logo
The countries that could solve Britain's health crisis, according to a professor

The countries that could solve Britain's health crisis, according to a professor

Telegraph05-06-2025
When Devi Sridhar was a child, her father, an oncologist, would show her pictures of cancer patients' blackened hearts, livers and lungs as a warning not to smoke. The slides, projected on the walls of her family home in Miami, were enough to put Sridhar and her four siblings off the habit for good. But their father was diagnosed with lymphoma when Sridhar was 12 years old, despite living a healthy life. She got used to a 'crossroads' of good or bad news at every blood test or screening. When he died, at just 49, Sridhar didn't eat for months.
Sridhar left school early, graduated from the University of Miami with a medical degree at 18, and went on to be awarded a Rhodes scholarship to Oxford for a PhD in anthropology. She became Prof Sridhar in 2014, when she joined the University of Edinburgh and set up its global health governance programme. Prof Sridhar was one of the first experts to warn that Covid was coming to Britain – in January 2020 – and later advised the Scottish government on its Covid strategy, while she went to fitness boot camps in a local park every day and qualified as a personal trainer. And then, one morning, she got a phone call as she rode the bus to work. A routine smear test had come back showing signs of high-risk HPV, and changes to her cervix. It was 'possibly cancer'.
At home in Miami, Prof Sridhar would have been staring down the barrel of huge hospital fees and debt. In Britain, extensive NHS waiting lists meant that the changes to her cervix might not be treated quickly enough to prevent their development. In India, where her parents were born, and where there were no routine cervical cancer screenings, perhaps it never would have been caught 'until it was in an advanced stage,' says Prof Sridhar, two years on.
There was no date given for a follow-up consultation, so Prof Sridhar phoned local clinics to ask whether there were any cancelled appointments she could attend. Two months later she secured a slot. Her abnormal cells were frozen, she was given an HPV vaccine to boost her immune response, and now she's cancer-free. It turned a fact that she had always known – that our health is always influenced more by the countries we live in than it is by our lifestyles – into a concrete reality.
'You can bubble yourself off individually,' with a good diet, exercise, air purifiers and water filters, 'but at the end of the day, you're all in it together,' Prof Sridhar says. That's the theme of her latest book, How Not to Die (Too Soon): The Lies We've Been Sold and the Policies That Can Save Us. From her perspective as a global health expert, trying to live for longer is less about changing our own habits and more about realising that 'if I moved to a blue zone, I would probably be doing all the same that people there already do, and I wouldn't be thinking about it,' she explains.
Britain 'leads the world in reducing gun violence' and in bringing down smoking rates, but there remains much that we could learn from how things are done elsewhere in the world, says Prof Sridhar. Here is what she knows.
Exercising like the Dutch
The Netherlands is famous for the bike networks that span its cities. It would be easy to think that the Dutch love to cycle as a part of their culture, but bike lanes originally came about in the 1970s. In 1971, a Dutch girl called Simone Langenhoff was killed as she cycled to school, one of 450 children who died in road traffic accidents that year alone. Her father led a campaign to widen access to safe cycle routes. Now, there are 22,000 miles of cycle paths across the country, and by 2015, a quarter of all trips in the country were made by bike.
As a result, getting exercise while you travel to work or to see friends is the default. Almost all Dutch people cycle, and 'only 4 per cent of people don't get the recommended daily amount of exercise,' says Prof Sridhar. This makes it the most fit country in the world, in terms of the amount of exercise people get per week on average.
We pale in comparison here in Britain, where one in three men and 40 per cent of women are physically inactive. We have cycle lanes in our cities too, but making people want to use them is another issue. 'If you make walking or cycling safe, people will generally choose it, but people don't feel safe if they're too close to vehicles,' says Prof Sridhar. 'For women, it's often about whether a road is well-lit. We need to think through the barriers and how to tackle them, instead of telling people that their concerns aren't valid.'
Prof Sridhar points to Paris as a city where Dutch-style changes are well underway. 'When they created physically separate lanes for cycling, not just a little painted path, the number of women cycling went up radically,' she says.
Prof Sridhar would like to see the same in Britain, but first we need an attitude shift, she says. All of us around the world are inherently lazy – if we don't have to exercise, then we often won't. She wishes that the messaging from the government was that 'something is better than nothing,' she says. 'Even as a personal trainer, I struggle to get to the gym for an hour some days, but if I can manage a twenty minute walk, I'll do it, because that's much better than nothing at all.'
Eating like the Japanese
British adults get more than half of their daily calorie intake each day from ultra-processed foods (UPFs), a situation that has been tied to increased rates of obesity, cardiovascular disease and colorectal cancer. 'But Britain isn't fatter than people in countries like Japan because we're more stupid, or because we're lazy, or because we don't buy enough diet books,' says Prof Sridhar. It's all about the availability of healthy food – and the habits we learn as we grow up.
