&w=3840&q=100)
‘Doomsday plane' seen in Washington: What does this indicate amid Israel-Iran conflict?
Each E-4B can carry up to 112 personnel and has a flight range of over 7,000 miles. Reuters/File Photo
As US President Donald Trump weighs the option of launching a strike on Iran amid its ongoing tensions with Israel, one of America's 'Doomsday planes' was seen flying to Joint Base Andrews in Washington, DC, on Tuesday night.
The flight has led to renewed questions about whether Washington is getting ready for a possible full-scale conflict.
Read Israel Iran conflict live updates
Notably, Trump has repeatedly raised the idea of the US joining Israel in targeting Iran's nuclear facilities. In response, Iran's supreme leader has issued a fresh warning, saying the US would face strong retaliation if it carries out any attack.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The situation puts Trump and the world in a difficult position, as he tries to balance his aim of keeping the US out of another war while also stopping Iran from developing a nuclear weapon.
ALSO READ | Operation Sindhu: How India rescued its first batch of nationals from Iran
But what exactly is the 'Doomsday plane'? How dangerous is its deployment? And does this mean the US is preparing for war?
Let's get you all the answers:
Boeing E-4B Nightwatch: All about the 'doomsday plane'
Also known as the 'Doomsday plane', the E-4B Nightwatch caught attention after it made a sudden flight from Louisiana to Maryland on Tuesday.
This aircraft acts as an airborne command centre for the President, Defence Secretary, and the Joint Chiefs of Staff, helping them maintain secure communications and coordination during crises.
It took off from Bossier City at 5:56 pm ET, flew along the coastline, circled near the Virginia-North Carolina border, and landed at Joint Base Andrews at 10:01 pm.
The aircraft is designed to fly for up to a week without landing and is capable of refuelling mid-air. Reuters/File Photo
The flight lasted just over four hours and led to speculation online, particularly because it used the callsign ORDER01, different from its usual code ORDER6.
Each E-4B can carry up to 112 personnel and has a flight range of over 7,000 miles.
Its value to the US Air Force lies in its unique features, which are unmatched by any other American military aircraft.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Built to resist nuclear explosions, cyber threats, and electromagnetic interference, the plane is equipped to launch counterattacks if needed.
Dear Americans, did you know that...? The US President's "doomsday plane" E-4B has landed near Washington, as reported by Defence Index.
The last time such actions took place was on September 11, 2001, after the terrorist attack on the "twin towers".This plane can withstand a pic.twitter.com/YQlMXyMtsI — HeyTam (@HeyTam) June 18, 2025
According to the New York Post, it has shielding to withstand thermal and nuclear impacts and can maintain communication with any part of the world using 67 satellite receivers and antennas inside its dome.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The aircraft is designed to fly for up to a week without landing and is capable of refuelling mid-air.
The longest known continuous flight by an E-4B is 35.4 hours.
Its interior includes 18 beds, a room for briefings, areas for coordination and discussions, a command space, and rest zones, spread across three levels, turning it into a 'Flying Pentagon' during emergencies.
The E-4B has been used during major incidents. Former US President George Bush flew in a similar aircraft after the 9/11 attacks, and in 1995, Fema (Federal Emergency Management Agency) officials travelled on one during Hurricane Opal.
The plane's appearance is often seen as a signal of a serious event involving the US.
Although the fleet of four E-4Bs regularly takes to the skies to stay prepared, some believe this particular mission may relate to growing security concerns for the President amid rising fears of a prolonged war in West Asia.
ALSO READ | Iran's exiled prince claims Supreme Leader Khamenei 'hiding like a rat'. Who is Reza Pahlavi?
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Is US preparing for a war in West Asia?
The aircraft's recent flight took place around the same time as Donald Trump called for Iran's 'unconditional surrender' and promised complete backing for Israel's military moves.
In response, Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei , dismissed the US demands and issued a warning that American military action would bring 'irreparable damage to them.'
'Americans should know that any military involvement by the US will undoubtedly result in irreparable damage to them,' he said.
Khamenei made the statement a day after Donald Trump posted on social media, asking Iran to surrender without any conditions. He also warned Khamenei that the US was aware of his location, adding that there were no plans to kill him, 'at least not for now.'
Although Trump earlier kept some distance from Israel's surprise strikes on Iran's nuclear sites, he has recently suggested the US may play a bigger role, saying he is aiming for more than just a ceasefire. Notably, more American fighter jets and warships have also been deployed to the region.
A US official told Associated Press that Washington currently has no role in the talks, though that might change.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Israel vs Iran: What's happening?
