logo
Kiama MP Gareth Ward's criminal trial told of ‘unreliability' in closing address

Kiama MP Gareth Ward's criminal trial told of ‘unreliability' in closing address

News.com.au5 days ago
A jury who have sat through the lengthy criminal trial of Kiama MP Gareth Ward have been told a man who alleges the MP sexually abused him has a 'certain unreliability'.
Mr Ward, a NSW independent MP, was charged in March 2022 with three counts of assault with act of indecency, an alternative charge of common assault against an 18-year-old man at Meroo Meadow in 2013, and intercourse without consent against a 24-year-old man in Potts Point in 2015.
Since his arrest three years ago, the 43-year-old has denied the allegations and pleaded not guilty to all counts.
In the Darlinghurst District Court on Monday, defence barrister David Campbell SC continued his closing address, telling the court that the first complainant, a parliamentary staffer who was 24 at the time of the alleged incident, has a 'certain unreliability' when it comes to his memory.
In evidence, the man was earlier asked about which particular event he was attending at Parliament House on the night in question, to which he said he couldn't recall 'exactly' but gave details as to which event he believed it was.
'I believed it was that event,' the man said.
'Do you think it, do you believe it or do you know it … what's the position?' Mr Campbell replied, to which the man stated he 'believes it'.
Mr Campbell told the jury that what the man couldn't do was say he 'knows it'.
'He (the complainant) said that sometimes memories can meld together, particularly given the amount of time that has passed,' he said.
'Due to that corrosive effect on the memory, there must be a certain unreliability of what (name redacted) is now suggesting to you the jury.'
Mr Campbell went on to thank the jury for their patience over the past eight weeks.
'This is the last chance we have to say anything to you on behalf of Mr Ward … and there may well be bits we haven't covered,' he said.
'Our submission to you is clearly this: The Crown has simply not discharged the burden it has in either of those two complainants' cases.'
The barrister urged the jury to find the MP not guilty on all counts.
Mr Ward is alleged to have assaulted a man, who had just turned 18 at the time, at the MP's South Coast home in February 2013.
It's also alleged Mr Ward sexually assaulted another man – who was 24 years old at the time – at his Potts Point apartment in September 2015.
Beginning his political career in 2011, Mr Ward was a councillor on the Shoalhaven Council before becoming the Liberal member for Kiama in 2011, a seat he has held since.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Climate visa won't turn tide on environmental damage
Climate visa won't turn tide on environmental damage

Sydney Morning Herald

time6 hours ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Climate visa won't turn tide on environmental damage

The new visa pathway for Tuvaluans indicates a significant and welcome shift in government policy in that it recognises for the first time that climate change can force people to leave their homes (' Four in five Tuvaluans apply to move to Australia. Frayzel is among them ', July 20). But while it offers a way out, it does not address the cause of their displacement. When Pacific nations ask Australia to cut emissions to help slow sea-level rise, the government is unwilling to act. Offering resettlement while enabling massive fossil fuel expansion ignores both our climate obligations and the human rights of those already bearing the consequences. Wouldn't the right approach be to match humanitarian support with a meaningful effort to reduce emissions driving the rising sea levels and climate warming? Anne Ammann, Dargan Parenting priorities I don't often agree with Parnell Palme McGuinness, but I do on this one (' Women's revolution will benefit all', July 20). Fifth-wave feminism, which will make it possible for parents to prioritise looking after their child themselves, particularly in the early years, has been highlighted by the current childcare scandals. Economic changes to make that possible make long-term sense for society and the economy, even if there is a short-term hit to government coffers. It was crazy to think that someone called an educator was a reasonable substitute for parents, particularly in the first two years of a child's life. Gary Barnes, Mosman Parnell is correct to spell out the obvious that babies need parents and parents need babies. This is an evolved genetic imperative we ignore to our peril with dire consequences for individuals and society. Business will also be a winner with happy, fulfilled and productive employees. Win-win all round. Mother and freelance writer Virginia Tapscott must be applauded for her enlightened manifesto, which we desperately need. The elephant we've been ignoring is the fundamental flaw of allowing the care of our young and their parents to be at the mercy of a profit-driven industry. Richard Hambly, Potts Point Investing in the future Many years ago, in the late 1970s, the old Marrickville Council decided to invest in multiple child care centres (' More must be done to attract quality childcare staff ', July 20). It was the best decision those long-departed councillors ever made. My children (and later grandchildren) have all benefited from a system where the staff has professional development and support, while parents have a ready avenue to express concerns. There is no good reason why child care cannot be provided by local government in the same way as libraries and other community services. Joanna Mendelssohn, Dulwich Hill Dollars not sense Richer by the day, thanks substantially to tax-free wealth gains on a property that houses a gymnasium, a guests' retreat, half a dozen bathrooms and serves as a domestic dwelling for two (' Rich lister sells house for $40m, doubles his money in five years ', July 20). Meanwhile, poorly paid workers struggling to find the money to enable their families to survive from day to day have to pay tax on their paltry earnings, and people think it's OK. Unbelievable. If those who make the rules were poor, lowly paid workers rather than overly well-to-do, things might be different, more reasonable, and society less unjust and not so sick. Ross Drynan, Lindfield Trump's hubris When Donald Trump's delicate sensitivities are offended, his default response is to sue, baby, sue (' Angry Trump sues Murdoch for $15b ', July 20). This is designed to cause the offender to surrender and has proved effective at times. However, he has underestimated Murdoch. Murdoch is far more savvy than Trump and would not have allowed The Wall Street Journal to publish the Epstein birthday letter without doing all the checks and balances. I suspect Trump will be forced to eat humble pie this time to avoid a court case that could open a very nasty can of worms. Graham Lum, North Rocks Live and learn Correspondent Trevor Somerville mentions that he is still a curious learner who owns a computer (Letters, July 20). May I suggest the Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC) may be of interest and help him fill his time. In a nutshell, universities from around the world make short courses available to the public on a wide range of subjects. These courses are open to all, with no prerequisites, and free options are available. Australian providers, including RMIT, Deakin and Melbourne Universities, offer courses on the UK's FutureLearn platform. A bonus of the MOOC experience is the variety of perspectives brought by learners from across the globe. Barbara Chapman, South Yarra (Vic) Best of them mall I grew up not far from Roselands shopping centre and it offered more than mere shops. (' Concerts, weddings: The history of western Sydney's shopping centres ' July 20). The 1960s were a different time. The Battle of the Bands held heats at the Raindrop Fountain, Johnny Farnham offered Sadie and Raindrops Keep Falling on my Head, and the beautiful pool offered summer joy in the 'burbs and allowed many of us to meet up. Special events like the film America the Beautiful in 360-surround merely added the icing. Shops were rarely even considered. Roselands was a destination in itself and simply the place to be in what appeared to be far simpler times. Janice Creenaune, Austinmer

