Tensions rise as Lula blasts U.S. over visa sanctions tied to Bolsonaro trial
Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva called a U.S. decision to impose visa bans on officials involved in former President Jair Bolsonaro's trial "arbitrary" and "baseless," and said foreign interference in the judiciary was "unacceptable."
In a statement on Saturday, the leftist leader said the action violated fundamental principles of respect and sovereignty between nations.
In an escalation of tensions between U.S. President Donald Trump and the government of Latin America's largest economy, Washington imposed visa restrictions on Friday on Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, his family and other unnamed court officials.
The visa bans were a response to the Supreme Court's decision to issue search warrants and restraining orders targeting Trump ally Bolsonaro, who is accused of plotting a coup to overturn the results of a 2022 election he lost.
"I am certain that no form of intimidation or threat, from anyone, will compromise the most important mission of Brazil's powers and institutions, which is to permanently defend and uphold the democratic rule of law," said Lula.
Solicitor general Jorge Messias, the top judicial official for Lula's executive branch, said in a statement posted on X late Friday that Prosecutor General Paulo Gonet was also targeted by the ban.
Messias said no "improper maneuver" or "sordid conspiratorial act" would intimidate the judiciary in carrying out its duties with independence, as he condemned what he also described as arbitrary U.S. visa revocations targeting Brazilian officials for fulfilling their constitutional responsibilities.
In addition to Moraes, seven other justices from Brazil's 11-member Supreme Court were also hit by the U.S. visa restrictions, Government Institutional Relations Minister Gleisi Hoffmann said on Friday.
They include justices Luis Roberto Barroso, Dias Toffoli, Cristiano Zanin, Flavio Dino, Carmen Lucia, Edson Fachin, and Gilmar Mendes.
The Prosecutor General's Office and the Supreme Court did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Trump has criticised the proceedings against Bolsonaro as a "witch hunt", a term he has used to describe his own treatment by political opponents, and has called for the charges to be dropped. In a letter last week, he announced a 50% tariff on Brazilian goods starting August 1, opening the message with criticism of the trial.
Bolsonaro is on trial before Brazil's Supreme Court on charges of plotting a coup to stop Lula from taking office in January 2023.
The right-wing firebrand has denied that he led an attempt to overthrow the government but has acknowledged taking part in meetings aimed at reversing the election's outcome.
© Thomson Reuters 2025.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Today
21 hours ago
- Japan Today
Suits filed to null upper house election over vote disparity
Lawyers on Tuesday filed lawsuits at high courts across Japan to nullify the results of Sunday's House of Councillors election and seek a rerun, saying the disparities in the weight of votes violated the principle of equality under the Constitution. While the vote gap had been on a declining trend since the mergers of two pairs of less-populated prefectures into two constituencies in 2015, the maximum disparity in the latest upper house election expanded to 3.13-fold from 3.03-fold in the previous race in 2022. The Supreme Court said in its 2023 ruling that resolving such disparities is an urgent matter. It had ruled that the upper house poll results in 2010 and 2013, as well as those of House of Representatives races in 2009, 2012 and 2014, were in a "state of unconstitutionality" but stopped short of invalidating the election results. The lawsuits filed Tuesday morning by two groups of lawyers included those submitted to the Osaka High Court, the Hiroshima High Court's Matsue and Okayama branches and the Fukuoka High Court's Naha branch. "Even though the top court said the disparities should be corrected, this election was held under the same system," lawyer Hidetoshi Masunaga said at a press conference after filing the suit with the Osaka court. Calculations by Kyodo News based on data released by the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications showed that Kanagawa Prefecture had the highest number of voters per lawmaker and Fukui Prefecture the lowest. Vote weight disparities in upper house elections were 5.00-fold in 2010 and 4.77-fold in 2013. The disparities then fell since Tottori and Shimane prefectures were merged into one constituency and Tokushima and Kochi prefectures into another ahead of the 2016 election. The top court ruled that the disparity of up to 3.08-fold in 2016 and 3.00-fold in 2019 were constitutional. © KYODO
The Mainichi
21 hours ago
- The Mainichi
Suits filed to null Japan's upper house election over vote disparity
TOKYO (Kyodo) -- Lawyers on Tuesday filed lawsuits at high courts across Japan to nullify the results of Sunday's House of Councillors election and seek a rerun, saying the disparities in the weight of votes violated the principle of equality under the Constitution. While the vote gap had been on a declining trend since the mergers of two pairs of less-populated prefectures into two constituencies in 2015, the maximum disparity in the latest upper house election expanded to 3.13-fold from 3.03-fold in the previous race in 2022. The Supreme Court said in its 2023 ruling that resolving such disparities is an urgent matter. It had ruled that the upper house poll results in 2010 and 2013, as well as those of House of Representatives races in 2009, 2012 and 2014, were in a "state of unconstitutionality" but stopped short of invalidating the election results. The lawsuits filed Tuesday morning by two groups of lawyers included those submitted to the Osaka High Court, the Hiroshima High Court's Matsue and Okayama branches and the Fukuoka High Court's Naha branch. "Even though the top court said the disparities should be corrected, this election was held under the same system," lawyer Hidetoshi Masunaga said at a press conference after filing the suit with the Osaka court. Calculations by Kyodo News based on data released by the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications showed that Kanagawa Prefecture had the highest number of voters per lawmaker and Fukui Prefecture the lowest. Vote weight disparities in upper house elections were 5.00-fold in 2010 and 4.77-fold in 2013. The disparities then fell since Tottori and Shimane prefectures were merged into one constituency and Tokushima and Kochi prefectures into another ahead of the 2016 election. The top court ruled that the disparity of up to 3.08-fold in 2016 and 3.00-fold in 2019 were constitutional.
Japan Times
a day ago
- Japan Times
Lawyers file lawsuit to nullify Upper House election
A group of lawyers filed a lawsuit with Osaka High Court on Tuesday to nullify the results in six electoral districts, including Kyoto, Osaka and Hyogo, of Sunday's House of Councilors election, claiming that the election was unconstitutional in terms of vote-value disparities. Similar lawsuits are expected to be filed elsewhere in the country later on Monday. According to estimates by Jiji Press, the maximum vote-value disparity in the Upper House election was 3.13 times, between Fukui, which had 308,428 voters per Upper House seat, and Kanagawa, which had 965,500 voters. The figure was up from 3.03 times in the previous election three years ago. In the written complaint, the lawyers argue that the apportionment provisions for Upper House seats did not meet the constitutional requirement of population-based proportional representation. "Japan is the only major developed country that uses proportional representation not based on population," Hidetoshi Masunaga from the lawyer group told a news conference. "We hope the court will declare the election unconstitutional." In 2023, the Supreme Court deemed the disparities in the 2022 Upper House election constitutional, saying that there was not necessarily a significant expanding trend in the disparities, while noting that there had barely been concrete progress in efforts to correct them.
