NEET 2025: HC orders NTA to form grievance redress panel
The court's direction came while dealing with a plea concerning NEET-UG 2025 in which a candidate, who appeared for the examination on May 4 at a Meerut centre, sought compensatory marks for allegedly suffering loss of time and mental disturbance due to irregularities in biometric verification at the exam centre.
It stated that constitutional courts cannot be expected to scrutinise CCTV footage for such candidates who have been prejudiced on account of loss of exam time for no fault of their own, noting that such cases ought to be examined by a body of experts transparently and fairly.
'It may be observed that this court has come across a few individual cases where the candidates suffered loss of exam time for the reasons not attributable to them,' the court said.
'Accordingly, the respondent No.1 or NTA is directed to constitute a standing Grievance Redressal Committee for the said purpose, if not already in place, where aggrieved candidates may approach for redressal of their grievances,' the court said in its Monday order.
The petitioner sought certain reliefs, including the awarding of compensatory marks in the medical entrance exam and preservation of CCTV footage from the concerned test centre.
The petitioner alleged that during the authentication process, before the exam, the biometric verification did not work at the test centre, and he was made to file an application requesting permission to enter the examination hall.
The plea said the petitioner was permitted to enter the examination hall only five minutes before the commencement of the test.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
4 hours ago
- NDTV
Kuki Students Ask Manipur Governor To Open State Civil Service Exam Centre In Churachandpur
Imphal: State civil service aspirants in Manipur's Churachandpur district have requested Governor AK Bhalla to hold the Manipur Public Service Commission (MPSC) mains exam in the southern hill district too, considering the situation in the state where members of the Meitei community and the Kuki tribes are unable to visit each other's areas with safety guarantees. An MPSC notification on July 11 said the mains exam will be held in two centres - state capital Imphal, and Guwahati in neighbouring Assam. "...However, this arrangement imposes undue physical, psychological, and financial hardship on aspirants from the Kuki community. So, we earnestly request your kind intervention to facilitate the conduct of the mains examination in Churachandpur district," the Kuki Students Organisation (KSO) said in a letter to Mr Bhalla. The KSO said holding the exam in Churachandpur will ensure inclusivity and equal opportunity for all aspirants, while also addressing the logistical and psychological challenges posed by long-distance travel. Several national-level exams such as UGC-NET, NEET, Agniveer, SSC, and banking services have been "successfully and smoothly conducted in Churachandpur in recent times", the KSO said, adding they are confident the state-level MPSC exams can also be conducted in the district efficiently in the same conducive environment. "Your timely and compassionate intervention will not only ensure fairness and justice for all aspirants but will also go a long way in restoring trust in the democratic institutions of the state. It will reaffirm the commitment that no deserving youth is left behind due to circumstances beyond their control," the KSO said. The Kuki tribes have refrained from going toward the valley area where the airport is located, citing security concerns. The better paved National Highway also passes through the valley to the east in central Manipur and goes toward Nagaland and Assam. To get out of Churachandpur, the Kuki tribes have been taking National Highway 102B - known for its bad patches and large potholes - that goes to Mizoram's capital Aizawl to the west. Aizawl has an airport. Members of the Meitei community can only take flights out of Imphal as all the highways pass through Kuki settlements. The Kuki tribes say they will not allow Meiteis to pass through their areas until their demand for a separate administration is met. A civil service aspirant in Churachandpur told NDTV it would be helpful if the MPSC mains exam can also be held in her district. Going to Guwahati will take a minimum of three days, and not every candidate has barely enough to survive, let alone travel, she said. "If the exam centre is in Guwahati, we have to be ready more than a week in advance to prepare for travel. We will waste many days on the road. It will be physically and financially draining," the civil service aspirant said, requesting anonymity.
