U.N. urges U.S. to reverse sanctions on expert over Gaza criticism
United Nations rights chief Volker Turk also called for a halt to "attacks and threats" against people appointed by the UN and other international institutions like the International Criminal Court, whose judges have also been hit with U.S. sanctions.
"I urge the prompt reversal of U.S. sanctions against a Special Rapporteur of the UN Human Rights Council, Francesca Albanese, in response to work she has undertaken under the mandate on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory," Mr. Turk said in a statement.
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Wednesday announced that Washington was sanctioning the outspoken expert "for her illegitimate and shameful efforts to prompt (ICC) action against U.S. and Israeli officials, companies, and executives".
Ms. Albanese slammed the sanctions as "calculated to weaken my mission".
"I will continue to do what I have to do," she told reporters during a visit to Slovenia.
Mr. Rubio slammed the UN expert's strident criticism of the United States and said she recommended to the ICC that arrest warrants be issued targeting Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Mr. Rubio, whose country has boycotted the UN rights council since President Donald Trump returned to power in January, also accused Ms. Albanese of "biased and malicious activities" and accused her of having "spewed unabashed antisemitism (and) support for terrorism".
"We will not tolerate these campaigns of political and economic warfare, which threaten our national interests and sovereignty," Mr. Rubio said.
'Genocide'
Ms. Albanese has long faced harsh criticism by Israel and some of its allies over her relentless criticism and long-standing accusations that Israel is committing "genocide" in Gaza.
The Italy-born expert, who assumed her current mandate in 2022, released a damning report earlier this month denouncing companies — many of them American — that she said "profited from the Israeli economy of illegal occupation, apartheid, and now genocide" in the occupied Palestinian territories.
The report provoked a furious response from Israel, while some of the named companies also raised objections.
Washington last month slapped sanctions on four ICC judges, in part over the court's arrest warrant for Netanyahu, barring them from the United States.
UN special rapporteurs like Albanese are independent experts who are appointed by the UN rights council but do not speak on behalf of the United Nations.
'Attacks and threats'
The current president of the rights council, Swiss ambassador Jurg Lauber, also decried the sanctions against the expert in a statement.
He urged UN member states to "fully cooperate with the Special Rapporteurs and mandate holders of the Council and to refrain from any acts of intimidation or reprisal against them".
Mr. Turk said the rapporteurs worked on "sensitive and often divisive issues, that are of international concern" and urged member states to avoid resorting to "punitive measures".
Israel on Wednesday commended Rubio's action against the rapporteur.
"Albanese has consistently undermined the credibility of the UN Human Rights Council by promoting false narratives and pushing for illegitimate legal actions that ignore the realities on the ground," said Israel's UN Ambassador Danny Danon.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
20 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Sanctions as deadly as war, linked to mass fatalities every year: Study
Sanctions can cause as many fatalities as armed conflict, with unilateral penalties being associated with more than half a million deaths per year, according to a new analysis. Unilateral and economic sanctions imposed by the US and the European Union lead to a substantial increase in mortality that disproportionately hurts children younger than five years old, the study published in the Lancet Global Health journal found. Sanctions can hobble public health provision and keep humanitarian organisations from operating effectively, weighing on the death toll. 'Woodrow Wilson referred to sanctions as 'something more tremendous than war.' Our evidence suggests that he was right,' authors Francisco Rodríguez, Silvio Rendón and Mark Weisbrot wrote. 'It is hard to think of other policy interventions with such adverse effects on human life that continue to be pervasively used.' The researchers, whose work was funded by the Center for Economic and Policy Research, a progressive think tank, looked at mortality rates by age group in sanctions episodes for 152 countries between 1971 and 2021. They used four unique econometric tools to isolate the causal relationship between categories of sanctions and higher mortality rates. Their findings were consistent across all four methods: Global, economic and unilateral sanctions are all associated with higher death tolls. United Nations sanctions are not, to any statistically significant level. The term 'global sanctions' in the study refers to all penalties, whereas 'economic sanctions' are trade and financial deterrents and 'unilateral sanctions' are imposed by either the US or the EU. UN sanctions potentially have less impact given they're framed as efforts to minimize impact on civilian populations, the authors point out, while US sanctions often aim for regime change or shifts in political behavior, which deteriorates living conditions in target countries. 