Climate change blamed for UK heatwave amid 32C temperatures
Searing temperatures of 32C hitting the UK this week have been made 100 times more likely due to human-caused climate change, scientists have warned.
A rapid study by the World Weather Attribution (WWA) research group found the current heatwave in the south-east of England was around 10 times more likely than without human activity warming the planet.
Dr Fredi Otto, from Imperial College London, underscored the severity, warning that heatwaves are "silent killers" and that the impacts of heat are "severely underestimated", leaving the UK unprepared for the conditions expected to persist into the weekend.
Experts highlighted that older people, along with those suffering from heart issues, respiratory illnesses, and conditions such as diabetes, face the highest risk of death.
They also noted that heatwaves occurring earlier in the summer are particularly deadly, as the population is less acclimatised to coping with warmer conditions.
The researchers also identified wildfires as an "emerging risk" for the UK during summer, with conditions increasingly resembling those found in southern Europe.
They urged the public to exercise extreme caution with barbecues, cigarettes, and glass, all of which can ignite fires in the hot, dry weather.
This study marks only the second time the WWA, known for its rapid assessments of climate change's role in specific extreme weather events, has analysed a forecasted event rather than one that has already occurred.
The analysis, which drew on observations for early summer heat in the south east of the UK, found that a heatwave – defined as three days of temperatures above 28C for the region – in June would be expected once every five years today.
But without humans warming the atmosphere by around 1.3C since pre-industrial times, such a heatwave would only have occurred about once every 50 years, the study shows.
The heatwave was made approximately 2-4C more intense as a result of the overall warming of the planet, meaning the current weather 'just wouldn't have been a heatwave without human-induced warming', Dr Ben Clarke, from Imperial College London, said.
Temperatures had been forecast to hit 32C across the south east on Saturday and had already reached that level on Thursday in London.
Heat of that level could be expected in June once in 25 years in the current climate, but only once in 2,500 years in June before industrialisation, the researchers said.
While the impacts of temperatures rising above 30C are not as severe as the record-breaking heat topping 40C in some places in July 2022, the researchers warned people were still at risk.
They urged people to ensure they were drinking enough water, and to encourage elderly relatives to do the same, avoid areas with high air pollution, keep windows and curtains shut during the day, and consider going to cooler public buildings such as museums to protect against the heat.
Dr Clarke, researcher at the Centre for Environmental Policy at Imperial College London, said: 'This heatwave is another reminder that our planet has already heated to a dangerous level.
'We're at 1.3C today, but heading for around 3C this century.
'With every fraction of a degree of warming, the UK will experience hotter, more dangerous heatwaves.
'That means more heat deaths, more pressure on the NHS, more transport disruptions, tougher work conditions and poorer air quality.'
Dr Otto, associate professor in climate science at the Centre for Environmental Policy, said: 'We know exactly what has intensified this heatwave – burning oil, gas and coal, which has loaded the atmosphere with planet-heating greenhouse gases.
'It is totally insane we have political leaders in the UK trying to drag us back to the past with calls for more fossil fuels.
'The climate will continue to drive increasingly dangerous heatwaves, fires and floods in the UK until emissions are reduced to net zero globally.'
She added that while people working in air-conditioned offices would 'probably be OK' this week, poorer people working outdoors, in kitchens or other hot environments and then returning home to poorly insulated flats would be enduring hot conditions throughout.
