Debate centers on fairness and safety during hearing on transgender sports bills
Lawmakers on the Maine Legislature's Judiciary Committee heard more than eight hours of public testimony Thursday on a package of Republican bills that would roll back protections for transgender students in schools. The proposals include measures to restrict access to bathrooms and locker rooms, limit participation in sports, and prohibit school staff from using students' affirming names and pronouns without parental permission.
Supporters of the bills described them as efforts to protect girls' safety and fairness in athletics, as well as to uphold parents' rights in decisions about their children's gender identity. But critics argued the legislation mirrors a national wave of attacks on transgender rights and would put trans youth at risk.
Maine, which has drawn national attention for its gender-inclusive school policies, has seen an influx of proposals targeting those protections this session. In addition to sports, bathroom, and pronoun restrictions, lawmakers introduced bills that would strip gender identity from the Maine Human Rights Act and limit access to gender-affirming care.
Transgender teens and allies crowd State House to fight anti-trans bills
Similar bills have been passed by at least 28 states across the country, a statistic some Republican lawmakers cited during their testimony on Thursday.
But in Maine, similar attempts to restrict trans students' rights have failed, said Gia Drew, executive director of Equality Maine.
'They're trying to rehash issues that we've already had debates on here in the Legislature time and time again,' she said. 'The tactics some of the opposition have used are dangerous, and this has been going on for years now.'
The issue of trans girls' participation in sports has been central to Maine's months-long standoff with the Trump administration. After Rep. Laurel Libby (R-Auburn) posted a photo of a trans student athlete on her legislative Facebook page, President Donald Trump singled out Maine for its policy, prompting Gov. Janet Mills to tell the president she would see him in court. Since that exchange, at least three federal agencies opened investigations into Maine, claiming the state's inclusion of transgender athletes violated Title IX, a federal anti-discrimination law.
Before the hearing, a group of female student athletes spoke at a press conference in support of the bills, which they said would address unfair competition from trans athletes.
The issue of fairness was one that came up repeatedly during the hearing, from the bill sponsors as well as the student athletes that testified in support, who focused on biological differences between boys and girls, such as strength and speed, and argued that allowing trans girls to compete in women's sports creates safety risks and takes winning opportunities away from cisgender girls.
'Girls shouldn't have to feel uncomfortable in their sports, or be worried about getting seriously hurt,' said 17-year-old Biance Wright, an athlete from Benton.
Sen. Sue Bernard (R-Aroostook), who sponsored one of three bills addressing school sports, said the issue 'boils down to one question: Should a person be allowed to self-identify with a gender and be allowed to compete with an automatic advantage?'
Rep. Elizabeth Caruso (R-Caratunk) echoed those concerns, saying the bills she sponsored aimed to restore compliance with Title IX and referenced the Trump administration's executive order banning trans girls from girls' sports.
'This is not a political issue, and it's not a partisan topic,' said Caruso. 'Athletic potential depends on biology and not identity. Gender identity may be neutral in many areas of school life, but when it comes to sports and private spaces, terminology matters.'
Caruso and other lawmakers described the bills as a win for all Mainers. Judiciary Committee member Rep. Ellie Sato (D-Gorham) pushed back, asking, 'How is it a win for all Mainers if trans students are being discriminated against?'
The hearing drew hundreds of people, with critics of the legislation vastly outnumbering supporters. Many who testified, including other student athletes, said they didn't see an issue with trans student participation in sports.
Paige Lambert, a student athlete from Fairfield, told the committee: 'I've never felt threatened by a trans athlete. Never felt unsafe or mistreated by a trans athlete.'
'Let me be clear: trans people are not the threat, trans people are under threat,' said Betsy Rodman, an educator and mother of a trans child.
Some speakers warned that the legislation would endanger trans students by increasing bullying, mental health risks, and creating unsafe school environments. They underscored the need for inclusive spaces and highlighted the disproportionate discrimination trans students face, with several citing research that has found high rates of bullying and suicide attempts among trans youth.
