logo
The lavish £9.5m jewellery collection Princess Charlotte will inherit from Princess Kate

The lavish £9.5m jewellery collection Princess Charlotte will inherit from Princess Kate

Yahoo11-02-2025
On Christmas Day 2024, Princess Charlotte caught the attention of royal fans by wearing a sweet necklace and a set of friendship bracelets. However, the pieces of children's jewellery that the nine-year-old daughter of the Prince and Princess of Wales has so far been spotted wearing are just the tip of the iceberg compared to the collection she is set to inherit.
Princess Kate, 43, possesses one of the most impressive collections of glittering jewels of all of the British royal style set. From pieces she has been gifted by her husband Prince William and sets she has inherited from her late mother-in-law Princess Diana, to the tiaras she has borrowed from the royal collection, Kate has turned heads with her countless glittering jewels since her royal wedding in 2011.
Though the palace hasn't explicitly disclosed which pieces Charlotte will wear when she is older or inherit when the time comes, it is expected by royal fans that she will have the opportunity to delve into her mother's jewellery box when she is of age.
Charlotte's paternal aunt Princess Anne wore her first tiara aged 17, so it won't be long before Prince George's younger sister is eligible for a glittering diadem.
HELLO!got the lowdown on some of the most lavish pieces that Charlotte will likely inherit from a selection of industry-leading jewellery experts, as royal fans wait in anticipation of the young royal's tiara debut.
The glistening tiara that the late Princess of Wales wore on her wedding day to King Charles in 1981 has featured in the jewellery collection of the Spencer family for decades. Kate and her sister-in-law Meghan Markle both wore royal tiaras on their wedding days, as the piece remains in the Spencer family collection. But as the granddaughter of Princess Diana, fans look forward to seeing if Charlotte will one day wear it.
Jewellery designer Jessica Flinn tells us that the piece is estimated to be worth between £400,000 to £500,000 due to its "delicate yet striking design" crafted from silver and white diamonds. "It strikes a perfect balance between the extravagance we expect from royal jewellery and the gentle femininity we have come to associate with Princess Diana," she says.
Both Kate and Princess Diana have worn the Cambridge Lover's Knot Tiara. It was commissioned in 1818 by Queen Mary and was crafted by renowned British jewellers, Garrard, as a replica of a piece owned by Princess Augusta of Hesse-Kassel.
"The design consists of diamond-encrusted lover's knot motifs, symbolising love and unity," Nilesh Rakholia of Abelini tells us. "Crafted from diamonds and pearls and set in platinum, the tiara features 19 baroque pearl drops, each suspended from an arch of brilliant-cut diamonds."
Estimated by experts to be worth between £1 million and £3 million, it's particularly eye-catching owing to the "graceful arches and dangling pearls which provide a dramatic yet delicate movement".
Kate turned heads at the Earthshot Prize in Boston in 2022, accessorising her green Solace London gown with the Queen Mary emerald choker which was worn by Princess Diana during the 1985 Australia tour. Royal fans can look forward to the day Princess Charlotte dons the enchanting piece – either as a choke or a headpiece as her late grandmother did.
Jewellery designer Poppy Elder says of the piece dating back to the Delhi Durbar Parure of 1911: "This choker is a perfect example of how royal jewellery evolves with each generation", adding that it's made from large cabochon emeralds set in platinum and diamonds, featuring Art Deco styling, and is worth between £500,000 and £1 million.
The Princess of Wales made her tiara debut on her wedding day, borrowing the Cartier Halo tiara from the royal collection with the permission of the then-reigning monarch, Queen Elizabeth. "The tiara was first created as a gift for the Queen Mother in the 1930s and is a perfect example of the Art Deco jewellery design that was popular at the time, and has recently seen a resurgence in jewellery trends," Jessica Flinn tells us, estimating the tiara to be worth £1 million.
"The piece features delicate detailing, complete with hundreds of round cut and baguette cut white diamonds, all set in luxurious platinum. The tiara's intricate scroll-like motifs create a light, delicate effect, making the tiara among the more understated and subtle pieces in the royal collection.