'Making our societies more equal is essential to reduce the impacts of climate change,' Dr Otto said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Times letters: Tying hospital funds to patient satisfaction
Write to letters@ Sir, There is a big difference between motivation and financial incentives ('Hospitals' funds tied to patient satisfaction', news, Jun 28). Most health and other professionals are primarily motivated by wanting to make a difference in the world and have an impact in their chosen field. They are not indifferent to money, but are far more likely to be demotivated by lack of money than motivated by financial rewards. Improved technology and better systems are vital, but the NHS is essentially a people-based service. The new NHS plan will only succeed if the people who have to implement it are personally committed to doing so — providing the extra discretionary effort and passion that money can't buy. The NHS plan of 2000 was similarly far-reaching: it enjoyed enormous support from many NHS professionals and organisations and kickstarted the major improvements of the following CrispChief executive of NHS England and permanent secretary of the Department of Health 2000-06 Sir, It's hard to see how cutting the income of a poorly performing NHS trust will result in its treating its unfortunate patients better: the reverse is far more likely. A fairer and more intelligent policy would be to replace the managers of badly run trusts with others who have a track record of serving the public ParlourLincoln Sir, Too often elaborate and expensive plans are made without any patient involvement. If the ten-year NHS plan is to be successful then patient representation on every single 'change' project should be encouraged. The patients' voice needs to be clear and loud, so as to have a real impact on future Mabs ChowdhuryConsultant dermatologist, Cardiff Sir, To achieve success during the 20-plus years that I was a clinical director in an NHS commissioning group, I spent my life explaining to the non-clinical managers why their initial ideas might not work for clinicians. Labour's suggestion will only work if the managers are willing clinicians who know the system; to think otherwise is folly. One need only look at what happened when the pandemic struck, and managers abandoned ship to the doctors and nurses, to realise Shelley HaylesOxford Sir, You report that patients will decide how much hospitals are paid by rating their treatment and that an improved NHS app will give patients more choice over who treats them and where. On the first issue there has never been a problem with staff motivation but there has been a perennial one with facilities provided (namely, operating theatres, beds and equipment) — which is hardly the responsibility of those providing the care. On the second issue there have been many studies to show that patients prefer local treatment, where any complications can be dealt with promptly by the same team and overall travel kept to a minimum. These proposals will be ineffective and wasteful. Instead we need to eliminate inefficiency and provide adequate facilities for a professional workforce that should be trusted and not treated like difficult ThomasRet'd consultant orthopaedic surgeon, Itchen Stoke, Hants Sir, I enjoyed Ben Macintyre's account of Anglo-Iranian relations ('Iranian distrust of the British runs deep', Jun 28) but I fear he is too accepting of some of the propagandist claims regularly made by the Islamic Republic. He omits to mention British support for the Constitutional Revolution between 1905 and 1909, particularly the role played by the extraordinary Philo-Persian Cambridge scholar and activist Edward Browne. He might also have recalled Lord Curzon's intense interest in the country. He cites British support for Reza Khan in 1921, but after the chaos of the previous ten years many Iranians welcomed the stability he brought. Macintyre claims that Mohammad Mosaddegh was 'left-leaning'. He was certainly reformist and nationalist, but he came from an old Qajar family and had been a high functionary in the last days of the dynasty, suggesting paternalism rather than socialism. We and the Americans were certainly involved in his overthrow. But that would not have happened if substantial elements in the army, the religious establishment and the population at large had not supported the Shah. Finally, the present regime is well aware of the decline in our international influence. They shout loudly about us not because they believe we are really capable of damaging them but because it is helpful to them in rallying nationalist John JenkinsFormer British ambassador to Syria, Iraq and Saudi