The United States is at risk of a Spanish-style electricity meltdown
Spain has been ramping up solar power for years, and set a record of meeting nearly 80 per cent of demand on April 21. On April 28, the day of the meltdown, solar provided 59 per cent of electricity, wind about 12 per cent, and nuclear and gas approximately 22 per cent.
But providing reliable electricity to people with intermittent renewables, such as wind and solar, is more difficult than with baseload power, such as coal, natural gas, and nuclear power. In a 2024 report, the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC), a nonprofit international regulatory authority, warned of high and elevated risks of shortages for much of the United States from 2025 to 2029.
Credit: Reuters | @agusssgtf
According to the report, electricity supplies are likely to be inadequate as coal and some gas-fired generators face retirement and energy demand surges due to data centre and artificial intelligence technology. The NERC authors stated: 'The trends point to critical reliability challenges facing the industry: satisfying escalating energy growth, managing generator retirements, and accelerating resource and transmission development.'
The Midcontinent Independent System Operator, which provides electricity for 15 states from Louisiana to Wisconsin, as well as the Canadian province of Manitoba, is at high risk of suffering a shortage of electricity in the high demand months of summer and winter, for instance.
Subsidies for wind and solar, signed into law in 2022 by Joe Biden in the Inflation Reduction Act, are at the heart of the problem. The wind and the sun are effectively free sources of energy, but they don't blow and shine continuously. Continuous, dense power from gas, coal, and nuclear is needed as a backup for renewables. But since these do not get subsidies, there is less incentive for companies to invest in them.
The Solar Energy Industries Association states that solar energy represents 'energy dominance'. It argues that the tax credit for solar is 'one of the most important federal policy mechanisms to support the growth of solar energy in the United States' and has provided 'critical stability for businesses and investors'.
After their electricity meltdown, Spaniards may beg to differ. In the United States, oil, gas, and coal have no tax breaks in the Inflation Reduction Act, and these forms of energy are currently vital to keep solar and wind in operation.
The danger of potential blackouts is the reason that Donald Trump declared an energy emergency on his first day in office. He is taking several steps to avert the disaster forecast in the NERC report. These steps could also be emulated by the UK and the EU if they wanted to ensure a reliable grid.
They don't seem keen to follow suit, however. Coincidentally, or not, following the Spanish meltdown, a new report by the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change was published stating that 'any strategy based on either 'phasing out' fossil fuels in the short term or limiting consumption is a strategy doomed to fail'. But despite the chaos on the Iberian peninsula, the Institute's sensible recommendations were evidently deemed unpopular by Labour Party leadership.
President Trump, meanwhile, has asked the Environmental Protection Agency to end its Biden-era rules that would have required coal-fired and new natural gas-fired power plants to close if they could not eliminate 90 per cent of the CO2 emissions. He has also requested Congress to get rid of the billions in subsidies for renewables and other clean energy credits in the Inflation Reduction Act scheduled for the next decade. The combination of ending the subsidies for renewables and keeping open existing power plants should avert the blackouts forecast in the NERC report.
President Trump is going further by accelerating development of fossil fuel projects. He has reopened Alaska to oil development, and is fast-tracking permitting for fossil fuel projects, so approvals come in 28 days or fewer. He has asked the Environmental Protection Agency to reconsider the finding that greenhouse gases such as CO2 and methane are pollutants. He has ordered the United States to withdraw from the Paris Agreement and other associated UN agreements, a process that takes a year.
The real winner from renewable energy use is China, which dominates wind and solar manufacturing. China makes around 75 per cent of the world's batteries, used in electric vehicles and to back up solar arrays. The tariffs that President Trump is placing on China, as well as removal of the tax credits, should tilt American energy policy in a more resilient direction.
The stability and reliability of the power grid cannot depend on subsidised renewables. It is crucial to maintain continuous, dense power from coal, natural gas, or nuclear energy to ensure a dependable electricity supply. The steps taken by President Trump to avert blackouts by promoting fossil fuel development and reconsidering emissions rules reflect a necessary response to the challenges highlighted in the NERC report. The Spanish disaster proves it.
