Private credit firms eye new funds for Hong Kong property as banks step aside
Gaw Capital, Blue Mountain among those raising new funds
Funds should have tighter covenants to cushion risks, analyst says
HONG KONG, May 7 (Reuters) - As valuations fall and banks pare exposure, some private credit firms are stepping in to invest in large commercial properties and developers in Hong Kong with plans for new fund launches for one of the world's most expensive real estate markets.
Gaw Capital Partners and Blue Mountain Bridge Capital are among those looking to launch new funds for the Asia Pacific region, including Hong Kong, despite the heightened market volatility induced by U.S. President Donald Trump's trade wars.
In Hong Kong, in particular, access to private credit would be a major, though short-term, relief for many of the developers as anxiety grows about their ability to service debt at a time when both demand and prices have been on a downward trajectory.
While the city has remained unscathed by a destabilising property crisis in mainland China, concerns have swirled about the financial health of a few developers amid rising economic and sector headwinds.
Private credit funds, specialised lenders that finance companies and projects, have boomed into a $2 trillion industry globally, luring big-time investors as well as wealthy individuals targeting higher yields.
Moreover, some private credit investors could also potentially profit in a default scenario if they manage to sell the collateral at a price higher than their lending, subject to market conditions.
Blue Mountain Bridge, a Hong Kong-based private credit firm, is in the market to raise $250 million in its first fund with the aim of securing $150 million by the end of 2025, chief investment officer Raymond Chan said.
"This is the best time to be a private credit investor in Hong Kong," he said.
In January, Chan's fund closed a $33.4 million one-year senior loan secured by a newly converted office property in Hong Kong, which pays an annual coupon of 15% and has a loan-to-value ratio of 63%.
In December, Blue Mountain exited a $64.1 million senior one-year loan. That loan to a developer for refinancing reaped an internal rate of return (IRR), a key gauge of profitability, of 15%, Chan said.
The payoff is higher than the average net IRR of 11.9% recorded by private credit and direct lending funds over the 2018 to 2023 years, considered a solid performance, according to a S&P Global report last year.
Gaw Capital, a Hong Kong-based real estate private equity fund that has $34.4 billion assets under management, is launching a new fund targeting commitment of $2 billion, according to a person with knowledge of the matter.
The fund will invest in both private credit and private equity deals in tier-1 and 2 cities in Asia Pacific, including Hong Kong, said the person, who declined to be named because the information is not yet public.
Sun Hung Kai & Co, a local alternative investment company, launched a new business by co-investing in a $100 million residential mortgage portfolio from developers in November, and it will close another portfolio soon.
"We've seen both so-called distressed developers and high-quality, low-geared developers approaching us for cashflow or to optimize the usage of balance sheet," said Gigi Wong, the firm's managing director.
"And there are Hong Kong banks approaching us to sell their secondary loan or problematic loan."
The private credit interest comes against the backdrop of liquidity problems in major city developer New World Development and its smaller peers, triggering concerns of a potential domino effect across the entire sector.
Sliding property sales and rentals as well as high vacancies and interest rates are eroding landlords' ability to service debt, Moody's said in a report in February, prompting banks to scale back both new financing and refinancing to the sector.
Total loans for property development and investment have been declining since 2022, and are down 12.6% year-on-year at the end of 2024, according to the data compiled by the city's de-facto central bank, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority.
"When you have a loan coming due, in today's market, it's very, very hard to get that refinancing done," said Edwin Wong, partner and head of Asia Credit at Ares Management, a private credit firm.
"We may look at the group level and say, hey, this is something we can think about - to give them that breathing room to ride out the current environment." The firm is looking at all debt opportunities, from senior to junior.
Commercial property has been the worst affected in Hong Kong with record vacancy rates of close to 20%, hurt by an oversupply and grim economic outlook, and prices have dropped 40% since the 2019 peak, according to CBRE data.
Some distressed commercial properties were transacted last year at 60% lower than peak prices.
