logo
Looking To Domestic IT Operations For Data Security

Looking To Domestic IT Operations For Data Security

Forbes4 days ago
Tony Williams Raré, CEO/CIO at Global IT Communications, Inc., overseeing technical and operational strategies for company and customers.
In today's global economy, outsourcing is often seen as a cost-saving solution. The global outsourcing market is expected to reach $866.9 billion by 2027, driven by labor arbitrage and operational flexibility. Yet, increasing cybersecurity threats and shifting U.S. policy are forcing businesses to reconsider the long-term implications, especially when handling sensitive data.
The Illusion of Cost Savings
Outsourcing can initially appear beneficial. A Deloitte outsourcing survey report shows that 57% of businesses outsource to reduce costs. However, while immediate savings are tangible, hidden costs quickly emerge. Quality control, increased management oversight and infrastructure investments all add up. According to the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, outsourced workers earn significantly less than domestic employees, revealing a cost that is both economic and ethical.
More concerning are the risks. IBM's 2024 Cost of a Data Breach Report shows the average breach costs $4.9 million. For companies dealing with protected health information (PHI), financial data or personally identifiable information (PII), those savings can rapidly become liabilities.
Who Bears The Risk?
While operations are outsourced, accountability stays in-house. A PwC study found that 32% of customers would stop using a brand after only one bad experience. Potential language barriers, poor voice quality or time zone differences can impact service delivery and resolution times. High turnover and minimal training at offshore centers can further reduce service consistency. According to a study by Intercom, 70% of end users feel more loyal to companies that provide support in their native language.
HR And Legal Complications
Offshore outsourcing introduces HR and legal complications. U.S. labor laws don't apply abroad, raising ethical and PR issues. Enforcement of intellectual property (IP) rights is weaker in many countries, making businesses vulnerable to trade secret theft and insider threats. The U.S. Department of Justice has increased enforcement under the Defend Trade Secrets Act, particularly in cases involving the mishandling of trade secrets offshore.
Jurisdictional confusion also hinders legal recourse. If offshore personnel mishandle sensitive data, determining liability across borders becomes nearly impossible.
Security And Compliance Failures
Another issue is data security. Offshore data centers and cloud environments frequently replicate or store data across multiple jurisdictions—often without customers' awareness—leading to diminished data control and transparency. U.S.-based organizations embracing cross-border outsourcing must therefore navigate a complex web of legal and regulatory frameworks to maintain compliance and visibility over their sensitive information.
The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) continues to identify third-party and supply chain attacks as top national cybersecurity threats, particularly as more organizations rely on outsourced and offshore vendors.
Cross-border data workflows present significant compliance challenges, particularly with standards such as HIPAA, SOC 2 and NIST. Processing sensitive data across jurisdictions with different legal protections increases the risk of unauthorized access, data exfiltration and regulatory violations.
Political And Strategic Vulnerabilities
Political tensions and evolving trade policies can disrupt outsourcing relationships. The 2024 Republican platform aims to "stop outsourcing and turn the United States into a manufacturing superpower," potentially signaling more restrictions ahead, particularly in government contracts.
As geopolitical alliances shift, organizations risk sudden disruptions or surveillance by foreign governments. Even with contracts in place, enforcing U.S.-level protections abroad remains difficult.
The Case For Domestic IT Operations
The tide is shifting. U.S.-based managed service providers (MSPs) offer several key advantages:
• Compliance with domestic regulations like CMMC 2.0 and HIPAA
• Seamless communication and customer service
• Lower latency and higher service quality
• Legal and regulatory alignment
Domestic operations can allow for greater control, faster response times and higher accountability.
Strategic Reassessment
The question businesses must ask is: Do the savings justify the risk? Offshore outsourcing may reduce direct costs, but it exposes organizations to regulatory penalties, customer dissatisfaction and long-term brand damage.
To adapt to increasing compliance demands and the evolving security landscape, organizations should consider strengthening their internal governance frameworks—such as implementing role-based access controls and conducting regular third-party risk assessments—to reduce their dependence on outside vendors for sensitive functions. Additionally, investing in cybersecurity training for in-house teams and designating a compliance officer can help ensure ongoing adherence to CMMC 2.0, SOC 2 and NIST standards, even without external partners.
For those considering U.S.-based managed service providers (MSPs), it's essential to assess vendor transparency, data residency policies and experience with regulatory compliance. Look for MSPs with clear incident response plans and the ability to customize security frameworks to meet your industry's specific needs. Common pitfalls to look out for include unclear SLAs, vendor lock-in and underestimating the internal preparation needed to manage third-party partnerships. A readiness checklist—including asset inventory, current documentation and executive alignment—can help ensure smoother collaboration.
Conclusion
The global outsourcing landscape is shifting under the weight of cybersecurity threats, changing regulations and evolving political priorities. Protecting your business's future now means going beyond cost-cutting.
Smart enterprises are reassessing their outsourcing strategies, focusing on domestic partnerships, investing in in-house cybersecurity maturity and refining their governance frameworks. The future belongs to businesses that build resilient, secure and ethically grounded operations that safeguard both customer trust and long-term value.
Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rivian vs. Lucid: 1 Reason Jim Cramer Likes One Stock Over the Other
Rivian vs. Lucid: 1 Reason Jim Cramer Likes One Stock Over the Other