'I can't count the number of times students have taken refuge in my office to avoid unsafe hallways, locker rooms or bathrooms,' Rodman said. 'I've never heard of a cisgender student feeling threatened or assaulted by a trans person in a bathroom, but I have many stories in the other direction, unfortunately.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
Hochul hosts Texas lawmakers in Albany, proposes New York redistrict again to counter GOP plans to gain seats
Aug. 5—ALBANY — Gov. Kathleen C. Hochul is opening the door for New York to redraw its congressional district lines, for a third time since 2022, in a Democrat-backed bid to counter plans to add Republican seats in GOP-controlled states. In Texas, GOP lawmakers are forging ahead with a rarely done mid-decade redistricting process, done at the behest of the Trump administration. The map being put up for a vote in Texas would eliminate up to five Democratically held districts, redrawing the map to split up primarily Democratic voting precincts into new, largely Republican districts. Lawmakers were called back to Austin for a vote on the bill to advance the maps, expected to pass in the majority-Republican state legislature, but most of the state's Democratic lawmakers left the state and have denied their chambers the quorum of members necessary to conduct business. Texas Gov. Gregory W. Abbott and the state's Republican legislative leaders have moved to arrest those lawmakers and forcibly return them to the state Capitol. Six of those lawmakers came to Albany, and dozens of others have traveled to Democratically controlled states like California and Illinois. Texas state troopers lack the power to arrest the legislators outside of Texas, and while other state leaders can opt to comply with the Texas orders and arrest them themselves, that likely won't happen in a Democrat-run state. In the state Capitol on Monday, Hochul and some of her top leadership team, alongside New York Assembly Speaker Carl E. Heastie, D-Bronx, met with the six visiting Texan legislators and pledged to back up their efforts to resist the GOP redistricting effort. "These public servants are taking a stand — a strong stand — against a blatant power grab that's happening in their state as we speak," Hochul said. "And this will have implications not just in Texas, but for our entire nation and its future." Hochul said that breaking quorum is a legally valid form of resistance that does not break the law. The Texas arrest orders do not allege a specific crime, accusing the legislators of "dereliction of duty." Even after arrest, the lawmakers will only be taken to the state Capitol, and won't be incarcerated after that. Hochul said the new map being proposed in Texas presents a "radical, radical redrawing of the congressional lines that were already adopted," and said the clearly partisan focus of the plan requires a firm response where Democrats can muster one. Redistricting efforts are state-led across the entire nation, and each state has its own approach. While some Democratic-led states keep the basic approach of letting their legislatures draw the maps themselves, others including New York, Illinois and California have adopted nonpartisan systems that assign the drawing of maps to an independent, bipartisan or nonpartisan commission. In New York, that's the Independent Redistricting Commission, formed in 2015 as a result of a state constitutional amendment agreed to by a majority of voters in 2014. The commission, with an equal panel of Republicans and Democrats, is tasked with redrawing the state legislative and congressional district lines after each 10-year federal census. Its first test was in 2021, and it failed to advance bipartisan maps for state legislature or Congress. Lawmakers redrew the maps themselves under the terms of the constitutional amendment, and those maps were tossed by the state's top court, which created the current congressional map with the help of a court-appointed "special master." The state constitution requires that district lines be drawn in a nonpartisan way, intent on keeping "communities of interest" intact and respecting the racial and ethnic makeup of the state. On Monday, Hochul said it may be time to abandon that approach and use the control the Democratic Party has in New York to secure more seats for itself in Congress. "If Republicans are willing to rewrite these rules to give themselves an advantage, then they're leaving us with no choice, we must do the same," Hochul said. "There's a phrase, 'you have to fight fire with fire.' That is a true statement of how we're feeling right now." Hochul said New York's state legislators are supportive of rethinking how they approach redistricting, evidenced by Speaker Heastie's presence. Heastie floated voting on another amendment to the state constitution, although he didn't lay out specific ideas. Hochul, responding to reporters' questions after the main event, said she would support an amendment that would disband the Independent Redistricting Commission. In New York, the state constitution can be amended two ways. One way that's rarely been used involves a once-every-20 year vote to call a constitutional convention, but the most common way requires that two separate meetings of the state legislature, with at least