New Zealand declines approval for Contact Energy's wind farm project
An independent Expert Consenting Panel convened under the country's COVID-19 Recovery (Fast-track Consenting) Act 2020 (FTCA) declined resource consent for the project.
Make sense of the latest ESG trends affecting companies and governments with the Reuters Sustainable Switch newsletter. Sign up here.
Under the act, the panel is advised and provided administrative support by the country's Environmental Protection Authority, which is not involved in the panel's decision-making process.
The decision "represents a significant setback for New Zealand's decarbonisation, Contact's mission to improve electricity security of supply and the country's economic development," Contact Energy CEO Mike Fuge said.
"During construction, the New Zealand economy would benefit from the creation of up to 240 new jobs, with around NZ$230 million ($133 million) to NZ$280 million in domestic spend," he said.
The panel, in its report, acknowledged the project's potential to support the goal to double the overall volume of electricity from renewable sources by 2050.
However, it was "not satisfied adverse effects on significant indigenous vegetation and the significant habitats of indigenous fauna on Jedburgh Plateau can be offset or compensated for in a way that will achieve the purpose of the FTCA," it said.
The panel's decision can be appealed to the High Court within 15 working days. Contact will review the decision and assess the next steps available, Fuge said.
($1 = 1.7188 New Zealand dollars)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
11 hours ago
- Spectator
Fighting welfare rebels, Liz Kendall looked like a woman tortured
That this government is bad at maths will not come as a surprise to many readers. Thus far, however, in its endless parade of resounding successes, this has been mostly confined to miscalculations on the economy. Now, though, government innumeracy seems to have spilled out into its Parliamentary arithmetic too. Despite having a landslide majority, Labour has managed to find itself, not quite a year into power, with a serious backbench rebellion on its hands. This is doubly impressive: not only is the government's majority enormous, it is composed of an intake of infamously supine backbenchers, desperate for attention and promotion from No. 10. They make the 1997 Labour cohort look like The Few. To have provoked this lot into open rebellion is quite the achievement. Enter Liz Kendall, whose flagship welfare reform bill has run into choppy waters as backbenchers threatened to torpedo its passage through parliament. Kendall wanted to give the impression she had come with open ears; 'we've listened' being her most oft repeated introit. In fact, an open chequebook might have been more appropriate. More and more concessions were announced – from a rise in Universal Credit to another £300 million in disability allowances. Reassessments for benefits were stripped back, the constraints on those claiming PiP were watered down. This wasn't just a retreat, it was full-scale surrender. Even so, it was still tough going for Kendall. There were innumerable requests for her to give way, with the queries from her own benches as hostile as those opposite. Labour MPs had self-selected into two groups. Immediately behind Kendall was a gaggle of youthful MPs who looked like the focus group for an acne cream brand. This Praetorian Guard of work experience students huddled protectively to her rear. Next to her were her ministers of state, including a rather melancholy-looking Sir Stephen Timms, on whose upcoming review of the changes Kendall hung much of her argument. Further up the benches were the vultures, Labour veterans of rebellions of yore, greyer and grimmer in outlook. I could swear I saw John McDonnell lick his lips as Kendall struggled to answer for yet another time. A lot of them had turned out, which didn't help the already hot temperatures. Many MPs resorted to fans: varying from Cat Smith's stylish opera-style number to Kim Johnson's vast fanning device – the size of a tennis racket – which looked like it might have been part of the cooling system at a nuclear power plant. Also struggling to keep her cool was Kemi Badenoch in her response. Labour goading when she mentioned the Covid pandemic tipped her over the edge. 'I remember sitting on that side of the House and them demanding that we spend more and more money' she bellowed, visibly angry with the hindsight enthusiasts opposite. Meanwhile the government benches radiated misery. 'I feel sorry for the Right Honourable Lady: she looks like she is being tortured', snapped Mrs Badenoch. Liz Kendall pulled a face which did not exactly dispel that notion. Mrs Badenoch then motioned at the Starmer and Reeves-shaped craters on the government benches. Indeed, the Leader of the Opposition mentioned the Chancellor considerably more than she mentioned anybody else: for her it was very clear where the blame should be laid. Today is the anniversary of the Battle of the Somme: Mrs Badenoch's thrust was that the tradition of sending people over the top without sufficient support was alive and well. There was precious little comfort for Ms Kendall from her own side, either. Rachel Maskell, leader of the rebels and whose amendment it is that could sink the bill, accused the government in a carefully-worded speech of 'lacking mercy' and of having their priorities all wrong. 'We know that those with the broadest shoulders could pay more,' lamented Emma Lewell. (Perhaps; they could also just hop on a plane to Dubai.) Chair of the Work and Pensions committee Debbie Abrahams described the bill as 'a dog's breakfast'. Over on the vulture step, Kim Johnson brandished her inflatable tennis racket and began flapping again. The Lib Dems announced they would be supporting Rachael Maskell, their spokesman, Steve Darling – who is himself blind – accusing the government of creating a two-tier and 'Orwellian' system. They're good at that, it seems. After hours of ceaseless grumbling, Stephen Timms returned to announce the biggest U-turn of all; gutting the reforms entirely and scrapping the section on PIP. But this massive concession only seemed to enrage the rebels further. 'Ootraaageous!' yelled Ian Lavery, brandishing his order paper at the Deputy Speaker. 'This is crazy, man!' One Tory backbencher asked how much of the promised £5 billion savings would the taxpayer now be on the hook for, following the government's various U-turns. (The correct answer is surely, 'every penny of it'). Even Mr Timms, a popular figure on both sides of the House, couldn't get away with his next bit of bluster – a cop-out so clear you could see it from space. 'We'll set out these figures in the usual way,' he replied, triggering gales of laughter on the opposition benches. In the end, the rebels didn't vote down the Maskell amendment – because they didn't need to. The welfare reform was no more! It had ceased to be! It had expired and gone to meet its maker! It was stiff, bereft of life, an ex-bill! Meanwhile, there sat Kendal, the front benches looking more and more like a crater in no man's land and with no sign of a rescue party in sight.
