logo
Unaware of the Battle of Bunker Hill, the British elite partied on

Unaware of the Battle of Bunker Hill, the British elite partied on

Washington Post23-06-2025
In mid-June 1775, as the combatants far away at Bunker Hill in Massachusetts counted their dead, the English elite — as yet unaware of the battle — were welcoming the summer with horse racing, cricket and perhaps some flirtation in the pleasure gardens by the Thames. With Parliament adjourned until October, the landowning classes would soon leave London for their estates.
After weeks of torrid weather, the social season would end on June 23 with one last extravaganza, a regatta with half a million spectators crowding the river banks to watch the racing boats and a parade of barges. King George III would not attend because he was mourning the death of his sister, the scandalous queen of Denmark, and so the greatest eminence on show would be Frederick, Lord North, the prime minister. North would try to project cheerful serenity at a moment when in politics the mood was bleak.
About the series
In the lead-up to the 250th anniversary of America's independence, Post Opinions will be publishing a series of essays and letters about the nation's founding — and how the events of that era remain relevant today.
Previous
Next
At age 43, North had been premier for five years. A master of Greek, Latin and parliamentary debate, but notoriously odd in his appearance — plump, with thick lips and bulging eyes, North described himself and his wife as 'the ugliest couple in London' — the prime minister suffered from private agonies of self-doubt. And on regatta day, the news that recently arrived from the colonies gave him every reason to worry.
Story continues below advertisement
Advertisement
It had taken 40 days, until May 29, for the first, unofficial account of the British army's fighting rebel colonials at Lexington and Concord on April 19 to reach London. Reluctant to accept it, North waited for confirmation from Gen. Thomas Gage, the British commander in Boston. This came in 12 days later — and then more ships from America brought a tangle of truth and fiction.
In Philadelphia, the Continental Congress had voted to create a rebel army — that was correct — but the London newspapers also carried a fake report that Boston had fallen to the insurgents. It was said that John Hancock, one of the rebel leaders, was marching on New York with 10,000 Native Americans hurrying to join him. Meanwhile, the newspaper opinion columns vilified North for being too harsh with the colonists or too mild or merely muddleheaded.
North's principal opponents in Parliament were the Whigs, led by the marquess of Rockingham. Wilting in the heat at Wimbledon on Regatta Day, the marquess penned an anxious letter to his friend and ally, the Irish orator Edmund Burke. 'All things seem in suspense,' he wrote. In March, Burke had mustered almost 80 members of the House of Commons to vote for peace with the colonies, only to be overwhelmed by North's majority. Now, Rockingham could see what was unfolding in America. 'The whole of the continent is enraged,' he told Burke, 'and united in the determination of resistance.'
North was being driven to the same conclusion: The insurrection he hoped to confine to New England had spread far beyond it, as from New York to Savannah royal governors and their deputies were forced to abandon their posts. In 1774, he had passed laws to close the port of Boston, end democracy in Massachusetts and intimidate the other colonies into obedience. More treason followed. Then, Parliament declared that Massachusetts was in rebellion and Gage ordered his troops to Concord, with disastrous results.
Story continues below advertisement
Advertisement
North had also pinned his hopes on a scheme he called his 'Conciliatory Proposition.' Each colony would have to pay for its share of imperial defense and administration and, in return, Parliament would refrain from directly taxing them. Now this policy failed, too, as one by one the colonies rejected North's new deal.
Their refusal to accept North's offer became known in London in the weeks before the regatta, and this — coupled with reports of the fighting near Boston — led to four meetings of North's cabinet to concoct a new strategy. They saw no reason yet to panic. The British economy was strong and the public finances robust, after many years of budget surpluses. The old enemy, the French, were beset by famine that brought rioters to Versailles. Elsewhere, Russia had defeated Turkey, seizing Crimea, and with Austria and Prussia it had carved Poland into slices.
With Europe at peace, the British could take their time to subdue the colonies. The key to America lay, the cabinet believed, in the Hudson Valley. So long as the British still controlled their chain of forts along the Hudson, they could split the colonies in two and keep the rebels at bay. North climbed aboard his barge on Regatta Day believing the Hudson was securely held.
Story continues below advertisement
Advertisement
As if conspiring with the Americans, the London weather soured. Wind and rain wrecked the parade of barges and at the regatta ball in Chelsea afterward, the wine ran out and the food was cold. The prime minister was glimpsed looking drenched and disheveled, and Lady North's silks were ruined, details mocked in the press. Worse was to come.
The following morning, June 24, the newspapers revealed that Britain's Hudson Valley strategy had collapsed. The previous month, they said, the rebels had taken the river bastions Forts Ticonderoga and Crown Point. News of Bunker Hill — a British victory, but a costly one — would not arrive for four more weeks, and when it did, the British would realize that now they faced a foreign war for which they were unprepared. Hesitantly, they began to gather their forces for what might be a decisive struggle in 1776.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Should the UK introduce a wealth tax? Have your say
Should the UK introduce a wealth tax? Have your say

Yahoo

time3 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Should the UK introduce a wealth tax? Have your say