Arabia; Matfield, Kent Sir, Ben Macintyre's article brought back memories from the late 1960s, when an Iranian student friend told me that in Iran, should someone trip over a stone, you could be sure that an Englishman had put it AlbrightRottingdean, Brighton & Hove Sir, As a teacher I found that gaining the trust and support of parents whose children who were a threat to good order in school was enough to resolve the problem. Jenni Russell's comment piece ('Fear of knives is destroying the social order' Jun 28) reminds us that the more young men carry knives, the more others feel forced to do so. When teenagers appear in court charged with knife crimes their parents are not obliged to attend. These are the people who have brought these young people into the world and have engaged with the responsibility of bringing them up. Owners of dangerous dogs can appear in court; why not the parents of dangerous teenagers? Then courts could demand their co-operation and InsonEast Mersea, Essex Sir, I was much impressed by Jenni Russell's views on the disturbance of social order by petty crimes. Perhaps two days in supervised stocks might provide an effective solution; why waste money on incarceration when the low-cost public shame and indignity of this suffered by offenders might well make them mend their ways within a very short time?Peter HardymentCobham, Surrey Parliament's lingo Sir, The proposed 'inclusive' makeover to parliament's 'outdated' language must be resisted ('Division bell rings for 'confusing' parliamentary terms', news, Jun 28). Such an unnecessary change is likely to be irreversible, and is yet another damning example of the Labour government's contempt for tradition and also its utmost uninterest in maintaining high standards of literacy for the future. The perverse logic underpinning this decision will no doubt have deleterious ripple effects in the education sector further down the line. The literary canon will not be taught in schools on the grounds that the 'confusing' language in these texts 'alienates' students; resultant successive generations of university students will be less willing and able to read; and the longer-term ability for students and academics to engage critically with literature — let alone write about it elegantly — will decline and fall. Edward Gibbon will be turning in his Edward HowellOxford Two-tier justice Sir, Lord Hermer, the attorney-general, describes the claim that there exists a two-tier justice system in this country as 'offensive' (Jun 28). But there is indeed a two-tier system, as justice is available only to those eligible for legal aid and those to whom the cost of it all is immaterial. The great majority of the population comes into neither category. Lawyers are fond of repeating that justice delayed is justice denied: it is also the case that justice too-expensive-to-be-afforded is also justice Davies-HumphreysChester Sir, Tim Davie's advice to employees to avoid conflict with friends and family over Gaza is no doubt well intentioned ('BBC staff told not to fight with family and friends over Gaza coverage', Jun 26). Given the BBC's Glastonbury coverage of Bobby Vylan's chant of 'death to the IDF', why should employees feel unable to defend their employer? If they are uncomfortable doing so, should they not seek to change the organisation from within — or alternatively consider whether they should change their employer?Andrew LeslauHenley-on-Thames, Oxon Sir, If, as reported (Jun 27), disability benefit changes will now apply only to new claimants, it is questionable whether the same criteria should not have been applied to the imposition of VAT on school fees, thereby preventing the enforced displacement of thousands of WellingsHalesowen, W Midlands Sir, Further to your report ('Give 65-year-olds MoT 'to keep them living at home' '), as a 67-year-old who plays hockey and cricket at club and international age group level, erects the marquees for the village fête, cleans the local church using an extendable ladder and goes mountain biking on Salisbury Plain, am I allowed to question the age criteria of the proposed care home assessment?Mark BanhamBeechingstoke, Wilts Sir, Regarding people dining alone being given a bad table (Notebook), the trick is, when entering, to ask for a table for two and order a glass of wine right away, 'While I wait for my friend'. When it comes, smile apologetically, pick up your phone and say you've just learnt that your friend can't make it and you'll be eating alone. You'll never be asked to JohnstoneLondon NW1 Sir, Dafydd Thomas's letter (Jun 28) reminded me of a dinner party in Nashville at which I was the only one of the 12 guests who did not carry a gun. The hostess