If Princess Charlotte gets married there is no guarantee that she will follow in her mother's footsteps by wearing this tiara but if the opportunity arises, it is guaranteed the budding royal will wear it with the sense of poise she inherited from her mother."
Among the pieces that were passed on from Princess Diana's collection to Kate were her blue sapphire and diamond drop earrings. Charlotte may well wear the earrings that her mother has worn on countless occasions, including to Trooping the Colour in 2022.
"These earrings are estimated to be worth between £1.5 million and £2.5 million," jewellery expert Nilesh Rakholia tells us. "They feature oval-cut Ceylon sapphires, surrounded by brilliant-cut diamonds, arranged in a classic cluster design. They are set in white gold or platinum, enhancing the brightness of the diamonds and the rich colour of the sapphires."
He adds that Diana's pairing of the earrings with her iconic sapphire engagement ring makes them even more iconic, not to mention how the combination of sapphires and diamonds exemplify timeless elegance.
Diana's sapphire numbers are not the only classic drop earrings in her collection. She debuted the Diamond and South Sea pearl earrings during the coronation banquet of Emperor Akihito and Empress Michiko of Japan in 1990 - 29 years before Charlotte's mother wore the exact pair to the 2019 BAFTAs.
Jessica Flinn explains: "The earrings feature two beautiful South Sea Pearls of exceptional quality, their creamy white shine making them among some of the finest pearls in the world."
"Set in platinum and encrusted with white diamonds, their regal, luxurious charm is undeniable," she adds, estimating the sparkling set to be worth £250,000 and £300,000.
"The platinum and diamonds are masterfully crafted in a unique horseshoe shape with flowing leaf motifs, making them a truly exceptional piece in the royal collection and giving them an almost Art Nouveau feel."
The Lotus Flower Tiara is perhaps one of the most versatile headpieces in the royal collection as it can be worn both on the forehead and the crown of the head.
Jewellery designer Sophia Perez says: "The lotus flower motif is achieved through incredibly precise diamond placements, with each petal shape carefully defined. The platinum setting ensures durability while maintaining an airy, delicate structure."
Meanwhile, Poppy Elder muses on the wearability of the piece for Charlotte: "Due to its light, delicate design, it is an ideal tiara for younger royals, making it highly likely Charlotte will wear it in her early tiara appearances."
If Charlotte wears this £1 million piece, she will join her mother in continuing the legacy of Princess Margaret as well as the Queen Mother who received the piece as a wedding gift in 1923.
Kate's jewellery box also features the Collingwood pearl and diamond earrings which once belonged to William's mother. The understated drop earrings have been paired with the Cambridge Lovers Knot tiara by both Kate and Diana, suggesting that Charlotte will one day add them to her own collection.
"These earrings showcase expert gem selection - the pearls have a mirror-like sheen, and the diamonds are arranged to enhance that effect," Sophia Perez says of the earrings which are set with round and marquise-cut diamonds in white gold.
"The marquise-cut diamonds add a delicate, leaf-like detail, giving the earrings a soft, organic feel." She estimates them to be worth around £100,000 to £150,000.
Princess Charlotte has already shown that she likes to wear a dainty bracelet - take the gold piece she wore in the Royal Box at Wimbledon, for example. However, there is a certain heirloom piece that will elevate her collection tenfold when the day comes.
Princess Diana dripped in pearls on an official visit to Hong Kong in 1989, rounding off her look with a three-row pearl bracelet which now belongs to Kate. William's wife wore the bracelet in 2017 during a reception at Berlin's Clärchens Ballhaus, highlighting it's timeless quality.
"The uniformity of the pearls speaks to their quality—perfectly round, well-matched in size and lustre. The clasp isn't just functional but a piece of jewellery in itself, designed to add a hint of sparkle while remaining elegantly understated," Sophia tells us.
Though it packs a punch visually, it is a more modest piece in the royal collection in terms of price. Sophia estimates the pearl bracelet to be worth between £30,000 and £50,000.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Prince Harry and Prince William set for family reunion at their cousin's wedding: report
Prince Harry and Prince William set for family reunion at their cousin's wedding: report