On Thursday, Israel's armed forces said they launched another round of airstrikes on Tehran and other locations in Iran, but gave no further details.
The offensive has targeted several Iranian nuclear and defence sites, killing high-ranking generals and nuclear scientists. A US-based Iranian rights organisation reported that at least 639 people, including 263 civilians, have died in Iran, with over 1,300 injured.
In return, Iran has launched about 400 missiles and many drones, killing at least 24 people in Israel and injuring hundreds. Some of the strikes hit residential buildings in central Israel, causing massive destruction.
Iran has launched about 400 missiles and many drones. Reuters
Internet access across Iran, already unstable for several days, completely failed on Wednesday. NetBlocks, a group that monitors online connectivity, confirmed a 'near-total national internet blackout.'
Iran's Communications Ministry said the blackout was intentional, claiming it was needed to stop Israel from using the country's networks for military purposes.
With inputs from agencies
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
23 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Donald Trump risks losing more women voters if he pardons Diddy, can spark ‘another Epstein-like situation'
Former Fox News host Megyn Kelly has fired a warning shot at Donald Trump following reports that the former president is 'seriously considering' pardoning Diddy. The disgraced music mogul's sentencing is due October and if convicted could face 20 years in prison. Trump, already under fire over the Epstein mess, with even MAGA loyalists now turning on him, risks walking into another PR disaster if he tries to spring Diddy from behind Brooklyn bars, especially after the rapper openly admitted to being a domestic abuser. Reacting to the speculation, Kelly made it clear, Trump shouldn't even think about it. She warned that such a move would backfire hard, damaging not just his campaign but the Republican party itself, especially as he continues to dodge calls to release the supposed Epstein client list. A Wall Street Journal report had earlier revealed Trump's alleged ties to Epstein, including sending him a birthday card, something Trump has denied and sued the outlet over. But now, even his own base is asking questions. As Kelly put it, 'It looks to the MAGA base like [Trump's] part of the elite cabal. And they don't like that. They elected Trump because he promised not to be one of them.' Also read: Diddy could walk free: Donald Trump 'seriously considering' pardon as disgraced mogul makes another $50M jail release plea Pardoning Diddy, Kelly says, won't fix Trump's image, it'll damage it further. 'There's already people thinking that there's a cover-up here,' she said, hinting that Diddy's infamous white parties, now under federal investigation, were more than just flashy events, but loaded with drugs, young women, and illegal activity. Kelly's warning comes at a time when Trump's female support is already disappearing. First came the abortion ban backlash, and now, if he lets Diddy walk free, she says, 'It tells all these young, vulnerable women they don't count. That they don't matter. That even the top Republican will look the other way when it comes to this kind of victim.' And it's not just liberals who are done. 'There are young conservative women who aren't in love with Trump or MAGA. And this will not help,' Kelly said, calling the whole move a 'miscarriage of justice.' What makes the situation worse is Diddy's crimes that were caught on CCTV, brutal footage from a now-shut-down hotel shows him violently attacking then-girlfriend Cassie Ventura. 'He beat those women to a pulp and didn't even deny it,' Kelly said. 'He got away with it. He was only found guilty on two minor charges… let him at least serve the time on those.' Also read: 'To deal with Donald Trump, everyone should be a little drunk,' says Stephen Colbert before bashing the US President for taking $10 million trip to Scotland Earlier, a report from Deadline suggested Diddy's case has already stirred things up inside the White House, with a few of the disgraced rapper's close allies seen hovering around, quietly trying to score him a way out after his bail plea got turned down. Diddy and his legal team have been repeatedly trying for release, even prepping a $50 million bond to get him out of jail. Trump, on his part, addressed the pardon rumours, claiming he hadn't received a formal request, but didn't exactly shut the door either. 'I'd look at what's happening,' he said. 'I haven't seen him, I haven't spoken to him in years,' he added, nodding to their past friendship. 'I would certainly look at the facts. If I think somebody was mistreated, whether they like me or don't like me, it wouldn't have any impact.'
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
Long-term investing: Volatility, even threats, have limited shelf life; 5 large-caps from different sectors with upside potential of up to 38%
Synopsis What will dominate headlines for some time? Tariff impacting X industry, goods stuck at ports, exporters under pressure, India-US talking to resolve the deadlock. Yes, the action by President Trump will create issues, but it is not the end of the world. There are a couple of reasons for our assumption that things will not be as bad as they might appear to be when you read the headlines that are bound to come in the coming weeks. You may not be aware, but the history of threats, trade, and diplomacy reveals that, finally, the last one has won.
