The Lake Winnipeg blame game
The extent to which our governments will go to avoid responsibility has reached new heights.
Lake Winnipeg is dying and, instead of rallying all interested parties and levels of government — including First Nations — to the rescue, a sordid skirmish is occurring before the courts.
The most absurd claim has come from the City of Winnipeg, which insists that the release of 220 million litres of raw sewage into the Red River last year had little effect on the pollution of Lake Winnipeg.
Such a preposterous assertion was made in defence of a $4.8-billion lawsuit by 11 First Nation communities who have a substantial stake in the health of the lake. Municipal, provincial and federal governments have been named as defendants in the suit.
Although this court case is focused on the 2024 spill, it has been nearly impossible to obtain an accurate picture of just what the city regularly spills into our rivers.
Recently, Free Press writer Julia-Simone Rutgers provided an in-depth article (From muddy to cruddy, May 10) summing up the sheer scale of releases of sewage, and the results are staggering.
In the last decade an average of 10 billion litres/year is now the operative figure that will be used by environmentalists and lawyers alike.
This can no longer be termed 'de minimus,' it is a disgusting reality that citizens of this fair city must bear.
For years the City of Winnipeg has got away with using the local rivers as its backup to a sewer infrastructure that is designed for a much smaller city and is unable to cope with the strains of increased pressure from growth and a changing climate. Federal dollars are pouring in for housing initiatives without supporting the requisite infrastructure.
The city received millions to address our housing crisis yet the $166 million MP Terry Duguid announced for infrastructure work barely scrapes the surface of the $3 billion needed to sustain our north end sewage treatment plant.
The frustration with government inaction set this lawsuit in motion, as no long-range tripartite funding arrangements have been negotiated, only dribs and drabs of cash committed to upgrade the treatment plant.
As far as achieving the separation of combined sewers, the city hired Jacobs Engineering to create a master plan which is designed for future generations to carry the majority of the financial liability.
By allowing this neglect to fester into a lawsuit, city hall and taxpayers will be faced with a colossal debt on top of the need to fix their sewage woes.
At least the gargantuan spill of February 2024 has triggered both provincial and federal regulations.
For much too long, the City of Winnipeg has found ways to avoid charges under federal and provincial environment laws. In this instance they are being applied but both are lacking in transparency.
Environment and Climate Change Canada enforcement officers laid one charge in April under the federal Fisheries Act, which prohibits the deposit of a deleterious substance into water frequented by fish. They will not comment on the charges.
The province also took a year to press charges against the city under the environment act and these are before the court, which may result in fines up to $500,000, but likely the fines will be waived as the regulators are part of the problem.
It will be a long time before we learn why such a misadventure was allowed to occur at the Abinojii Mikanah bridge last year. The city has certainly not been forthcoming and any attempt to directly reach waste and water officials have been circumvented.
Lawyers representing each level of government are scrambling before the Court of King's bench to shirk their responsibility in the $4.8-billion Lake Winnipeg lawsuit. The city has laid cross-claims against the province and feds, while the province has filed a cross-claim against the city and insist that First Nations water quality is a federal responsibility.
The blame game has begun.
Frankly, the public should feel embarrassed at the inability of our governments to show any leadership aimed at solving this existential crisis for our shared ecosystem.
Uniting to provide solutions for the common good has been usurped by political infighting and finger-pointing.