New York Post

time34 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Prince Harry and Prince William set for family reunion at their cousin's wedding: report

Prince Harry and his estranged brother, Prince William, may soon breathe the same air. The feuding brothers, who have not maintained contact following the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's royal exit in 2020, will both be invited to the wedding of their eldest cousin, Peter Phillips, Hello! reports. The eldest and 'favorite' grandchild of the late Queen Elizabeth II announced last month that he is engaged to Harriet Sperling after one year of dating. Advertisement 4 Prince Harry and his estranged brother, Prince William, will both be invited to their cousin's wedding, according to a new report. Getty Images 'Mr. Peter Phillips, the son of HRH The Princess Royal and Captain Mark Phillips, and Ms. Harriet Sperling, daughter of the late Mr. Rupert Sanders and Mrs. Mary Sanders of Gloucestershire, have today confirmed their official engagement,' a spokesperson for the couple told The Post in a statement. The statement added that King Charles and Queen Camilla, as well as Prince and Princess of Wales, have been informed of the news. Advertisement 'Both families were delighted with the wonderful news of their engagement,' the statement added. Though a wedding date has yet to be set, the upcoming celebration has sparked questions over whether both princes will attend, given their yearslong feud. 4 Peter Phillips announced last month that he is engaged to Harriet Sperling after one year of dating. Getty Images Princess Anne's son grew up close to both William and Harry, however his relations with the brothers has taken a hit in recent years given the major shift in family dynamics. Advertisement The last time Phillips, who shares two daughters with ex-wife Autumn Kelly, was seen with William and Harry was during the late Queen Elizabeth II's funeral in September 2022. While it's unknown at this stage if the 'Spare' author, 40, plans to attend the pair's wedding, Harry had previously attended Peter's sister Zara Tindall's wedding in 2011. 4 Phillips grew up close to both William and Harry, however his relations with the brothers has taken a hit in recent years given the major shift in family dynamics. Getty Images The duke may be hesitant to attend the nuptials, given that he lost his bid for taxpayer-funded security earlier this year. Advertisement In recent years, the Invictus Games founder has opted to attend several milestone family events alone, including the funeral of his uncle, Lord Robert Fellowes, last summer. Follow The Post's royal family live blog for the latest pics, news, exclusive details and more It marked the first time Harry and William were reunited amid their feud, though sources said they were 'keeping their distance' and didn't speak to each other at the service. Still, he famously skipped out on the wedding of his longtime friend and the godfather of his son, Archie. 4 The feuding brothers have not maintained contact following the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's royal exit in 2020. WireImage Harry did not make the trip to England for the high-profile wedding of Hugh Grosvenor, the Duke of Westminster, and his bride, Olivia Henson. While the father of two was invited to the nuptials, at which Prince William served as usher, the duke's security concerns prevented him from going.

Woody Allen, Twiggy 1967 Philosopher Interview Explained
Woody Allen, Twiggy 1967 Philosopher Interview Explained

Buzz Feed

time2 hours ago

  • Buzz Feed

Woody Allen, Twiggy 1967 Philosopher Interview Explained

A 58-year-old interview is going viral after people were left impressed by the expert way that British supermodel Twiggy reacted to director Woody Allen's attempt to embarrass her. Twiggy, who would have been just 17 years old at the time, is being lauded for how she handled the potentially awkward situation, with then-31-year-old Woody seemingly belittling her intelligence during the uncomfortable conversation. Woody kicked off the 1967 interview by asking Twiggy her thoughts on 'serious matters,' and when she asks what he means by that, he replies: 'I don't know, who's your favorite philosopher?' Twiggy can't hide her shock at the question, and she laughs awkwardly before answering: 'I haven't got one, I have no idea.' She then curiously asks: 'Who's yours?' 'Oh, I like them all,' Woody stutters in response, but Twiggy refuses to let him get away that easily. 'Who?' she asks again, and Woody sheepishly replies: 'All your basic philosophers.''Who?' Twiggy repeats, Woody once again stumbles over his words as he says: 'Just all of them.' 'I don't know their names though,' Twiggy confesses, with a serious look on her face. 'What are their names?' Twiggy previously revealed that this interview took place during her first-ever trip to New York, and that she wanted to run off and 'burst into tears' when Woody first asked the question. "There was one person who wasn't so nice — a young comic called Woody Allen, and he was to interview me for a documentary," she told Glamour in 2009. "His first question was: 'Who's your favorite philosopher?' My heart sank. I wanted to run off and burst into tears. I didn't know any philosophers. And he probably knew I didn't.''When I said so, he replied: 'Oh, come on, everyone has a favorite philosopher.' It was such a cruel thing to do to a young girl," she also revealed that Woody left the set and refused to continue with the interview after she turned the tables on him. "I was desperate and trying not to cry, but I turned the tables on him and asked him to come up with some names — but he couldn't think of any either!' Twiggy recalled. 'Then he said to me: 'I suppose you've read Dickens,' thinking I hadn't. So I said: 'Yeah, I read him at school.' In the end, he said: 'Oh, I can't interview her,' and left the stage." And in a 2025 interview with the Guardian, Twiggy said: 'He was trying to make me look stupid. My heart sank. I remember looking at him, pleading with my eyes for him to stop.' 'If I was the age he was there, in my 30s, I would never have behaved like that towards someone who was only 17,' she added. The interview clip resurfaced on X on Sunday and quickly went viral, racking up over four million views and thousands of likes and retweets as other users praised Twiggy's reaction. One quote-tweet that has been liked more than 92,000 times reads: 'She was 17, a perfectly acceptable age to not know any philosophers but a very impressive age to embarrass a 31 year old with his own bullshit.''I love how the look in her eye goes from bashful to, 'oh, I'm going for the kill now. Game on,'' somebody else noted.'The funniest part about this is you'd think the obvious thing to do if you plan to ask a question to humiliate someone is to know the answer yourself, but the thought never even crossed his mind,' another wrote. And one more concluded: ''What are your thoughts on serious matters?' is the most fake intellectual question of all time like… which one???'

