Over 1400 professors holding M. Phil degree exempted from NET
On Tuesday, the state higher and technical education department issued a government resolution, which came attached with the list of 1,421 professors, who will benefit from the relaxation from the NET qualification, a mandatory criterion for all professors. While all of them are already working professors in various state universities, they will now be eligible for career advancement schemes with this exemption.
All these professors are those who were appointed between 1994 and 2009 based on their M.Phil. qualification. A senior professor explained, 'After UGC introduced clearing NET as mandatory qualification for appointment of professors, many who were already appointed based on older qualification criteria were allowed to continue if they fulfilled certain conditions. One of them was if they have an M. Phil degree, such professors were allowed to continue despite having NET qualification.
This resolution too was brought after a lengthy struggle by professors affected by the changes. And finally, a blanket order was issued in September 2022 that all such professors who are appointed based on M. Phil degree between specified years will be exempted from the NET. But Maharashtra took the longest time to implement it.'
According to information shared by Bombay University and College Teachers Union (BUCTU), the state government insisted on individualised orders for such professors, despite having a blanket order from UGC.
'This process took a really long time as UGC asked the state to provide a list of names of professors who should be exempted. Now, finally, the GR includes a total 1,421 names of professors who are exempted from the NET qualification,' said a BUCTU member.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
6 hours ago
- Indian Express
Why India's new NAAC reforms might backfire
The recently proposed reforms at India's National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC) have been heralded as a watershed for the country's sprawling higher education system, which counts over 45,000 colleges and nearly 1,100 universities, serving more than 40 million students as per All India Survey on Higher Education (AISHE) data (2021-22). As NAAC's well-established but often-criticised system of letter grades is poised to give way to new digital dashboards, a binary 'accredited/not accredited' classification, and a five-step maturity matrix, there is an optimistic air of modernisation. At first glance, minimising labour-intensive campus inspections with data-driven processes seems an obvious advance, promising greater objectivity and transparency. However, as the dust settles, it becomes clear that underneath these glitzy digital upgrades, the deeper flaws of Indian accreditation may well persist, if not intensify, unless reforms go beyond the surface. Historically, NAAC's grading system — A++, A+, B+, and so forth – has played a pivotal role in shaping student admissions, staff appointments and, crucially, determining the allocation of government funding. According to UGC reports, the stakes are enormous: In 2022, over 70 per cent of colleges and universities relied on NAAC accreditation to access various central and state government schemes. Even a single notch higher in NAAC ratings can yield crores in research funding, greater autonomy and a surge in student applications. Such high stakes breed perverse incentives. It isn't surprising, then, that a burgeoning industry of consultants specialising in 'Grade Optimisation' services has mushroomed, a phenomenon highlighted in a 2023 Education Ministry internal audit, which noted that nearly 60 per cent of accredited institutions had used external consultants for compliance documentation, leading to growing concerns that self-study reports have become polished brochures rather than honest reflections. The new digital reforms, intended to sanitise the process by emphasising uploaded data, audited metrics and user-friendly dashboards, risk becoming a new arena for performative excellence rather than substantive change. Data laundering can be as insidious as staging a pre-inspection campus clean-up: For example, a 2022 study by the Centre for Policy Research found that 27 per cent of colleges reported inflated faculty research publications, while over 15 per cent admitted to embellishing 'best practices' in their NAAC reports when surveyed anonymously. When the system's rewards are tightly coupled with a handful of quantifiable indicators, such as student-teacher ratios, placement records, or research output, activities inevitably turn toward massaging the numbers. Switching to a binary 'accredited/non-accredited' label or five-tier maturity scale may remove some ambiguity, but it remains susceptible to gaming, especially if monitoring and independent verification are weak. Crucially, the proposal to reduce accreditation validity from five to three years is meant, in theory, to foster a culture of continuous improvement. However, there is a risk that this change will simply triple the bureaucratic burden. Faculty in India already spend substantial time on compliance: A 2021 NAAC survey noted that, on average, preparing for accreditation consumes 8-10 months of labour per cycle, diverting attention from research and teaching. With cycles now more frequent, paper (or digital) pushing may crowd out pedagogy. If the accreditors' gaze becomes more relentless but not fundamentally more discerning, the core mission of educational excellence may recede further behind an ever-thickening curtain of compliance. The human dimension is the crux of meaningful reform, yet India has consistently underestimated its importance. The so-called 'peer reviewers' who form visiting teams are often chosen through obscure or politicised processes. Transparency International's 2022 report on higher education notes that 21 per cent of institutions surveyed believed that accreditation outcomes could be influenced by favours or hospitality, a shameful open secret. By global best practices, peer review relies on independent, trained academics scrutinising institutions with integrity and deep professional commitment. In contrast, India's system too often reduces assessment visits to rituals: Tea, tours, and testimonials, rather than rigorous, constructive critique. Digital platforms will not magically instil ethics or expertise. To fix the