logo
Supreme Court rejects BCCI, Riju Raveendran plea in Byju's settlement case

Supreme Court rejects BCCI, Riju Raveendran plea in Byju's settlement case

The Supreme Court on Monday upheld an order rejecting the appeals of the BCCI and Byju's co-founder Riju Raveendran seeking withdrawal of insolvency proceedings against his company.
A bench comprising Justices J B Pardiwala and R Mahadevan dismissed the appeals filed by the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and Raveendran challenging the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) verdict on April 17.
BCCI and Raveendran had previously challenged an order of the Bengaluru bench of the National Company Law Tribunal, which on February 10 directed to place their settlement offer before the new Committee of Creditors (CoC), in which US-based Glas Trust, the trustee for lenders to which Byju's owes USD 1.2 billion, is a member.
A two-member Chennai bench of the NCLAT comprising Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain and Jatindranath Swain upheld the directions passed by the NCLT and said the settlement proposal was filed after the formation of CoC, hence as the provisions of Section 12 A of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, it requires the approval of the lender's body.
Both BCCI and Raveendran contended since the application under Section 12A was filed before the constitution of the CoC, the provisions of Section 12A coupled with Regulation 30A(1)(a) shall apply and not Regulation 30A(1)(b).
Section 12 A of IBC prescribes an exit route from insolvency. It mandates that NCLT may allow the withdrawal of insolvency initiated by any financial or operational creditor under Sections 7,9 or section 10, based on an application made with the approval of 90 per cent voting share of the CoC.
Regulation 30A(1)(a) deals with the provision of filing Section 12 A proceedings through the interim resolution profession before formation of CoC whereas 30A(1)(b) deals with provision of filing after formation of CoC.
The BCCI and Byju's contended Form FA, which is an application for withdrawal of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), was submitted before the formation of CoC of Byju's.
However, rejecting the plea NCLAT said, "Form FA, admittedly having been filed on November 14, 2024, is post (formation of) CoC." "If the application under Section 12A is filed under Regulation 30A(1)(a) before the constitution of CoC then Section 12A which mandates the approval of such application for withdrawal by 90 per cent voting share of the CoC shall not apply but if the application is filed after the constitution of the CoC then the provisions of Section 12A shall apply with full force," said NCLAT.
CIRP against Byju's was initiated on July 16, 2024 by NCLAT admitting a Rs 158.90 crore claim from BCCI as an operational creditor of edtech major. An IRP was appointed also by the NCLT in this matter.
Later, a settlement was arrived between the parties and Raveendran approached NCLAT.
The appellate tribunal set aside the insolvency proceedings against Byju's on August 2, 2024 after approving dues settlement with the BCCI, which had entered into a Team Sponsor Agreement with the cricket body in 2019.
This was challenged by Glas Trust before the Supreme Court.
Glas Trust, a financial creditor, also filed a separate petition before NCLT seeking resolution of its debt of USD 984.3 million (approximately Rs 8,200 crore).
The apex court on October 23, 2024, set aside the NCLAT order staying the CIRP against Think & Learn, which owns edtech brand Byju's and asked BCCI to approach NCLT for the settlement.
Although BCCI submitted Form FA to the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) on August 16, 2024, it had instructed the IRP to file it only after the resolution of an appeal pending before the Supreme Court.
Raveendran contended before NCLAT there was a delay on the part of the IRP in filing the withdrawal form.
The NCLAT, however, rejected the plea.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Terror and sports cannot go together': Congress on Asia Cup matches against Pakistan
‘Terror and sports cannot go together': Congress on Asia Cup matches against Pakistan

Indian Express

time3 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

‘Terror and sports cannot go together': Congress on Asia Cup matches against Pakistan

The Chandigarh Congress has opposed the proposed India-Pakistan cricket matches scheduled to be held during the Asia Cup in September, urging the Union Government to withhold clearance for the fixtures. The party has argued that 'terror and sports cannot go together,' questioning the moral and strategic logic behind resuming cricket ties with Pakistan. Rajiv Sharma, chief spokesperson of the Chandigarh Congress, said that the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) has agreed to play against Pakistan at a neutral venue. He said the people of Chandigarh and other places in the country are upset with what he termed an 'unwarranted agreement,' particularly at a time when Operation Sindoor, launched in response to cross-border terrorism, is still ongoing. 'It is extremely disappointing that while not a single perpetrator of the Pahalgam attack has been brought to justice, the cricket boards of both nations are moving towards friendly sporting ties,' Sharma said. He warned that Indian sponsors' funds could inadvertently benefit the Pakistan Cricket Board, which, he claimed, may use the money to further terror activities against India. The Congress leader also questioned the BCCI's rationale behind opting for a neutral venue to accommodate Pakistan's interests, stating that India holds the right to host the tournament and should not compromise its position. Calling the decision an 'insult to the self-respect of the people of Chandigarh and the nation,' Sharma urged Chandigarh MP Manish Tewari to raise the issue in Parliament. He also slammed the office-bearers of the Union Territory Cricket Association for their silence on the matter, accusing them of compromising national pride for personal or political gains.

