logo
Clueless Labour's class war against Farage won't stop him… Reform voters care about policies not what school he went to

Clueless Labour's class war against Farage won't stop him… Reform voters care about policies not what school he went to

The Sun31-05-2025
MEMO to the Labour Party – if you are ever going to stop ­rampant Reform UK, you will definitely not do it with laughably outdated class warfare.
Labour chairman Ellie Reeves dismisses Nigel Farage as 'a privately educated stockbroker and career politician'.
7
7
But with her ham-fisted sneer, Ms Reeves draws unwelcome attention to her own privileged existence.
Ellie is an Oxford-educated barrister, the sister of Chancellor Rachel Reeves, the wife of Labour peer Lord Cryer, which makes her Baroness Cryer, and the daughter-in-law of two, er, career ­politicians.
More privilege than you can shake a silver spoon at!
Hardly a child of the proletariat, are you, Baroness Cryer? Are you still keeping coal in the bathtub? How are your racing pigeons? See you down the Rat And Trumpet for a game of arrows? Gawd blimey, what a load of nonsense!
What a shedload of inverted snobbery.
I was educated by the state because there was never another option for the child of a greengrocer and a dinner lady.
I do not see my state education as a badge of honour.
Who cares if Farage's folks sent him to a private school?
The parents of Clement Attlee and Tony Blair also sent their sons to private schools.
And Attlee and Blair were both consequential Labour Prime Ministers, arguably the only two this country ever elected.
Labour's Baroness Cryer, I respectfully suggest, knows bugger all about the working class of this country.
Back in the day, the working class were exhilarated to vote in their millions for Labour's Blair and, more recently, the Conservative Boris Johnson (Eton and Oxford).
Sure, you can have your doubts about Reform, and how they are going to pay for some of their big promises. Increasing benefits while slashing taxes — can it really work?
And Nigel has to explain how Brexit will work in a world where America is an unreliable ally.
But where Farage went to school, or earned a crust before politics, should never come into it.
Unthinkable even a few months ago, there is now a path opening up that could whisk Nigel Farage all the way to 10 Downing Street, a path that has been built by disillusion with the first Labour Government since May 2010, and the increasing irrelevance of the Tories, who had 14 years to get it right.
Keir Starmer's big state-of-the-nation speech on Thursday, his shirt sleeves neatly rolled up, was astonishing. No mention of Kemi!
Starmer treated Nigel Farage (and the Reform MPs who could share a minicab) as the effective leader of His Majesty's Opposition, Starmer's true rival for power at the next General Election.
Keir ­predictably rolled out the fact that his father toiled in a factory.
No mention of his knighthood or lucrative career as a human rights lawyer.
But Starmer got this right — the UK can't afford another Liz Truss.
As the reality dawns that Farage could actually form the next government, he will come under increased scrutiny.
Reform's policies
The nation must know the bill for Reform's policies.
But what Labour will not get away with is painting ­Farage as an unelectable toff.
Because the man has the soul of the British working class on speed dial.
For example, most ordinary Brits care about climate change.
But I reckon that most of them love Farage's promise — in a country responsible for just one per cent of global ­emissions — to ditch the self-harming insanity of Net Zero.
Unfortunately for Sir Keir, Baroness Cryer and all the silver-spoon socialists like them, working people are not snobs.
The working class believes, as Ian Brown of the Stone Roses had it, that it's not where you're from that matters — it's where you're at.
TOP marks to Tory Robert Jenrick for bravely confronting ticket cheats on London's lawless underground network.
Now that's what I call a Justice spokesman.
Sabrina knows Name Of The Game