CBRE estimated the funding gap - driven by changes in capital values due to repricing and rental adjustments - in Hong Kong between 2025 and 2027 to be $720 million across the office, industrial and retail sectors.
Besides asset managers and investment firms, family offices and wealthy individuals are entering the private credit market, attracted by higher yields compared to direct investment in the real estate market, law firm JSM partner Jasmine Chiu said.
Due to growing competition, interest rates for private credit have come down to the high single and low double digit ranges, from mid-high teens in 2023.
However, some firms are not rushing into deals, said market participants, as they are wary of gaps in valuation expectations and the risks involved.
Raffles Family Office's head of investment advisory Sky Kwah said investors should exercise more caution when they structure deals, to look for lower loan-to-values (LTVs), tighter covenants and more equity cushion.
Otherwise, Kwah said, the private credit firms could take a hit if the property market faces further corrections.
Because of the growing competition among private credit funds, "some lenders may be forced to accept looser covenants or lower quality collateral to deploy the capital," he said, adding borrowers with weaker fundamentals may pose risks. (Reporting by Clare Jim, Kane Wu, and Summer Zhen in Hong Kong; Editing by Sumeet Chatterjee and Shri Navaratnam)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
10 minutes ago
- India.com
After two failed businesses, This Delhi man built Rs 200000000 company in just 3 years, his unique idea was to..., his net worth is...
New Delhi: From facing early setbacks in his father's established business to founding his own refurbished mobile phone business, Neeraj Chopra's entrepreneurial journey has all the makings of a Bollywood blockbuster — drama, setbacks, a unique idea, and an impressive comeback. Today, when everyone has a mobile phone in their hand, Neeraj turned this very device into a business worth crores. Without any major investment or marketing, he launched a startup named Zobox, which refurbishes old mobile phones and sells them again — all in an eco-friendly manner. In a mere three years, Zobox has achieved a turnover of Rs. 20 crore. The range of mobile phones available at Zobox spans across various well-known brands, ensuring there's something for every customer. 'Opting for refurbished mobile phones allows our customers to save money while also playing a part in creating a sustainable future,' says Neeraj, the founder of Delhi-based Zobox to the Weekend Leader. 'We are all about making eco-friendly choices and promoting responsible consumerism.' All you need to know about Zobox: Zobox's refurbished phones are priced 30-50 per cent lower than the maximum retail price of new models. The refurbished phones come with a six-month warranty For instance, if a brand-new handset costs Rs. 10,000, Zobox offers the refurbished version of the same model for just Rs. 3,000-5,000. Each phone listed on the Zobox app 'Zobiz' undergoes a rigorous inspection and certification process, guaranteeing quality and reliability. Launched in December 2020, Zobox operates under the registered name, Zobox Retails Private Limited. Started in 2020 with just Rs 50 lakh in capital and a team of 8–10 people, the company crossed a turnover of Rs 20 crore in just three years. Today, Neeraj's net worth is around Rs 37 crore, and Zobox is rapidly expanding its footprint across the country. Neeraj Chopra: Man Who Earned Rs 20 Crore Business in Just Three Years Neeraj was born into a business-class family in Delhi Neeraj's initial business experiences were marked by struggles and learning curves. His father, who was trading in pesticides and seeds, later ventured into the wholesale business of electronic components in Delhi's renowned Old Lajpat Rai Market. Neeraj finished his Class 12 at Naval Public School, Delhi, in 1998 Neeraj went on to pursue his from Satyawati College under Delhi University. When Neeraj started his college journey, his father took him under his wing to teach him about the family business. At 18, he was sent to Hong Kong to gain practical experience by working with his uncle. His life in Hong Kong was focused on the import of electronic components from China and then selling them in India. Returned to India in 2010 After the death of his uncle in 2010, Neeraj returned to India and joined the family business. However, working in the country proved to be a challenging experience for him. He later ventured into his own businesses in sectors like real estate and power banks, but faced losses in both. He observed that just like Cars24 resells used cars, mobile phones could also be refurbished and sold again. This thought led to the birth of Zobox — a startup that repairs and refurbishes old mobile phones and sells them at affordable prices.
