Trial of High Court claims against Andrew Tate brought forward to next summer
Four women are suing the former professional kickboxer over allegations of sexual violence, including that he grabbed one by the throat on several occasions in 2015, assaulted her with a belt and pointed a gun at her face.
Tate's barristers told an earlier court hearing that there was 'total denial of wrongdoing'.
In written submissions for a hearing on Wednesday, barristers for the women said that following a preliminary hearing in April this year, a 16-day trial had been listed to start on February 22 2027.
But Mrs Justice Lambert told the court in London that she was 'very keen to get on' with the case and that it should be listed sooner, fixing the trial to start on June 22 2026.
The trial could last up to five weeks, with a further preliminary hearing expected to take place at a later date.
She said: 'We just need to make this happen, really.
'It is not in anyone's interests that this case goes into the long grass of 2027.'
Following the short hearing, the four claimants said: 'We welcome the judge's decision to bring our case forward.
'We've already spent years waiting for justice, and so it's of some comfort to hear that Andrew Tate will face these allegations in a court earlier than the original plan of 2027.'
Andrew Tate is being sued over allegations of sexual violence (AP Photo/Vadim Ghirda, File)
The hearing in April was told that the case is believed to be a legal first as it will consider whether allegations of coercive control, in a civil context, could amount to intentional infliction of harm.
Judge Richard Armstrong said that the claimants were 'seeking damages likely to reach six figures'.
The women are bringing a civil case against Tate at the High Court after the Crown Prosecution Service decided not to prosecute in 2019.
Three of the British accusers were the subject of an investigation by Hertfordshire Constabulary, which was closed in 2019.
In court documents, one woman suing Tate claimed he 'would strangle her or grab her by her throat if she spoke back to him or said anything that he did not like… until she told him that she loved him or apologised for whatever he demanded at the time'.
She said he, and his brother Tristan Tate, 'played good cop and bad cop to manipulate her', and that Tate allegedly put her in a headlock or whipped her with a belt if she did not get out of bed and do work for his webcam business.
One woman said Tate and his brother Tristan 'played good cop and bad cop to manipulate her' (AP Photo/Vadim Ghirda, File)
The documents also allege Tate 'had weapons, including firearms, which were often pointed at her' and that he had 'indicated to her that he would like to kill someone if he could'.
Tate said that her account was 'fabrication' and a 'pack of lies', and has previously described the allegations as 'unproven and untested'.
In a statement, a spokesperson for Tate previously said: 'He denies ever threatening anyone with a firearm, engaging in non-consensual acts or subjecting any individual to physical or psychological harm.
'These are civil claims, brought years after the alleged events and following a CPS decision not to pursue criminal charges.
'It is deeply troubling that such graphic and one-sided accounts are being publicised before any judicial assessment has taken place.'
The statement added: 'Mr Tate will defend himself vigorously and remains confident the truth will prevail.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
Identity of teen thug who murdered mum on tram tracks revealed as knifeman turns 18
One relative described the victim as "my beautiful Danielle" KILLER UNMASKED Identity of teen thug who murdered mum on tram tracks revealed as knifeman turns 18 Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A TEENAGE murderer who knifed a mum to death after a row over an e-scooter can today be unmasked by The Scottish Sun on Sunday. Ryan Heath was just 16 when he repeatedly plunged a Rambo-style blade into Danielle Davidson, 33. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 3 Danielle Davidson, 33, from Edinburgh, was murdered by teen thug Ryan Heath 3 Danielle Davidson was killed on tram tracks in Edinburgh The maniac — who was a knife offender from the age of 11 — could not be named when he was caged for 18 years last December, because he was still 17 at the time. But the monster's face can finally be shown two years after the horror attack on tram lines in Edinburgh's Leith. And we can also reveal that Heath's deceased mother was a friend of mum-of-one Danielle. Just eight days before the senseless slaying, Heath had been put on a supervision order by the Children's Reporter for repeated thuggish behaviour. The balaclava-clad fiend argued with Danielle's pal Conlan Carr over the scooter before turning and knifing her. He stabbed her four times, inflicting blows to her head and body in the broad daylight horror in May 2023. The fatal wound went through Danielle's back, piercing her lung. She was rushed to hospital but could not be saved. Heath initially claimed self defence but pleaded guilty to murder after harrowing CCTV of the killing was played to the High Court in Edinburgh. Prosecutor John McElroy KC said at last November's hearing: 'She shouted, 'I have been stabbed,' before collapsing on the tram track.' The footage also showed Heath entering a women's toilet in Tesco to change his clothes after the attack. Heartbreaking Old Firm march Grieving parents call for knife crime action in Scotland He later told his aunt and uncle: 'I have done the crime, so I will do the time.' It emerged in court that he was charged with knife possession at 11 and had also been involved in drug dealing from the age of 13 as a 'victim of modern slavery'. Last night Tory shadow justice secretary Liam Kerr said: "The killer already had a lengthy rap sheet for drugs and thuggery. "He wore a balaclava, carried a cruel blade and stabbed his victim several times. "The public needed protection from Heath, unmasked. "People will rightly question whether the reasons that teenagers are granted anonymity in court apply in this harrowing case." Heath's lawyer Iain McSporran KC told the court: 'She was an entirely innocent victim in this dreadful crime.' Jailing him at the High Court in Glasgow last December, Judge Lord Arthurson said: 'This was an appalling and cowardly attack on a vulnerable and defenceless young mother. 'She was in the wrong place at the wrong time while you were intoxicated by drugs and armed with a large, lethal bladed weapon.' We told in March how the 18-year sentence imposed by Lord Arthurson was reduced to 14 years on appeal. Lawyers for Heath successfully argued that the punishment breached guidelines to encourage more lenient sentences for the under-25s. Judges at the Court of Criminal Appeal agreed — despite calling the offence 'shocking'. Lord Matthews ruled: 'The sentence was more akin to that which might have been imposed on an adult offender.' After her death, Danielle's cousin John Davidson posted on social media: ' My beautiful Danielle. I am broken.'
