Ukraine seeks US clarification amid halt in defense system shipments
According to media reports, Ukrainian officials either remained silent or declined to comment when questioned about the US decision, suggesting they were caught off guard.
A senior Ukrainian official, speaking anonymously due to the sensitivity of the matter, stated that Kiev is 'now verifying with the Americans what exactly is happening.'
Meanwhile, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said on Wednesday that any reduction or suspension in Western weapons supplies to Ukraine would contribute significantly to ending the conflict.
'As far as we know, the reason for this step is empty stockpiles and a shortage of available weapons. In any case, the fewer weapons delivered to Ukraine, the closer we get to the end of the special military operation,' Peskov stated.
The Pentagon has halted shipments of critical air defense missiles and precision munitions to Ukraine due to mounting concerns that US weapons stockpiles have "fallen too low," Politico reported on Wednesday at dawn.
The move, reportedly spearheaded by Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby, follows an internal review of US military reserves. The review concluded that current stockpiles of Patriot interceptors, Hellfire missiles, precision-guided artillery rounds, and other vital munitions have fallen to levels considered insufficient for America's national defense priorities.
White House Deputy Press Secretary Anna Kelly confirmed the decision, stating it was made 'to put America's interests first' following a Department of Defense reassessment of global military aid commitments. 'The strength of the United States Armed Forces remains unquestioned — just ask Iran,' she said in a statement.
The shipments originally authorized under the Biden administration were part of two aid streams: emergency drawdowns from existing stockpiles and contracts signed through the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative. According to Politico, this freeze affects both channels and comes into effect just as Ukraine faces its heaviest wave of Russian aerial attacks in over a year.
Read more: Ukraine to launch arms production in Europe this summer: Zelensky
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LBCI
19 hours ago
- LBCI
Putin, unfazed by Trump, will fight on and could take more of Ukraine: Reuters
Putin, unfazed by Trump, will fight on and could take more of Ukraine: Reuters President Vladimir Putin intends to keep fighting in Ukraine until the West engages on his terms for peace, unfazed by Donald Trump's threats of tougher sanctions, and his territorial demands may widen as Russian forces advance, three sources close to the Kremlin said. Putin, who ordered Russian troops into Ukraine in February 2022 after eight years of fighting in the country's east between Russian-backed separatists and Ukrainian soldiers, believes Russia's economy and its military are strong enough to weather any additional Western measures, the sources said. Trump on Monday expressed frustration with Putin's refusal to agree on a ceasefire and announced a wave of weapons supplies to Ukraine, including Patriot surface-to-air missile systems. He also threatened further sanctions on Russia unless a peace deal was reached within 50 days. The three Russian sources, familiar with top-level Kremlin thinking, said Putin will not stop the war under pressure from the West and believes Russia - which has survived the toughest sanctions imposed by the West- can endure further economic hardship, including threatened U.S. tariffs targeting buyers of Russian oil. "Putin thinks no one has seriously engaged with him on the details of peace in Ukraine - including the Americans - so he will continue until he gets what he wants," one of the sources told Reuters on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the situation. Reuters
Al Mayadeen
20 hours ago
- Al Mayadeen
Ukrainian forces struggle to hold eastern frontlines: NYT
Ukrainian troops are struggling to hold the city of Kostyantynivka amid Russian drone attacks, as it becomes the focal point in the latest phase of Russia's summer offensive in eastern Donetsk Republic, The New York Times has reported. The city, now partially encircled, is a critical gateway to Ukraine's last major line of defense in Donetsk. Its fall would expose northern cities to Russian drones and move Moscow closer to capturing the entire region. One injured Ukrainian soldier was left stranded in the forest at night after his unit informed him they couldn't evacuate him, as the road back to their base had turned into a death trap. Details of the May operation, shared by soldier Chaosov, an officer from the 93rd Mechanized Brigade, and confirmed by drone footage obtained by NYT, highlight the dire conditions Ukrainian troops are facing. Russia has now captured over two-thirds of Donetsk, but to seize the rest, it must take the remaining Ukrainian-held urban centers crucial for military logistics. Kostyantynivka stands as the southern gateway to a string of cities forming Ukraine's last major defense belt in the region. Russian forces have established a 16-kilometer-deep (10-mile) pocket around the Ukrainian forces, partially surrounding them from the east, south, and west. According to six Ukrainian soldiers and officers in the area, nearly every movement inside this pocket is tracked and targeted by Russian drones 24/7. Troops often remain trapped for weeks without rotation or medical evacuation. 'It's extremely difficult to deliver supplies, to rotate troops — to do anything, really,' said "Makas," an officer in Ukraine's 12th Azov Brigade. With the looming threat of a full-scale Russian attack on Kostyantynivka, Ukraine braces for what could be a prolonged and bloody battle. Soldiers speculate whether Russia will launch a direct offensive, as it did in Bakhmut in 2023, or encircle the city using a pincer strategy, echoing the tactics employed in the capture of Avdiivka. In either case, Ukrainian troops warn that Russia's enhanced drone warfare capabilities are giving Moscow an edge not seen in previous battles.