Indian Express
6 hours ago
- Indian Express
High Court upholds challenge to CUET-PG answer key, directs NTA to award marks for correct answer
The Punjab and Haryana High Court has directed the National Testing Agency (NTA) to rectify the Common University Entrance Test- Postgraduate (CUET-PG) 2025 result of a Panjab University student who was denied marks for a correctly attempted question in Political Science. Holding that the NTA's reasoning was 'not in consonance with the simple language of the disputed question', the court said the answer given by the petitioner was 'correct in terms of plain reading'. A division bench of Chief Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice Sanjiv Berry passed the order while disposing of a writ petition filed by Gurshaan Singh Cheema, a final-year undergraduate student from the Chandigarh-based university. Cheema had sought the setting aside of the provisional answer key published on April 24, the final answer key released on May 6, and the result and score sheet issued the same day. Challenging the final answer key issued by NTA for the CUET-PG 2025 Political Science paper, Cheema contended that his answer to Question ID 7311302427 concerning the chronological order of four constitutional amendments, was rejected despite being historically accurate. For Cheema, Advocate Prashant Kumar Kapila contended that the petitioner lost five marks — lack of credit of four marks for the correct and negative marking (one mark) for selecting an answer different from the one listed. At the same time, the counsel argued that a student who selected the factually incorrect answer gained four marks instead of getting one negative mark. This, the counsel said, significantly impacted his rank and eligibility for admission. The court reproduced the question in its order: 'Arrange the following amendments to the Constitution in a chronological order: A. Incorporation of Dadra and Nagar Haveli as Union Territory B. Abolition of Election Tribunals C. Abolition of Privy Purse D. Reducing the age of voting rights from 21 to 18 years.' Cheema had selected Option 1 (A, B, C, D), which corresponds with the order in which the constitutional amendments were enacted — 1961, 1966, 1971 and 1989, respectively. However, the NTA had marked Option 2 (A, C, B, D) as correct, based on what it claimed was a subject expert's interpretation of 'chronology' in the context of 'effect on federal structure and political development'. Rejecting this rationale, the court noted: 'Undoubtedly, the amendments… were enacted in the year 1961, 1966, 1971, 1989, respectively and by arranging these enactments in chronological order, the correct answer had to be Option 1 (A, B, C, D)… The explanation given by the NTA… appears to be hyper technical and not in consonance with the simple language of the disputed question.' The court further observed that the question did not mention any context beyond the literal chronological arrangement: 'There was no occasion for the candidate to have answered so in terms of the concept which was in the mind of the subject expert, which was nowhere reflected in black and white in the question paper.' Accordingly, the bench directed the NTA to treat Option 1 as the correct answer and update Cheema's scorecard. 'The petitioner is entitled to get credit thereof in the scorecard,' the court said, adding that NTA must issue the revised scorecard within 15 days of receiving the order. The NTA conducts the CUET, a standardised test, for admission to undergraduate and postgraduate programmes in Central Universities and other participating institutes. Its results are accepted by several state universities too. Senior Panel Counsel Anil Chawla represented the Union of India while Advocate Arun Gosain appeared for the NTA and Advocates Hemen Aggarwal and Dashim Garg represented the UGC.
News18
15 hours ago
- News18
NEET UG 2025: SC Declines To Consider Plea Alleging Errors In Question Paper
Last Updated: NEET-UG 2025: The petitioner's counsel argued that the three questions were incorrect, citing two expert opinions that supported this claim. On Friday, the Supreme Court declined to hear a plea asserting that there were 'serious errors" in three questions from the NEET-UG 2025 examination. A bench of Justices P S Narasimha and A S Chandurkar advised the petitioner's counsel to approach the relevant high court. The National Testing Agency conducts the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test-Undergraduate (NEET-UG) for admissions to MBBS, BDS, AYUSH, and other related courses in both government and private institutions nationwide. The petitioner's counsel argued that the three questions were incorrect, citing two expert opinions that supported this claim. He stated that these questions affected the petitioner's score by 13 marks. 'These (three) questions were absolutely wrong. I have taken two expert opinions and those experts also concur with my views. They have certified my views," the counsel of the petitioner argued. The bench noted that the exam had already concluded. 'You withdraw this and go to the high court," the bench suggested, emphasising not wanting to deny the petitioner any remedy. The counsel requested that the Supreme Court appoint a panel of experts to review the questions within three days and consider their opinions. After the bench expressed unwillingness to entertain the plea, the petitioner's counsel decided to withdraw it. On July 4, the Supreme Court also declined to entertain a separate petition challenging the NEET-UG 2025 results due to an alleged error in one of the questions. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