Prof Sridhar has adapted her own diet to be more similar to what people traditionally eat in Okinawa, a subtropical region of Japan where people are twice as likely to live to 100 as they are in the rest of the country. 'The main carb in the Okinawan diet is sweet potato,' Prof Sridhar says, which is packed with fibre and micronutrients. Then there's the practice of 'only eating until you're 80 per cent full,' as opposed to the culture of 'finishing everything on your plate' that Prof Sridhar (and most of us) grew up with.
But even if all of us in Britain knew about its benefits, that wouldn't be enough to keep us healthy. 'If I had a magic wand and could do one thing, it would be to change school meals in Britain, so that at least all kids are getting one really great nutritious meal a day,' Prof Sridhar says. Adolescents in Britain get closer to two thirds of their calorie intake from UPFs, as they're cheaper to mass produce and serve. It's a situation that sets us up to eat badly for life – and shows us how obesity is a nationwide problem, not the fault of individual people.
'We know that eating fruits and vegetables with healthier proteins is more expensive, so there are arguments against subsidising them to be cheaper or changing school meals. But you'll pay either way,' says Prof Sridhar. 'If someone gets Type 2 diabetes at age 19, they'll need support from the NHS for the rest of their life. In the end, they're the same budgets, because it's all taxpayer-funded and supported.'
Creating a healthcare system like the Finnish
In Britain, life expectancy has been in decline since 2011. In Finland, however, life expectancy has risen by around two years since then for both sexes, and things are only set to get better: by 2070, the average Finnish man should expect to live to 89. Mortality from treatable conditions is lower than the EU average, too. This is a sure sign that Finland has got it right when it comes to healthcare, Prof Sridhar says, as is the fact that cancer survival rates are among the best in Europe.
'When you're diagnosed with cancer, the faster you get access to treatment, the more likely you are to survive. Part of the reason Britain struggles with this is that we can't get treatment within the 60 days, or 30 days, whatever the crucial window is for the particular cancer that you have,' she explains.
The big difference is that Finland's health system is built around prevention, says Prof Sridhar. 'With the NHS, we often wait for someone to have a heart attack before we wonder how to save them. Instead, we should look at whether that person knew they were at risk of heart attack. Did they know their blood pressure? Did they know their adiposity levels around their abdomen? It would help if we shifted our thinking and implemented screenings earlier on.'
The way to do that is through tax, Prof Sridhar says. 'In Finland, they've done very well to reduce inequality. Capitalism exists, and it's accepted that some people will have nicer lives than others, but there comes a point where you're deemed to have enough. In Britain, there are billionaires and multi-millionaires that pay less tax than an NHS nurse, because of how the system works. We could tax those people properly, and have a healthier society where everyone does better, without putting the onus on normal working people.'
Cleaning up our water and air like the Swiss
Zurich, in Switzerland, is the least polluted city in the world. It wasn't always that way. In 2010, the city's air was badly polluted, a result of traffic as well as wood-burning for heat in the winter. The city committed to lowering its emissions, which meant reducing the amount of journeys people took by car.
Here, as in many countries with cleaner air, 'the message has been about connecting diesel and the danger from air pollution to your health and the health of your loved ones, rather than the environment,' says Prof Sridhar. 'Changing your car is really expensive. Helping people to realise that children who breathe polluted air are more likely to have asthma, and will have changes in their brain, makes it easier for them to take action.'
Switzerland also has some of the cleanest tap water in the world, along with Germany. In England, we've 'become worse at separating sewage from the water supply,' says Prof Sridhar. When it comes to fixing that, however, we needn't look so far for answers.
'Scotland has some of the cleanest and best-tasting water in the world, while in England, water quality has declined,' says Prof Sridhar. 'The difference is that in Scotland, our water is publicly owned. When things go wrong, we're able to hold water companies accountable, because the shareholders are people who live here. In England, where water is private and the companies are owned by people overseas, that's much harder to do.'
Ageing well like India
Prof Sridhar's Nani, her maternal grandmother, lives in Chennai, a big city in the east of India. At 92, she stays active, eats a simple plant-based diet, and has a good social life. She lives independently and can still get about well. 'She hasn't fought ageing, or tried to look younger,' Prof Sridhar says.
Prof Sridhar's grandmother has inspired her to pursue 'functional health' rather than attempting to look a certain way. Doing squats and staying flexible is important 'because one day, those are the things that will help you to go to the bathroom on your own,' she says. 'My grandmother would never in a million years say that she's sporty, and it would be helpful to move away from those categories in Britain too,' says Prof Sridhar. It's another change that could start in schools, where at the moment, 'people can feel that they're un-sporty, so can't participate'.
India has its own challenges with getting its population to move more – 'people have often had to work hard and move all of their lives just to get food and water, so why would they move in their leisure time?', Prof Sridhar points out – 'but there are fewer care homes in India as well as in Japan, so someone like my grandmother is able to stay living independently for longer, because you can stay in your community for longer'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