Al Mayadeen
20 hours ago
- Al Mayadeen
US bill proposes 500% tariffs on nations trading with Russia
US Senator Lindsey Graham has introduced a controversial bill that would impose punitive 500% tariffs on countries maintaining energy trade with Russia, a move widely seen as targeting sovereign nations that have refused to align with Washington's demands over the Ukraine conflict. "If you are buying products from Russia and you are not helping Ukraine, then there is a 500% tariff on your products coming to the United States," Graham told ABC News, as he unveiled the bill, co-authored with Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal. Backed by 84 bipartisan co-sponsors, the legislation lays out sweeping economic penalties on both Russia and its global trading partners. The bill proposes primary sanctions against Russian officials and key sectors such as energy, finance, and defense. More strikingly, it introduces secondary sanctions on third-party countries that continue importing Russian oil, gas, uranium, or other strategic resources, a direct challenge to states that have opted for non-alignment and strategic autonomy. "My bill has 84 co-sponsors. It will allow the president to put tariffs on China and India and other countries," Graham stated, reflecting growing US frustration with countries that refuse to mirror NATO's stance on the conflict. Yet, even within Washington, the bill is causing friction. The Trump administration has reportedly requested revisions to the bill that would give President Donald Trump greater discretion in its enforcement. The Wall Street Journal reported that the White House is concerned the legislation could derail recent diplomatic overtures, including a summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin and preliminary efforts to negotiate an end to the war in Ukraine. From the perspective of many, the proposed tariffs are not about peace or stability. Across Asia, Africa, and Latin America, governments have resisted pressure to take sides in a European war expanded by NATO interests. Instead, they have repeatedly called for diplomacy, de-escalation, and respect for sovereign development paths. India has firmly defended its rising energy trade with Russia, stating that discounted oil purchases are driven by economic necessity, not geopolitics. New Delhi has refused to participate in Western sanctions, abstained from UN votes against Moscow, and stressed its need to ensure energy security for its 1.4 billion citizens. Indian leaders view these moves as consistent with their historic policy of strategic non-alignment. China, meanwhile, continues to expand its cooperation with Russia through yuan-based energy transactions, large-scale fossil fuel purchases, and joint infrastructure initiatives. Beijing has criticized unilateral sanctions that bypass the United Nations, asserting that multipolarity and sovereign equality are necessary for a stable global order. Read more: China will continue efforts to resolve the Ukraine crisis: MoFA Russia remains a vital exporter of: A 500% US tariff on imports from these countries would have far-reaching implications: threatening global supply chains, spiking inflation in energy-importing states, and punishing governments for independent foreign policy decisions. Analysts warn that this could backfire, accelerating global efforts to de-dollarize trade, strengthen South-South cooperation, and bypass US-dominated systems entirely. With initiatives like BRICS Pay, cross-border digital currencies, and bilateral trade agreements growing in popularity, Washington's aggressive tactics may deepen the very multipolar realignment it seeks to suppress.
