Puck Fair goers win fight to keep late-night drinking, after gardaí sought to shut pubs at 2am
On 10 July at the District Court of Killorglin sitting in Cahersiveen, 14 publicans applied under Section 10 of the Intoxicating Liquor Act 1962 for the annual special exemption for the three principal nights of the fair on 10, 11 and 12 August.
However, gardaí objected on the grounds of straitened resources. District Court Judge David Waters set the closing time at 2am, in line with the Garda submission, saying the fair was not all about drinking.
Today in the Circuit Court in Killarney, Judge Terence O'Sullivan said he saw no grounds to restrict the Puck Fair's traditional drinking time, which has historically ended at 3am.
Puck Fair dates to 1603 the last year of the reign of King James 1 of England, Judge O'Sullivan noted.
Since the 1970s, the pub closing time at Puck was 3am.
'Prior to that, there was a 24-hour opening of the pubs in Killorglin,' barrister Katie O'Connell, instructed by John O'Dwyer solicitor, had told the court.
Daytime and family activities took place and afterwards people would go for a drink. Street entertainment ended at midnight and then the fair volunteers go for a drink to relax and enjoy themselves, Ms O'Connell said.
Puck Fair was 'bigger than Christmas' for people from the region, the barrister said. 'Chipping away' at the status of the festival was taking place.
The statue of the Puck Goat sat at the entrance to the town and economically the festival was important to Killorglin, with people put through college and school on the strength of the fair.
Only the gardaí, not the locals, had objected, Ms O'Connell also said.
Advertisement
Garda Supt John Ryan of Killarney was called to give evidence by State solicitor Diane Reidy. The garda objections were twofold, Supt. Ryan said.
Pubs were given an exemption to open to 2am the night preceding Puck Fair and the garda felt that four nights of going until to 2am would be sufficient, given that street entertainment finished at midnight.
Having pubs open to 3am needed additional police resources. It was reasonable to reduce it by an hour, he felt.
Cross examined by Ms O'Connell, Supt Ryan agreed the fair was 'the lifeblood of Killorglin'.
Ms O'Connell also told Judge O'Sullivan that organisers of the festival did not want everyone spilling out from the pubs at 2am, and the extra hour would mean there was safer dispersal and organisation of buses and taxis.
'It's always been 3am. Nothing warrants the reduction,' she said.
While she appreciated the extra garda resources was paid for through taxes, the Killorglin community were also taxpayers. The festival organisers contributed 3,000 euro to the resources of the gardai, she said.
'Judge Waters thought the front line (policing) should trump anything else,' she said.
State solicitor Diane Reidy said the issue was one of resources, not public order and Puck Fair was the only festival in Kerry seeking to open until 3am.
'It's the proper allocation of resources and the additional strain on garda resources to police it,' Ms Reidy said.
In his decision, delivered after a recess to look at the legislation, Judge O'Sullivan said the traditional opening had been to 3am and there was no evidence of anyone in the locality objecting on noise or nuisance.
'In reality, the objection is about the pressure on police resources without any particular incident,' the judge said.