NSW MP Gareth Ward likely to be removed from parliament after conviction for sex crimes
NSW MP Gareth Ward likely to be removed from parliament after conviction for sex crimes

ABC News

time20 hours ago

  • ABC News

NSW MP Gareth Ward likely to be removed from parliament after conviction for sex crimes

A sitting member of the NSW parliament has been convicted of serious sexual offences — so what happens next? The independent member for Kiama, Gareth Ward, was found guilty of four offences relating to the sexual abuse of two young men after a nine-week trial in the NSW District Court. Following the verdict, the NSW government swiftly called for the 44-year-old to resign from parliament — claiming his position was "no longer tenable". Even the Liberal Party — the previous party of Ward — said the politician had breached public trust and his crimes were an "abuse of power". The conviction of a sitting politician for serious crimes is a rare event. Ward was previously barred from parliament when the allegations first surfaced, but his shock re-election saw him return. Now that he has been found guilty by a jury, will he be removed from office? The NSW Constitution contains provisions for expelling sitting members convicted of an "infamous crime" — that is an offence that carries a maximum sentence of more than five years. All four of Gareth Ward's offences meet that criterion, with the most serious offence — sexual intercourse without consent — carrying a maximum prison term of 14 years. However, the politician's seat will not be vacated just yet. Ward has 28 days to lodge an appeal in the NSW District Court, and his seat in parliament will not be declared vacant until the challenge is resolved. However, these provisions do not interfere with the powers of the House to expel members. Election analyst Ben Raue is a close observer of Australian politics. He said the NSW parliament has powers to remove politicians. "I can't imagine they would have issues passing a motion of suspension, I think that would be the bare minimum to be honest," he said. Mr Raue said NSW parliament is in unchartered waters with this case. "It is very unusual," he said. After the verdict, Ward was granted bail release to return home ahead of a hearing on Wednesday where the Crown will seek to have the politician taken into custody ahead of his sentence. The verdict was handed down more than three years after Ward was first charged. The then-Liberal politician was stood down from his portfolio as the NSW Minister for Families, Communities and Disability Services after it emerged that he was the subject of a police investigation. In 2022 he was suspended from parliament after he refused to resign over the allegations. "That is one of the things that is so odd about this case is normally when people are facing serious criminal charges like this, they resign from their public office," said Mr Raue. Despite the case hanging over his head and his inability to represent his community in the parliament — constituents in Kiama re-elected him in 2023, allowing him to return to parliament. "I think it is a sign of how popular he had been that he managed to get re-elected," said Mr Raue. "I think there was a recognition that the voters had their say and until he is convicted, he is a member of parliament." Mr Raue said the conviction means voters in Kiama are likely to be returning to the polls. "I think it is likely now we will see a by-election at some point — either he resigns, or he is expelled," he said.

