Analysis: Timeline suggests Trump team changed its tune on Epstein files after Trump was told he was in them
We've known the two men had a relationship dating back decades, and we've seen Trump's name appear in various previously released Epstein-related materials. Being in the documents isn't proof of any wrongdoing.
But the news is significant in another way: It adds to questions about precisely why the administration changed its tune on the Epstein files.
That doesn't mean there's been a cover-up of any actual Epstein-related misconduct by Trump; there remains no real evidence of that. But the administration clearly started downplaying the Epstein information – in a rather abrupt shift – around the same time Trump was told his name appeared in the files.
What's more, sources familiar with the review told CNN the files appeared to include several unsubstantiated claims about Trump and others that the Justice Department found not to be credible.
In other words, extensive disclosures could have at least created problems for Trump. And the administration appeared to abruptly move away from such disclosures.
We'll get to the full timeline in a second. But a few key things stand out:
While we don't know the precise date in May that Bondi briefed Trump, the efforts to downplay Epstein conspiracy theories and previous promises for disclosure really kicked off on May 18, when top FBI officials Kash Patel and Dan Bongino appeared together on Fox News and suddenly said Epstein had indeed died by suicide.
News of that May briefing contradicts Trump's claim from July 15 that Bondi hadn't told him he was in the files. When asked, Trump told reporters: 'No, no, she's given us just a very quick briefing.' If this is a nothingburger, why hide that?
Elon Musk's later-deleted claim that Trump wasn't releasing the Epstein files because he was in them was lodged June 5, after the May briefing.
Trump's recently launched, baseless claims that powerful Democrats 'made up' the Epstein files would fit with his tendency to deflect and distract when there's something he doesn't want out there.
Prior to May, the administration had repeatedly promised extensive disclosures. Bondi in early March said Americans would 'get the full Epstein files,' subject to some redactions, and that 'everything's going to come out to the public.' Trump said on April 22 that '100% of all of these documents are being delivered.' But by late May and early June, Patel and Bongino for the first time indicated there wasn't much to the information and walked back those promises. On May 29, Bongino suggested it amounted to 'nothing.' On June 4, he downplayed the case as a 'hot potato for folks.' On June 6, Patel went further than the administration had before in suggesting disclosures would be limited to avoid re-victimizing people, saying, 'Not doing it. You want to hate me for it, fine.' The administration ultimately did not release substantial new documents, saying in its July 7 memo that it 'found no basis to revisit the disclosure of those materials' and citing how many of them were under court seal.
The administration did hype the files in one big way in early May. Bondi said on May 7 that the information included 'tens of thousands of videos of Epstein with children or child porn.' By June 6, Patel appeared to walk back Bondi's claim. The DOJ's memo a month later did not back it up.
And now, the full timeline.
Feb. 21: Attorney General Pam Bondi is asked by Fox News about an Epstein 'client list,' and she responds by saying that it's 'sitting on my desk right now to review.' (The administration has since claimed she was referring to other documents.)
Feb. 26: Bondi on Fox hypes a release of documents set for the following day, calling it 'breaking news,' and saying it will include 'a lot of information.'
Feb. 27: The White House invites right-wing social media influencers to the White House and gives them binders of Epstein-related documents. But the documents are mostly old news, and some influencers cry foul.
March 1: Bondi tells Fox that Americans will 'get the full Epstein files,' subject to redactions to 'protect grand jury information and confidential witnesses.'
March 3: Bondi tells Fox's Sean Hannity that DOJ has received a new 'truckload of evidence' from the FBI. She adds that 'everything's going to come out to the public.'
March 14: Bondi repeats on Fox Business Network that she has received a new 'truckload of documents.' She adds that 'we will get out as much as we can, as fast as we can, to the American people, because they deserve to know.'
March 23: Bondi tells Fox News that 'we are releasing all of these documents as soon as we can get them redacted to protect the victims …'
April 22: President Donald Trump is asked in the Oval Office about when the Epstein files will be released and says, '100% of all of these documents are being delivered.'
May 7: Bondi claims there are 'tens of thousands of videos of Epstein with children or child porn.' Her public claim comes shortly before the release of a secretly recorded video in which she made a similar claim.