Judge O'Sullivan said he appreciated the District Court Judge had 'more connection' with the locality than himself, but he did not see any grounds to depart from the tradition.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Daily Mirror
2 days ago
- Irish Daily Mirror
Off-duty bouncer "no longer the same man" after violent hotel assault
An off-duty bouncer who was violently attacked by two men whom he had previously barred from a hotel in Arklow is 'no longer the same man' after being forced into early retirement due to the severity of his injuries. A Polish national who attacked the victim near his workplace while he was off-duty on Christmas Eve five years ago was sentenced to three years in prison for the attack. A sitting of Wicklow Circuit Criminal Court heard that the victim had suffered serious facial injuries after being struck in the head with a bottle on Main Street, Arklow on December 24, 2019. Mateusz Gorecki (31), of Ferrybank, Arklow, Co Wicklow pleaded guilty to assault causing harm to Paul Lee, contrary to Section 3 of the Non-Fatal Offences Against the Person Act 1997. The unemployed male, who has been living in Ireland for 14 years, also pleaded guilty to a separate charge of production of an article capable of inflicting serious injury on the same date. Garda Emmet Furlong gave evidence that the injured man was sitting in his car outside the Royal Hotel on Main Street, Arklow at around 10pm on Christmas Eve five years ago to collect his partner from work. Garda Furlong said Mr Lee saw Gorecki and another male, with whom he had interactions in the past in his role as a bouncer at the hotel. The witness said the two men had been barred from the premises by Mr Lee as a result of a previous incident. He told the court that Mr Lee felt the two men, one of whom seemed to have a bottle in his hand, were glaring at him before they walked up and down past his vehicle on the other side of the road. Garda Furlong told prosecution counsel, James Kelly, BL that the bouncer got out of his car to go to speak to the pair. Video footage of the incident was played in court which showed that Gorecki attempted to hit Mr Lee before throwing a bottle at his head. The accused's companion had punched and kicked the victim between the two actions by Gorecki. The court heard that Mr Lee was referred to three different hospitals over the Christmas holiday period for treatment for his injuries. Garda Furlong said the victim suffered fractures to his skull, eye socket and cheekbone and required surgery to implant three plates in his face. He told Mr Kelly that Gorecki was 'nonplussed' by what happened when arrested and claimed he had not thrown a bottle. The witness said the accused was still of the view that the bottle had not hit Mr Lee, despite the video evidence. The court heard that Gorecki had no previous convictions at the time of the assault on the bouncer but had subsequently been convicted of two public order offences for being intoxicated in a public place. Cross-examined by defence counsel, Feargal Kavanagh SC, as to who was the principal protagonist in the assault, Garda Furlong said Gorecki caused the most damage but his accomplice, who received an 18-month prison sentence for his role, was 'more of a leader.' The court heard Gorecki had been drinking at a party in his sister's house in Arklow earlier on Christmas Eve. In a victim impact statement, which was read on his behalf by his son, Mr Lee (54) said he had been a proud, hard-working man before the attack but had been forced into early retirement by an act of unprovoked violence. He told the court that the assault had not just caused him the normal physical agony but had devastated his life entirely. Mr Lee said the psychological effects were 'insidious and even more profound' and he had suffered chronic and persistent damage. The court heard he suffers from seizures and 'insufferable headaches' as well as blurred vision and post-traumatic stress disorder. 'I do not recognise myself,' said Mr Lee. The Irish Mirror's Crime Writers Michael O'Toole and Paul Healy are writing a new weekly newsletter called Crime Ireland. Click here to sign up and get it delivered to your inbox every week He claimed that work provided him with structure, identity and pride but he was now 'no longer the same man' as every aspect of his life had been affected. Mr Lee said his family had also suffered as they were looking at a person who had 'faded into someone unrecognisable.' 'The emotional toll is impossible to fully explain,' he added. He described the assault as not a momentary injury but 'a permanent turning point in my life.' Mr Lee urged Judge John Martin for any sentence to reflect the seriousness of Gorecki's offending which had 'taken the remaining years of my life.' Pleading for leniency, Mr Kavanagh said Gorecki came from a relatively poor background and had suffered a lot of tragedy. The court heard his father died when he was very young, while his mother died last year and a brother was killed in a motorcycle accident in Ireland a few years ago. Mr Kavanagh said the defendant had also expressed remorse and shame for what he described as a 'one-off incident.' He said Gorecki was assessed as being at a moderate risk of reoffending which he believed was linked to his difficulty in finding employment. However, Mr Kavanagh said the accused had recently received the offer of a job at Arklow Golf Club. The barrister said Gorecki had also reduced his alcohol intake and had not committed any other offences since 2023. While not seeking to blame Mr Lee for what happened, Mr Kavanagh said the bouncer had stood 'toe to toe' with the accused and spoke into their faces. Sentencing Gorecki to three and a half years in prison for the assault offence, Judge Martin suspended the final six months for a period of 12 months on condition that the accused place himself under the supervision of the Probation Service on his release from prison for two years and remain free of alcohol for that period. The judge observed that the accused had only demonstrated partial responsibility for an offence that was 'quick and drink-fuelled' but whose effects were 'lasting and very significant.' He said Mr Lee had suffered most horrific injuries in an attack where Gorecki had delivered 'the first and last blow.' The judge noted that the defendant had only entered guilty pleas after a jury had been sworn in to hear his trial. He also took into account that Gorecki had made no concrete expression of remorse or any offer to make amends. The judge offered his best wishes to Mr Lee and expressed hope that the finalisation of the case would bring him some closure. Sign up to the Irish Mirror's Courts and Crime newsletter here and get breaking crime updates and news from the courts direct to your inbox.