First doctors in UK to graduate through part-time study celebrate
First doctors in UK to graduate through part-time study celebrate

Glasgow Times

time7 minutes ago

  • Glasgow Times

First doctors in UK to graduate through part-time study celebrate

The University of Edinburgh group has completed an 'innovative' five-year programme, known as HCP-Med for Healthcare Professionals, which aims to offer people already working in health the flexibility to become doctors. It is open exclusively to existing healthcare professionals, clinical scientists and veterinary surgeons living and working in Scotland. The course has been designed to address the increasing demand on the healthcare workforce in Scotland and has a strong emphasis on GP placements. Graduate Calum MacDonald with his wife Debbie and daughter Freya (Douglas Robertson/PA) The first three years of the undergraduate course are conducted part-time and mainly online, so that students can study in their own time while balancing work and other commitments. After completing their remote studies, students then join the university's full-time undergraduate medical programme for the final two years and carry out a range of clinical placements in GP practice and hospital wards. Dr Jen Kennedy, programme director HCP-MED, said: 'We have lots of incredibly talented people working within the NHS in Scotland who may have missed the traditional route to become doctors. 'By creating this new pathway and widening access to medical degrees, we are able to nurture their talent and use their valuable experience to enhance the healthcare workforce.' Calum MacDonald, who started his career as a staff nurse in an intensive care unit in Glasgow, is part of the first cohort of students who graduated from the programme on Saturday. His experience working in intensive care and subsequent training to become an advanced critical care practitioner, a role he has held since 2016, led him to consider a career as a doctor. He became a father in his second year of the course and the programme enabled him to stay in Glasgow and balance work with part time study and family life. Now a newly qualified doctor, he has secured a foundation post in Glasgow and will rotate across seven specialties. He said: 'I'm very proud to fly the flag for the HCP-Med programme – it's been a challenging but incredibly rewarding journey. 'Being able to continue working as a nurse while studying medicine was a huge financial incentive. I am delighted to be graduating today and am excited to start my placement as a junior doctor in Glasgow.' He is considering specialising in anaesthetics or general practice. Alongside the part-time study, students receive full funding from the Scottish Funding Council which the university said makes it an attractive route to retrain for those already working within the healthcare industry. Professor David Kluth, head of Edinburgh Medical School, said: 'I am very proud that Edinburgh is the first university in the UK to offer this innovative part-time programme. 'We are committed to doing all we can to empower individuals to reach their full potential and to widen access to medicine for future generations. 'The students on this programme bring with them a rich diversity of backgrounds, experiences and skills – from prior careers to lived experience of the communities they will serve. 'This breadth of talent and perspective is vital in building a more inclusive, adaptable, and effective medical workforce for Scotland.'