Sometime in May: Bondi briefs Trump about the Epstein files and tells him his name appears in them, among several other high-profile figures, CNN has confirmed. The files appeared to include several unsubstantiated claims, including about Trump, that the DOJ found to be not credible, sources said. (The precise date of this briefing isn't clear, but White House officials noted Wednesday that Trump's name was already in the binders Bondi handed out earlier this year.)
May 18: For the first time, the administration begins downplaying the Epstein conspiracy theories. FBI Director Kash Patel and Deputy Director Dan Bongino appear together on Fox News and say Epstein indeed died by suicide. This despite both of them having promoted the conspiracy theories before joining the FBI.
May 19: White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt says the administration is 'committed to releasing those files,' but defers to the Justice Department on timing.
May 29: Bongino on Fox again downplays the significance of what will soon be released. 'There is nothing in the file at this point on the Epstein case,' he says. 'And there's going to be a disclosure on this coming shortly.' He says the administration will release video of the jail on the day of Epstein's death that backs up that assertion.
June 4: Bongino is pressed on Hannity's show about the lack of Epstein disclosures. He downplays the case as a 'hot potato for folks' and then alludes to his own evolution on the subject: 'I'm not paid for my opinions anymore. I work for the taxpayer now. I'm paid on evidence. That's it.'
June 5: Elon Musk claims while lashing out at Trump that the 'real reason' the president is not releasing the Epstein files is because '@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files.' He provides no evidence for his claims and later deletes the post, while expressing regret for some of the things he said about Trump.
June 6: Patel appears on Joe Rogan's podcast and downplays the looming disclosures again. 'We're gonna give you everything we can,' Patel says, before adding that 'we're not gonna re-victimize women. We're not going to put that sh*t back out there. It's not happening, because then he wins. Not doing it. You want to hate me for it, fine.'
Patel also appears to contradict Bondi's claim about 'tens of thousands of videos of Epstein with children or child porn,' telling Rogan the videos from Epstein's island are 'not of what you want.'
July 6: Axios breaks the news that the DOJ has officially concluded that Epstein died by suicide and there was no 'client list,' despite Bondi's comments in February.
July 7: The DOJ releases an unsigned memo laying out these conclusions. DOJ says it won't release any further documents because much of it is under court-ordered seal. 'Through this review, we found no basis to revisit the disclosure of those materials and will not permit the release of child pornography,' the memo says.
The memo also undercuts Bondi's claims of 'tens of thousands of videos' of Epstein 'with children or child porn.'
July 8: Trump for the first time lashes out at people still asking questions about Epstein, calling those questions a 'desecration.' He tells reporters: 'Are you still talking about Jeffrey Epstein? This guy's been talked about for years.' He cites recent deadly floods in Texas and adds: 'I mean, I can't believe you're asking a question on Epstein at a time like this.' The president will go on to make similar comments over the next two weeks, including baselessly suggesting various powerful Democrats are behind the Epstein files.
July 15: Trump is asked about whether Bondi told him his name was in the files and denies it. 'No, no, she's given us just a very quick briefing and – in terms of the credibility of the different things that they've seen,' he says.
