Vast Releases Haven-1 Space Station VR App for Apple Vision Pro, Meta Headsets, and SteamVR
Vast Lead Astronaut, and former Acting Chief Astronaut at NASA, Andrew Feustel, serves as the narrator of the simulation, and also advised on the app's development. With three missions to space and 197 days on the International Space Station, Feustel's input was essential to ensuring an accurate simulation of being onboard a space station.
In the opening, Feustel greets the user at Vast headquarters in Long Beach, California, where Haven-1 is currently being designed and manufactured. His voice then guides the user through the station's interior, inviting them to interact with life support systems and other critical components showcasing the functionality of the station.
Much like on a real mission aboard Haven-1, the app enables users to run experiments and partake in routine astronaut activities including accessing storage areas for food and crew equipment, and checking a digital crew interface that monitors the station's systems.
Users can also interact with the simulated Haven-1 Lab, the world's first microgravity research, development, and manufacturing platform on a commercial, crewed space station. In the Haven-1 Lab, the user can check on experiments and view payloads from inaugural lab partners Redwire and Yuri, both foremost experts in developing microgravity payloads.
Other features of Haven-1 VR include the 1.1 m domed window, which boasts an immersive, 180-degree view of Earth, and the revolutionary zero gravity sleep system, which provides optimal support and comfort to astronauts while they sleep. Feustel specifically provided guidance on the simulated experience of looking through the window and the 'overview effect', a documented phenomenon that Feustel and other astronauts have experienced when viewing the Earth from space.
Scheduled to launch no earlier than May 2026, Haven-1 represents a preliminary step toward Vast's vision of pioneering the future of long-term space habitation.
Download the VR app from Meta, the App Store, or Steam to follow Vast's progress and get an up-close look at the world's first commercial space station. https://www.vastspace.com/haven-1-vr
About Vast
Founded in 2021 by Jed McCaleb, Vast is developing humanity's next-generation space stations and pioneering the path to long-term living and thriving in space. Haven-1, scheduled to be the world's first commercial space station, is currently in development and is expected to launch NET May 2026. Vast is also developing Haven-2, the proposed successor to the International Space Station (ISS), designed to serve NASA's Commercial LEO Destinations (CLD) program as a micro-gravity laboratory in space. Vast's long-term ambition is to create artificial gravity habitations that enable humans to live in space, reaffirming its commitment to ensuring a spacefaring future for all.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Here's how Character.AI's new CEO plans to address fears around kids' use of chatbots
When Karandeep Anand's 5-year-old daughter gets home from school, they fire up the artificial intelligence chatbot platform so she can chat about her day with her favorite characters, such as 'Libarian Linda.' Anand's experience using the product as a parent might be helpful now that he's new chief executive, a change the company announced last month. He's taken on the top job at a complicated moment for the company, which lets users talk to a variety of AI-generated personas. faces fierce competition in an increasingly crowded space, as well as lawsuits from families who claim the service exposed their children to inappropriate content and failed to implement adequate safeguards. has also received tough questions about safety from lawmakers, and one advocacy group said earlier this year that AI companion apps should not be used by kids under 18. Even for adult users, experts have raised alarms about people forming potentially harmful attachments to AI characters. Anand brings experience at some of the biggest tech companies to his new role leading approximately 70-person team. He spent 15 years at Microsoft and six years at Meta, including as vice president and head of business products at the social media giant. He also served as a board advisor for before joining as CEO. And he told CNN he sees a bright future for the platform in interactive AI entertainment. In other words, rather than people consuming 'brain rot' on social media for entertainment, Anand wants them co-creating stories and conversations with for fun. 'AI can power a very, very powerful personal entertainment experience unlike anything we've seen in the last 10 years in social media, and definitely nothing like what TV used to be,' Anand said in an interview. Unlike multi-purpose AI tools like ChatGPT, offers range of different chatbots that are often modeled after celebrities and fictional characters. Users can also create their own for conversations or role play. Another distinction is that bots respond with human-like conversational cues, adding references to facial expressions or gestures into their replies. The personas of AI characters on the app vary widely, from romantic partners to language tutors or Disney characters. It also features characters like 'Friends hot mom,' which describes itself as 'curvy, busty, kind, loving, shy, motherly, sensual'; and 'Therapist,' which calls itself a 'licensed CBT therapist,' although it features a disclaimer that it is not a real person or licensed professional. '(We're) doubling down on entertainment, doubling down on trust and safety,' Anand said. 