Sunday World
2 days ago
- Sunday World
Bouncer ‘no longer the same' after violent assault by men he barred from Wicklow hotel
Mateusz Gorecki (31), of Ferrybank, Arklow, Co Wicklow pleaded guilty to assault causing harm to Paul Lee. An off-duty bouncer who was violently attacked by two men whom he had previously barred from a hotel in Arklow is 'no longer the same man' after being forced into early retirement due to the severity of his injuries. A Polish national who attacked the victim near his workplace while he was off-duty on Christmas Eve five years ago was sentenced to three years in prison for the attack. A sitting of Wicklow Circuit Criminal Court heard that the victim had suffered serious facial injuries after being struck in the head with a bottle on Main Street, Arklow on December 24, 2019. Mateusz Gorecki (31), of Ferrybank, Arklow, Co Wicklow pleaded guilty to assault causing harm to Paul Lee, contrary to Section 3 of the Non-Fatal Offences Against The Person Act 1997. The unemployed male, who has been living in Ireland for 14 years, also pleaded guilty to a separate charge of production of an article capable of inflicting serious injury on the same date. Garda Emmet Furlong gave evidence that the injured man was sitting in his car outside the Royal Hotel on Main Street, Arklow at around 10pm on Christmas Eve five years ago to collect his partner from work. A suitcase in a luxury hotel room News in 90 Seconds - July 25th Garda Furlong said Mr Lee saw Gorecki and another male, with whom he had interactions in the past in his role as a bouncer at the hotel. The witness said the two men had been barred from the premises by Mr Lee as a result of a previous incident. He told the court that Mr Lee felt the two men, one of whom seemed to have a bottle in his hand, were glaring at him before they walked up and down past his vehicle on the other side of the road. Garda Furlong told prosecution counsel, James Kelly, BL that the bouncer got out of his car to go to speak to the pair. Video footage of the incident was played in court which showed that Gorecki attempted to hit Mr Lee before throwing a bottle at his head. The accused's companion had punched and kicked the victim between the two actions by Gorecki. The court heard that Mr Lee was referred to three different hospitals over the Christmas holiday period for treatment for his injuries. Garda Furlong said the victim suffered fractures to his skull, eye socket and cheekbone and required surgery to implant three plates in his face. He told Mr Kelly that Gorecki was 'nonplussed' by what happened when arrested and claimed he had not thrownOff a bottle. The witness said the accused was still of the view that the bottle had not hit Mr Lee, despite the video evidence. The court heard that Gorecki had no previous convictions at the time of the assault on the bouncer but had subsequently been convicted of two public order offences for being intoxicated in a public place. Asked under cross-examination by defence counsel, Feargal Kavanagh SC, who was the principal protagonist in the assault, Garda Furlong said Gorecki caused the most damage but his accomplice, who received an 18-month prison sentence for his role, was 'more of a leader.' The court heard Gorecki had been drinking at a party in his sister's house in Arklow earlier on Christmas Eve. In a victim impact statement, which was read on his behalf by his son, Mr Lee (54) said he had been a proud, hard-working man before the attack but had been forced into early retirement by an act of unprovoked violence. He told the court that the assault had not just caused him the normal physical agony but had devastated his life entirely. Mr Lee said the psychological effects were 'insidious and even more profound' and he had suffered chronic and persistent damage. The court heard he suffers from seizures and 'insufferable headaches' as well as blurred vision and post-traumatic stress disorder. 'I do not recognise myself,' said Mr Lee. He claimed that work provided him with structure, identity and pride but he was now 'no longer the same man' as every aspect of his life had been affected. Mr Lee said his family had also suffered as they were looking at a person who had 'faded into someone unrecognisable.' 