July 23: We learn Trump is indeed in the files.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The winners and losers in US-EU trade deal
The US and EU have struck what is being billed as the largest trade deal in history, after talks in Scotland. It actually resembles the framework for an agreement rather than a full trade deal, with details still unclear. But the headline figures announced by President Donald Trump and EU chief Ursula von der Leyen do offer clues about which sectors and groups could be hit hardest or have most to gain. Follow reaction live Trump - winner After promising new trade deals with dozens of countries, Trump has just landed the biggest of them all. It looks to most commentators that the EU has given up more, with instant analysis by Capital Economics suggesting a 0.5% knock to GDP. There will also be tens of billions of dollars pouring into US coffers in import taxes. But the glowing headlines for Trump may not last long if a slew of economic data due later this week show that his radical reshaping of the US economy is backfiring. Figures on inflation, jobs, growth and consumer confidence will give a clearer picture on whether Trump's tariffs are delivering pain or gain. US consumers - loser Ordinary Americans are already aggrieved at the increased cost of living and this deal could add to the burden by hiking prices on EU goods. While not as steep as it could have been, the hurdle represented by a 15% tariff rate is still significant, and it is far more pronounced than the obstacles that existed before Trump returned to office. Tariffs are taxes charged on goods bought from other countries. Typically, they are a percentage of a product's value. So, a 15% tariff means that a $100 product imported to the US from the EU will have a $15 dollar tax added on top - taking the total cost to the importer to $115. Companies who bring foreign goods into the US have to pay the tax to the government, and they often pass some or all of the extra cost on to customers. Markets - winner Stock markets in Asia and Europe rose on Monday after news emerged of the deal framework. Under the framework, the US will levy a 15% tariff on goods imported from the EU. While this rate is significant, it is less than what it could have been and at least offers certainty for investors. The agreement is "clearly market-friendly, and should put further upside potential into the euro", Chris Weston at Pepperstone, an Australian broker, told AFP. European solidarity - loser The deal will need to be signed off by all 27 members of the EU, each of which have differing interests and levels of reliance on the export of goods to the US. While some members have given the agreement a cautious welcome, others have been critical - hinting at divisions within the bloc, which is also trying to respond to other crises such as the ongoing war in Ukraine. A big Trump win but not total defeat for Brussels French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou commented: "It is a dark day when an alliance of free peoples, brought together to affirm their common values and to defend their common interests, resigns itself to submission." He was joined by at least two other French government ministers as well as Viktor Orban, the Hungarian leader, who said that Trump "ate von der Leyen for breakfast". Carmakers in Germany - loser The tariff faced by importers bringing EU cars to the US has been nearly halved, from the rate of 27.5% that was imposed by Trump in April to a new rate of 15%. Cars are one of the EU's top exports to the US. And as the largest manufacturer of cars in the EU - thanks to VW, Mercedes and BMW - Germany will have been watching closely. Its leader, Friedrich Merz, has welcomed the new pact, while admitting that he would have welcomed a "further easing of transatlantic trade". That downbeat sentiment was echoed by the German carmaking trade body, the VDA, which warned that even a rate of 15% would "cost the German automotive industry billions annually". Carmakers in the US - winner Trump is trying to boost US vehicle production. American carmakers received a boost when they learned that the EU was dropping its own tariff on US-made cars from 10% to 2.5%. Theoretically that could result in more American cars being bought in Europe. That could be good for US sales overseas, but the pact is not all good news when it comes to domestic sales. That is down to the complex way that American cars are put together. Many of them are actually assembled abroad - in Canada and Mexico - and Trump subjects them to a tariff of 25% when they are brought into the US. That compares with a lower tariff rate of 15% on EU vehicles. So US car makers may now fear being undercut by European manufacturers. EU pharmaceuticals - loser There is confusion around the tariff rate that will be levied on European-made drugs being bought in the US. The EU wants drugs to be subject to the lowest rate possible, to benefit sales. Trump said pharmaceuticals were not covered by the deal announced on Sunday, under which the rate on a number of products was lowered to 15%. But von der Leyen said they were included, and a White House source confirmed the same to the BBC. Either scenario will represent disappointment for European pharma, which initially hoped for a total tariffs exemption. The industry currently enjoys high exposure to the US marketplace thanks to products like Ozempic, a star type-2 diabetes drug made in Denmark. This has been highlighted in Ireland, where opposition parties have pointed out the importance of the industry and criticised the damaging effect of uncertainty. Ireland 'not celebrating' Trump's EU deal US energy - winner Trump said the EU will purchase $750bn (£558bn, €638bn) in US energy, in addition to increasing overall investment in the US by $600bn. "We will replace Russian gas and oil with significant purchases of US LNG [liquified natural gas], oil and nuclear fuels," said Von der Leyen. This will deepen links between European energy security and the US at a time when it has been pivoting away from importing Russian gas since its full-scale invasion of Ukraine. Aviation industry in EU and US - winner Von der Leyen said that some "strategic products" will not attract any tariffs, including aircraft and plane parts, certain chemicals and some agricultural products. That means firms making components for aeroplanes will have friction-free trade between the huge trading blocs. She added that the EU still hoped to get more "zero-for-zero" agreements, notably for wines and spirits, in the coming days. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Miami Herald
