
Why has Iran stepped up its deportation of Afghan refugees?
For decades, tens of thousands of Afghans – who have fled war and poverty and sought a better future – have crossed into neighbouring Iran.
Tehran has largely been lenient towards members of this community. But in recent years, Iranians seem to have grown tired of hosting them – and sentiment towards foreign nationals has hardened. list of 3 items list 1 of 3 list 2 of 3 list 3 of 3 end of list
The Iranian government has responded by expelling undocumented people. Those being forced out have no choice but to return to the country they escaped from.
While the Taliban government is welcoming returning Afghans, what kind of life awaits them, and what can the international community do to help? Presenter:
James Bays Guests:
Arafat Jamal – Afghanistan representative of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR)
Orzala Nemat – Activist for the rights of Afghan women and director of the Development Research Group, a UK-based consultancy
Hassan Ahmadian – Assistant professor of West Asian Studies at the University of Tehran
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Jazeera
5 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Iran's FM Araghchi, Saudi Crown Prince MBS hold ‘fruitful' talks in Jeddah
Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS) has met Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi in Jeddah in the first visit by a top Iranian official to the Gulf kingdom after Israel's war with Tehran. Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei said Araghchi's talks with Prince Mohammed and other Saudi officials on Tuesday were 'fruitful'. The visit after the 12-day intense conflict between Israel and Iran, which saw the United States bomb three Iranian nuclear facilities before mediating a ceasefire, suggests that the war did not derail the rapprochement between Tehran and Riyadh. Saudi Arabia's official news agency, SPA, said Araghchi and Prince Mohammed 'reviewed bilateral relations and discussed the latest regional developments and the efforts being made in that regard'. 'The Crown Prince expressed the Kingdom's aspiration that the ceasefire agreement would contribute to creating conditions that promote security and stability in the region, emphasizing the Kingdom's stance in supporting dialogue through diplomatic means as a path to resolving disputes,' SPA said. It added that Araghchi expressed his gratitude to the kingdom for 'condemning the Israeli aggression'. The top Iranian diplomat also met with Saudi Minister of Defence Khalid bin Salman bin Abdulaziz and Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan Al Saud. Israel launched a massive bombardment against Iran on June 13, without direct provocation, killing top military commanders and nuclear scientists as well as hundreds of civilians. Iran retaliated with missile barrages that left widespread destruction in Israel. After the US targeted Iran's nuclear sites, Tehran responded with a missile launch against a US airbase in Qatar. Shortly after that attack, US President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire between Iran and Israel. While Arab countries condemned the attack as a violation of Qatar's sovereignty, Iran appears to be pushing to repair relations with Gulf states. Ties between Tehran and Riyadh were strained for years over disagreements around regional conflicts and mutual accusations of spreading instability. But the two countries agreed to restore formal relations as part of a deal brokered by China in 2023, and top Saudi and Iranian officials have been in regular contact. Before the outbreak of the recent war, Saudi Arabia had welcomed Iran's nuclear talks with the US, saying it supported efforts to resolve regional and international disputes. On Monday, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said he believed Tehran could resolve its differences with the US through dialogue, but trust would be an issue after the attacks on his country. In an article published by the Financial Times earlier on Tuesday, Araghchi accused Israel of preferring conflict over diplomacy. 'Iran remains interested in diplomacy, but we have good reason to have doubts about further dialogue,' he wrote. 'If there is a desire to resolve this amicably, the US should show genuine readiness for an equitable accord.'


