UK's newest cars on the market ranked with popular model named best value
The latest cars to hit the UK market have been pitted against each other to find out which is the best value for money.
The average price for a new motor in the UK has risen sharply in recent years - driven by supply chain issues, increased material costs and the rapidly growing switchover to electric vehicles (EVs), which generally cost more than internal combustion engine (ICE) cars. Many so-called mid-range models now come with a hefty price tag exceeding £40,000, even they're lacking premium features.
To help buyers navigate this challenging market, Which? has introduced its Great Value recommendation guide for cars, highlighting those combining strong performance in independent tests with a price tag significantly lower than the average in their class. These recommendations are based on the cost of buying new, although more affordable options are available on the used market. So here are five standout models, as endorsed by the UK's consumer champions, ranked from most to least expensive.
5. Nissan Qashqai — average lowest price: £26,693.
The Nissan Qashqai, a popular mid-sized SUV, has been updated to deliver even more style and practicality. It stands out for its generous passenger space and appealing, well-designed cabin. While some of the most desirable features are reserved for higher trim levels, even the entry-level models come well equipped, ensuring that buyers don't have to compromise on the essentials. The Qashqai's strong reputation for reliability and comfort make it a solid choice.
4. Mazda 3 — average lowest price: £23,405.
The Mazda 3 is widely regarded as a great example of what a great value car should be. It offers a premium feel both inside and out, with a distinctive design that sets it apart from the competition. The Mazda 3 is enjoyable to drive, safe and packed with standard features, so even the most affordable version is well equipped for the needs of most motorists.
3. Skoda Kamiq — average lowest price: £22,892.
The Skoda Kamiq is a compact SUV that offers a surprisingly spacious interior for its size. It is comfortable, easy to drive and scores highly for safety. The Kamiq's practical design and reasonable running costs make it a smart choice for those seeking value, without sacrificing everyday usability. Its reputation for reliability and the generous list of standard equipment it comes with further enhance its appeal.
2. Kia Ceed Sportswagon — average lowest price: £22,497.
For those in search of a family car, the Kia Ceed Sportswagon is a compelling alternative. It offers a large boot and a spacious cabin, as well as a driving experience that is both comfortable and enjoyable. While some engine options may not be the most fuel-efficient for long distance driving, the Ceed Sportswagon's overall practicality and value make it a strong contender in the estate car category.
1. Seat Ibiza — average lowest price: £17,758.
The Seat Ibiza is an excellent entry point for buyers seeking value in a small car. It delivers a good driving experience, a reasonable amount of interior space and a lot of equipment as standard. Although the interior may not feel exactly luxurious, the Ibiza offers a lot for the money. It is an ideal choice for those who want a straightforward, reliable and affordable new car.
As Which?'s car expert Michael Passingham puts it: "One car that exemplifies great value is the Mazda3. Instead of hiding essential tech inside high-end upgrade packages, the most useful ones are installed as standard. Think things like parking sensors, a reversing camera, adaptive cruise control, blind spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic collision alerts. A lot of manufacturers could learn from this approach."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Major UK airport travel chaos planned as hundreds threaten to walk out
Brits jetting off during the busy summer holidays have been issued a stark warning as 450 staff members across three separate companies are threatening to strike at a major UK airport UK holidaymakers could face significant disruption if 450 workers at one UK airport plan to go ahead with strike action. Unionised staff members at Glasgow Airport - Scotland's second largest hub - have been embroiled in disputes around pay and working conditions for months, with an overwhelming 98.7 per cent of members backing industrial action. The strikes, which could take place in weeks during the busy summer holidays, involve three separate companies based at Glasgow Airport: Swissport, ICTS Central Search, and Glasgow Airport Ltd. The looming threat comes after 100 workers from Glasgow Airport Ltd (including airport ambassadors, airside support officers, engineers, and managers) rejected a four per cent increase. Unite points out that the company made a staggering £40.65 million in its 'latest recorded accounts'. Around 250 ICTS Central Search workers are also stuck in an on-going dispute due to understaffing, working conditions, and pay. These staff members worth with passengers directly in the security search area - meaning any strikes could spark long delays. Lastly, 100 workers at Swissport - the country's largest ground handler - are in dispute over 'working rotas and work-life balance, plus health and safety concerns'. A consultative ballot on a new offer has been made by Swissport to address the issues raised - which will conclude on Monday, July 14. "If this offer is rejected, Unite will move to open a full industrial action ballot," United the Union said. "Swissport made £17.6m in its latest recorded profits. On the flip side, a dispute involving 300 Menzies Aviation workers - which the Mirror reported about here - has now been resolved. It comes after the union negotiated a deal which establishes a four per cent minimum increase in pay for new starters, and up to 10 per cent for workers depending on their grades. 