said that she advised her children when returning home late to shout up 'It's only me, Mother'. Otherwise, she said, 'I'll shoot 'em'.Averil MansfieldLondon W2 Sir, Your editorial (Jun 28) accuses the M&S Red Diamond Strawberry and Creme sandwich of 'desecrating' the legacy of the 4th Earl of Sandwich, thus perpetuating the legend that the Earl created the delicacy. The Romans, among others, might contest that claim. The first Earl of Sandwich, however, whose scorched remains, recognisable only by his clothing and medals, were washed ashore after his ship was set on fire at the Battle of Solebay in 1672, could lay claim to the dubious honour of being history's first example of a 'toasted' CooteErith, Kent Write to letters@
Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
From Brazil to Westminster: How health pilot is proving a force for good for patients and the NHS
Jessica Ellis is a Chewie. She's not from a galaxy far, far away but here, right now, working in one of our most deprived communities. To the people she helps, she is a force for good. We are standing in front of a large block of council flats in Westminster, central London. The entrycom buzzes. "Hi Mrs Dikir, how are you?" Jessica asks. And then "thank you" as we're let in and make our way up five flights of stairs. Inside the flat, in the living room, Mr Jaber Dikir sits on a soft, plush armchair. It has to be comfortable because Mr Dikir spends most of his days sitting here. "I have a heart problem, I have open heart surgery and now I have heart failure," Mr Dikir explains. "I have water in my chest and that gives me big trouble to sleep, to breathe," he adds as he begins to wheeze. I ask Mr Jaber how Jessica has been able to help him. "She hears you, she listens to you," he replies. "She understands everything. She even called the doctor and he gave me permission to stay at home (for my blood tests). That's really appreciated. I couldn't walk properly, I couldn't go to the clinic." Jessica is a community health and wellbeing worker (CHWWs). That's where the nickname comes from. CHWWs work in small teams, going door to door in some of the most deprived areas of the country. It's part of an NHS pilot inspired by a successful programme in Brazil. A simple but effective intervention Jessica says her role is "to make life easier". Mr Dakir, she tells me, is struggling with his mobility. So is organising a designated disabled bay. "Mr Dakir is struggling to get out to his appointments, and the GP needs a blood test from him. So I was able to speak to the GP and he's been labelled as temporarily housebound so the district nursing team can come in now and take the bloods for him at home." A simple but effective intervention that has a huge impact on Mr Dakir and the NHS. The project is currently being used in 15 neighbourhoods around the country. In Westminster, there has been a 7% drop in A&E admissions and an 11% reduction in hospital admissions year on year. There has also been a 47% increase in the likelihood of households having vaccinations, an 82% increase in cancer screenings and a 7.3% drop in unscheduled GP consultations. Taking community care right to the patient's door Dr Melinda Creme is a local GP. Jessica acts as a conduit between Dr Creme and her patients. "We need to look at the costs of what might happen downstream if disease is not picked up earlier, if health inequalities are not addressed sooner, and so there should be potential huge savings down the line. "It might take five years, 10 years to make a difference and that's the issue, because obviously governments change within that time. "But if there's a long-term lens on this, then we stand a chance of being able to afford a health service free at the point of delivery." This is exactly what the government wants, what the NHS wants, to bring care into the community. With this project, they are taking community care right to the patient's door. Dr Creme says the days when people would go to their GP and expect their family doctor to look after anybody and everybody about everything are gone. "We can't possibly do that. We're not equipped to do that because the population is expanding and we cannot address all needs." Labour's 10-year health plan set for launch The government is expected to focus on personalised and community care in its 10-year health plan when it is published on Thursday. It will look to ease pressure on buckling emergency departments and models like this have shown early signs of good results, but they require time and investment. Projects like this can help ease the strain on services facing record pressures and tight budgets. They could be a significant part of a wider NHS plan.
