grieve took over the foundation and since then has invested £110 million in theatres, dance studios, art galleries, prizes, exhibitions and more. Autocratic, single-minded and fun to be around, he was described as the last of the Victorian 'entrepreneur philanthropists'. At first he found the role challenging. There were large assets but little sense of order. Even establishing the extent of them took two years. 'There was no structure. At first it operated out of my office in Fleet Street,' he told The Times.
He bought property, notably a handsome Fitzroy Square townhouse that served as a headquarters until 2021, and shrewdly invested the remaining capital. Gradually he had acquired what one profile described as 'a Micawber-like reputation' for good financial management and an aversion to paying over the odds. 'It isn't my money, after all,' he insisted.
Some early philanthropic forays were quickly cast aside, including those into medicine and social welfare, and a venture supporting film production was shelved after precipitating a deluge of paperwork. A £3 million grant to plug a hole in the Royal Court's 1999 redevelopment budget led to claims that Buckingham Palace had vetoed a plan to rename it the 'Jerwood Royal Court', though compromise was reached after 'a robust debate' with the Royal Court retaining its identity and its two auditoria bearing the Jerwood name.
Less controversial were grants of £900,000 for the Jerwood Gallery at the Natural History Museum, £1.4 million for the Jerwood Library at Trinity Hall, Cambridge, Grieve's alma mater, and £1 million for the Jerwood Hall at the London Symphony Orchestra's centre in the long-derelict Hawksmoor church of St Luke's in the City. 'I think we have found where we can make tangible, important and lasting contributions,' Grieve said. Equally important was a reputation for professionalism and for encouraging and rewarding excellence.
The Jerwood Painting Prize, established in 1994, gradually overtook the Turner as the prize painters most wanted to win before being phased out a decade later. Works by its winners, including Craigie Aitchison, Maggi Hambling and Prunella Clough, formed part of the ever-growing Jerwood Collection. There have also been Jerwood prizes for film-writing, choreography, composition and craftsmanship.
Some of the collection found a home at the Jerwood Gallery in Hastings, which opened in 2012. Grieve not only oversaw its construction, designed by his architect son Tom, but personally assembled its collection with advice from his curator daughter Lara, later referring with no embarrassment to his policy of 'enlightened nepotism'. Seven years later the gallery and its funders went their separate ways.
Another home for the collection was the Jerwood Space, a converted Victorian school in Southwark, south London, that combines an art gallery with low-cost dance and theatre rehearsal studios. The foundation received a National Lottery grant towards the development, but handed it back when Grieve noticed that it came with strings attached. 'I realised that the Arts Council would want to bear in on me, tell me I hadn't done this or that. So I rang up Gerry Robinson [then chairman of Arts Council England] and asked to whom I should make the cheque out. I think you'd say he was taken aback,' he said.
Grieve claimed to have never paid more than £100,000 for a painting, yet he successfully assembled a vast canon of predominantly British art that included works by Walter Sickert, Augustus John, Stanley Spencer, Winifred Nicholson and LS Lowry. 'It's still organic, we'll continue to buy, but sometimes we fail at auction because we're not prepared to pay prices we cannot afford,' he said, explaining that on one occasion he missed out on a piece by Tristram Hillier when the bidding broke the foundation's ceiling.
Another focus was on the stage, including a £1.2 million grant towards the 215-seat Jerwood Vanbrugh Theatre at the Royal Academy of Dramatic Art. For Grieve this was a logical continuation of cradle-to-grave, or at least school-to-success, support for theatre professionals. 'It fitted very well,' he said. 'We now have the Jerwood Space, we have the Royal Court where we're supporting young playwrights, we have the capital grant to establish the theatres there, and we're supporting young theatre directors.'
Under Grieve's auspices the Jerwood Foundation operated as a lean organisation, run by only a handful of staff and trustees. It was also something of a personal fiefdom. On one occasion he committed £500,000 to a motorised training vessel for the Sea Cadets after his wife read in The Times that the MoD was refusing to finance its construction. For him, such flexibility was crucial. 'It's one of the characteristics that makes us different from others,' he said.
So too was being able to react quickly to events. During the Covid-19 pandemic he reduced operating costs by selling Jerwood's headquarters and decamping to a converted farm building in the rolling hills of Shropshire, where he had lived for more than three decades. He also established a £1 million Blue Sky Fund, shared between the Theatre Artists Fund and Help Musicians, to support freelance artists whose livelihoods were jeopardised by the closure of theatres and performance spaces. 'Not just the violinist, but the bloke that fixes the lighting, the stagehands, carpenters and wig-makers,' he told the Financial Times.
Surveying his first 30 years running the Jerwood Foundation, Grieve insisted that it was his duty to give back to society on as wide a basis as possible. 'It might sound amorphous, but you have to try. Your mission must have a purpose,' he said. 'Philanthropy is not about making money and giving it away to say that you are the 'big guy'. The foundation has come to pride itself on its willingness to take risks. There is no formula. We're flexible, open-minded and, I'd like to think, not a soft touch.'
Alan Thomas Grieve was born in London in 1928, the only child of Lewis Grieve, who owned a jute sack factory, and his wife Doris (née Amner). His father wanted him to be a diplomat but a chaplain at Aldenham School, Hertfordshire, nudged him towards law, which he read at Trinity Hall, Cambridge, where he won a hockey blue. There he befriended a young American GI whose father repaid his kindness by laying on the trip of a lifetime around the US. Before completing his studies he undertook National Service with the 14th/20th King's Hussars; later he was a captain in the City of London Yeomanry (Territorial Army).
On graduating he joined Slaughter & May and in 1957 married Anne Dulake, who had studied medicine. He is survived by their daughter, Amanda, Lady Harlech, a creative stylist at Chanel, and two sons, Charles, who runs Brandcast Media, and Ivan, an artist. The marriage was dissolved and in 1971 he married Karen Dunn, whom he had met at a dinner party and who worked in antiques. She also survives him with their son, Tom, an architect, and daughter, Lara, who is a trustee and executive director of the Jerwood Foundation. 'I have instilled the work ethic first, then natural instinct. They have lived with art and seen it,' he said of his children.
Grieve moved to Taylor & Humbert in 1958 and a few years later advised the owners of Radio Caroline on their pirate radio operation. He was also the author of Purchase Tax (1958), which is as exciting as the title suggests, and in 1973 was involved in forming the Intellects Group, an international group of law firms. After being appointed senior partner in 1979 he oversaw the mergers that eventually led to his firm becoming Taylor Wessing.
By the time Jerwood died, Grieve had largely retired from legal work to concentrate on philanthropy. A combination of the foundation's previous resources, a fresh legacy from Jerwood and a run of healthy investment returns enabled him to increase the Jerwood profile in the 1990s, supporting more artists and organisations with larger sums. He continued to drive the foundation forward, remaining a trustee to the end of his life and only stepping down as chairman last year.
A trim figure whose hair turned white at an early age, enabling him to maintain an almost unchanged look of urbane assurance, Grieve was just as spry and sprightly in person as he was with the Jerwood Foundation. He swam regularly and skied until his knees complained too much. 'You've got to be nimble, got to be fleet-footed, got to be on top of your funding,' he told one journalist, telling another: 'Success is a mixture of luck, timing and expertise, and if you are able to bring these together, you will usually produce results.'
Alan Grieve CBE, lawyer, philanthropist and chairman of the Jerwood Foundation, was born on January 22, 1928. He died on May 14, 2025, aged 97
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nigel Farage urges Chancellor not to hike gambling taxes for horse racing
Nigel Farage urges Chancellor not to hike gambling taxes for horse racing

