logo
The Joy of Swimming With Strangers

The Joy of Swimming With Strangers

New York Times22-06-2025
Swimming among strangers in a public pool is everything that I love about living in the city, but doing it underwater. Traversing a mile back and forth during lap swim in a New York public pool sometimes feels like walking down Broadway at midday or taking the 4 train uptown in the evening. It's meditative, but what each person does affects everyone else; ignoring the other pedestrians creates problems for you and them. As the city's outdoor pools get ready to open, I've been thinking more about this obvious but remarkable detail — this intense togetherness, these feelings of sympathy, of enmity, of forgiveness, even of competition with complete strangers.
But swimming is different from strolling down a sidewalk in one critical way. Pushing yourself in exercise can mean working until you fail, visibly, and it's a particularly vulnerable thing to do among strangers, especially in open, democratic spaces like a crowded public pool. When you cry in public, those around you will probably leave you alone, but even the silence feels intimate. The act of looking away from someone has just as much a sense of companionship as the act of looking at them, and avoiding a stranger when swimming or walking might be just as companionable as walking or swimming together.
New York City's public pools have long been palatial — neo-Romanesque, Art Deco or Beaux-Arts, some now a century old or more. The earliest were constructed as bathhouses for residents of poorer neighborhoods at a time before air-conditioning. Robert Moses, an obsessive open-water swimmer, built 11 huge public pools under the Works Progress Administration and started a free swim program to prevent drowning deaths. (The city's Department of Parks & Recreation continues to offer free swimming lessons.) A French academic once remarked that Los Angeles's banks recalled churches, stately and sacred. In New York City it's our pools, these majestic structures built as public amenities that now, often in dire need of repair yet still anchoring communities, seem incredibly humble.
As of 2023, the last pool census I could find, New York City also has over 15,000 private pools. These pools, largely clustered in expensive neighborhoods, often feature in places like luxury residences, hotels and fancy gyms. Some are more affordable than others, but almost all curate their users. They have a reputation for being cleaner, but their utilization can be only as high as their accessibility. New York City's public pools, on the other hand, in addition to being clean and safe, enjoy mass utilization: According to the parks commissioner, the city's 50 or so outdoor pools serve about 1.5 million people during the 10-week stretch in the summer when they're open. When anyone can exercise with anyone, regardless of wealth — as should be the case — no one can control being seen in this state of vulnerability or by whom.
For years, I organized my life around the adult swim hours at the Metropolitan Recreation Center in Williamsburg, home to one of the 12 indoor pools in the Parks Department system (though fewer than half are operating). When the pool closed — temporarily, I hoped — I reorganized my days around the lap swim hours in Crown Heights, Flushing and Manhattan and learned a whole set of manners at each pool, where swimmers have invented and are inventing rules to live (or at least swim) by.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bride Faces Dilemma as Groom Insists on Only Inviting Wedding Guests Likely to Give Gifts Valued at $300 or More
Bride Faces Dilemma as Groom Insists on Only Inviting Wedding Guests Likely to Give Gifts Valued at $300 or More

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Bride Faces Dilemma as Groom Insists on Only Inviting Wedding Guests Likely to Give Gifts Valued at $300 or More

The bride said that she was feeling "really conflicted" by her husband-to-be's suggestion A bride-to-be is questioning the ethics behind her fiancé's wedding guest list criteria. In a post on Reddit's "Wedding" forum, the bride shared how her fiancé suggested that they should only invite friends and family who will give them wedding gifts valued at $300 or higher. Now, the woman is "feeling really conflicted" and is asking Reddit users for their perspective on the situation. "I'm not sure how to feel," she admitted. For context, the bride explained that her fiancé and his family do not have a history of greediness. In fact, they've all been very "generous." At the couple's engagement party, the groom-to-be covered "70%" of the costs and his side of the family gave them "cash gifts" even though there was no expectation. The bride's family did not give gifts, nor did the majority of her friends. "He was pretty disappointed by that and now seems guarded," the Redditor recalled of her fiancé's reaction to the low gift count. He is also "paying for most" of their wedding expenses. Following the party, the soon-to-be bride and groom had a conversation about their wedding guest list. "When I told him I'd like to invite about 100 people from my side, he said we should only invite guests who would likely give at least $300 in gifts," the bride wrote. "I told him that felt really transactional, and in the heat of the moment, I said something I regret. We haven't spoken since." Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. She asked the forum: "Is it reasonable for him to feel that way? Or is this a red flag?" Fellow Reddit users had mixed reactions in the comments section. Some Redditors noted that only inviting well-off guests was "definitely transactional," and that the groom "sounds greedy," with his suggestion being a "massive red flag." "I would think if he expects guests to supplement what he's putting into the wedding that maybe you guys should scale back to a level he feels more comfortable spending," the top comment reads. "I'm sorry you're dealing with this uncomfortable situation." A few Redditors advised the bride to reevaluate her relationship moving forward. "Getting married is a celebration of your life together. It is a chance to thank all of the people who have helped you along the way and that you love. I cannot imagine marrying someone who is this transactional and cruel. Not everyone can afford that level of gift," one person wrote. "Sorry, but I honestly think this is a great opportunity to reevaluate the relationship and determine if this is genuinely someone you want to spend the rest of your life with." Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store