AT first, reports that Sabrina Carpenter is in the running to appear in Mamma Mia! 3 seemed a little unlikely.
The Espresso singer was born in 1999, a full 25 years after Abba appeared on the 1974 Eurovision Song Contest, singing an impossibly catchy song in adorably Swedish accents.
7
7
Then you learn that Sabrina has named her cats . . . Benny and Bjorn.
Back in the Seventies, music snobs like me turned our noses up at Abba, while secretly humming S.O.S and Mamma Mia behind closed doors.
But everybody is an Abba fan now.
Sabrina's hamsters are probably called Agnetha and Anni-Frid.
HARRY TRIPS AGAIN
PRINCE HARRY made a surprise 6,400-mile round trip from his home in Montecito, California, to Shanghai, China, to give a speech on – you have to be kidding me – environmentally friendly travel.
Flying across the planet to pontificate about saving the planet?
The hypocrisy is off the scale.
Harry's means of transport from Los Angeles to Shanghai remain unknown.
But assuming that the Duke of Sussex did not travel to China in a hand-carved wooden boat, The Times reported that a first class return flight from LA to Shanghai produces more than 6,311kg of greenhouse emissions, while emissions in a private jet could be anywhere from ten to 100 times higher, depending on the aircraft.
Which means that Air Miles Harry has a carbon footprint that is much larger than his brain.
HIS MAJ TRUMPS DONALD
BACK off, Tango chops!
King Charles III did not directly criticise the American president when he – the King of Canada! – opened the Canadian Parliament.
7
No need.
Just by being in the Canadian Parliament, and with his gentle, moving 'speech from the throne' in English and French, Charles obliterated Trump's casually graceless threats about making Canada the 51st state of the US.
As if nothing had changed, the POTUS was still ranting on social media about how Canada would save itself $61billion if they 'become our cherished 51st state'.
'They are considering the offer!' Trump posted.
Er, no they are not, Mr President. The Orange oaf's obsession with the deal is derailing his presidency.
Because Donald Trump struggles to understand that some things in this world are just not for sale.
DOGS OUT TO HELP
DON'T bring your work problems home.
It will upset your dog.
7
A team of psychologists at Virginia's Radford University report that dogs showed clear signs of stress when their owners complained about problems at work.
'Dogs are highly sensitive animals who can 'catch' the emotions and feelings of humans,' says the results, published in the journal Scientific Reports.
'They experience increases in stress when their owner does.'
I would go further.
Dogs are so completely attuned to human emotions that they know how you feel, even if they are not your dog.
Our dog Stan died exactly a year ago.
And every day since, one or two dogs I have never met before catch my eye and veer towards me, raising their faces as if to say: 'May I be of any assistance?'
The study in the journal says that a dog's advanced sense of smell means they can sniff out a rise in cortisol – a hormone released when humans are experiencing profound emotions.
At first, I thought it was my imagination.
But after a year, I know it is real – dogs understand that I am in mourning for my own dog.
And what incredible creatures dogs are – they just want to help.
SHOVE YOUR EXCUSE
WHEN Brigitte Macron shoved her husband Emmanuel in his brioche-hole, the pint-sized president of France recovered well.
Taken aback by Brigitte's firm push in the face, Macron realised the entire world was watching.
And smiled and waved.
It was only when Macron later insisted that he and his wife were 'simply joking' that he began to look ridiculous.
Brigitte shoved Macron where his croissant doesn't shine.
Why try to spin it any other way?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Domesday Book village is up in arms as new owner of £585,000 historic cottage applies to bulldoze it in favour of 'modern, bland new-build' homes
Domesday Book village is up in arms as new owner of £585,000 historic cottage applies to bulldoze it in favour of 'modern, bland new-build' homes

