Mistrial declared in Maradona death case over judge's role in TV series
A new trial will have to start from scratch, with three new judges, in a case already long delayed into Maradona's death in 2020, allegedly due to medical negligence.
Judge Julieta Makintach was forced to step down from the case this week after it emerged she had been involved in a documentary miniseries about the case, potentially breaking a string of ethics rules.
Her colleague, judge Maximiliano Savarino, annulled the trial on Thursday saying Makintach's behavior had "caused prejudice" to proceedings that have already heard hours of painful, sometimes tearful, testimony from witnesses including Maradona's children.
"I am not calm. I am angry. I hate them!" the footballer's daughter Jana Maradona told reporters outside the court Thursday.
Ex-partner Veronica Ojeda described the events as "outrageous."
But she added: "if I have to do it (testify) a thousand times more, I will."
Maradona -- considered one of the world's greatest ever players -- died in November 2020 aged 60 while recovering from brain surgery.
He was found to have died of heart failure and acute pulmonary edema -- a condition where fluid accumulates in the lungs -- two weeks after going under the knife.
His seven-person medical team is on trial over the conditions of his home convalescence, described by prosecutors as grossly negligent.
- 'Divine Justice' -
In a trial that kicked off on March 11, prosecutors alleged the former footballer was abandoned to his fate for a "prolonged, agonizing period" before his death.
Daughter Gianinna Maradona told the court her father was kept in "a dark, ugly and lonely" place and that his carers were more interested in money than his welfare.
Then the proceedings hit a hiccup, with Makintach coming under scrutiny over alleged unauthorized filming.
She denied any wrongdoing, but after police raids and a week-long suspension of proceedings, evidence came to light that brought the 47-year-old judge's conduct into question.
A trailer for a TV show dubbed "Divine Justice" was played in court Tuesday, showing Makintach stalking the halls of justice in high heels as grim details of the footballing hero's demise were relayed.
The footage, which sparked an uproar, appeared to contain unauthorized recordings made inside the court, and showed Makintach being interviewed on camera.
Makintach has been suspended from her duties and is being investigated by a judicial disciplinary body, accused of violating impartiality requirements, influence peddling and possibly even bribery.
The prosecution, the complainants and most of the defense lawyers had asked for a new panel of judges to be appointed and the trial restarted.
No date has been set, but the prosecution has said it hopes for a restart this year.
Any possible appeals could delay the resumption of proceedings, for which judges will be chosen by an internal court lottery.
Maradona's caregivers risk prison terms of between eight and 25 years if convicted of "homicide with possible intent" -- pursuing a course of action despite knowing it could lead to his death.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
24-07-2025
- France 24
Google ordered to pay Argentine pictured naked in his yard
The policeman had sought payment from the internet giant for harm to his dignity, arguing he was behind a two-meter (6.6-foot) wall when a Google camera captured him in the buff, from behind, in small-town Argentina in 2017. His house number and street name were also laid bare, broadcast on Argentine TV covering the story, and shared widely on social media. The man claimed the invasion exposed him to ridicule at work and among his neighbors. Another court last year dismissed the man's claim for damages, ruling he only had himself to blame for "walking around in inappropriate conditions in the garden of his home." Google, for its part, claimed the perimeter wall was not high enough. Appeals judges, however, concluded the man's dignity had been flagrantly violated, and awarded him an amount in Argentine pesos equivalent to about $12,500, payable by Google. "This involves an image of a person that was not captured in a public space but within the confines of their home, behind a fence taller than the average-sized person. The invasion of privacy... is blatant," they wrote. The judges said "there is no doubt that in this case there was an arbitrary intrusion into another's life." And they found there was "no justification for (Google) to evade responsibility for this serious error that involved an intrusion into the plaintiff's house, within his private domain, undermining his dignity. "No one wants to appear exposed to the world as the day they were born." The judges pointed to Google's policy of blurring the faces and license plates of people and vehicles photographed for Street View as evidence it was aware of a duty to avoid harm to third parties. But in this case, "it was not his face that was visible but his entire naked body, an image that should also have been prevented."