Al Jazeera
12 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
ICC seeks arrest of Taliban leaders over alleged persecution of women
Judges at the International Criminal Court (ICC) have issued arrest warrants for two top Taliban leaders on charges of persecuting women and girls. ICC judges on Tuesday said there were 'reasonable grounds' to suspect Taliban Supreme Leader Hibatullah Akhundzada and chief justice Abdul Hakim Haqqani of committing gender-based persecution. 'While the Taliban have imposed certain rules and prohibitions on the population as a whole, they have specifically targeted girls and women by reason of their gender, depriving them of fundamental rights and freedoms,' the court said in a statement. The Taliban had 'severely deprived' girls and women of the rights to education, privacy and family life and the freedoms of movement, expression, thought, conscience and religion, ICC judges said. 'In addition, other persons were targeted because certain expressions of sexuality and/or gender identity were regarded as inconsistent with the Taliban's policy on gender.' The court said the alleged crimes had been committed between August 15, 2021, when the Taliban seized power, and continued until at least January 20, 2025. The court's chief prosecutor, Karim Khan, sought the warrants in January, saying that they recognised that 'Afghan women and girls as well as the LGBTQI+ community are facing an unprecedented, unconscionable and ongoing persecution by the Taliban'. UK-based rights group Amnesty International welcomed the move by the ICC, saying it was an 'important step towards justice'. 'The announcement is an important development that gives hope, inside and outside the country to Afghan women, girls, as well as those persecuted on the basis of gender identity or expression,' Amnesty International chief Agnes Callamard said in a statement. 'This is a crucial step to hold accountable all those allegedly responsible for the gender-based deprivation of fundamental rights to education, to free movement and free expression, to private and family life, to free assembly, and to physical integrity and autonomy.' The US-based Human Rights Watch also welcomed the decision. 'Senior Taliban leaders are now wanted men for their alleged persecution of women, girls, and gender non-conforming people. The international community should fully back the ICC in its critical work in Afghanistan and globally, including through concerted efforts to enforce the court's warrants,' Liz Evenson, the group's international justice director, said in a statement. The ICC, based in The Hague, was set up to rule on the world's worst crimes, such as war crimes and crimes against humanity. It has no police force of its own and relies on member states to carry out its arrest warrants – with mixed results. In theory, this means anyone subject to an ICC arrest warrant cannot travel to a member state for fear of being detained. Last year, the United Nations accused the Taliban government of barring at least 1.4 million girls of their right to an education during their time in power. Taking into account the number of girls not going to school before the group came to power, the UN said 80 percent of Afghan school-age girls – a total of 2.5 million – were being denied their right to an education. Authorities also imposed restrictions on women working for non-governmental groups and other employment, with thousands of women losing government jobs. Beauty salons have been closed and women blocked from visiting public parks and gyms as well as travelling long distances without a male chaperone. A 'vice and virtue' law announced last summer ordered women not to sing or recite poetry in public and for their voices and bodies to be 'concealed' outside the home.


Al Jazeera
12 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Iran rejects Trump's claims it asked for relaunch of nuclear talks
Iran says it has not requested talks with the United States over its nuclear programme, as claimed by US President Donald Trump. 'No request for a meeting has been made on our side to the American side,' Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei said on Tuesday in comments carried by the country's Tasnim news agency. The clarification came a day after Trump, during a dinner in the White House with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, said Iran was actively seeking negotiations on a new nuclear deal following the 12-day war with Israel last month, which the US also joined. 'We have scheduled Iran talks. They want to talk,' Trump told reporters. 'They want to work something out. They are very different now than they were two weeks ago.' Trump's Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff – also present during the dinner – had even said the meeting could take place in the next week or so. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi wrote in an opinion piece published in the Financial Times newspaper on Tuesday that Tehran remains interested in diplomacy but 'we have good reason to have doubts about further dialogue'. Sanctions relief On June 13, Israel launched an unprecedented bombing campaign on Iran that targeted military and nuclear sites as well as residential areas, killing senior military commanders and nuclear scientists. Iranian authorities say the Israeli strikes killed at least 1,060 people. Israel says retaliatory drone and missile fire by Iran killed at least 28 people. The US joined the war, bombing Iranian nuclear sites at Fordow, Isfahan and Natanz, just days before a planned meeting between Tehran and Washington, DC on reviving the nuclear talks. Trump then went on to announce a ceasefire between Israel and Iran. The negotiations, aimed at limiting Iran's nuclear programme in exchange for sanctions relief, would replace the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) – a deal signed with the US, China, Russia, France, Germany, the United Kingdom and the European Union – which Trump ditched during his first term in office. Floating the prospect of more talks on Monday, Trump also dangled the prospect of lifting punitive US sanctions on Iran, imposed after the US withdrawal from JCPOA, with further restrictions piled on this year. This month, the US issued a new wave of sanctions against Iranian oil exports, the first penalties against Tehran's energy sector since the US-backed ceasefire ended the war between Israel and Iran. 'I would love to be able to, at the right time, take those sanctions off,' said Trump. Towards the end of last month, Trump said he was working on 'the possible removal of sanctions', but dropped his efforts after Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei claimed 'victory' in the Iran-Israel war. Tehran's denial regarding talks with the US came after Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian told US journalist Tucker Carlson that Iran had 'no problem' resuming talks so long as trust could be rebuilt between the two sides. The interview, aired on Monday, provoked a backlash in Iran, with the critics accusing Pezeshkian of being 'too soft' in the wake of last month's attacks on the country. 'Have you forgotten that these same Americans, together with the Zionists, used the negotiations to buy time and prepare for the attack?' said an editorial in the hardline Kayhan newspaper. The conservative Javan daily also took aim at Pezeshkian, saying his remarks appeared 'a little too soft'. In contrast, the reformist Ham Mihan newspaper praised Pezeshkian's 'positive approach'.