The UK government has faced calls to introduce a "wealth tax", as chancellor Rachel Reeves looks at ways to raise revenue ahead of the autumn budget to plug a hole in public finances. Higher borrowing costs, low economic growth and the recent u-turn on welfare spending cuts have added to pressure on public finances, raising speculation that Reeves will be forced to raise taxes in the autumn budget to balance the books. To help the UK's financial situation, former Labour leader Neil Kinnock recently suggested that the government impose a 2% tax on assets valued above £10m. This was something put forward by a group of cross-party MPs in letter to Reeves ahead of her first autumn budget last October. Reeves has refused to rule out a wealth tax in the upcoming autumn budget, though business secretary Jonathan Reynolds said on Friday that such a levy would be "daft". Read more: UK set to lose 16,500 millionaires this year as non-dom status ends One concern that has been raised about introducing a wealth tax is that this could prompt more high-net-worth individuals to leave the UK. A report released by Henley & Partners last week showed that the UK is already expected to suffer the largest outflow of millionaires globally in 2025. The Henley Private Wealth Migration Report 2025 forecasts a net loss of 16,500 high-net-worth individuals (HNWIs) from the UK this year, the highest such outflow ever recorded by the firm in the past decade of tracking global wealth migration trends. Juerg Steffen, CEO at Henley & Partners, said: "For the first time in a decade of tracking, a European country leads the world in millionaire outflows. 'This isn't just about changes to the tax regime. It reflects a deepening perception among the wealthy that greater opportunity, freedom, and stability lie elsewhere." In April, the Treasury confirmed plans to abolish the longstanding non-domicile regime, a move widely seen as a trigger for an accelerating outflow of wealthy residents. At the same time, an analysis published in June by the Tax Justice Network found that the 9,500 millionaires that were reported to be leaving the UK in 2024 represented just 0.3% of the UK's 3.06 million millionaires. Do you think the UK should introduce a wealth tax? Vote in the poll below. Yahoo UK's poll of the week lets you vote and indicate your strength of feeling on one of the week's hot topics. After the poll closes, we'll publish and analyse the results each Friday, giving readers the chance to see how polarising a topic has become and if their view chimes with other Yahoo UK in to access your portfolio

Father of Stephen Lawrence ‘very frustrated' at killer's parole hearing delay
Father of Stephen Lawrence ‘very frustrated' at killer's parole hearing delay

Yahoo

time3 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Father of Stephen Lawrence ‘very frustrated' at killer's parole hearing delay

The father of Stephen Lawrence is 'very frustrated' and has asked for a full explanation after the public parole hearing for one of his son's killers was delayed. David Norris was due to make a bid for freedom on Wednesday and Thursday, but the hearing was adjourned because unspecified information was not made available to the panel that is due to hear the case. A lawyer for Stephen's father Neville Lawrence said the Government had failed to provide the details. Guy Mitchell, from Hodge Jones and Allen, said: 'Dr Lawrence is understandably very frustrated by this last-minute delay to the hearing which was due to go ahead on Wednesday. 'We understand this is due to the Government failing to provide certain information to the Parole Board in time. Dr Lawrence is seeking a full explanation as to the reason for this failing.' Norris was jailed for life with a minimum term of 14 years and three months in 2012 after he and Gary Dobson were convicted of murder in 2011 nearly 20 years after Stephen's racist killing. A spokesperson for the Parole Board said: 'The hearing has had to be adjourned due to information directed by the panel not being made available for the case. 'Without all proper information, the panel cannot consider a parole review. 'The panel's priority must be to ensure the relevant information is available, so that they can thoroughly review the potential risks and ensure public protection.' A new date will be set for the public hearing once the information has been provided. Stephen was on his way to catch a bus with his friend Duwayne Brooks in Eltham, south-east London, in April 1993 when he was set upon and killed by a gang of five or six attackers who used a racist term before they struck. Incompetence and allegations of corruption, centred around Norris's drug dealer father Clifford Norris, dogged the investigation into Stephen's death for years. There was also outrage when it emerged that undercover officers from the Metropolitan Police had spied on justice campaigners supporting the family. In 1999 a public inquiry into the case found that the force was institutionally racist, a conclusion repeated by Baroness Casey in 2023 in her review following the rape and murder of Sarah Everard by a serving officer. Parole hearings are normally held in private but a public hearing was allowed in Norris's case after an application by the media that was backed by Stephen's parents. In a document outlining the decision, it was revealed that Norris now accepts that he was present at the scene of the murder, but claims that he punched Stephen and was not the person who stabbed him. The other suspects in the case were Jamie and Neil Acourt, who have since been convicted of unrelated drugs offences, and Luke Knight. A sixth suspect, Matthew White, died in 2021. The College of Policing is leading a review of the most recent stage of the investigation into Stephen's death after Dobson and Norris were convicted.

UK's Starmer to Propose Gaza Peace Plan to Trump and Allies
UK's Starmer to Propose Gaza Peace Plan to Trump and Allies

Bloomberg

timean hour ago

  • Bloomberg

UK's Starmer to Propose Gaza Peace Plan to Trump and Allies

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer will propose a plan for peace in Gaza in a meeting with President Donald Trump on Monday, designed to deliver immediate humanitarian relief on the ground as well as charting a path to a two-state solution. Starmer will also discuss the UK-led plan 'in the coming days' with his cabinet and with other international allies, including Arab states, his spokesman Dave Pares told reporters in London on Monday, without providing further details.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store