Time of India
10 minutes ago
- Time of India
Sensex falls over 100 pts, Nifty below 24,700 amid US trade deal jitters
Indian equity benchmarks experienced a decline for the fourth consecutive session, influenced by uncertainties surrounding a delayed interim trade agreement with the U.S. and continuous foreign fund outflows. Weak corporate earnings further contributed to the downward pressure. Investor sentiment remains fragile amidst geopolitical and economic concerns, with specific stocks like Bharat Electronics and Infosys facing losses. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Experts View Global Markets Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads FII/DII Tracker Indian equity benchmarks opened lower for the fourth consecutive session on Tuesday, weighed down by uncertainty over a delayed interim trade deal with the United States, continued foreign fund outflows, and weak corporate 9:24 am, the BSE Sensex was down 117 points, or 0.15%, at 80,73, while the Nifty50 declined 36 points, or 0.15%, to 24, portfolio investors (FPIs) offloaded Indian equities worth Rs 6,081 crore ($700.92 million) on Monday, as per provisional data — their biggest single-day selling since May 30. The sharp outflow has heightened concerns about near-term market sentiment remains fragile ahead of the August 1 deadline set by U.S. President Donald Trump for progress on a trade agreement, with fears growing over potential geopolitical and economic repercussions from further early trade, Bharat Electronics (BEL), Eternal, Infosys, ICICI Bank, TCS, and HDFC Bank were among the top laggards on the Sensex, falling up to 2.5%. Meanwhile, Reliance Industries, Adani Ports, Tata Motors, and Power Grid opened in the the sectoral front, the Nifty IT index slipped 0.4%, weighed down by losses in Infosys, Wipro, and Coforge. In contrast, Nifty Metal, Realty, and Oil & Gas indices gained over 0.5%, offering some support to the the broader market, the Nifty Midcap 100 edged up 0.1%, while the Nifty Smallcap 100 declined 0.4%, reflecting mixed sentiment across individual stocks, Waaree Energies surged over 4% after the company reported an 89% YoY jump in consolidated net profit for Q1 FY26, coming in at Rs 745 crore compared to Rs 394 crore in the same period last year."There are more headwinds than tailwinds for the market now. The major issue weighing on markets is that the expected trade deal between India and the US has not happened so far and the probability of a deal before the August 1 deadline is becoming lower. President Trump's success in reaching deals with Japan and EU, which were advantageous for the US, may further make the US position harder on deal with India," said Dr. VK Vijayakumar, Chief Investment Strategist, Geojit Investments."Sustained FII selling is impacting the market despite the DII buying. It is better to remain in a wait and watch mode," Vijayakumar Matalia, Derivative Analyst at Choice Broking, said, "After a negative opening, Nifty can find support at 24,600 followed by 24,500 and 24,300. On the higher side, 24,800 can be an immediate resistance, followed by 24,900 and 25,000."Asia shares eased on Tuesday while the euro nursed its losses as investors pondered the downside of the U.S.-EU trade deal and the reality that punishing tariffs were here to stay, with unwelcome implications for growth and Nikkei eased 0.8%, while Chinese blue chips fell 0.1%.European shares steadied after Monday's sell-off. EUROSTOXX 50 futures edged up 0.2%, while FTSE futures and DAX futures both added 0.1%. S&P 500 futures nudged up 0.1%, while Nasdaq futures added 0.2%.The selling from Foreign institutional investors (FIIs) extended for the sixth day as they sold equities worth Rs 6,082 crore on July 28, while Domestic institutional investors (DIIs) bought equities worth Rs 6,764 crore on the same day.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
10 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Jane Street to argue that retail demand drove its India options trades