STV News
3 hours ago
- STV News
Families of Chinook crash victims press on with legal action against MoD
The families of those killed in the 1994 Chinook helicopter crash have said they will press on with seeking a judicial review after the Ministry of Defence (MoD) dismissed their demands for a judge-led public inquiry. RAF Chinook ZD576 was carrying 25 British intelligence personnel from RAF Aldergrove in Northern Ireland to a conference at Fort George near Inverness when it crashed in foggy weather on June 2 1994 on the Mull of Kintyre. All 25 passengers – made up of personnel from MI5, the Royal Ulster Constabulary and the British Army – were killed, along with the helicopter's four crew members. The families launched legal action in a 'letter before action' to the UK Government sent earlier this month on the 31st anniversary of the crash. They said they will now pursue a judicial review after the MoD responded and rejected their demands for a public inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the crash, and for access to files which have been sealed for 100 years. Nicola Rawcliffe, whose brother Major Christopher Dockerty was killed in the crash aged 33, said: 'I am furious and disgusted with the MoD's decision to summarily dismiss our claim. 'The MoD is continuing to deceive our families and disrespect our loved ones' memories by claiming that the many previous inquiries investigated all the facts, but we now know the aircraft was not airworthy. They didn't know half of what we know now. 'The Government may have sealed the files for 100 years, but we, the families of those who died, are firmly united, strong and defiant, and we will get to the truth, no matter what it takes.' Following the crash, the Chinook's pilots, Flight Lieutenants Richard Cook and Jonathan Tapper, were accused of gross negligence, but this verdict was overturned by the UK government 17 years later following a campaign by the families. A subsequent review by Lord Philip set out 'numerous concerns' raised by those who worked on the Chinooks, with the MoD's testing centre at Boscombe Down in Wiltshire declaring the Chinook Mk2 helicopters 'unairworthy' prior to the crash. The MoD said the crash was a 'tragic accident' and while its sympathies remain with the families and friends of the victims, there have been several investigations and inquiries and it believes it is unlikely another would reach any new conclusions. Andy Tobias, who was eight when his father Lieutenant Colonel John Tobias, 41, was killed, said: 'My childhood was stolen from me because someone decided my dad and his colleagues should be put on a helicopter that was not fit for purpose. 'My mum, my brother, I and all the families deserve the truth and the MoD must repay the honour and integrity that those on board had shown in their years of service to their country. That's why we formed the Chinook Justice Campaign and we will not rest until we get the truth. If that takes a judge to rule in court, then so be it.' The families, who have coalesced into the Chinook Justice Campaign, said failing to order a public inquiry is a breach of the UK Government's human rights obligations. Solicitor Mark Stephens, from law firm Howard Kennedy, said: 'This decision by the MoD to dismiss our claim is an unforgivable betrayal of service people who gave their lives for their country and an undisguised slap in the face for their long-suffering and bereaved families. 'So much for the Government's so-called commitment to duty of candour. 'We will now seek a judicial review into the Ministry of Defence's decision to deny the families truth, transparency and justice.' A MoD spokesperson said: 'The Mull of Kintyre crash was a tragic accident, and our thoughts and sympathies remain with the families, friends and colleagues of all those who died. 'We understand that the lack of certainty about the cause of the crash has added to the distress of the families. 'We provided a detailed and considered response to the pre-action protocol letter stating the reasons why we cannot accept the demand for establishing a new public inquiry. 'It's unlikely that a public inquiry would identify any new evidence or reach new conclusions on the basis of existing evidence. 'The accident has already been the subject of six inquiries and investigations, including an independent judge-led review.' It is understood the sealed documents contain personal information relating to third party individuals and the early release of this information would breach those individuals' data protection rights. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Wales Online
5 hours ago
- Wales Online
One of the biggest drugs haul in history discovered at British port with £100m of cocaine seized
One of the biggest drugs haul in history discovered at British port with £100m of cocaine seized After the vessel was intercepted officers moved 37 large containers out of their way before locating the haul which weighed 2.4 tonnes worth an estimated £96m The load was discovered on a container vessel at the London Gateway port. It had been travelling from Panama (Image: Border Force ) Border Force officers in Essex have seized a huge volume of cocaine with a street value of almost £100m. Officers have called the discovery one of the largest drugs busts in recent history. The load was discovered on a container vessel at the London Gateway port. It had been travelling from Panama. After the vessel was intercepted at the port in Stanford-le-Hope, Essex, officers moved 37 large containers out of their way before locating the haul which weighed 2.4 tonnes worth an estimated £96m. It makes the haul the sixth largest cocaine seizure since records began, the Home Office said. In a statement a spokesperson for Border Force said: 'The interception strikes a significant financial and operational blow against the organised crime groups behind its importation and is an example of an intelligence driven outcome to disrupt criminal supply chains.' Article continues below Border Force maritime director Charlie Eastaugh explained: 'This seizure - one of the largest of its kind - is just one example of how dedicated Border Force maritime officers remain one step ahead of criminal gangs who threaten our security. 'Our message to these criminals is clear. More than ever before we are using intelligence and international law enforcement cooperation to disrupt and dismantle your operations.' Government minister Seema Malhotra added: "Drugs gangs trying to import illegal substances into the UK are a blight on society and we will leave no stone left unturned in our pursuit of organised crime gangs inflicting addiction, misery and death upon Britain's communities."