Aussie killer who took ‘delight' in murdering dad and stepmum fights sentence 10 years after he was jailed
Aussie killer who took ‘delight' in murdering dad and stepmum fights sentence 10 years after he was jailed

News.com.au

time20 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Aussie killer who took ‘delight' in murdering dad and stepmum fights sentence 10 years after he was jailed

Warning: Distressing content. A man who took a 'chilling' delight in killing his father and stepmother is fighting his 42-year jail sentence more than a decade after the brutal crimes. Corey Breen was jailed for 42 years with a non-parole period of 33 years in 2015 after he murdered his father, Paul Breen, and stepmother, Felicia Crawford. Breen in 2013 used a hunting knife to smash the glass panels of the unlocked front door of his father's North Sydney home before kicking the door open on Good Friday. Breen later admitted to police he had smashed the glass to give his dad the 'f**king spooks before I killed the c**t'. Paul screamed out before his son stabbed him 15 times, killing him 'on the spot'. Ms Crawford tried to hide behind the door of a converted bedroom in the garage just outside the home, but Breen used the door to pin her against the wall before stabbing her 10 times. She managed to stagger back to her bedroom, falling from her bed before she died. Two young children were inside the home and witnessed the horrific murders, with judge Jane Mathews saying they would be affected by the events for the rest of their lives. After spending more than 10 years in prison, Breen, now 38, is fighting his sentence in the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal. He argued in his grounds of appeal that Judge Mathews made several errors in sentencing, including by taking into account nine connected offences from a crime spree Breen embarked on the afternoon of the murders. It included stabbing a bystander in the face that caused a 'significant' laceration that required emergency treatment. His grounds of appeal also allege Judge Mathews made mistakes determining Breen's overall non-parole period in finding the offences involved multiple victims and a series of criminal acts and by determining previous convictions were an aggravating factor. Killer's 'violent fantasies' Breen had been 'nursing violent fantasies' long before killing his parents, evidenced by a chilling letter he wrote to his mum in 2009. He wrote he was 'happy, fun and would do anything for my friends', but things changed when he was alone. 'I get very angry and plot out murders of people I hate. I do it all in my head. I run over it again and again refining every detail,' Breen wrote. 'They are always extremely horrific and extremely brutal. 'I'm scared someday soon the monster that I've kept locked away for so long will finally reach the surface.' He wrote that people would suffer and die if the 'monster' was unleashed, acknowledging the thoughts were 'evil' and he had not acted on them because nothing had 'pushed (him) quite that far yet'. 'But I do feel it is close,' he wrote. Judge Mathews said in her judgment the 'letter assumes a highly chilling quality when one considers the circumstances of these offences, more than 3½ years later.' His mum encouraged him to seek psychological help after she received the letter, but Breen appeared to keep his 'evil' thoughts to himself. He threatened to kill several of his relatives the following year over the belief they didn't support him enough when he lost his job after he was convicted for a 2009 assault at work. By 2011, he was estranged from his entire family. 'Ur dead': Disturbing text before murders Breen began his crime spree in the hours before the homicide by assaulting his girlfriend. He armed himself with a 19cm hunting knife and took out a rifle at one point, but a guest at his home managed to confiscate it before Breen walked out of the home with the blade. Running at a female bystander, Breen changed course and stabbed a man in the face before stealing a woman's bike and unleashing at a nearby convenience store. There, he assaulted another two bystanders and his girlfriend – who had followed him to try to calm him down – and tried to steal a car. He knocked over shelves in a bid to get to one of the bystanders and take his keys, stabbing at the staff door the man had hid behind. As the chaos unfolded, Breen texted his girlfriend's mum, writing 'Ur dead u filthy c**t', and stole a car from a nearby home before driving to his grandparents' home with the intent to kill them. Once there he stole another car and drove to his friends' home to steal guns to use to kill his parents. A resident who was home refused to give him a shotgun, and he squeezed her hand holding the keys to a firearm storage room tightly. He eventually let her go and left after taking her phone, at which point he drove to his dad's house. Police caught him a short time later, with an officer telling him he was under arrest for several stabbings and car theft. 'Multiple murder, mate,' Breen replied. 'I achieved my mission.' Son's 'delight' in killing parents Judge Mathews said both Paul and Ms Crawford's final moments must have been 'filled with unimaginable fear and horror', the 'horrendous' events sparked after something inside Breen 'snapped'. In a 'chilling' interview with police after the murders, Breen revealed he had been on his way to his mum's house when he was caught, saying he would have 'knifed her', his mum's boyfriend, his siblings, 'and whoever else was there'. He told officers he'd had a 'time bomb' sitting in his head and he knew he would kill his dad sooner or later. 'Just tonight was the night,' he said in his police interview. Judge Mathews said Breen expressed 'pleasure' over the killings, telling officers of his 'absolute pure hatred' for Paul and Ms Crawford because of his 'sh*t upbringing'. 'The delight he expressed in having murdered the two victims is quite chilling,' Judge Mathews said of Breen's police interview. Breen later told a forensic psychiatrist that he didn't remember any events surrounding the murders or the interview: He said: 'The person in the interview is not me … it sends my blood chilling.' Judge Mathews noted Breen had told a forensic psychiatrist that he was drinking heavily on the day of the killings and was taking an antidepressant, the doctor later diagnosing him with a substance abuse disorder. He found while Breen did set out to kill his dad and stepmum, it was not planned in advance. That, along with Breen's 'deep remorse' and findings he had reasonable prospects of rehabilitation, meant the offences fell short of the maximum imprisonment of life in jail, Judge Mathews said. Breen will fight his sentence during an appeal hearing on October 22.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store