Yahoo

time6 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Rivian vs. Lucid: 1 Reason Jim Cramer Likes One Stock Over the Other

Key Points Lucid closed a deal with Uber to power its robotaxi division. Wall Street veteran Jim Cramer is doubting the deal's long-term potential. Rivian may be a better buy due to a deal with VW. 10 stocks we like better than Lucid Group › Lucid Group (NASDAQ: LCID) soared in value following the announcement of its partnership with Uber Technologies. According to the deal's terms, Uber will invest $300 million in the electric vehicle (EV) maker. Uber also committed to purchase 20,000 vehicles from Lucid to kick-start its robotaxi division. Wall Street veteran Jim Cramer recently weighted in on the deal, and his take was surprising to many. He compared Lucid's deal with Uber to a partnership Rivian Automotive (NASDAQ: RIVN), another EV stock, made earlier this year. If you're invested in either Lucid or Rivian, you'll want to give Cramer's comments some consideration. How big is the Uber and Lucid partnership in reality? The details of Lucid's partnership with Uber are fairly straightforward. The latter says it is expecting to launch a robotaxi service later next year in a major U.S. city. To power this launch, Uber plans to order 20,000 Lucid Gravity SUVs over the next six years. According to a press release, the vehicles will be owned and operated by Uber or its third-party fleet partners and made available to riders exclusively via the Uber platform. To help Lucid scale up enough to produce this many vehicles, Uber also agreed to invest $300 million into the business. Around the same time, Lucid announced a 1-for-10 reverse stock split, but it's not clear how connected these two events are. While all of this looks promising on paper, there are two obvious problems. First, Uber's robotaxi division remains in its infancy. Whether it can actually grow big enough to acquire 20,000 Lucid vehicles remains a huge open question. Second, $300 million won't do much to keep Lucid financially viable over the next six years. While it ended 2024 with more than $6 billion in liquidity, the company also posted a net loss of $2.7 billion, roughly the same net loss it posted in 2023. A $300 million cash infusion is helpful, but it will hardly cure its ongoing financial challenges. Jim Cramer thinks Rivian's deal with Volkswagen is superior When Jim Cramer was asked about Lucid's partnership with Uber last week, he called the deal a "dalliance." In other words, he views it more as a short-term arrangement than a bona fide long-term partnership. "I think that you need a commitment, like the Volkswagen commitment to Rivian is extraordinary," Cramer said. "That's an open-ended check from one of the biggest car companies." He is referring to a joint venture between Volkswagen and Rivian that was announced in November 2024. The German automaker will receive crucial access to Rivian's software operating platform and technological back end. In exchange, Rivian receives up to $5.8 billion in funding. It's not hard to see the difference in commitments here. Uber is investing just $300 million into Lucid, with the promise of buying vehicles over the next six years. Rivian, meanwhile, is receiving up to $5.8 billion in funding by the end of 2027, starting with an immediate $1 billion convertible note. To be clear, Lucid's deal with Uber is still very exciting. ARK Investment CEO Cathie Wood eventually sees the robotaxi market being worth up to $10 trillion by 2030. But Rivian's deal with Volkswagen gives more credence to Rivian's tech stack and differentiation. If you're excited about the Uber-Lucid tie-up, be sure to dive into Rivian's and Volkswagen's partnership, as Cramer correctly points out. Should you invest $1,000 in Lucid Group right now? Before you buy stock in Lucid Group, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Lucid Group wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,063,471!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025 Ryan Vanzo has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Uber Technologies. The Motley Fool recommends Volkswagen Ag. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Rivian vs. Lucid: 1 Reason Jim Cramer Likes One Stock Over the Other was originally published by The Motley Fool

The clock is ticking on solar tax credits and All Energy Solar can help
The clock is ticking on solar tax credits and All Energy Solar can help

Yahoo

time6 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The clock is ticking on solar tax credits and All Energy Solar can help