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Covid inquiry begins examination of impact on social care sector
The Covid inquiry will start examining the impact of the pandemic on care services for elderly and disabled people on Monday. Bereaved families say they have been waiting for this moment for years, describing the way Covid swept through care homes as one of the clearest and most devastating failures of the pandemic. Nearly 46,000 care home residents died with Covid in England and Wales between March 2020 and January 2022, many of them in the early weeks of the pandemic. The government says it supports the inquiry and is committed to learning lessons from it. There are key questions families and care staff want answering, including why the decision was made in March 2020 to rapidly discharge some hospital patients into care blame this, in part, for seeding the virus into care homes in the early stages of the are also questions about blanket "do not resuscitate" notices being placed on some care home residents by medical services, and about visiting policies which prevented families seeing their loved ones for months."It was an awful, awful time," says Maureen Lewis, manager of St Ives Lodge care home in northeast home cares for up to 35 people, many of whom have dementia. When we visited earlier this month, some of the residents were sitting round a table in the dining area, making brightly coloured collages of flower baskets. Staff and residents sat cheek by jowl chatting to each other. This was a huge contrast to our first visit on 15 April 2020. Then, staff were dressed head to toe in protective suits, their faces covered by masks. It was three weeks after the UK locked down to try to stop Covid spreading. Despite this, St Ives Lodge had just lost six residents in a week."That was the hardest. And that was right at the very beginning of Covid," Maureen remembers. The ones they couldn't saveWhat guidance did care homes get? On 17 April 2020 the number of deaths in care homes reached its peak, with 540 people dying in England and Wales in one Ives Lodge had locked down in mid March, but a resident who had returned from hospital developed Covid symptoms. Those who sat at the same dining table as him quickly showed the same signs. They died within seven days of each other. The home later lost another resident to the the time, Maureen described how doctors and district nurses refused to come in, how care homes struggled to get protective equipment (PPE) and there was no helpful guidance from government."We were like a mini hospital," she told BBC News, "dealing with end-of-life care... Googling what to do". It was an experience described by many other care home managers who felt abandoned by the government and NHS in the early months of the pandemic. Looking back, Maureen says: "There were no protocols, no testing and [the NHS] was basically getting rid of any residents back to care homes. They were discharged as normal, but we were in a pandemic."She wants the inquiry to find out why such decisions were made, and she wants those in positions of responsibility held to remains angry with the former Health and Social Care Secretary, Matt Hancock, for his statement on 15 May 2020, that the government had "thrown a protective ring around care homes". "There was no ring of protection for care homes at all," she says. "He needs to take accountability for the decisions he made." Mr Hancock is due to give evidence within the next few days. It will be his seventh, and likely final Jean Adamson, the evidence which will be heard at the inquiry over the coming weeks will be the most important father, Aldrick, died with Covid on 15 April 2020. The last time she saw him was when, whilst she stood outside, she glimpsed him through the window of his care home a few days before he passed away. She was devastated she could not be at his side."We weren't allowed to say goodbye to him, to hold his hand," she says. "It's an experience that will stay with me forever. There is no grief like it."She too has questions about the policy of discharging patients to care homes. On 17 March 2020 the NHS sent a letter to all hospitals telling them to free up beds. Over the next four weeks, an estimated 25,000 patients were discharged into care homes many were not tested for Covid. On 2 April 2020, the government advised "negative [Covid] tests are not required" before patients were discharged into care was changed on 15 April 2020, the day Aldrick Adamson died. New government guidance said anyone discharged from hospital to a care setting would be tested first. Jean Adamson believes patients who arrived at her father's care home from hospital could have seeded the virus there. Other factors such as staff moving between care homes and the spread of the virus in the general community will have played a part but, she says, the rapid discharge of patients to care homes without them being tested or isolated was a choice. "It was a reckless decision," she says. "The way that my father and tens of thousands of other care home residents were sacrificed. It really gets me because I think it smacks of ageism and disability discrimination."In the five years since her father's death she has become an active member of the campaign group, Covid-19 Bereaved Families for Justice says the group wants the inquiry to look at the ban on care home visits that kept families apart for also want answers to why some people were "routinely placed on do not attempt resuscitation orders [DNARs]", without discussion with relatives or an assessment."There was an abuse of the do not attempt resuscitation policy. We need to understand how that came about," she inquiry will also examine the difficulties faced by care workers who supported people in their own phase is expected to last five weeks, with the report not due until next both Maureen Lewis and Jean Adamson the memories of the pandemic remain traumatic and both say what they want now is the truth."We need to understand so that we can learn lessons going forward for when we have the next pandemic and what happened here should never happen again," says would like more recognition of how care services survived without much help. In future, she says: "There needs to be more investment" and better planning for emergencies.