Diana Furchtgott-Roth is the director of the Center for Energy, Climate and Environment at The Heritage Foundation
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
5 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
EU, US Differ on Pharma Tariffs, Complicating Trump's Trade Deal
The European Union and the US appear to differ on some fundamental details in their new trade agreement, underscoring the difficulty they'll have in turning this deal into a reality. The EU said it would accept a 15% tariff on nearly all its exports to the US. President Donald Trump told reporters that the bloc also agreed to open up its 'countries to trade at zero tariff.'
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Oil Prices Caught Between a $70 Summer and Growing Surplus Fears
(Bloomberg) -- Oil traders are grappling with a tension — there's a growing chorus of warnings about the market weakening later this year and into 2026, but for now prices are holding strong near $70 a barrel. The High Costs of Trump's 'Big Beautiful' New Car Loan Deduction Can This Bridge Ease the Troubled US-Canadian Relationship? Trump Administration Sues NYC Over Sanctuary City Policy France's TotalEnergies SE last week warned the market is facing abundant supply as the OPEC+ group unwinds output curbs, even as slowing global growth weighs on demand. Norway's Equinor ASA said its new Johan Castberg field is operating at full pelt, with a Brazilian offshore asset starting soon, a reminder of additional barrels expected from outside the producer group. Both the International Energy Agency and the US Energy Information Administration earlier this month bolstered their estimates for the surplus they see next year. The two widely-followed forecasters expect supply to eclipse demand by the most since the pandemic, with the IEA's projection at 2 million barrels a day. A surplus that pushes prices lower will help tame inflation, hurt high-cost producers and likely please US President Donald Trump who has called for lower prices since taking office. It's a stark contrast with the here and now, where inventories at key storage hubs remain low, reflected in a bullish market structure that indicates tight supplies. Profits from turning crude into fuels are also far above seasonal norms, underpinning demand for crude. 'One of the issues that has been supporting oil has been the seasonal strength of the summer months,' Francisco Blanch, head of commodities and derivatives research at Bank of America Corp. said in a Bloomberg TV interview. 'Second half of the year the surplus is going to be close to 200 million barrels,' which will ultimately weigh on prices, he added. While most of the IEA's revision of next year's outlook centered on output additions by the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies, who will meet to discuss output levels in early August, there were also some less obvious drivers. Forecasts for the supply of biofuels, which compete with conventional oil, are about 200,000 barrels a day higher than two months ago in the agency's estimates. The US government now sees global oil supplies about 2.1 million barrels a day higher in the fourth quarter of this year than the first, the biggest increase it has seen over the period since February. The two bodies' forecasts constitute an important element in traders' evaluations of how the market will unfold. For now, signs of robust demand remain. Leading oil trader Vitol Group said last week that jet fuel demand has been steadily climbing, with flight numbers reaching all-time highs. US weekly oil-demand figures are the highest this year. That data has been revised higher in final monthly readings for four of the last five periods where complete figures are available. And while the global trade war offers reason to be concerned about consumption, historically demand estimates have tended to be revised higher too, suggesting that the currently-expected surplus could narrow. From 2012 to 2024, the IEA's demand forecasts have ended up being on average close to 500,000 barrels a day higher than when the estimate was first issued, as more data became available. That excludes 2020, when the global pandemic transformed consumption patterns. Still, once the summer's strength wanes, a global surplus is likely to emerge, according to Natasha Kaneva, JPMorgan Chase & Co.'s head of global commodities strategy. 'Supply is increasing,' Kaneva said in a Bloomberg TV interview. 'At some point this inventory build will start showing up in visible inventories in OECD countries like the United States. At the moment it's not priced in.' --With assistance from Julian Lee, Grant Smith, Kari Lundgren, Lisa Abramowicz, Scarlet Fu and Romaine Bostick. Burning Man Is Burning Through Cash It's Not Just Tokyo and Kyoto: Tourists Descend on Rural Japan Confessions of a Laptop Farmer: How an American Helped North Korea's Wild Remote Worker Scheme Elon Musk's Empire Is Creaking Under the Strain of Elon Musk A Rebel Army Is Building a Rare-Earth Empire on China's Border ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Analysis-Out-gunned Europe accepts least-worst US trade deal