Reuters
14 hours ago
- Reuters
Chile's Codelco secures lithium quota needed for SQM partnership, company says
SANTIAGO, July 1 (Reuters) - Chile's state-run copper producer Codelco said on Tuesday that it received regulatory approval for a lithium extraction quota that is key to its planned joint venture with Chilean lithium miner SQM. Chile's nuclear energy regulator CCHEN approved an initial extraction of 2.5 million metric tons of lithium metal equivalent (LME) per year from 2031 to 2060, Codelco said.
Scottish Sun
14 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Struggling iconic car firm ‘asking to delay payments' – after axing hundreds of jobs at UK factory and £4billion losses
It could leave the company owing more money down the line FORK IN THE ROAD Struggling iconic car firm 'asking to delay payments' – after axing hundreds of jobs at UK factory and £4billion losses Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A STRUGGLING car brand has reportedly asked to delay payments to suppliers in a bid to free up funds. The company's new CEO has already confirmed it will be axing hundreds of jobs at a UK factory after reporting £4 billion in losses in the last financial year. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 3 Nissan has reportedly asked suppliers if it can delay payments Credit: Getty 3 It comes after 250 job losses at its Sunderland factory Credit: AFP Nissan's Sunderland factory will be axing around 250 jobs as part of a "voluntary leave scheme" which allows employees to choose to leave their role with the company's support. Earlier this year the manufacturer announced 20,000 job losses, seven factory closures and a pause on all post-2026 new car development. It is all part of a restructuring project overseen by CEO Ivan Espinosa after he was appointed in April. Now, Reuters has reported that the major car manufacturer has asked suppliers to allow it to delay payments in an attempt to free up short-term cash. According to a source and emails seen by Reuters, Nissan has asked some suppliers in Britain and the European Union to accept delays in payments. This would give the company more cash on hand at the end of the April-June first quarter. Requests like this are not uncommon as a means of freeing up cash flow. In a statement, Nissan told The Sun: 'As we take quick actions under the Re:Nissan plan, we are leveraging the strong and flexible relationships we have built with our suppliers to ensure financial stability and maintain solid foundations for future success. 'With their full agreement, we have incentivised some of our valued suppliers to collaborate under more flexible payment terms, at no cost to them , in order to support free cash flow. 'As previously communicated, our cash position remains strong. We continue to cooperate with our valued suppliers across our operations, including in the UK, where we are looking forward together to the launch of the all-new Nissan LEAF and the arrival of our new e-POWER technology to Qashqai, the highest-volume car built in Britain.' While the deal could help the company in the short-term, they could be left with more to pay down the line. A source from the company told the reporter that June payments would be delayed until August 15, while some would be pushed until September. New Nissan Leaf tested - it's bigger, better and goes further These delays are not being forced on suppliers, but were sent as requests earlier this month. It is all part of Nissan's attempt to rebuild in light of their financial difficulties. The company hopes to have positive free cash flow by the 2026 financial year. In other emails, a director in the treasury department stated a target of freeing up $150million. Suppliers have allegedly been given two options. They can accept a delayed payment in return for a higher repayment with interest. Or they can be paid on time by HSBC, with Nissan paying the bank back with interest later. Nissan estimated that it could boost free cash flow by up to $59 million by extending payment terms. It comes as another major manufacturer has reported a loss on its Nissan Motor shares. Renault announced today that it will report a loss of about $11.2 billion in the first half after changing the way it accounts for the investment. After a two-decades long partnership, the French carmaker is trying to distance itself from the struggling business. Renault owns 35.7% of the company, and plans to assess changes in its value based on Nissan's share price, with no impact on its net income nor on dividends it pays out. Essentially, they are interested in how much the company is valued at, not its monetary worth.