16 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Social Security quietly backtracks on unpopular benefit change
The Social Security Administration made a big announcement recently, but it was not popular. The announcement was intended to save the government money and improve efficiency - a big focus for the Trump administration, which came into office and made creating the Department of Government Efficiency its top priority. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Over half a million Social Security benefit recipients were slated to be impacted by the shift, but it has drawn many objections, including from lawmakers who have expressed serious concern about its impact. In light of all this pushback, Social Security has now quietly backtracked. The change isn't going to happen starting September 30, 2025, after all. Here's more about the proposed benefit change, along with insight into why it was scrapped. Social Security had planned to revolutionize the benefits delivery process as part of its efforts to enhance efficiency. Specifically, the intent was for paper checks to be stopped permanently beginning September 30, 2025. Lawmakers have long desired to make this change, and there has officially been a rule requiring electronic delivery of benefits for well over a decade since 2011. However, no one in the past took decisive action to stop sending paper checks. Related: Social Security's 2026 COLA will be good news for older Americans The White House wanted to be the administration that put an end to physical checks. A July 2025 notice posted on the Social Security Administration's website stated: "Starting September 30, 2025, the Social Security Administration (SSA) will no longer issue paper checks for benefit payments. This change is part of a broader government-wide initiative to modernize payment systems and enhance service delivery." The announcement about shifting to paper checks outlined some of the reasons why the Social Security Administration made this plan, including: Improving speed and efficiency, as direct deposits are quickerCost savings, because sending out a paper check costs the government $0.50, while it's possible for the government to make a direct deposit of a Social Security check for just $0.15Better security, since paper checks are 16 times more likely to be stolen Because of these benefits, the government said that Social Security recipients would have two options for receiving payments after September - direct deposit or a Direct Express card. Related: AARP CEO shares blunt 9-word warning about Social Security While there were clearly some good reasons for shifting away from paper checks, the decision was also a very unpopular one. The reason: There was serious concern that people who most need their benefits would lose access because they are unbanked or underbanked. Some Social Security recipients face barriers to opening bank accounts. These include being unable to afford account fees, being ineligible due to previously overdrafting or other problems, or lacking a government-issued ID needed to open an account. Senator Elizabeth Warren was a vocal critic of the plan to switch, commenting on a press call, "There are about 600,000 Americans who still receive their paper checks - it's a small fraction of people who receive Social Security payments, but it's a population that often needs checks through paper." More on retirement: Dave Ramsey offers urgent thoughts about MedicareJean Chatzky shares major statement on Social SecurityTony Robbins has blunt words on IRAs,401(k)s Warren met with Social Security Commissioner Frank Bisignano, and after that meeting, the Administration backtracked on the change. Warren announced on July 23 that Commissioner Bisignano had agreed to keep sending out physical checks to those who need them, and an SSA spokesperson confirmed this to both CBS MoneyWatch and Kiplinger. While the Administration has agreed to cancel the unpopular change, it will still be pushing people to switch to electronic means of receiving payments by communicating about the benefits of making the change and explaining how to do it. The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
The Hill
16 minutes ago
- The Hill
Live updates: Trump, UK prime minister to meet at start of big week for economy
President Trump will meet with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer for 'wide-ranging talks' on Monday in Scotland. Fresh off Trump's trade deal with the European Union, announced Sunday, Trump and Starmer are expected to discuss implementation of the U.S.-U.K. trade deal, agreed to in May, the prime minister's office said Sunday. The struggle to reach a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, along with the hunger crisis in Gaza, as well as the war in Ukraine, are also on the table. Trump's five-day visit to Scotland is a mix of business — trade talk ahead of Thursday's White House deadline for tariff deals — and pleasure, with the president taking in his golf courses. In Stockholm on Monday, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent starts the next round of trade meetings with China. Looking even beyond tariffs, a flurry of economic activity this week makes it a significant one. The Federal Reserve announces its next interest rate decision on Wednesday. Between Tuesday and Thursday, the government will release consumer confidence insights, second-quarter GDP data, details on job openings, and the Fed's preferred inflation measure, the PCE index.