By Mark John LONDON (Reuters) -In the end, Europe found it lacked the leverage to pull Donald Trump's America into a trade pact on its terms and so has signed up to a deal it can just about stomach - albeit one that is clearly skewed in the U.S.'s favour. As such, Sunday's agreement on a blanket 15% tariff after a months-long stand-off is a reality check on the aspirations of the 27-country European Union to become an economic power able to stand up to the likes of the United States or China. The cold shower is all the more bracing given that the EU has long portrayed itself as an export superpower and champion of rules-based commerce for the benefit both of its own soft power and the global economy as a whole. For sure, the new tariff that will now be applied is a lot more digestible than the 30% "reciprocal" tariff which Trump threatened to invoke in a few days. While it should ensure Europe avoids recession, it will likely keep its economy in the doldrums: it sits somewhere between two tariff scenarios the European Central Bank last month forecast would mean 0.5-0.9% economic growth this year compared to just over 1% in a trade tension-free environment. But this is nonetheless a landing point that would have been scarcely imaginable only months ago in the pre-Trump 2.0 era, when the EU along with much of the world could count on U.S. tariffs averaging out at around 1.5%. Even when Britain agreed a baseline tariff of 10% with the United States back in May, EU officials were adamant they could do better and - convinced the bloc had the economic heft to square up to Trump - pushed for a "zero-for-zero" tariff pact. It took a few weeks of fruitless talks with their U.S. counterparts for the Europeans to accept that 10% was the best they could get and a few weeks more to take the same 15% baseline which the United States agreed with Japan last week. "The EU does not have more leverage than the U.S., and the Trump administration is not rushing things," said one senior official in a European capital who was being briefed on last week's negotiations as they closed in around the 15% level. That official and others pointed to the pressure from Europe's export-oriented businesses to clinch a deal and so ease the levels of uncertainty starting to hit businesses from Finland's Nokia to Swedish steelmaker SSAB. "We were dealt a bad hand. This deal is the best possible play under the circumstances," said one EU diplomat. "Recent months have clearly shown how damaging uncertainty in global trade is for European businesses." NOW WHAT? That imbalance - or what the trade negotiators have been calling "asymmetry" - is manifest in the final deal. Not only is it expected that the EU will now call off any retaliation and remain open to U.S. goods on existing terms, but it has also pledged $600 billion of investment in the United States. The time-frame for that remains undefined, as do other details of the accord for now. As talks unfolded, it became clear that the EU came to the conclusion it had more to lose from all-out confrontation. The retaliatory measures it threatened totalled some 93 billion euros - less than half its U.S. goods trade surplus of nearly 200 billion euros. True, a growing number of EU capitals were also ready to envisage wide-ranging anti-coercion measures that would have allowed the bloc to target the services trade in which the United States had a surplus of some $75 billion last year. But even then, there was no clear majority for targeting the U.S. digital services which European citizens enjoy and for which there are scant homegrown alternatives - from Netflix to Uber to Microsoft cloud services. It remains to be seen whether this will encourage European leaders to accelerate the economic reforms and diversification of trading allies to which they have long paid lip service but which have been held back by national divisions. Describing the deal as a painful compromise that was an "existential threat" for many of its members, Germany's BGA wholesale and export association said it was time for Europe to reduce its reliance on its biggest trading partner. "Let's look on the past months as a wake-up call," said BGA President Dirk Jandura. "Europe must now prepare itself strategically for the future - we need new trade deals with the biggest industrial powers of the world." (Additional reporting by Jan Strupczewski in Brussels; Christian Kraemer and Maria Martinez in Berlin; Writing by Mark John; Editing by Nick Zieminski) Sign in to access your portfolio