foundation, NAAC must invest in assembling a large, diverse, well-trained cadre of reviewers, free from conflicts of interest and subjected to robust oversight, including whistleblower mechanisms and periodic reviews themselves. The essential function of accreditation, in its healthiest form, is not policing but professional development: It should provoke introspection, highlight strengths and gaps, and enable sustained progress. The best models, such as those of the European Quality Assurance Register (EQAR) or Singapore's Committee for Private Education, blend self-assessment with external review, encourage faculty development, and create feedback loops that genuinely improve teaching, research, and student outcomes. Unfortunately, Indian accreditation too often encourages chasing metrics rather than meaning. The Higher Education Quality Council's 2023 analysis underscored this, finding that while 93 per cent of accredited colleges improved on NAAC-mandated metrics, only 36 per cent showed convincing gains in student learning or faculty research output over five years. To be fair, digital tools can aid in streamlining data collection and improving transparency, but they are no substitute for a culture grounded in trust, integrity, and aspiration. The government's renewed efforts must reimagine NAAC not just as a gatekeeper, but as a mentor. This calls for serious investment in capacity building, radical transparency, and real accountability, for both reviewers and institutions, something dashboards alone cannot ensure. As India aims for global academic stature, accreditation reform must rest on ethics, autonomy, and ambition. Technology may impress, but only a shift in institutional culture and incentives can turn superficial compliance into meaningful change. The real test for NAAC is not how efficiently it counts colleges, but whether it can inspire them to count for more. The writer is former professor and dean, Christ University, Bengaluru
India.com
13 hours ago
- India.com
CBSE Compartment Results 2025 Big Update: Board likely to announce Class 10, Class 12 Results by THIS date
UGC NET Result 2025 big update: NTA UGC NET Result to be declared on....; know how to check scores at CBSE Class 10, 12 Compartment Result: The Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) is likely to release the result for the Compartment examinations of Class 10th and 12th soon. The candidates who have appeared for the examination are asked to keep all the details ready for the fast and easy access to the results. Soon after the formal announcement of the results, the same will be available on the official website of the board i.e. The candidates must note that the board has not announced any official date for the declaration of the result. As per reports, the CBSE Compartment examinations results are expected to be released in the first week of August. How to download result For the convenience of the candidates, we have mentioned the steps via which they can check the results: 1. Go to the official website at 2. Under the '2025 Results' section, select 'Secondary School (Class 10) Supplementary Examination Result 2025' or 'Senior School (Class 12) Supplementary Examination Result 2025' to view results for your respective class. 3. You will be greeted with a new page. 4. Enter the required credentials to view the result. 5. You will be able to see your result now. 6. Download and save it for future references. What is the expected date for the results to be released? For the past two years, the result for the CBSE Compartment exams has been released in the first week of August only, for both Class 10 and 12. Based on this past trend, students can expect the results to be released by the first week of the new month. In case a student finds any discrepancy in their result, they can send it for re-evaluation, or verification of marks on the official website of CBSE. If there are any changes made, they will be notified through their login account.
News18
2 days ago
- News18
Sucess Story: Bihar Farmer's Son Clears UGC NET For Fourth Consecutive Time
Last Updated: Success Story: Pankaj Kumar Sah passed the UGC-NET exam for the fourth consecutive time while working. He is set to become a professor soon. If you approach any task with genuine hard work and dedication, you may initially face struggles, but success is guaranteed. This is exemplified by the story of Pankaj Kumar Sah from Dhamdaha Chandrahi, Purnia, Bihar who endured many challenges to achieve his dream and ultimately succeeded. Pankaj Kumar Sah, the son of Yogendra Prasad Sah, a farmer from Chandrahi Ward No. 15 in Dhamdaha, Purnia district, balanced his studies while assisting his father in farming. He passed the UGC-NET exam for the fourth consecutive time while working. He is set to become a professor soon. Pankaj expressed pride in rising from humble beginnings to passing a national-level exam. An acquaintance informed him of the results, and upon checking, he discovered he had been selected for the Assistant Professor position. He cleared the exam first in June 2020, then in 2023, again in June 2024, and now for the fourth time in June 2025. He currently works in the General Administration Department and aims to become a professor soon. Pankaj mentioned that while he serves people through his role in the General Administration Department, he aspires to fulfil his dream by contributing to the education sector. Pankaj revealed that he effectively used his spare time for studying. His daily bus commute of 1 hour for over 30 kilometres to his workplace was dedicated to studying. He continued his studies at home at night after return from office. He also helped his father with farming. He advised young people that no exam is too big and that nothing is greater than a human being. With hard work, success can be easily attained. Meanwhile, Nilufa Yasmin, a resident of Palita Road area in Katwa, Purba Burdwan, West Bengal has secured rank 1 in the UGC NET JRF 2025. She achieved a perfect 100 percentile score in the exam. She has been focused on her studies from the beginning, consistently achieving good results in school, college, and at the postgraduate level. Her love for teaching made her pursue it as a career goal. With that aim, she began preparing for the UGC NET and JRF exams. view comments First Published: July 29, 2025, 17:16 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