50 Falck firefighters who perform fire safety functions at the airport have also come to an agreement after being offered a basic wage increase of 4.5 per cent. "Employers at Glasgow Airport will not get away with underpaying or mistreating Unite's members," Unite general secretary Sharon Graham said in a statement. "Hundreds of workers are involved in disputes at the airport. Summer strike action which would ground planes and passengers remains on the cards. These highly profitable companies can easily afford to put the minds of the travelling public at rest by making fair offers to workers." Last year, it was reported that Glasgow Airport handled a whopping 8,067,685 passengers in 2024 - a 9.63 per cent spike compared to the year before. The hub flies to 82 destinations in 28 different countries, and offers 20 domestic flights. If workers at all three companies go ahead with their vow to strike - it's clear the school holiday season will quickly turn into chaos. A spokesman for Glasgow Airport told the Mirror: "We are reviewing the ballot results and remain open to finding a sensible resolution." Similarly, a spokesperson for Swissport said: "Our priority is the safety and wellbeing and fair treatment of our workforce, alongside maintaining high standards of service for our customers and we remain committed to working constructively with Unite to find a fair and sustainable resolution." Do you have a story to share? Email us at yourmirror@ for a chance to be featured.
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Busy UK tunnel on the verge of tolls to plug huge £820k funding gap
Debate has broken out following proposals to charge UK motorists for driving through a 61-year-old tunnel that attracts 25 million drivers, cyclists and pedestrians every year Brits could soon face charges for driving through a major UK tunnel in a controversial move that has been branded 'outrageous'. The Clyde Tunnel, which connects north-west and south-west Glasgow has long been a crucial part of the city's transport infrastructure since fully opening back in 1964. Estimated to have cost £10.5 million to build, the two-way tunnels - which are both 762 metres long - were only expected to handle around 9,000 cars every day. Today, they attract more than 25 million vehicles, cyclists and pedestrians each year. However, Glasgow City Council is now facing a yearly shortfall of around £820,000 for managing the road, due to it requiring regular maintenance and repairs. At a recent council meeting, Cllr Angus Millar, the convenor for climate, Glasgow Green Deal, transport and city centre recovery, said the council was continuing its talks with Transport Scotland * and local government body Cosla to discuss the upkeep of Clyde Tunnel. "The council has no specific proposals to introduce any road user charging in Glasgow," he said. "However, members will be aware that the council has repeatedly stated its interest in further exploring possibilities around a boundary congestion charge and potential tolling at the Clyde Tunnel. Both [would] exempt Glasgow residents." According to The Times, Glasgow MSP Paul Sweeney argued it isn't 'sustainable' for Glasgow City Council to continue maintaining the tunnel without raising additional funds to cover the cost - which accounts for around 10 per cent of the city's entire annual road maintenance budget. "Over the past decade, Glasgow city council has lost the equivalent of a full year's worth of funding as a result of disproportionate SNP cuts to Glasgow, compounded by the constrained council boundary, meaning that many of the region's most prosperous households do not contribute to the city's tax base," he added. The politician concluded that a toll for vehicles using the tunnel who aren't registered within the Glasgow boundary is therefore a 'reasonable proposal in line with European norms'. However, other MSPs have slammed the proposals - arguing it would 'punish' workers, families and patients travelling to the Queen Elizabeth Hospital. "Many of the hospital's dedicated staff commute from outside the city, and this charge would clobber them simply for driving to work," said Annie Wells, a Scottish Conservative MSP for Glasgow. She branded the move 'outrageous' - scathing the council for even 'considering' plugging the funding gap through a traveller toll. It is unlikely that any form of toll would be introduced until after the Scottish Parliament elections next year. No specific details on how much UK motorists would be charged for using the tunnel have been announced. *The tunnel is not a designated A road meaning Transport Scotland does not have responsibility for its management.