Jane Street Group LLC is expected to argue that its controversial Indian options trades were a response to outsized demand from retail investors, people familiar with the matter said. The trading giant has been working on its defense against market manipulation allegations from the Securities and Exchange Board of India. The regulator in early July alleged Jane Street had taken large positions that artificially influenced prices in the country's stock and futures markets, moving them in favor of its options bets on multiple days. A 105-page order from Sebi detailing its preliminary findings devoted a long section to Jane Street's trading activity on Jan. 17, 2024, which was the firm's most profitable day over a roughly two-year period that the regulator scrutinised. The New York-based firm is expected to argue it was eager to facilitate options bets from the country's retail investors, knowing it would be largely unhedged, said the people familiar with the matter, who asked not to be identified discussing private information. The firm hedged less in India than in other markets and spread out its hedging activity over multiple hours on that day in January 2024 to reduce its market impact, the people said it is likely to explain. On that morning, the NSE Nifty Bank Index dropped 3.2 per cent at the open and fell further during the day. Sebi alleged that Jane Street aggressively bought the index's constituent stocks in the cash and futures markets to manipulate the gauge's intraday levels, then reversed the trades in the afternoon to profit from a much larger bearish index options position. Jane Street is expected to say that high retail demand for options on that index was a key driver behind its trading in the morning, according to the people familiar with the matter. The firm will likely argue that individual traders bought about $4 billion worth of the gauge's stocks using options in the first half hour of trading, and that Jane Street — which was acting as a market maker — facilitated about $1 billion of that demand. Those numbers are based on net delta positions, which represent the value of cash equities the options positions are equivalent to when taking into account the derivatives' sensitivity to the underlying assets' price moves. Partial Hedging Sebi's order said Jane Street's share purchases on that January 2024 morning represented between approximately 16 per cent and 25 per cent of the trading turnover for 10 of the 12 Nifty Bank Index stocks, making the firm by far the single largest net buyer. As Jane Street sold call options and bought puts, it amassed a bearish position that represented 7.3 times the size of its long cash and futures bets, according to the regulator. Jane Street is expected to argue that the high retail options demand created a gap between prices implied by the options and those reflected by the shares, and the firm sought to close it through a standard arbitrage trade, the people familiar said. The retail demand was so large that only 10 per cent of it could have been hedged — partial hedging being a common practice among derivatives market makers internationally, the firm is expected to say. In the afternoon, Jane Street sold the stocks over more than three hours, spreading out its hedging to protect against settlement-price uncertainty as the options were about to expire, also a typical tactic globally, the people said it will argue. Huge Turnover Retail traders' enthusiasm for options has helped turn India into the world's biggest market for listed derivatives by contracts traded, with turnover of more than 300 times that of cash equities. Global trading firms have used their capital and technological edge to profit from that large imbalance, but local investors have cumulatively incurred billions of dollars in losses, leading the regulator to crack down on the trading frenzy. Critics of Jane Street say the sheer size of its positions built up over a short time would have given the firm market-moving power, even if the trades were within regulatory limits. Alexander Gerko, the billionaire founder of rival XTX Markets Ltd., has challenged Jane Street to show that its India trading strategy was 'legit' by proving it would work better after scaling it down by a factor of a 100. 'Any 'normal' strategy works worse as it scales up, due to market impact, unless your strategy IS market impact,' he wrote in a LinkedIn post earlier this month. The regulator's interim order presented serious allegations and a 'compelling narrative,' though it is not certain that Jane Street acted inappropriately based on the initial findings, said Abhiraj Arora, a Mumbai-based partner at law firm Saraf and Partners who once worked at Sebi's surveillance and investigations department. Arora, who isn't involved in the case, said too harsh a crackdown and excessive surveillance of market makers could lead to wider bid-ask spreads, poorer trade execution and increased price swings. The Jane Street case ultimately 'serves as a significant test for India's regulatory framework and its capacity to oversee increasingly complex global trading practices,' he said.