one election between, vote on the amendment, sending it to a popular vote the next November. If a majority of voters approve the measure, the constitution is amended. "What we're proposing that — maybe what we bring before the voters in 2027, hope not to have to use it, but sometimes the best way to get a bully to stop being a bully is to remind them that they could also be bullied," Heastie said. "So perhaps the Republican members of Congress here in New York could say to their Republican colleagues in Texas, 'hey, slow down on this because this can also affect us.'" Heastie bemoaned the New York press and popular editorial boards, which he said have urged Democrats to follow the rules. "I say to all of you, to all of the press here, your editorial boards keep asking us to 'be fair' and 'play fair' and I think that's the wrong thing to ask us to do," he said. After the meeting, New York's Republicans fired back and called the suggestion that New York should redraw its maps to respond to another state doing the same hypocritical. "Governor Hochul and Albany Democrats are once again trying to rig the redistricting process in their favor to preserve their own political power at the expense of the people," said Senate Minority Leader Robert G. Ortt II, R-North Tonawanda. "Governor Hochul has described mid-decade redistricting as 'undemocratic', yet her and other New York Democrats are willing to destroy democracy under the guise of 'saving democracy'. Voters know what this is really about — political power." In a statement from her campaign, Rep. Elise M. Stefanik, R-Schuylerville, the most senior New York GOP lawmaker, slammed the governor for pitching a plan to undo a constitutional amendment. "In her own words, Kathy Hochul is hell bent on angrily spiting the New York state constitution, the will of New York voters, good government groups and the courts by dismantling fair and legal district lines," Stefanik said in a statement. "The worst governor in America needs to be reminded that she conveniently forgot to tell the unlawful out-of-state radical Democrats at (Monday's) desperate press conference that she lost not once but twice in her efforts to illegally draw gerrymandered lines in New York to rig our Congressional elections and suppress the will of the voters." If Democrats do put up another amendment to dissolve the Independent Redistricting Commission, it could come before voters as early as 2027 — but state Democrats' recent record on voting-related amendments on the ballot hasn't been shining. In 2021, Democrats put five proposals on statewide ballots but only two passed — one related to civil courts in New York City, another on confirming a right to a clean environment. The three failed proposals were related to voting, one that would change some rules related to the Independent Redistricting Commission, one to allow for same-day voter registration and another to allow excuse-free absentee mail voting. A strong GOP counter-argument, in part led by Stefanik, and a somewhat laggardly Democratic pitch on those efforts, helped to flip the expected balance of support, and each failed proposal lost by at least 9 percentage points. Solve the daily Crossword
NBC News
4 minutes ago
- NBC News
A Republican got jeered at a townhall. He plans to hold more.
Rep. Mike Flood, R-Neb., faced off with a raucous crowd that hurled boos, jeers and middle fingers at him at a town hall in Lincoln on Monday. The conservative Republican said he has no regrets and would do it all over again. 'I don't regret it at all,' Flood said in a phone interview on Tuesday. 'Every member of Congress has to do it the way they see fit. But for me, this comes with the territory. And I feel like you got to put yourself in the town square if you want to be a member of Congress for your district.' 'And if you feel strongly about how you're voting and the choices you're making,' he added, 'you should be able to stand on the town square and be accountable for those votes and tell people why you did it and take their input.' In this polarized political climate, the vast majority of lawmakers, in both parties, are opting not to hold town halls this August recess. Last spring, after a series of GOP town halls went off the rails, Rep. Richard Hudson, R-N.C., the GOP campaign chief for the 2026 election cycle, urged his Republican colleagues not to hold in-person town halls, calling them 'no longer effective' due to Democratic disruptions. And violent threats against politicians have seen a steady uptick in recent years. But Flood, the chairman of the Republican Main Street Caucus, whose members call themselves 'pragmatic conservatives,' didn't heed Hudson's advice. He held a town hall in Columbus in March and another in Seward in May before Monday's event on the University of Nebraska campus in liberal-leaning Lincoln, the largest city in his district. 'As elected officials, we have to put ourselves in environments that are not comfortable,' he said, though he made clear he was not judging colleagues in either party who have chosen not to hold town halls. House Republican Conference Chair Lisa McLain, R-Mich., called him Tuesday morning and commended him for hanging tough, Flood said. His next town hall will likely be held in the spring. Flood said concerns about cuts to Medicaid in the GOP's 'big, beautiful bill' dominated Monday night's 87-minute town hall, which was carried live by public television. 