Scottish Sun
8 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Warning for 31million bank customers losing more than £350 a year for leaving cash in zombie accounts
We've explained how to find the top rates CASH BLOW Warning for 31million bank customers losing more than £350 a year for leaving cash in zombie accounts Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) MILLIONS of Brits are losing out on hundreds of pounds each by keeping their savings in low-interest "zombie" accounts. More than 31million bank customers have £186billion in savings accounts earning just 1.5% interest, according to Paragon Bank's app Spring. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 To help you get the best returns, we've listed the top savings rates below These accounts generate £2.3billion a year in interest, but savers could earn over three times more by switching to accounts offering up to 5% interest, The Sun can reveal. The average bank customer has around £10,000 in savings, according to Raisin. If that £10,000 is kept in an easy access account earning 1.5% interest, it would generate just £150 in interest each year. But switching to Chase's 5% easy access account would boost that to £500, earning you an extra £350. Experts specifically warn that using savings linked to current accounts often means low rates, restrictions, and losing value to inflation. Derek Sprawling, managing director of Spring, said: "Too many savers are leaving their money with their current account provider's linked savings accounts. "Simply sticking with a savings account offered by their current account provider often means an array of restrictions, such as tiered rates or withdrawal limits, on top of poor rates. "There are other options for savers, it is possible to get a rewarding rate of return without sacrificing access to their money or wading through a host of restrictive terms and conditions." If your savings account pays less than the current inflation rate of 3.4%, it's time to look for a better deal. Plus, the Bank of England is expected to cut its base rate soon, which could make savings rates even lower. The base rate affects how much banks pay savers - when it drops, interest on savings usually goes down too. Financial markets expect the Bank to reduce rates at its next meeting in August, and again to 3.75% before the end of the year. How this affects your savings depends on the type of account you have. Fixed-rate accounts won't change, but easy-access accounts can see their rates drop at any time. What types of savings accounts are available? THERE are four types of savings accounts: fixed, notice, easy access, and regular savers. Separately, there are ISAs or individual savings accounts which allow individuals to save up to £20,000 a year tax-free. But we've rounded up the main types of conventional savings accounts below. FIXED-RATE A fixed-rate savings account or fixed-rate bond offers some of the highest interest rates but comes at the cost of being unable to withdraw your cash within the agreed term. This means that your money is locked in, so even if interest rates increase you are unable to move your money and switch to a better account. Some providers give the option to withdraw, but it comes with a hefty fee. NOTICE Notice accounts offer slightly lower rates in exchange for more flexibility when accessing your cash. These accounts don't lock your cash away for as long as a typical fixed bond account. You'll need to give advance notice to your bank - up to 180 days in some cases - before you can make a withdrawal or you'll lose the interest. EASY-ACCESS An easy-access account does what it says on the tin and usually allows unlimited cash withdrawals. These accounts tend to offer lower returns, but they are a good option if you want the freedom to move your money without being charged a penalty fee. REGULAR SAVER These accounts pay some of the best returns as long as you pay in a set amount each month. You'll usually need to hold a current account with providers to access the best rates. However, if you have a lot of money to save, these accounts often come with monthly deposit limits. To help you get the best returns, we've listed the top savings rates for each account type below. What's on offer? If you're looking for a savings account without withdrawal limitations, then you'll want to opt for an easy-access saver. These do what they say on the tin and usually allow for unlimited cash withdrawals. The best easy access savings account available is from Atom Bank, which pays 5% - and you only need to pay a minimum of £1 to set it up. This means that if you were to save £1,000 in this account, you would earn £50 a year in interest. However, this rate is only for new customers and includes a 2.25% bonus for the first 12 months. Meanwhile, Snoop's easy access saver offers customers 4.6% back on savings worth £1 or more. If you're okay with being less flexible about withdrawals, a top notice account could be a great option. These accounts offer better rates than easy-access accounts but still let you access your money more flexibly than a a fixed-bond. Plum's 95-day notice account offers savers 4.84% back with a minimum £1 deposit, for example. This means that if you were to save £1,000 in this account, you would earn £48.40 a year in interest. Oxbury Bank's 120-day notice account offers 4.6%, requiring a minimum deposit of £1,000. If you want to lock your money away and keep the same savings rate for a set time, a fixed bond is a good choice. The best fixed rate currently offered is GB Bank's one-year fixed bond, which pays 4.58%, requiring a minimum deposit of £1,000. Meanwhile, Marcus by Goldman Sachs's one-year fixed bond offers 4.55% back on a deposit of £1 or more. This means that if you were to save £1,000 in this account, you would earn £45.50 a year in interest. If you want to build a habit of saving a set amount of money each month, a regular savings account could pay you dividends. Principality Building Society's Six Month Regular Saver offers 7.5% interest on savings. It allows customers to save between £1 and £200 a month. Save in the maximum, and you'll earn 25.81 in interest. While regular savings accounts look attractive due to the high interest rates on offer, they are not right for all savers. You can't use a regular savings account to earn interest on a lump sum. The amount you can save into the account each month will be limited, typically to somewhere between £200 and £500. Therefore, if you have more to save, it would be wise to consider one of the other accounts mentioned above.