Starmer must protect Reeves zealously now. If she falls, so does he
Starmer must protect Reeves zealously now. If she falls, so does he

Times

time19 minutes ago

  • Times

Starmer must protect Reeves zealously now. If she falls, so does he

Colleagues have compared Sir Keir Starmer to a tank: he powers on, under attack, even when the government seems to be falling apart around him. After a disastrous week when he was outmanoeuvred by his own MPs and forced into a humiliating retreat over welfare reform, Starmer was in full tank-like mode on Wednesday, at prime minister's questions, as he moved inexorably towards the line of fire. He was oblivious to the plight of Rachel Reeves, his chancellor, on the benches behind him. The 8.30am meeting in Downing Street does not take place on those Wednesday mornings when Starmer is preparing for PMQs. But No 10 had been made aware that 'something had happened at home' that morning and Reeves was upset. 'In normal circumstances,' I was told by a senior aide, 'she would have taken the day off.' These were not normal circumstances: had Reeves failed to appear in the chamber, after the collapse of the government's flagship welfare reform programme, speculation about her future would have been even more febrile. She knew that, and so did Starmer. Reeves was upset about a personal matter, but she was also under enormous strain: Britain's first female chancellor had become a 'lightning rod' for much of the dismay and anger directed at the government. Farmers, businesses, the disabled, pensioners, red wall MPs, Blairites — the chancellor had angered them all during her year at the Treasury. She seemed increasingly isolated and was being blamed inside the parliamentary party, even more than Starmer, for the welfare shambles. 'A chancellor is at their most exposed when they are taking money away,' Morgan McSweeney, Starmer's chief of staff, has told colleagues by way of explanation for the troubles of Reeves, whom he supports. • Janice Turner: Rachel Reeves's tears were ours after a year of Keir Starmer Reeves prides herself on being an 'iron chancellor', austere, unyielding, committed to her fiscal rules and pre-election pledges not to raise taxes on income and VAT or increase employee's national insurance. She is fearful of the power of the bond market, and, as she always says to me, 'I don't want to take risks with people's mortgages.' She was pleased with how her multi-year spending review had been received. 'The spending review was the best day I've worked in politics in 20 years,' McSweeney said, 'because it was the day we made more announcements on the things we're doing to change people's lives.' Since then the U-turns on the winter fuel allowance, which Reeves had unilaterally removed from most pensioners under instruction from the Treasury during a period early in the parliament when she and other senior ministers had complete autonomy, and the rebellion against welfare reform had weakened her authority. Worse, they had blown a £5 billion hole in the public finances. And here she was in the chamber, brutally exposed, in all her vulnerability and desperation. It seemed, at first, as if she was already mourning the end of her chancellorship. Kemi Badenoch had seen what Starmer had not: that Reeves, her eyes swollen as tears rolled down her cheeks, was distressed. Did the chancellor have the prime minister's full support, Badenoch asked, her eyes shining with malign intent. The tank powered straight into the trap set for him. Starmer is not a nimble performer or fluent speaker, nor respected for his emotional intelligence and empathy. This was the moment to declare total support for the chancellor, the loneliest politician in Britain. Instead he made a feeble joke about Badenoch's precarious position in her own party. Outside the chamber McSweeney was being inundated with messages from contacts in business who assumed Reeves had been fired or was due to resign. The markets responded to the spectacle of the chancellor's misery: sterling weakened and the yield on ten-year government bonds, or gilts, rose by the most in one day since the debacle of Liz Truss's mini budget in autumn 2022. Starmer was compelled to respond. That evening he gave a BBC interview confirming what he had neglected to say in the chamber: that Reeves would be chancellor 'for many years'. The next day they hugged in front of the cameras at the launch of the government's NHS ten-year plan, and Wes Streeting, the health secretary, rallied to her side in a buccaneering speech. The markets stabilised, and paradoxically Reeves ended the week strengthened: Starmer's support for her was now unequivocal and No 10 was briefing that she commanded the full confidence of the markets because of her fiscal rules and authority. You couldn't make it up. Last week at Westminster was politics at its most raw and unforgiving and it was deeply revealing about the state of the government and the failings of Starmer's leadership. Reeves likes to project an image of strength, which leads to a certain coldness in public performance. On numerous occasions she has said to me: 'I have been underestimated all my life.' It's as if she is continuously trying to fight impostor syndrome and prove her detractors wrong — one of whom, Maurice Glasman, the blue Labour peer, has dismissed her as a 'just a drone for the Treasury'. I first met Reeves when she was a parliamentary candidate (she was elected in 2010), and even then Labour people — she was already close to Gordon Brown and Ed Miliband — were talking about her as a future chancellor. As an Oxford graduate she had the choice of joining either Goldman Sachs or the Bank of England. She chose the latter because she believed her destiny was to enter politics. Over the years, in our many conversations, I've always had the sense that Reeves was conflicted and had slight class and intellectual insecurities. I've written before about this doubleness, what I call Rachel 1 and Rachel 2, the former being the restless economist interested in ideas and political economy and the latter the cautious automaton beholden to Treasury orthodoxy. She is not a moral missionary like Gordon Brown but is a product of the Labour Party. The party has nurtured and encouraged her, created the conditions for her rise, which is why it hurts her so much to know that members have turned against her, and that fellow MPs direct much of the blame at her for the government's struggles. They lament what they perceive to be her lack of compassion for pensioners, the disabled and families with more than two children. These charges are unfair and wound Reeves deeply. • My Week: Sir Keir Starmer Starmer, by contrast, comes from outside the party: as a career lawyer he does not relish the game at Westminster, he is bored by arcane Labour rules and procedures and he doesn't even enjoy mixing with MPs, which is why he messed up so spectacularly over welfare reform. The work had not been done, the preparation with MPs not made. After an appalling week for Labour, No 10 advisers now speak of having reached a 'fork in the road': tax rises will follow in the autumn, the soft left will demand the wealthy are targeted and Starmer will be urged to tell a more convincing story about the purpose of his government, as if he hadn't had enough time to do so already. After the events of recent days, what is clear is that he and Reeves are bound inextricably together: if she fails, so does he. Meanwhile, Angela Rayner, unscathed by the debacle, watches and waits, her power enhanced.