'Medicaid, Medicaid, Medicaid, Medicaid — that was the No. 1 issue and something I started out with, just because I'm looking at the calls my office gets,' Flood said, adding that he spent time during the town hall addressing confusion in the audience about how the bill would affect them and reassuring seniors that they wouldn't lose their Medicare coverage. The Trump law does require recipients of Medicaid — the health care program for low-income people and those with disabilities — to work 80 hours per month if they are able-bodied adults under age 65, with some exceptions. 'If you're 28 years old and you don't want to work, you shouldn't expect free health care, if you can work,' Flood said. 'And that resonates with like 70% of people, that you'd have some work requirements.' Democrats believe the Trump law will cost Republicans the House majority in 2026, and they say Flood's hostile town hall is evidence of just how unpopular it is with voters. 'Every single vulnerable House Republican should follow Mike Flood's example and be brave enough to face their constituents in-person to see firsthand how unpopular and hated the Big, Ugly Law is,' said Viet Shelton, spokesman for the House Democrats' campaign committee. Flood, 50, the former speaker of the Nebraska House who was elected to Congress in 2022, also fielded tough questions about Trump's recent firing of the Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner and whether he backs releasing more information from the Jeffrey Epstein probe. He said he'll sign onto a resolution by House Rules Committee members on Wednesday to release the Epstein files. 'As long as it protects the victims and doesn't re-victimize those folks,' Flood said, 'I'm for its release.' But he opposes a bipartisan effort led by Reps. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., and Ro Khanna, D-Calif., to bypass GOP leadership and force a vote on the floor in September to compel the Justice Department to release the files. 'I don't sign discharge petitions,' he said, 'and it goes back to my day as a speaker of the legislature, where I wouldn't do the same thing.' Nebraska is a red state that went for Trump by more than 20 points in 2024, but the university's Kimball Recital Hall on Monday evening was mostly packed with Democrats, said Flood, who recounted how he recognized some individuals who had attended all three of his town halls this year. A former attorney, Flood said he prepared for about five to six hours for the town hall, anticipating what questions he might get and how he'd respond. Before the event got started, he told the university police officers on hand he didn't want anyone kicked out of the town hall for exercising their First Amendment rights. Only one individual was told to leave after protesting the situation in Gaza, Flood said, and he left peacefully. 'I said, 'I don't want people kicked out or removed just for voicing an opinion, no matter how they voice it. If somebody is fighting somebody else, yes, do what you got to do,'' Flood said. 'When you look at the video, it looks pretty hardcore. People are literally screaming, flipping me off. They are jumping up and down. They are standing with their back to me,' he recounted. 'None of those folks get asked to leave. They don't. I don't even say, 'Please stop.'' Just a handful of lawmakers are choosing to hold town halls during the weekslong August recess. For many, there are few upsides. On the same night as the Flood town hall, veteran Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wash., had to abruptly cancel his town hall midway through after a group of protesters 'took over the stage' and disrupted the gathering, local police said. Three individuals were arrested on trespassing charges. Things were much tamer at a separate town hall hosted by freshman Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin in Michigan. At one point at his town hall, someone asked Flood: 'How are you helping the working class?' He talked about how the Trump law included no tax on tips, an expanded child tax credit and other provisions. Then he said something that infuriated many attendees: 'Today's Republican Party is comprised of the heart and soul of the working class.' 'That brought the house down. They were very upset that I said that," Flood told NBC News. "But that's the reality. ... Every day Americans recognize that something's changed in our country, where, as a Republican, we have won the hearts and minds of the working class. And that was very hard for the crowd to accept. But I think, to an objective person, if we haven't won their hearts and minds, we're darn close to it.'
Epoch Times
4 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
Vance ‘Probably Favored at This Point' for 2028 Nomination, Trump Says
WASHINGTON—President Donald Trump said Vice President JD Vance is 'most likely' the leading contender to carry the MAGA torch in 2028, calling him 'probably favored' to become the Republican presidential frontrunner. 'I think most likely, in all fairness—he's the vice president,' Trump said, when asked whether Vance was the heir apparent to his Make America Great Again movement.