Dave Taylor has drawn attention to the pollution of rivers in Manitoba for several decades and is a regular contributor to the Winnipeg Free Press. Please see his blog at https://wpgsewage.wordpress.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
4 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Manitoba slides down mining sector investment attractiveness list: report
Manitoba's attractiveness to mining investors has dropped, a new report by a conservative think tank states. The keystone province made the Fraser Institute's top-10 list of most attractive jurisdictions for mineral endowment. However, the 2024 Annual Survey of Mining Companies — released earlier this week — places Manitoba 26th of 82 jurisdictions for investment attractiveness. A year prior, Manitoba ranked sixth of 86. The Tanco lithium mine near Lac du Bonnet. (Sinomine Resource Group / Free Press files) 'It's just a wake-up call that there are some outstanding issues that need to be addressed,' said John Morris, co-director of the Mining Association of Manitoba. Survey respondents cited increased concerns about Manitoba's community development conditions, political stability and uncertainty over what areas will be protected, the report reads. Morris said it aligns with what he's heard from junior firms that don't yet have operational mines. Hesitation stems, in part, from the New Democrats' 2023 promise to protect 30 per cent of Manitoba's lands and waters by 2030, Morris said. 'They do not know whether certain areas will become off limits for future mining projects,' he continued. 'If you're trying to plan a 30-year project … you will want to know in the early days whether where you're exploring is going to be put into a protected area or not.' Mine production often follows a decade of research and exploration, Morris noted. Policy interpretation of Manitoba's heritage resource permits and requirements is a long-standing issue, he added. Morris expressed confidence the industry's concerns will be addressed: 'Our association has a very good working relationship with the provincial government.' Politicians have touted Manitoba as the 'Costco of critical minerals,' referring to the variety of goods available at the big-box retailer. Manitoba has 30 of 34 minerals deemed critical. It has four active mines producing zinc, copper, gold, nickel, tantalum, cesium and lithium. Provincial mining minister Jamie Moses underscored the Fraser Institute report's timeline: the survey was conducted August-December 2024. Since the feedback window's tail end, the NDP has released a critical mineral strategy, opened a critical mineral office and a new gold mine, Moses said. (The Alamos Gold mine near Lynn Lake was being developed during the Progressive Conservatives' most recent reign.) 'Our government takes seriously the economic opportunity we have in our critical minerals sector,' Moses said. Environmental safety is also taken seriously, he said. He deferred to the province's environment minister when asked about a map or other means of transparency to show which areas will be conserved by 2030. There's been 'a lot of discussion' about the Seal River Watershed, Moses noted. Government and Indigenous leaders are pursuing a formal designation to turn the watershed, which is 50,000 square kilometres, into an protected area; it follows a year-long assessment. 'We know that we can do more than one thing at one time,' Moses said. 'That includes being able to advance mineral projects and also ensure that we have the right environmental sustainability approach.' Lauren Stone, PC finance critic, said the report shows the New Democrats have demonstrated they're 'anti-development and have created an anti-business rhetoric.' Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. 'Manitoba should be very concerned when we have almost equivalent the number of critical minerals here … to Saskatchewan.' Saskatchewan ranked seventh on the Fraser Institute's list for investor attractiveness. It touts 27 critical minerals within its borders. The 86-page report incorporates 350 responses from mining and exploration companies. Finland was crowned the top jurisdiction based on investment attractiveness. The Fraser Institute ranked every province and territory except for Prince Edward Island. Newfoundland and Labrador, British Columbia, Ontario, Quebec and Yukon also ranked ahead of Manitoba in investment attractiveness, the report says. Gabrielle PichéReporter Gabrielle Piché reports on business for the Free Press. She interned at the Free Press and worked for its sister outlet, Canstar Community News, before entering the business beat in 2021. Read more about Gabrielle. Every piece of reporting Gabrielle produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press's tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates. Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
CTV News
5 hours ago
- CTV News
Quebec lumber mill closing temporarily due to U.S. tariffs
Scierie St-Michel is closing for two months amid the trade war with the U.S. (Facebook/Scierie St-Michel Inc.) A lumber mill in Saint-Michel-des-Saints, Que., says it has to suspend all activities until October due to U.S. tariffs. The Scierie St-Michel will stop its sawmill and forestry operations as of Monday, Aug. 4, and will reopen Oct. 13. The planning mill will close on Aug. 18. The closure will impact about 250 employees. In a news release, the mill said the closure is a result of the ongoing trade war and could be extended. 'This suspension of operations is due to the increase in countervailing and anti-dumping duties to over 34.45 per cent by the U.S. government and threats of additional taxes in the future,' it said. 'We hoped until the last minute that the Canadian government would reach an agreement that would spare us the worst, but this was not possible.' The mill also said forestry management in the province must be modernized and pointed to the controversial Bill 97, which critics say would lead to major environmental and social setbacks. Indigenous activists have protested the bill and accuse the government of giving the forestry industry carte blanche to exploit the resource. Jean-François Champoux, president and CEO of Scierie St-Michel, urges the government to work with First Nations to pass the bill and '[create] a favourable business environment for our industry through this modernization.' The two-month pause is meant to 'ensure the long-term sustainability' of the business. 'When employees return in October, we will need certainty regarding a settlement on U.S. countervailing and anti-dumping duties, the modernisation of the forestry regime with Bill 97, including a settlement with First Nations on forestry, otherwise this shutdown will be extended indefinitely,' Champoux said.