'And a lot of the work we want to do is enable an entirely new creator ecosystem around AI entertainment.' was first sued by a parent — a Florida mom who alleges her 14-year-old son died by suicide after developing an inappropriate relationship with chatbots on the platform — last October. Two months later, two more families filed a joint suit against the company, accusing it of providing sexual content to their children and encouraging self-harm and violence. Since then, the company has implemented a range of new safety measures, including a pop-up that directs users who mention self-harm or suicide to the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline. It also updated its AI model for users under the age of 18 to reduce the likelihood that they encounter sensitive or suggestive content, and gives parents the option to receive a weekly email about their teen's activity on the platform. Anand said he's confident in the improvements has made since last year, but that work to keep the platform safe, especially for young users, continues. policies technically require users to be over the age of 13, although it does not ask for information to verify that users are signing up with the correct birthdate. 'The tech and the industry and the user base is constantly evolving (so) that we can never let the guard off. We have to constantly stay ahead of the curve,' Anand said. He added that the company continues to test how people could misuse new features to prevent abuse, such as a video generator launched last month that lets users animate their bots. In the days following the tool's arrival, users shared unsuccessful attempts to test its limits by creating fake videos of prominent figures like Elon Musk. 'We had to red team the product for such a long time to make sure you cannot use this for any negative use case like deepfakes or bullying,' Anand said. Those efforts aside, Anand said in an introductory note to users last month that one of his top priorities is to make the platform's safety filter 'less overbearing,' adding that 'too often, the app filters things that are perfectly harmless.' He told CNN that things like mentions of blood when users are engaging in 'vampire fan fiction role play' — something he says he's a fan of — might be censored under the current model, which he wants to update to better understand context while balancing the need for safety. Among Anand's other key objectives: encouraging more creators to join the platform to make new chatbot characters and upgrading the social feed where users can share content they've created with chatbots. The latter feature is similar to an app Meta launched this year that allows people to publicly share their prompts and AI-generated creations. Meta drew heat when apparently confused users shared conversations that contained embarrassing or personal details — a reminder of the privacy challenges that can come with AI tools. But the social element could help further differentiate from bigger competitors like ChatGPT, which users are also increasingly forming personal connections with. Another challenge Anand will face as CEO is retaining and growing the company's workforce, as an AI talent war heats up across the tech industry. In a sign of the competition for top talent, Meta has reportedly offered pay packages and bonuses worth hundreds of millions of dollars to grow its new superintelligence team. co-founder and former CEO Noam Shazeer was also lured back to Google last year, where he'd previously built conversational AI technology. 'It is hard, I will not lie,' Anand said. 'The good news for me as CEO is all the people we have here are very, very passionate and mission driven.'
Axios
2 hours ago
- Axios
Behind the Curtain: Zuck's AI moonshot
Mark Zuckerberg — in an unprecedented, multibillion-dollar talent raid — has dramatically reset the market for blue-chip AI builders, and further complicated the government's ability to stack its own technology bench. Why it matters: The Meta CEO is trying to lure talent from OpenAI and other tech companies with offers that can top $100 million in total compensation for the first year alone — beyond most star athletes' pay. Top-tier pay packages being offered by Meta for AI researchers can reach up to $300 million over four years, WIRED reports. A tech-news feed on X used a baseball card motif to portray an OpenAI researcher being "TRADED" to Meta. The talent derby has sent compensation soaring across AI, as rivals scramble to keep top talent and entice others not to flirt with Meta and other suitors. It's partly a continuation of an ongoing recruiting war — OpenAI built its lab with the help of some massive comp packages. Zuckerberg unveiled his dream team this week as Meta Superintelligence Labs (MSL), after meeting personally with potential recruits at his homes in Palo Alto and Lake Tahoe. The big picture: America has witnessed staggering valuations for startups. But never before have we seen company-valuation-sized salaries for people, rather than ideas or enterprises. That's injecting a new layer of drama and next-level economics for the biggest companies — many the size of nation-states — racing to win the AI wars. Collateral damage: The U.S. government is already struggling to recruit top researchers and scientists. A remotely talented AI specialist can now assume that riches in the tens of millions are attainable. So why sacrifice to serve in government? China, by contrast, can command top talent to work on government projects. A front-page Wall Street Journal story on Wednesday, "China Is Quickly Eroding America's Lead in the Global AI Race," said AI models from Chinese companies, including DeepSeek and Alibaba, are becoming popular in Asia, Europe, the Middle East and Africa. Zoom in: Zuckerberg's biggest single bet was investing $14 billion in Scale AI, and bringing co-founder Alex Wang to Meta as chief AI officer. Former GitHub CEO Nat Friedman will lead Meta's work on AI products and applied research. Eleven other new AI star hires were listed in Zuckerberg's internal memo announcing Meta Superintelligence Labs. Altman hit back at Zuckerberg's spree this week, telling OpenAI researchers in a Slack message that Meta "has gotten a few great people for sure, but on the whole, it is hard to overstate how much they didn't get their top people and had to go quite far down their list," WIRED reports. "I am proud of how mission-oriented our industry is as a whole; of course there will always be some mercenaries," Altman added. "Missionaries will beat mercenaries." Between the lines: Tech investors tell us that until very recently, the