The Sun

time21 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Nigel Farage urges Chancellor not to hike gambling taxes for horse racing

NIGEL Farage enjoys Glorious Goodwood ­yesterday — as he called on Chancellor Rachel Reeves to not hike gambling taxes. The Reform UK leader warned of enormous damage if the 15 per cent duty is aligned to the 21 per cent for online casino-style games. 2 He said: 'I do think horse racing is different. "You're making an individual decision each time to have a bet. "There are checks and safeguards in place already.' The racing industry says finances will be badly hurt if the current rate is increased for online games. A Treasury consultation on the issue has now closed. He was speaking out as he attended the West Sussex racecourse as a guest of Scottish Dubai-based businessman Dr James Hay, who has previously donated to the Tory party. His wife Fitriani has also given £50,000 to Reform UK last year. Horse trainer John Gosden has warned British horse racing will be harmed by the punishing new betting tax. "I don't want to see our industry destroyed. It would be tragic. We are world leaders." Nigel Farage on leading the polls, being 'ready' to be PM & why he 'hopes people hate him' 2

Donald Trump hits out at Federal Reserve as US jobs fall
Donald Trump hits out at Federal Reserve as US jobs fall

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Donald Trump hits out at Federal Reserve as US jobs fall

Donald Trump launched a fresh attack on the chair of the Federal Reserve after the US jobs market suffered a sharp slowdown over the summer. The world's largest economy added just 73,000 jobs in July – fewer than the 110,000 expected – reviving hopes of a September interest rate cut. And figures for May and June were lowered by 258,000 in an unusually large revision by the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). In retaliation, Trump last night said he would sack BLS head Erika McEntarfer. It came as US stocks tumbled after Trump slapped tariffs on trading partners. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 1 per cent yesterday afternoon, while the S&P 500 dropped 1.2 per cent. The tech-focused Nasdaq was down 1.7 per cent. European stocks were also rocked by Trump's trade war, with Germany's Dax losing 2.7 per cent and Paris's Cac index dropping 2.9 per cent. The UK got off lightly as the FTSE 100 fell 0.7 per cent, or 64.23 points, to 9068.58. Pharmaceutical firms were among the biggest fallers in London after Trump demanded lower prices. AstraZeneca fell 1.9 per cent and GSK dropped 1.5 per cent. The retreat came as revised figures showed the US economy added just 14,000 jobs in June, a figure revised from a previously reported 147,000. Payrolls for May were slashed by 125,000 to a gain of 19,000 jobs. The BLS described revisions as 'larger than normal'. Atakan Bakiskan, US economist at Berenberg, said: 'The July report provided ammunition for those expecting a Fed rate cut in September.' 'This data has led to a rapid recalibration of US interest rate expectations,' Kathleen Brooks, research director at XTB, said. On his social media platform Truth Social, Trump wrote: 'Too little, too late. Jerome 'Too Late' Powell is a disaster. DROP THE RATE! .. Tariffs are bringing billions of dollars into the USA!' The President has branded the central bank chair a 'stubborn moron', saying he 'must lower interest rates now'. 'If he continues to refuse, the board should assume control and do what everyone knows has to be done,' he added. Reports last month suggested Powell's future could be in doubt after Trump met congressional Republicans to discuss sacking him. But the President later insisted he would only fire the central bank boss if he were guilty of fraud.