Cision Canada
12 hours ago
- Cision Canada
Fishing Lake First Nation and Canada reach agricultural benefits settlement agreement
FISHING LAKE FIRST NATION, TREATY 4 TERRITORY, SK, Aug. 1, 2025 /CNW/ - Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada and the Fishing Lake First Nation Today, Chief Darcy Desjarlais of Fishing Lake First Nation and the Honourable Rebecca Alty, Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations, announced a settlement agreement resolving the Nation's Agricultural Benefits claim, also known as a Cows and Plows settlement. Canada will pay more than $101 million in compensation to the First Nation for failing to fulfill the federal government's Treaty 4 obligations to provide farming tools, crop seeds, and livestock. Fishing Lake First Nation will invest 100% of the settlement funds into the newly created Waywaynih Kunawapunteeing Trust to ensure the capital grows for generations to come. By keeping the entire settlement intact, the Nation can leverage loans with interest rates well below the annual returns anticipated on the trust's investments. This strategy will allow us to provide immediate benefits such as per capita distributions without reducing the value of the settlement. This approach creates a long-term source of wealth for Fishing Lake people, enabling investment in community priorities such as language, culture, housing, and economic development, while ensuring that future generations also benefit from this historic agreement. It represents a step toward reclaiming economic independence and advancing the vision of mino-pimâtisiwin (a good life) that Fishing Lake First Nation's ancestors sought when entering Treaty 4. Settling specific claims is an important part of Canada's ongoing efforts to advance reconciliation by rebuilding trust and strengthening its relationships with First Nations. By providing fair compensation in recognition of unkept promises, Canada is taking responsibility and working toward a better future. This work is guided by the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act. Quotes "When our ancestors entered into Treaty, they did so at a time when our people were suffering. They signed not only for their own needs, but with foresight for the generations to come. That same thinking guided us as we created this trust—designed not only to help our people today, but to ensure future generations have opportunities our ancestors were denied. This settlement is about more than money; it is about creating an economic foundation that can grow, give back, and pull our Nation forward, helping us reclaim what was lost and build a better future." Darcy Desjarlais Chief of Fishing Lake First Nation "Today's settlement with Fishing Lake First Nation is a meaningful demonstration of our commitment to acknowledge and address historical injustices. Building trust is essential in our efforts to advance reconciliation with First Nations. However, in order to build trust, we must first take responsibility. Our hope is that this agreement will strengthen Canada's relationship with Fishing Lake First Nation for generations to come." The Honourable Rebecca Alty Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations "The agreement with Fishing Lake First Nation represents a renewed commitment to working together in partnership under Treaty 4. This is reconciliation in action." The Honourable Buckley Belanger Secretary of State (Rural Development) Quick facts Fishing Lake First Nation is an Anishnabe Nation in the Treaty 4 territory. This area is well north of present-day Prince Albert, Saskatchewan, and Flin Flon, Manitoba. Treaty 4—also known as the Qu'Appelle Treaty—was signed on September 15, 1874, at Fort Qu'Appelle, Saskatchewan. In exchange for payments, provisions and rights to reserve lands, Treaty 4 ceded Indigenous territory to the federal government. The majority of Treaty 4 lands are in present-day southern Saskatchewan. Small portions are in western Manitoba and southern Alberta. Specific claims deal with past wrongs against First Nations. These claims—made by First Nations against the Government of Canada—relate to the administration of land and other First Nation assets, and to the fulfilment of historic treaties and other agreements. Claims are addressed through an alternative dispute resolution process under the Specific Claims Policy and, since 2009, the Specific Claims Tribunal Act. Over the past five years (April 1, 2020, to May 31, 2025), 229 claims have been resolved for nearly $15.1 billion in compensation. To date, 53 agricultural benefits claims have been resolved in Treaties 4, 5, 6, and 10, for more than $6.9 billion in compensation. Stay connected Join the conversation about Indigenous Peoples in Canada: You can subscribe to receive our news releases and speeches via RSS feeds. For more information or to subscribe, visit SOURCE Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada