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Domesday Book village is up in arms as new owner of £585,000 historic cottage applies to bulldoze it in favour of 'modern, bland new-build' homes

Villagers are up in arms after the new owner of a £585,000 historic cottage applied to bulldoze it to make way for new-build homes. Eric Abbott has also hit out at new owners of the property he lived in for more than 60 years after claiming they only sold it on the condition that it would be lived in by a family. Almost a thousand people have now signed a petition to stop the development in Swanmore, Hampshire, and 200 objections were written during the public consultation period for the plans. New owner Simon Smith has submitted an application to Winchester City Council to demolish the house and build two two-storey modern houses with four bedrooms each, parking for three cars and gardens. Neighbours think that the new build won't fit in well with the character of the village, and will cause traffic problems on an already busy street which is around the corner from a primary school. Houses on the street cost an average of £800,000, and some buildings in Swanmore - which is mentioned in the Domesday Book - date back to the 16th or early 17th centuries. Villagers received flyers about the petition against the redevelopment, which has 931 signatures, through their letterboxes. The flyers said that the cottage, known as Hiawatha, is being 'flattened' and replaced with 'two modern, bland new-builds'. Former company director Mr Abbott, 94, raised his family in the property with his wife Peggy. It was sold after being put on the market last year for £585,000. In an objection he wrote against the planning application, Mr Abbott said: 'As the previous owner of Hiawatha I was totally dismayed to see the change of heart of the new owners attempting to destroy Hiawatha and replace with totally unsuitable houses. 'I instructed the estate agent to ensure my wonderful house was only sold to a family who would love it like I did and not destroy it. 'The estate agent assured me that he had made this clear to the new owners and that they had agreed it to be their forever home which is all I ever wanted for another family to love it like I had for the last 64 years. 'It seems they lied and were buying Hiawatha for financial gain. 'I had been offered to sell to many builders and I declined as this house is part of history, it was there before Chapel Road was even made. 'I would never have sold it had I known this was their intention and they knew that. 'There is an ancient well that in the deeds demands that it should be operable for future water shortages in the village and this was a legal requirement. 'I believe Hiawatha was built in the 15th century it is a beautiful flint cottage which should not be replaced with two identical new builds. 'I feel it should remain standing and let the slow worms, birds, bats and many other species carry on living as they have been for many years. 'I strongly object and do hope that this does not go ahead it would be a great shame to the wonderful village of Swanmore.' David Hughes, 63, lives nearby and hopes he's not a 'nimby' for wanting the house to keep its character. The scientist said: 'I put in [an objection] saying I wasn't very keen on it, hopefully not from a nimby point of view. 'If we're not careful, we'll have a lot of new houses here. 'It's an unusual-looking house, it breaks up some of the monotony of the architecture.' The villager admitted that he was surprised 'how many other people were that bothered about it'. Swanmore local John Allen thinks that the council like the idea of the demolition because replacing the house with two houses will bring in more council tax. The 79 year old retiree said: 'The council like it, wouldn't it, more council tax, more money, that sort of thing.' Paraphrasing film producer Samuel Goldwyn in reference to Mr Abbott's agreement with the new owners, he said 'a verbal agreement isn't worth the paper it's written on'. 'He should've got it done legally,' he said. A middle-aged female neighbour who wanted to remain anonymous said she had signed the petition against the redevelopment. She said: 'I don't think it's the prettiest building in the village, but my main concern for it is if they put two properties in it. 'The road is already abused enough with traffic, I know there's three bedrooms [in each house].' 'As we all know, if you've got three teenagers moved in all of a sudden you haven't got enough parking.' An elderly female neighbour who also didn't want to be named said that it's 'bad' that the new owners didn't honour the agreement not to demolish the house. 'That's pretty poor, actually, I think,' she said. 'I mean, they knew what they were going to be doing with it - that doesn't seem very honest.' Ash Bennett, Mr Abbott's former neighbour, a 54 year old air traffic controller said: 'I've lived here 18, 19 years. 'I was aware when they sold the house, I didn't know until more recently about what was going to happen to it. 'I didn't follow it closely, but my understanding was that there was an agreement it wasn't going to be knocked down and developed, it would be renovated which isn't what they wanted to do. 'Personally speaking, I would rather they wouldn't knock it down.' The father of three added that the house needs 'a lot of work'. He said: 'I went in it 18 years ago, nothing much has been done to it since. 'My understanding is it would require a lot of work to it.' On the planning application, Historic England said that there is no evidence to indicate that the building predates the 19th century - it is believed to have been built between 1840 and 1868. It said: 'The building does not illustrate an important aspect of the nation's history, nor does it have the historic associations with nationally important individuals, groups, or events, which might give it historic special interest.' A decision is due to be made about the planning application on July 18.

'Just ignore Farage': Boris Johnson tells Tories how to counter the rise of Reform - as calls grow for former PM to lead the Conservatives once again
'Just ignore Farage': Boris Johnson tells Tories how to counter the rise of Reform - as calls grow for former PM to lead the Conservatives once again

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

'Just ignore Farage': Boris Johnson tells Tories how to counter the rise of Reform - as calls grow for former PM to lead the Conservatives once again

Boris Johnson has suggested that the best way for the Conservative Party to tackle the rise of Reform is to simply ignore them. The former prime minister, who led the Tories when the Brexit Party, now known as Reform, was polling at 'zero per cent,' believes that attacking them head-on is a waste of energy. Speaking about his time leading the Conservative Party, Mr Johnson pointed out that Reform's popularity in the polls was practically non-existent when he was in charge. He said that his approach was clear: 'My strategy with the individuals that you mention is don't talk about them.' He added: 'I think Conservatives need to focus on the economy and making life better for people and giving people opportunity. 'I think if we concentrate on the economy we mount full spectrum warfare on all the things that Starmer is doing wrong, we will win.' His advice comes after Reform's rise in the polls, with the party making a significant impact in the May local elections. Meanwhile, some Tory MPs have been calling for the former prime minister to make a dramatic return to the Commons, hoping he can evive the ailing Conservative Party. The former prime minister, who led the Tories when the Brexit Party, now known as Reform, was polling at 'zero per cent,' believes that attacking them head-on is a waste of energy Meanwhile, some Tory MPs have been calling for the former prime minister to make a dramatic return to the Commons, hoping he can evive the ailing Conservative Party Reform gained control of seven local authorities and became the largest party in three more, a stunning sweep that left Conservative strongholds in tatters. His remarks come amid growing concern in Conservative ranks about the threat from Reform, which has seen increasing support, particularly since the last general election. While the Tories lost a staggering 252 seats and only managed a 23.2 per cent vote share, Reform surged to secure five seats with 14.3 per cent of the vote. In recent months, both Sir Keir Starmer and Tory leader Kemi Badenoch have come under fire for spending too much time attacking Reform. Mrs. Badenoch, in a March interview with The Telegraph, dismissed Nigel Farage as a 'reality TV star,' suggesting that government should not be about drama. But Farage fired back, saying it was a good thing people knew who he was, comparing his TV background to Donald Trump's unconventional political rise. In May, the Prime Minister escalated his rhetoric, attacking Reform directly and calling them his main political rival. Yet, his attempt to discredit the party has only backfired. Last month, he echoed Reform's tough stance on immigration, warning that Britain could become an 'island of strangers.' His words sparked outrage among Labour MPs, and he was forced to walk back the comment, admitting regret. In May this year, Mr Johnson's allies were reportedly trying to convince him to make a bombshell return. Mrs Badenoch attempted to play down the prospect of a political return by Mr Johnson in a TV interview this morning, telling GB News: 'So, I love Boris. 'He sends me lots of messages, gives me lots of advice, like Iain Duncan Smith, like David Cameron. 'I have great people who have been in this situation before, who dealt with difficult times. So it's up to him what he wants to do. 'I have to focus on my job, which is making sure that Keir Starmer does not do more than the damage he's doing right now. 'We have to get him out in four years time, otherwise there's not going to be a country left I'm afraid.'

EXCLUSIVE When Queen heard it was Harry on the phone there was stony silence: Peerless Royal expert RICHARD KAY sensationally tells for first time exactly how Prince and Meghan 'blew' relationship with his grandmother
EXCLUSIVE When Queen heard it was Harry on the phone there was stony silence: Peerless Royal expert RICHARD KAY sensationally tells for first time exactly how Prince and Meghan 'blew' relationship with his grandmother

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

EXCLUSIVE When Queen heard it was Harry on the phone there was stony silence: Peerless Royal expert RICHARD KAY sensationally tells for first time exactly how Prince and Meghan 'blew' relationship with his grandmother

Just the other day, a former Buckingham Palace switchboard operator was reminiscing about working for the late Queen Elizabeth. One afternoon, a call had come through from Prince Harry in the US and he wanted to speak to his grandmother. The procedure was to ring the Queen's private number and let her know who was on the line. 'She would always thank you and then you would connect the call and leave them to their conversation,' the operator recalled.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store