Car finance payouts limited, but lenders aren't off the hook
Car finance payouts limited, but lenders aren't off the hook

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Car finance payouts limited, but lenders aren't off the hook

There may well be a few sighs of relief from senior finance company and banking executives following the Supreme Court's ruling, but it is unlikely you will hear the champagne corks verdict does almost certainly reduce the potential compensation bill significantly. Lenders no longer face the prospect of having to pay £30bn to £40bn to aggrieved car buyers. The likelihood of the government stepping in also appears to have receded the industry is not off the hook. The Financial Conduct Authority may still open a redress scheme for cases where dealers had a financial incentive from lenders to ramp up interest rates on loans as much as possible. The Supreme Court's ruling also upheld one consumer claim, in which the commission payments were deemed unfair – and that could provide a template for others to follow. All of this means the compensation bill could still be in the Supreme Court's intervention has been eagerly awaited since October, when the Appeal Court issued a verdict in three test cases which could have triggered an avalanche of compensation each case, people who had bought cars on finance claimed they were partially unaware that the deal had involved a commission payment being made by the lender to the car dealer. They claimed that in law the commissions amounted to bribes, or secret Appeal Court judges agreed, essentially saying that commission payments made by a finance company to a dealer for arranging a car loan were illegal if the car buyer had not given his or her "informed consent".They also concluded that a car dealer had a "fiduciary duty" towards the car buyer when it came to arranging a car loan. In other words, the dealer should set his or her own interests aside, and act purely on the customer's meant that millions of car buyers could potentially claim compensation – if they could show that the dealer had not specified what commission payments they were receiving for lining up a finance deal. It was not enough for the details to be buried in small had feared that this would lead to an avalanche of claims against them – and that the same arguments could be used to challenge other kinds of consumer finance agreements as well, potentially increasing the compensation bill still the Supreme Court threw very cold water over those arguments. The President of the Court, Lord Reed, dismissed the idea that car dealers had a "single minded duty of loyalty" to their customers, and insisted they "plainly and properly" had personal interests in the finance agreements they were involved ruling clearly blocks off what could have been a very wide avenue for compensation claims. However, the court did side with one of the claimants. In the case of Marcus Johnson, a factory worker, it decided that the finance agreement was "unfair" under the terms of the Consumer Credit Act. This was because the size of the commission payment was very large, and because Mr Johnson had been misled about the relationship between the dealer and the lender. He was, they said, entitled to say this could open the doors for other cases in which the commission payments are seen to be is also a key question the Supreme Court ruling does not answer. This is what should happen in cases involving so-called Discretionary Commission Agreements (DCAs). These were finance deals in which the car dealer could set the interest rate of a loan, within a set scale. The higher the rate, the more commission they would be paid – and the customer would be unaware of the Financial Conduct Authority banned such deals in 2021. It is now considering whether to launch a redress scheme for consumers who were affected by them. If it goes ahead, millions of car buyers could still have a claim, though it is not clear how much compensation they would to Richard Barnwell, a financial services advisory partner at accountancy firm BDO, the bill could still be substantial."We believe there is still a potential for redress, for example, if discretionary commission arrangements are deemed to be an unfair relationship, redress could still be from to £5bn to £13bn or more," he analysts agree. According to Martin Lewis, who runs the MoneySavingExpert website, "the Supreme Court has certainly narrowed the number of people who will be able to reclaim car finance. I think you're probably talking the lower end of £10bn, as opposed to £40bn."That £10bn would still be a significant figure. But the finance industry appears to have avoided the potential free-for-all rush to claim compensation the earlier verdict had threatened to spark while the Treasury says it will "work with regulators and industry to understand the impact for both firms and consumers", the BBC understands that the likelihood of the government intervening with retrospective legislation to protect financial firms has now diminished law of bribery only applies to persons who owe a single-minded duty of loyalty and are therefore bound to have no personal interest in the matter that they are dealing the present case the car dealers plainly and properly have a personal interest in the dealings between the customers and the finance companies.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store