MADISON, Wis., July 27, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Homeowners and businesses have a critical, rapidly approaching deadline to take advantage of the 30% federal solar tax credit: December 31, 2025. After this date, the Residential Clean Energy Credit will be eliminated entirely, and the Clean Energy Investment Tax Credit for commercial projects will be subject to new restrictions and early phase-out. All Energy Solar Inc. is urging people to act now to ensure their projects are completed in time to qualify for these significant savings. The recent "One Big, Beautiful Bill Act" abruptly cut short the federal solar tax credit, which was previously set to continue through 2034. This change creates a compressed timeline for those interested in investing in solar energy. For homeowners, this means a potential savings of an average of $9,000 will vanish in 2026. Businesses also face a limited window to capitalize on the full credit for renewable energy projects. "The phase-out of this federal tax credit is a big shift—not just for the solar industry, but for any homeowner or business thinking about going solar," said Ryan Buege, Vice President of Sales and Marketing at All Energy Solar. "The window is closing, but there's still time to lock in the full value if you act now. It may be years before solar becomes this affordable again." Typical installation timelines can span several months due to site design, permitting, and utility coordination. All Energy Solar encourages anyone considering solar to start their project now to maximize savings and avoid missing out on current incentives. "From your first consultation to system activation, going solar takes time—especially with permitting and utility approvals," Buege added. "Our team is experienced at navigating these local processes, but as demand surges, there will come a point where we simply can't guarantee new projects will qualify under the current incentive, especially for residential solar." For businesses switching to solar, the changes to the tax credit present a more nuanced, though still urgent, timeline. While the general elimination date for the Clean Energy Investment Tax Credit is December 31, 2027, projects that begin construction by July 4, 2026, can still qualify for the full 30% credit, provided they are placed in service within four years. Projects beginning construction after July 4, 2026, must be placed in service by December 31, 2027, to receive any credit. Furthermore, projects beginning construction after December 31, 2025, will face new "Foreign Entity of Concern" (FEOC) restrictions, requiring a certain percentage of components to be sourced from non-FEOC manufacturers to qualify for the credit. About All Energy SolarAll Energy Solar is a full-service solar energy solutions provider for residential, commercial, agricultural, and government customers seeking to make the transition to solar energy. Learn more at View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE All Energy Solar, Inc

Should You Buy XRP (Ripple) While It's Under $5?
Should You Buy XRP (Ripple) While It's Under $5?

Yahoo

time6 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Should You Buy XRP (Ripple) While It's Under $5?

Key Points XRP's value has surged nearly 480% in just 12 months. Deregulation, ETFs, and general crypto enthusiasm are driving the coin's value higher. XRP is priced for perfection, and it's looking increasingly like a speculative gamble. 10 stocks we like better than XRP › Cryptocurrency XRP (CRYPTO: XRP) has gained lots of attention from investors lately, resulting in a 480% increase over the past year. Whenever any type of investment rises that quickly, it's worth evaluating to see if it's worth owning. Unlike some cryptocurrencies, XRP (sometimes called Ripple) has real-world applications through its blockchain, which can act as a bridge currency in foreign transactions, saving both time and money compared to traditional financial transactions. But XRP's rapid value increase calls into question whether the crypto is overvalued right now, and if it's being driven higher simply because of investor sentiment. While XRP isn't necessarily a meme coin, here are three reasons why it may be best not to buy it right now. 1. It's very volatile If you're interested in owning cryptocurrencies, then it's likely that you're OK with some volatility. Any type of investment will have price swings, of course, but cryptocurrencies are more prone to make big movements on little to no news. While XRP isn't unique in its volatility, I think it's significant enough to dissuade some investors from owning it. Consider that back in February, XRP's value fell about 30% in just a five-week period. XRP regained its footing temporarily, but then fell 16% in just one week following the announcement of President Donald Trump's tariffs in early April. Those are just two examples of XRP's tendency toward volatility, both occurring within weeks of each other. Of course, the coin's value has subsequently rallied again, but if you're not used to investment value shifts to this degree and they might cause you undue stress or prompt you to take action without thinking, then it's probably best to stay away. 2. It's fairly speculative It's important to point out that some of the price movements XRP has experienced are tied to concrete reasons. For example, some of XRP's price gains over the past year have come from investors getting excited about crypto exchange-traded funds (ETFs) focused on XRP and the Trump administration taking a more open approach toward cryptocurrencies. But while crypto ETFs can signal more legitimacy for digital coins and open them up to more investors, there's still a lot of speculating involved. Some analysts have estimated that XRP's price could surge to $25 because of the launch of the ETFs -- only to see the value then fall by 90%. While that's just a prediction, it's a good representation of how speculative the price of XRP can be. What's more, XRP's value jumped more than 70% in the past month after the House of Representatives passed the Genius Act and the Digital Markets Clarity Act in the House, both of which clarify regulations for crypto and stablecoins. While it's good news for the industry, a 70% surge in XRP's price is likely unwarranted. Huge value movements over a short period, whether for stocks or crypto, often signal that investors are pushing up an investment solely based on how they feel. 3. It's already richly valued XRP's massive run lately means this crypto is priced for perfection. Its price already includes optimism around crypto deregulation, the launch of XRP ETFs, real-world usage of its blockchain, and a general optimism that's fueling a surge in crypto prices. In short, XRP is already on a huge run based on a handful of tangible reasons, and any more gains from here are likely purely built on the whims of crypto investors. Unlike stocks, cryptocurrencies don't have cash flow or earnings to judge their value by, and based on XRP's 480% jump over the past year, it looks like the coin's price is now detached from the already speculative metrics used to judge crypto values. Could XRP still go higher? Of course. Many cryptocurrencies have shown that they can continue to climb even without being tied to any concrete metrics. But there's no getting around the fact that buying XRP means you're paying a premium. And with optimism for XRP sky-high, any unmet expectations from the crypto could cause a substantial sell-off. Should you invest $1,000 in XRP right now? Before you buy stock in XRP, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and XRP wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,063,471!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025 Chris Neiger has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends XRP. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Should You Buy XRP (Ripple) While It's Under $5? was originally published by The Motley Fool

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store