Trump says US-EU trade deal is close — But sticking points remain
Trump says US-EU trade deal is close — But sticking points remain

Mint

time5 minutes ago

  • Mint

Trump says US-EU trade deal is close — But sticking points remain

US President Donald Trump on Sunday expressed optimism over reaching a trade deal with the European Union, even as the clock ticks toward an August 1 deadline that could trigger sweeping tariffs on EU exports to the United States. Speaking at the start of a high-stakes meeting with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen at his Turnberry golf resort on Scotland's western coast, Trump said there was a 'good chance' of striking an agreement, despite 'three or four main sticking points' — most notably around what he called 'fairness' in car and agricultural exports. US President Donald Trump on Sunday expressed confidence that the United States and the European Union could strike a trade deal, even as a looming August 1 deadline threatens to trigger sweeping tariffs on EU exports. Trump said at the start of a meeting with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen at his Turnberry golf resort in Scotland that 'three or four main sticking points' remain, with the key issue being 'fairness,' particularly regarding barriers to US car and agricultural exports. Von der Leyen acknowledged that talks were balanced on a knife's edge, saying there was a '50-50' chance of securing an agreement before the deadline. 'President Trump is a tough negotiator and dealmaker,' she said ahead of the meeting. 'If we reach an agreement, it will be the biggest deal either of us has done.' She also emphasised that any deal would need to be based on fairness and a rebalancing of the current trade relationship between the two economies. The high-stakes meeting comes amid escalating pressure from Washington, which has threatened to impose a 30% across-the-board tariff on EU goods unless a deal is reached. Currently, EU exports already face tariffs of 25% on automobiles, 50% on steel and aluminum, and an additional 10% on other goods. The European Commission, representing all 27 EU member states, has been striving to avoid further economic strain and prevent retaliation, while preserving a transatlantic trade relationship worth approximately $1.9 trillion annually. Sunday's face-to-face meeting between Trump and von der Leyen was a last-ditch effort to avoid a transatlantic trade rupture. A breakthrough, if reached, could avert what both sides view as a damaging trade war and offer a path forward for stabilizing US-EU relations amid broader geopolitical tensions.

US-China trade talks: Donald Trump administration & Beijing may extend tariff pause by another 3 months, says report
US-China trade talks: Donald Trump administration & Beijing may extend tariff pause by another 3 months, says report

Time of India

time27 minutes ago

  • Time of India

US-China trade talks: Donald Trump administration & Beijing may extend tariff pause by another 3 months, says report

Unlike China, other countries have an August 1 deadline to finalise trade deals with the US. (AI image) US-China trade deal: The world's two largest economies are expected to extend their current reciprocal tariff truce by another 90 days, according to a Reuters report quoting South China Morning Post. Another round of trade deal negotiations between the Donald Trump administration and China will take place in Stockholm on Monday. The current pause on reciprocal tariffs ends on August 12. The report said that the two sides may agree to another 3-month truce as they agree as trade deal negotiations continue. The report indicates that during this 90-day extension period, both nations will commit to refraining from implementing new tariffs or taking additional measures that could intensify the ongoing trade dispute. During recent meetings in Geneva and London that centred on "de-escalation", the upcoming discussions will see Chinese representatives addressing fentanyl-related tariffs with Trump's trade officials, the Reuters report said. The upcoming Stockholm talks on Monday will mark the third round of discussions between the United States and China, aimed at resolving the economic disagreements that have fuelled their ongoing trade dispute. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Struggling With Belly Fat? Try This at Home Home Fitness Hack Shop Now Undo Unlike China, other countries have an August 1 deadline to finalise trade deals with the US. Trump has managed to seal trade deals with five countries ahead of his August 1 deadline - Vietnam, Japan, UK, Philippines, and Indonesia. Talks are currently underway with the European Union to come to an agreement on tariff rates that will be applicable on the EU. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store