revenue outlook for AI models was unclear, and there was a debate about the return on capital spending. Now it's apparent that leading AI companies will do hundreds of billions in revenue per year. OpenAI is enjoying rampaging growth: The company said last month that it has $10 billion in annual recurring revenue, just 2½ years after the launch of ChatGPT — up from $5.5 billion last year. OpenAI has projected for investors that, fueled by AI agents and other new products, sales could total as much as $125 billion in 2029 and $174 billion in 2030, according to documents seen by The Information. Anthropic — a rival AI company led by Dario Amodei, an OpenAI alumnus — has hit a pace of $4 billion in revenue annually, up almost four times from January, The Information reported this week. At those rates of growth, you can see what Zuckerberg is seeing — and why he's suddenly pouring massive spending into making sure Meta remains a dominant AI player. The backstory: Zuckerberg is repeating a winning playbook. By 2012, he realized Facebook was behind on the mobile web. He famously redirected the entire company toward catching up. Facebook bought Instagram for $1 billion and later WhatsApp for $16 billion — racing ahead in areas where others had innovated. But this time he's betting on individuals, rather than successful enterprises. Reality check: Meta has spent a fortune on Llama, its large-language model (LLM), in an effort to develop a frontier model that can compete with OpenAI's ChatGPT, Anthropic's Claude and Google's Gemini. In a splashy story about " The List" of AI geniuses Zuckerberg is courting, the Wall Street Journal said Meta's "laggard history in generative AI has made some recruits hesitant." Bubbles can burst. AI salaries and data-center costs won't be sustainable without the ultimate payoff being unimaginably huge. And the more these companies spend, the bigger that payoff needs to be. As uncovered by a survey Axios reported last month, many small businesses using AI aren't even paying for it. The other side: Altman, noting that OpenAI has built "a culture that is good at repeatable innovation," said last month on a podcast hosted by Jack Altman, his younger brother, that Meta was making "giant offers to a lot of people on our team — like $100 million signing bonuses" and more than that in annual compensation. "We're set up such that if we succeed ... then everybody will do great financially," Sam Altman said. "[I]t's incentive-aligned with mission-first, and then economic rewards and everything else flowing from that." The bottom line: The bidding war is the most public manifestation of the secret race among AI giants — all betting that the technology will bring trillions of dollars in productivity gains. For them, the timeline is the biggest question.
Business Insider
3 hours ago
- Business Insider
Meta salaries: See how much AI engineers, researchers, and more at the tech giant get paid
The AI talent wars are intensifying as companies like Meta offer salaries in the mid-six figures. Federal filings reveal Meta's wage ranges for researchers, engineers, and other workers. The highest-paid research engineer at Meta makes up to $440,000 in base salary. Meta may be spending hundreds of millions of dollars to lure top AI talent from rivals. But how much is it paying its broader workforce of software engineers, product managers, and UX researchers? Thanks to data from federal filings, we now have a window into the company's salary ranges during a heated moment in Silicon Valley's talent wars. Software engineers at Meta can make up to $480,000. Machine learning roles go as high as $440,000. Even product designers and researchers routinely top $200,000. The numbers come from filings that companies must submit to the Department of Labor when hiring foreign workers through the H-1B visa program, which allows them to bring in 85,000 specialized workers annually through a lottery system. Because tech companies typically guard their compensation details closely, these government-mandated disclosures provide a peek into actual pay scales. The numbers reflect only annual salaries, excluding the stock options, signing bonuses, and other perks that can often double or triple total compensation packages. The data comes amid intense competition for AI talent in Silicon Valley. Meta is reportedly offering some AI researchers compensation packages worth up to $300 million over four years as it builds out a new Superintelligence lab. A spokesperson for Meta declined to comment. The frenzy extends beyond tech giants. Thinking Machines Lab, the secretive AI startup founded by former OpenAI chief technology officer Mira Murati, is paying technical staff base salaries of up to $500,000 before the company has launched a single product, Business Insider reported earlier this week. The battle has gotten personal. After Meta lured away seven OpenAI researchers, including Trapit Bansal, co-creator of the company's o1 reasoning model, OpenAI's chief research officer, Mark Chen, said in an internal memo that it felt like "someone has broken into our home." Here's what Meta is paying across key roles, based on H-1B filings from the first quarter of 2025. Data: A data scientist at Meta earns as much as $270,000. Engineering: Meta software engineers take home up to $480,000 in base salary. ASIC Engineer: $165,568 to $299,880 Business Engineer: $137,000 to $228,538 Design Engineer: $185,000 to $256,270 Electrical Engineer: $164,000 to $255,000 Embedded Software Engineer: $169,313 to $262,822 Engineering Director: $352,310 to $353,042 Engineering Manager: $246,536 to $288,767 Front End Engineer: $177,747 to $233,495 Hardware Engineer: $176,000 to $240,000 Network Engineer: $115,000 to $239,237 Quality Assurance Engineer: $189,213 to $244,000 Security Engineer: $145,000 to $258,524 Senior Software Engineer: $194,467 to $302,134 Software Engineer: $120,000 to $480,000 Software Engineering Manager: $219,978 to $328,000 Product and program management: A product manager at Meta is paid up to $314,159. Research: The highest-paid user experience researcher pockets up to $350,000.