'The emotional toll is impossible to fully explain,' he added. He described the assault as not a momentary injury but 'a permanent turning point in my life.' Mr Lee urged Judge John Martin for any sentence to reflect the seriousness of Gorecki's offending which had 'taken the remaining years of my life.' Pleading for leniency, Mr Kavanagh said Gorecki came from a relatively poor background and had suffered a lot of tragedy. The court heard his father died when he was very young, while his mother died last year and a brother was killed in a motorcycle accident in Ireland a few years ago. Mr Kavanagh said the defendant had also expressed remorse and shame for what he described as a 'one-off incident.' He said Gorecki was assessed as being at a moderate risk of reoffending which he believed was linked to his difficulty in finding employment. However, Mr Kavanagh said the accused had recently received the offer of a job at Arklow Golf Club. The barrister said Gorecki had also reduced his alcohol intake and had not committed any other offences since 2023. While not seeking to blame Mr Lee for what happened, Mr Kavanagh said the bouncer had stood 'toe to toe' with the accused and spoke into their faces. Sentencing Gorecki to three and a half years in prison for the assault offence, Judge Martin suspended the final six months for a period of 12 months on condition that the accused place himself under the supervision of the Probation Service on his release from prison for two years and remain free of alcohol for that period. The judge observed that the accused had only demonstrated partial responsibility for an offence that was 'quick and drink-fuelled' but whose effects were 'lasting and very significant.' He said Mr Lee had suffered most horrific injuries in an attack where Gorecki had delivered 'the first and last blow.' The judge noted that the defendant had only entered guilty pleas after a jury had been sworn in to hear his trial. He also took into account that Gorecki had made no concrete expression of remorse or any offer to make amends. The judge offered his best wishes to Mr Lee and expressed hope that the finalisation of the case would bring him some closure.
Irish Times
3 days ago
- Irish Times
Data breach ‘distress' case does not need personal injuries board approval, Supreme Court rules
A man who claims he suffered from distress, upset and anxiety arising from a financial services company's disclosure of his personal data to a third party may bring a case for damages without Personal Injuries Assessment Board (PIAB) approval, the Supreme Court has ruled. The court's ruling clarifies that claims for damages for 'emotional disturbances' which fall short of a recognised psychiatric disorder are not 'personal injury' claims, as defined by the Personal Injuries Assessment Board Act 2003. Before his appeal to the Supreme Court, Patrick Dillon's case seeking damages against Irish Life Assurance plc arising from a data breach was dismissed by the Circuit Court and High Court. The breach complained of occurred when Irish Life erroneously shared letters containing Mr Dillion's personal and financial data with a third party. Both the Circuit Court and High Court ruled Mr Dillon's case sought damages for 'personal injury', and in circumstances where Mr Dillion did not obtain PIAB authorisation before bringing the proceedings, the case should be dismissed as being frivolous, vexatious or bound to fail. READ MORE Under the Personal Injuries Assessment Board Act 2003, a party proposing to bring a case seeking damages for 'personal injury' must obtain authorisation from the PIAB. Mr Dillon's appeal to the Supreme Court was rooted in the question of whether a claim for damages for distress, upset and anxiety falls under the definition of 'personal injury' in the Personal Injuries Assessment Board Act 2003. The Act defines personal injury as including 'any disease and any impairment of a person's physical or mental condition'. In a judgment on Thursday, Mr Justice Brian Murray, on behalf of a five-judge Supreme Court panel, ruled that claims for damages for 'emotional disturbances' like distress, upset, anxiety and inconvenience which fall short of a recognised psychiatric disorder – like Mr Dillon's – is not a personal injury claim, as defined by the Act. As such, the judge found the Circuit Court and High Court were wrong to dismiss Mr Dillon's case on the basis that he had not obtained PIAB authorisation. [ Woman who left scene after knocking down pedestrian who then died avoids jail Opens in new window ] The judge noted that Mr Dillon's case is for non-material damage under the Data Protection Act 2018. This Act allows for judicial remedy, including compensation, for infringement of a data subject's rights. Mr Justice Murray noted that those who bring claims solely for mental distress, anxiety and upset – which do not require PIAB authorisation – 'cannot expect anything other than very, very modest awards'. The judge said it would be possible for a plaintiff to bring a case alleging a breach of their rights under the Data Protection Act 2018 that gives rise to a medically recognised psychiatric injury. In those circumstances, PIAB authorisation would be required to bring the case.