'Many times, a rogue regime will blame sanctions for all the problems of its country,' Jeremy Paner, a sanctions lawyer at Hughes Hubbard, told Bloomberg before seeing the study. 'It's easy to blame the US or Brussels.' Paner, who previously served as lead sanctions investigator at the Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control, was skeptical of the study's conclusion, emphasizing that OFAC works to ensure that humanitarian groups can work in sanctioned countries effectively. 'The point of sanctions is to further foreign policy and American values, including humanitarian work,' he said. Rodríguez, the study's lead author and an expert on sanctions and the crisis in Venezuela, countered that even if humanitarian aid is allowed into sanctioned countries, there are formidable obstacles to delivery. Banks and nonprofits often avoid interactions with the sanctioned nation regardless of the exceptions for aid. 'Saying, 'I'm going to block your oil exports, but I'm going to allow you to continue importing humanitarian goods,' is almost like saying to somebody who has just lost their job, 'Don't worry, you can still go into the store and buy whatever you want,'' Rodríguez said in an interview. For decades, academics have debated how sanctions affect mortality, but have struggled to prove such a relationship. Joy Gordon, who focuses on sanctions at Loyola University in Chicago, said the Lancet study offers a 'compelling argument, supported by rigorous methodology, that sanctions directly impact mortality' across age groups. The researchers urged policymakers to exercise restraint with sanctions, especially as the tool's use has ballooned. Some 25 per cent of countries were sanctioned by the US, EU or UN between 2010 and 2022 — up from 8 per cent of countries in the 1960s, according to the study, which cited Global Sanctions Database figures.
Mint
20 minutes ago
- Mint
At UNSC, India reaffirms commitment to peace, slams Pakistan for cross-border terrorism – 'at the other extreme is…'
India has reaffirmed its commitment to international peace and security through multilateralism and peaceful settlement of disputes, while strongly condemning cross-border terrorism and calling out Pakistan at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) High-Level Open Debate. 'As we complete 80 years of the United Nations, it is a useful moment to reflect on how far the spirit of multilateralism and peaceful settlement of disputes as enshrined in the UN Charter has been realized,' Ambassador Parvathaneni Harish, Permanent Representative to the UN, said delivering India's statement, news agency ANI reported. 'In the recent decades, the nature of conflicts has transformed, with a proliferation of non-state actors, often propped up as proxies by state actors; and cross-border funding, arms trafficking, training of terrorists, and spread of radical ideologies, facilitated by modern digital and communication technologies,' he said. On the need to ensure accountability for terrorism, the Ambassador referenced the April 22 terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, that killed 26 innocent tourists. "Consequent to the gruesome terrorist attack in Pahalgam... and based on the Council Statement of 25 April... India launched Operation Sindoor targeting terrorist camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir (PoJK), which was focused, measured, and non-escalatory in nature. On achieving its primary objectives, a cessation of military activities was directly concluded at the request of Pakistan," the Ambassador said. He stressed that "national ownership and consent of parties are central to any efforts to achieve peaceful resolution of conflicts," adding, "There should also be a serious cost to states who violate the spirit of good neighbourliness and international relations by fomenting cross-border terrorism." Addressing recent remarks by Pakistan's representative, Harish said, 'The Indian Sub Continent offers a stark contrast in terms of progress, prosperity and development models. On the one hand, there is India which is a mature democracy, a surging economy and a pluralistic and inclusive society. At the other extreme is Pakistan, steeped in fanaticism and terrorism, and a serial borrower from the IMF.' "It ill behoves a member of the Council to offer homilies while indulging in practices that are unacceptable to the international community," he said. The Ambassador also emphasised India's role as the largest cumulative contributor to UN Peacekeeping forces and a pioneer in promoting women in peacekeeping. "We are at a time, where there are growing doubts about the multilateral system, especially the United Nations," he said, stressing the urgent need to address "serious question marks over the representativeness of the UN Security Council." Harish reaffirmed, "India remains committed to working towards international peace and security through multilateralism and peaceful settlement of disputes."