Kent County Council leader calls for quicker asylum decisions
Kent County Council leader calls for quicker asylum decisions

BBC News

time32 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Kent County Council leader calls for quicker asylum decisions

The leader of Kent County Council (KCC) has called on the Home Secretary for quicker decisions to be made on asylum cases to limit the financial impact on the Linden Kemkaran's open letter to Yvette Cooper she said she was concerned to hear processing asylum claims for unaccompanied asylum-seeking (UAS) children who turned 18 was "still far too slow".She says it means Kent "continues to shoulder the burden of fully supporting them until a determination is made".The Home Office said it had given KCC "significant funding" to allow the authority to refurbish and obtain more accommodation for UAS children. Kemkaran said: "You will be aware that even in ideal circumstances, government funding for 18+ adults who were previously UAS children is woefully inadequate for us to meet our duties to them as care leavers."But in the absence of an immigration decision, all their support needs for housing and subsistence fall on the Kent taxpayer. "This is not a situation which I or my administration are prepared to tolerate."She says a quicker decision on cases would "reduce the burden on the taxpayer, open access to training, work and housing, and significantly reduce the burden on the state generally". Kemkaran also suggested that that the government could fund adults without an immigration decision, that were previously UAS children, at the same rate as under-18s, which she said was £143 per day."This would ensure that councils such as mine are not left out of pocket as a result of delays completely outside of our making or control," she Home Office said the safety and welfare of unaccompanied children arriving from abroad was a statutory duty and that it had to provide care placements for them, which required involvement from local authorities.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store