44 truckloads of waste from illegal Manama street vendors cleared
A detailed briefing laid out recent sweeps carried out in tandem with other bodies.
The aim was to rein in unlicensed selling and bring order to public spaces often blocked or cluttered by hawkers.
Khalifa Al Kaabi, Acting Director of Inspection, said clear rules are in place.
Safety rules
Only Bahraini citizens can apply for a street vending spot. They must be jobless, at least 21 years old, and follow safety rules when trading in the approved spots.
Yousif Al Bannai, Acting Head of Cleaning, said the issue of foreign hawkers remains stubborn, especially in busy parts of the capital.
Eleven sweeps were carried out between January and March, targeting hotspots like Shaikh Hamad Avenue, Sa'sa'a Avenue, and Zubara Avenue.
These efforts cleared dozens of lorry-loads of gear and rubbish.
An inspector brought over from Muharraq Municipality said several men had been caught selling fish on Sitra Island without a licence.
Fines of up to BD100 were handed out.
Lamya Al Fadhala, Acting Director General of the Capital Municipality, said any meat or vegetables taken from unlicensed vendors is thrown out. Some of it has expired, and the rest is simply unsafe to eat.
She urged Bahraini sellers to sort out their paperwork, follow health and safety rules, and stick to the town's trading guidelines.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Tribune
4 days ago
- Daily Tribune
Court nullifies gift after Bahraini man dies in same house
A Bahraini man's attempt to give his house to his wife fell apart after the Sharia Court of Appeal found he had never left the property, making the transfer void. Judges ruled the house must return to the deceased's name and be divided among his heirs, including children from a previous marriage. Since he remained living in the house until his death, the court found the gift had never taken effect. The case was brought by the man's children, who said their stepmother had transferred the property into her name using a gift deed signed while their father was still alive. Poor health They argued he was in poor health at the time, lacked full awareness, and never vacated the home. Their lawyer, Mohammed Al Sharabi, told the court that under Maliki doctrine and Article 912 of Bahrain's Civil Code, a property gift is only valid if the donor gives up possession while still alive. Otherwise, it is treated as a will. Islamic law does not allow bequests to legal heirs unless all other beneficiaries agree. The court agreed. It found the man owned other houses but chose to remain in this one. Ownership His wife never moved in, never used the property, and never showed any sign of control or ownership. There had been no handover, either in fact or in practice. Without that, the court said, the gift was void. The lower court had dismissed the claim and ordered the children to pay costs. The appeal court overturned that decision, cancelled the gift, and ordered the property returned to the deceased's name to be shared out according to Islamic inheritance law.
Gulf Insider
5 days ago
- Gulf Insider
Bahrain: Court Restores Marital Home To Husband After Sham Sale To Ex-Wife
A man has won back ownership of his home after the High Civil Court ruled that a BD270,000 property transfer to his ex-wife was a sham intended only to protect the asset. The court found that the sale contract between the couple was not genuine and ordered the house to be returned to the husband's name. The decision followed the submission of a signed statement from the ex-wife, confirming that the sale was only on paper and that her husband had remained the rightful owner throughout. The statement, dated 21 February 2010, was presented by the man's lawyer, Zuhair Abdullatif. The court deemed it legally binding, noting that the ex-wife neither denied her signature nor challenged the content. Under Bahraini law, a private document stands as valid unless its signature is explicitly denied. The man had purchased the home in early 2010 but soon faced financial difficulties. To protect the property, he transferred it to his wife's name in a fictitious sale, trusting she would safeguard it. Just one day after the transfer, the property was registered in her name. Less than a year later, she divorced him through khula, a form of wife-initiated divorce. Despite efforts to resolve the matter privately over the years, the ex-wife refused to return the property and even threatened to sell it. The man eventually took legal action, presenting the court with his ex-wife's written admission that the deal had been for formality only. In its ruling, the court referred to precedents set by the Court of Cassation, affirming that in sham transactions, the true intent of the parties takes precedence over the registered deed. If it can be proven that a transfer was only symbolic, actual ownership must be honoured. The court concluded that the sale was not real and ordered the Survey and Land Registration Bureau to remove the ex-wife's name and reissue the property deed in the husband's name.
Gulf Insider
5 days ago
- Gulf Insider
Bahrain: Man Refuses To Repay BD2,500, Court Sides With Ex-Wife
A man who accepted BD2,500 from his wife to cover dowry, wedding expenses, gold, and household furnishings — only to later abandon the marriage — has been ordered by a Bahraini court to return the full amount. The verdict came after the woman filed a civil case through her lawyer, AbdulAdheem Hubail. She told the court that the money was given to her then-husband in instalments during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, a time when many weddings were postponed and financial difficulties were common. According to the breakdown provided in court, BD1,000 was intended for the dowry, BD600 for the wedding ceremony, BD700 was raised from selling her gold, and BD200 was spent on furnishing their shared home. Despite receiving the funds, the man later walked away from the marriage and denied owing his wife any money. As evidence, the woman submitted her bank statement showing transfers made to him. The court referred the case for further investigation to verify the debt. A second witness, found credible by the court, confirmed that the woman had lent the man the money in stages while he was unemployed. The man had reportedly acknowledged the debt on several occasions and promised to repay her once he found work — a promise he never fulfilled. The court noted that the bank transfers went uncontested. Combined with the witness testimony, the judge ruled there was sufficient proof of the debt and ordered the man to repay the full BD2,500 to the woman.