Mint
20 minutes ago
- Mint
Who is Ghislaine Maxwell and why her testimony could change the Jeffrey Epstein case
Ghislaine Maxwell, the former British socialite and convicted sex offender, may be ready to speak out about her long-standing association with Jeffrey Epstein. According to a report in the New York Post, Maxwell is expected to meet US Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche to explore the possibility of a deal in exchange for cooperation with federal authorities. Maxwell, currently serving a 20-year sentence at a low-security prison in Florida, was convicted in 2021 for recruiting and grooming young girls for Epstein, who died by suicide in federal custody in 2019 while awaiting trial for sex trafficking. 'She's going to make a deal,' said noted lawyer Alan Dershowitz, who once represented Epstein. 'That's how it works. They make deals with mafia members, and they'll likely do the same here.' Ghislaine Maxwell is the daughter of late British media tycoon and former Member of Parliament Robert Maxwell, who once owned the Daily Mirror and publishing giant Macmillan. Known for her elite connections, Ghislaine was a regular in high society circles and even counted Britain's Prince Andrew among her close friends, often being spotted at royal residences, including Windsor Castle, the news agency AP reported. However, her life took a dramatic turn after her father's mysterious death in 1991, when he fell off his yacht. Investigations later revealed that Robert Maxwell had embezzled millions from his companies' pension funds, sending shockwaves through the UK. It was soon after his death that Ghislaine Maxwell was seen seated beside American financier Jeffrey Epstein at a memorial service, marking the beginning of a controversial partnership. Maxwell reportedly dated Epstein and later became a key figure in his inner circle, managing his multiple residences and staff. She has since been convicted for her role in Epstein's sex trafficking operation and is currently serving a 20-year prison sentence in the US. Legal experts believe Maxwell could hold critical information about the full scope of Epstein's sex trafficking operation, including names of both victims and alleged perpetrators. Some of Epstein's victims were reportedly forced to recruit others, further complicating the case. Maxwell, often referred to as the 'Rosetta Stone' of the Epstein scandal, is believed to have deep insight into both Epstein's circle and his finances. Though she has largely remained silent, Maxwell has indicated through her brother Ian Maxwell that she is willing to testify before a Congressional committee. If that happens, it would mark the first time her full version of events is heard by federal authorities. Until now, she has maintained her innocence and refused plea negotiations. The case has resurfaced after the US Justice Department announced plans to release information from recent FBI raids on Epstein's properties, only to later reverse the decision. This renewed focus has made Maxwell's account more significant than ever. The Justice Department has maintained there is no existing 'client list' linked to Epstein's alleged network. Maxwell's brother, Ian, has echoed that claim, stating that what some refer to as a 'list' was merely a high-profile address book, not evidence of trafficking. He also insists that his sister should never have been prosecuted, citing Epstein's 2007 plea deal in Florida, which promised immunity to his co-conspirators. However, New York prosecutors successfully argued that the deal was not applicable outside Florida. Maxwell has been incarcerated since 2022 at the Federal Correctional Institution in Tallahassee. Her family has repeatedly raised concerns over her safety, citing poor living conditions, solitary confinement, and a lack of adequate staffing at the prison. With her legal appeal options dwindling, barring a final petition to the US Supreme Court, Maxwell may now be more inclined to cooperate in hopes of a sentence reduction. Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump, who has previously dismissed the Epstein case as a 'hoax,' responded to the news of possible cooperation by saying, 'It sounds appropriate to do, yeah,' according to Politico. As questions around Epstein's death and his powerful connections continue to spark speculation, Ghislaine Maxwell's testimony may finally shed light on one of the most scandalous and mysterious criminal cases of recent decades.