Hindustan Times
26 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
What Donald Trump is teaching Harvard
At Harvard you can study negotiation. This being Harvard, there is in fact an entire academic programme dedicated to the craft. The principles are simple. Understand your alternatives—what happens if you fight rather than compromise—and your long-term interests. This being Donald Trump's America, Harvard itself is now the case study. Mr Trump has turned full guns on that supposed hotbed of antisemitism and left-wing indoctrination. America's oldest and richest university would be his most satisfying trophy and its capitulation would become a template for coerced reforms across higher education. The government has sought to review some of Harvard's coursework as Mr Trump has pressured it to hire fewer 'Leftist dopes' and discipline pro-Palestine protesters. When the university refused, his administration froze federal research grants worth $3bn and tried to bar it from enrolling foreign students. Harvard has fought back and sued the government twice. Its many constituencies have loudly supported this resistance. Seven in ten faculty who took part in a poll by the Crimson, a student newspaper, said the university should not agree to a settlement. Yet it seems likely that Harvard will fold in the manner of Brown University and Columbia; reports suggest it will pay up to $500m. Consider Harvard's options. Litigation has succeeded initially: a judge paused the ban on foreign students. Harvard had a sympathetic hearing in its lawsuit to restore government funding. Yet the university knows that it cannot count on the Supreme Court, with its conservative majority. Meanwhile, the potential damage from Mr Trump's campaign looks both acute and existential. Losing federal funds would transform Harvard from a world-class research university to a tuition-dependent one. They constitute 11% of the operating budget and represent almost all the discretionary money available for research. Making do without while maintaining current spending levels would see the university draw down its $53bn endowment by about 2% a year. That is possible for a while, though it would erode future income and much of the endowment is constrained by donor restrictions anyway. Already Harvard has frozen some hiring and laid off research staff. More trouble awaits. The Internal Revenue Service is considering revoking Harvard's tax-exempt status. Elise Stefanik, a Republican congresswoman, has suggested that the university committed securities fraud when it issued a bond in April and failed initially to tell investors about the government's demands. She wants the Securities and Exchange Commission to investigate. The Department of Homeland Security has sought records about foreign students who participated in pro-Palestine protests. Alumni, faculty and students report pride in Harvard's president, Alan Garber, resisting Mr Trump's extortion scheme. Yet more and more faculty are calling for a deal, especially in medicine and science since they have the most to lose. Steven Pinker, a psychology professor, has argued for a 'face-saving exit': Mr Trump may be 'dictatorial' but 'resistance should be strategic, not suicidal'. A deal similar to Brown's would not be so hard to swallow. To restore its federal funds, that university will pay $50m to workforce-development organisations. A likelier model is the one reached with Columbia, which coughed up $200m to the government. Most of its federal funding, worth $1.3bn, was reinstated and probes into alleged civil-rights violations were closed. Viewed from the outside, the price paid by Columbia looks arbitrary—there was no explanation for how it had been calculated. Columbia also agreed to dismantle DEI initiatives and will hire faculty specialising in Israel and Judaism, among other concessions. An outside monitor will ensure compliance. Claire Shipman, the university's acting president, said Columbia had not accepted diktats about what to teach or whom to hire and admit. Maybe so, but the settlement was still a shakedown. Mr Trump skipped the legal process by which the government can cancel funds. By law the administration has to offer a hearing and submit a report to Congress at least 30 days before the cut-off takes effect. None of that happened. Of course coercive, bilateral deals are Mr Trump's métier—he has achieved them with law firms and trading partners. Harvard has been making changes on campus that may be labelled as concessions in any eventual settlement. Some do appear designed to assuage Mr Trump. Since January the university has adopted the government's preferred definition of antisemitism; ended a partnership with Birzeit University in the West Bank; removed the leadership of the Centre for Middle Eastern Studies; and suspended the Palestine Solidarity Committee, an undergraduate group. DEI offices have been renamed and their websites scrubbed. Harvard's lack of ideological diversity will not be fixed by fiat. In 2023 a Crimson poll found that less than 3% of faculty identified as conservative. Now the university is reportedly considering establishing a centre for conservative thought akin to Stanford's Hoover Institution. Across campus it is understood that too many students seem ill-equipped to deal with views that challenge their own, says Edward Hall, a philosophy professor. Another insight you will glean in a Harvard negotiation class is to grasp your opponent's interests. In Mr Trump's practice, this means bagging a deal and bragging about it. He wrote a whole book on the topic. It could go on a syllabus.