Editorial: So long, Lolla kids. Hope you had fun.
Editorial: So long, Lolla kids. Hope you had fun.

Chicago Tribune

time4 hours ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Editorial: So long, Lolla kids. Hope you had fun.

After a slow start, we've come to regard Lollapalooza with affection. The kids who flock to Chicago (more than 100,000 per day this year, reportedly) are a fun crew, their destination instantly recognizable from their sparkly, skimpy attire wherever we encountered them in the city this weekend (usually peering into their phones, trying to find their Ubers). And, of course, they spend a lot of money around town, especially in and around Chicago's Loop, which needs their support. We'd expect the economic impact of the festival this year to be somewhere around $500 million, if not more. Over the years, Lollapalooza has turned into a good Chicago citizen and, with apologies to Coachella, which has a broader cultural mandate, has become North America's equivalent of Glastonbury, the massive outdoor British festival, which makes news in the entertainment business every year, often by slating such things as final farewells from the likes of Elton John and Rod Stewart, the pairings of iconic artists and young artists showing respect for previous generations. We saw some of that last phenomenon this year at Lolla, when young, female headliners such as Gracie Abrams brought out Robyn, Olivia Rodrigo introduced Weezer and Sabrina Carpenter surprised attendees with Earth, Wind & Fire, a retro band that also happens to be playing Ravinia on Thursday night. We hope that, for all our mutual benefits, Lolla keeps its focus on those deft kinds of surprises. The Chicago Police Department tells us that this year's festival went off without any significant trouble, beyond what you might reasonably expect when that many humans gather in one place. There were only 12 total arrests over the four nights, which is minimal; zero tickets issued (not a typo) and 42 ambulance reports, which is way down from previous years (in 2021, for example, there were 102 transports). The cooler weather likely helped, but this is all good news. It could well be that the disruptions caused to downtown residents by the now-departed NASCAR, which actually involved city streets and resulted in lengthy closures, has made us better appreciate Lollapalooza, which mostly confines itself to established festival grounds. We also always appreciate the effort to bring in local food operations, such as Fatso's Last Stand and the family-owned Bacci Pizzeria. And we heard from out-of-towners who were impressed with this year's drone show — especially how well it framed the real Willis Tower, if you had the right angle. Better yet, the aftershows at venues all over town were hopping this past weekend, from the Salt Shed to Radius and from Schubas Tavern to Lincoln Hall. Past concerns about the big event locking up acts with exclusive deals in protected territory haven't entirely gone away, but with this many people at so successful a festival, it's now clear that the smaller venues in Chicago generally have decided it's better to join the four-night party than stand against it. The Department of Cultural Affairs and Special Events could do more to use the Lolla base for the benefit of the whole city and get attendees to stay for a week or more. Still, much as we often detail Chicago's problems in this space, we also know that its gorgeous skyline can seduce a young visitor like nowhere else in the Midwest. Huge benefits accrue, not just in terms of tourism but when it comes to attracting new residents, when young pop stars with tens of millions of followers post love letters to our town, as when Carpenter posted 'thank you, Chicago. Wow.' Carpenter also made specific reference to Chicago in her set, mimicking a Chicago news station. Rodrigo found her way to Wrigley Field this weekend and we heard tell of a certain young Chicago Cubs star present at Lollapalooza, too. Simply put, this was a weekend for the spotlight to find a way through the haze and shine on the beauty, action and artistry of a Chicago summer. Glastonbury is taking the year off in 2026 to allow the natural land to recover. Thanks to our urban setting and the hard work of those who tend to its grounds, Lollapalooza does not have that problem. It'll be back — and we're happy about that.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store