France 24
27-06-2025
- France 24
Argentina to put 10 accused in 1994 bombing on trial in absentia
An Argentine judge on Thursday ordered that 10 Iranian and Lebanese nationals be tried in absentia over their alleged role in in the 1994 bombing of a Jewish community center in Buenos Aires that killed 85 people. The attack, which caused devastation in Latin America's biggest Jewish community, has never been claimed or solved, but Argentina and Israel have long suspected Lebanon's Shiite Hezbollah group of carrying it out at Iran's request. In his ruling Thursday, which was seen by AFP, Judge Daniel Rafecas acknowledged the "exceptional" nature of the decision to send the case to court over three decades after the bombing, with the suspects all still at large. Trying them in absentia, he said, allowed to "at least try to uncover the truth and reconstruct what happened." On July 18, 1994, a man drove a van packed with explosives into the seven-storey Argentine Israelite Mutual Association (AMIA) building. Argentine authorities named the suicide bomber as Lebanese Hezbollah militant Ibrahim Hussein Berro. Besides the 85 fatalities, the deadliest attack in Argentina's history injured more than 300 people. No one has ever been arrested over the attack. The 10 suspects facing trial are former Iranian and Lebanese ministers and diplomats, most of whom have been the subject of Argentine arrest warrants since 2006. Since 2006 Argentina had sought the arrest of eight Iranians, including then-president Ali Akbar Hashemi Bahramaie Rafsanjani, who died in 2017. Iran has always denied any involvement and refused to extradite the suspects. Thursday's ruling on trying them in absentia is the first of its kind in the South American country. Until March this year, the country's laws did not allow for suspects to be tried unless they were physically present. It comes amid a new push from Argentina's 300,000-strong Jewish community for justice to be served over the attack, backed by President Javier Milei, a staunch ally of Israel. Judge Rafecas said a trial in absentia was both justified, given the "material impossibility of securing the presence of the defendants," and necessary, to "prevent perpetual immunity" for those responsible. His ruling can be appealed to Argentina's Federal Court. The accused include former Iranian foreign minister Ali Akbar Velayati, who has called the allegations of his involvement "lies," and former interior minister Ahmad Vahidi, former Intelligence Minister Ali Fallahian and former ambassador to Argentina Hadi Soleimanpour. While the AMIA has in the past supported a trial in absentia, an association of the victims' families had previously opposed the idea, saying it feared it would merely serve to "close the case without truth and without justice." Neither AMIA nor the association were available for comment on Thursday. Nixed nuclear deal In April 2024, an Argentine court blamed Hezbollah for the attack, which it called a crime against humanity. It found that the attack and another on the Israeli embassy in 1992 that killed 29 people were likely triggered by the Argentine government under then-president Carlos Menem canceling three contracts with Iran for the supply of nuclear equipment and technology. The court did not however manage to produce evidence of Iran's involvement. The Inter-American Court of Human Rights in San Jose, Costa Rica last year found the Argentine state responsible for not preventing, nor properly investigating, the attack. It also blamed the state for efforts to "cover up and obstruct the investigation." Former president Cristina Kirchner has been ordered to stand trial over a memorandum she signed with Iran in 2013 to investigate the bombing. The memorandum, which was never implemented, allowed for suspects to be interrogated in Iran rather than Argentina, leading Kirchner to be accused of conspiring with Tehran in a cover-up. She has denied the charges which were brought by prosecutor Alberto Nisman who was found dead in at his home in 2015 in which a court later ruled was a murder. No one was ever charged over his death.
France 24
25-06-2025
- France 24
FIFA launch probe into Rudiger racism allegation
The incident came towards the end of the game between the two teams at the Club World Cup on Sunday. "Following an assessment of the match reports, the FIFA Disciplinary Committee has opened proceedings against CF Pachuca player Gustavo Cabral in relation to the incident involving him and Real Madrid's Antonio Rudiger during the FIFA Club World Cup game played in Charlotte on 22 June," FIFA said on Tuesday. Rudiger was visibly angered following an exchange of words with Argentine Cabral and spoke to Brazilian referee Ramon Abatti Abel. Cabral denied he had racially abused the German centre-back. Asked about the incident in the post-match press conference, Real Madrid coach Xabi Alonso said: "In football there is no tolerance for this, and if it happened, then measures should be taken. This is what Antonio has told us and we believe him. It's being investigated now". Cabral, 39, spoke after the game and said his words had been misinterpreted by Rudiger. The Argentine said he had called the defender a "coward", with the Spanish phrase he used similar to another which is linked to racist abuse. "The referee made the racism sign but I was telling him the same thing the whole time -- (coward)," said Cabral. © 2025 AFP
