Deadly Israeli strikes continue in Gaza
More than half of those killed were women and children.
Desperation is mounting in the Palestinian territory of more than two million, which experts say is at risk of famine because of Israel's blockade and nearly two-year offensive.
People in #Gaza, including UNRWA staff, are fainting due to starvation and severe hunger.
People including children are dying from severe malnutrition.
People are being starved.
UNRWA alone has thousands of trucks in neighbouring countries waiting to enter Gaza – banned by… pic.twitter.com/02h3MMD4pd
— UNRWA (@UNRWA) July 23, 2025
A breakdown of law and order has led to widespread looting and contributed to chaos and violence around aid deliveries.
More than 1,000 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli forces since May while trying to get food in the Gaza Strip, mostly near aid sites run by an American contractor, the UN human rights office said on Tuesday.
More than 100 human rights groups and charities signed a letter published on Wednesday demanding more aid for Gaza and warning of grim conditions causing starvation.
More than 59,000 Palestinians have been killed during the Israel-Hamas war, according to Gaza's health ministry, which is part of the Hamas-run government and staffed by medical professionals.
Its count does not distinguish between militants and civilians, but the ministry says that more than half of the dead are women and children.
The UN and other international organizations see it as the most reliable source of data on casualties.
The Israeli military said in a statement on Wednesday that forces were operating in Gaza City, as well as in northern Gaza.
It said that in Jabaliya, an area hard-hit in multiple rounds of fighting, an air strike killed 'a number of' Hamas militants.
"Silencing voices.
As if banning international media is not enough.
Humanitarian workers are also banned when they report on atrocities committed in #Gaza and elsewhere in the occupied Palestinian territory.
The denial of a visa to our colleague from @OCHAopt is the latest in… pic.twitter.com/ewMk0PUY7o
— UNRWA (@UNRWA) July 22, 2025
Troops struck roughly 120 targets throughout Gaza over the past day, including militant cells, tunnels and booby-trapped structures, among others, the military said.
One Israeli strike hit a house on Tuesday in the north-western side of Gaza City, killing at least 12 people, according to the Shifa Hospital, which received the casualties.
The dead included six children and two women, according to the health ministry's casualty list.
Another strike hit an apartment in the Tal al-Hawa area in northern Gaza, killing at least six people.
Among the dead were three children and two women, including one who was pregnant. Eight others were wounded, the ministry said.
A third strike hit a tent in the Naser area in Gaza City late on Tuesday and killed three children, Shifa Hospital said.
The Israeli military did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the strikes. It blames Hamas for civilian casualties because the militants operate from populated areas.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
11 minutes ago
- New York Times
How Israel's War Became Unjust
Israel's war in Gaza is not a genocide. It is a war for a just cause, the elimination of a cruel, fanatical, itself potentially genocidal terrorist organization that oppresses its own people, holds innocent hostages and will pose a severe danger to the state of Israel so long as it holds power. The war's heartbreaking civilian toll is inextricably linked to that terrorist government's refusal to obey the laws of war, its unwillingness to surrender no matter how much its own people suffer, its willingness to accept famine rather than give up control of humanitarian aid, its inclination to let cease-fire negotiations spin endlessly in the apparent hope that international pressure will save it from defeat. But despite all these realities, despite the fundamental responsibility that Hamas bears for all the horrors of the conflict it initiated on Oct. 7, 2023, Israel's warmaking at this moment is unjust. One can have a righteous cause, one's foe can be wicked and brutal and primarily responsible for the conflict's toll, and still — under any coherent theory of just war — there is an obligation to refrain from certain tactics if they create too much collateral damage, to mitigate certain predictable forms of civilian suffering and to have a strategy that makes the war's outcome worth the cost. These are tests that Israel is failing. The first one is the hardest to assess, because every protracted war yields inevitable civilian suffering, and an urban war against an entrenched enemy especially will have cruelties that can't be refined away. Such a war cannot be fought exclusively with precision strikes, the soldiers fighting it cannot be prevented from making terrible mistakes, and war crimes are inevitably committed even in righteous conflicts. So there is no way to look at the rubble in Gaza and the death-toll estimates and offer a mathematical proof that Israel is failing to exercise adequate restraint. I just think it's true. Deaths from famine are a clearer matter, which is why the threat of starvation is leading even some of Israel's strongest supporters to warn its government that something must be changed. Here, Israel has made a strategic choice, trying to separate food distribution from a system that it argues Hamas was exploiting for its own purposes. But if your strategic choice leads to children dying of starvation when the food is available to feed them, then a civilized nation has to make a different choice — even if that makes things easier for its enemies to some degree. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Forbes
13 minutes ago
- Forbes
The Gaza Paradox: How Can We Activate The Global Compassion Algorithm?
Gaza Strip map .Source: "World reference atlas" ... More [url=/search/lightbox/5890567][IMG] The stark reality of Gaza on July 26th, 2025, presents a chilling paradox. While humanity celebrates advancements in Artificial Intelligence, capable of solving complex problems and optimizing vast systems, millions of children, women, and men endure unimaginable suffering. They face starvation, displacement, and death from man-made violence, even as the global capacity for food production and the pathways to peace exist. This disconnect — suffering on a mass scale amidst technological excitement — forces us to confront an uncomfortable question: Are we losing sight of our essential humanity? It is a troubling imbalance. Our collective gaze is often captivated by the promise of ever more sophisticated technology, computing power, political absurdity and financial might. Yet, this fascination has begun to obscure the fundamental truth that suffering will not cease simply because our algorithms become more elegant or our wealth accumulates. Unless human minds return to the timeless wisdom of the Golden Rule — treating others as we wish to be treated, and refraining from actions we would not endure ourselves — we risk losing our way. This universal principle, woven into the fabric of every major religion and ethical tradition, suggests that perhaps, instead of more compute, we need more compassion. Otherwise – would we not be better off if AI-powered agents, unburdened by human frailties, acted on our behalf? Gaza: A Mirror Reflecting Our Paradox Today, in Gaza, the humanitarian crisis is at a peak. Reports from aid agencies and the media detail a catastrophic situation: widespread food insecurity, a decimated healthcare system and a population grappling with the psychological scars of prolonged conflict and displacement. Despite global efforts, the scale of need far outstrips the aid reaching those in despair. This is not a natural disaster; it is a man-made catastrophe, a stark reminder that human decisions, or the lack thereof, perpetuate immense suffering. The images emerging from Gaza — of families scavenging for food, of children succumbing to preventable diseases, of lives shattered by conflict — stand in stark contrast to the narratives of progress dominating our technological discourse. We marvel at AI generating art, composing music, and driving autonomous vehicles, while basic human dignity is denied to millions. This dissonance highlights a systemic blind spot: our collective ability to innovate technologically often outpaces our capacity for collective empathy and ethical governance. The Allure Of Progress Vs. The Ache Of Reality The psychological allure of technological progress is undeniable. AI promises efficiency, predictive power, and solutions to complex challenges. It offers a sense of control, a belief that with enough data and processing power, any problem can be solved. This narrative is powerful, driving investment, research, and public imagination. However, it can also create a dangerous diversion, drawing our attention away from the messy, deeply human problems that resist purely technical fixes. From a psychological perspective, our brains are wired to seek solutions and avoid discomfort. AI offers seemingly clean, scalable solutions, allowing us to intellectualize problems rather than confronting their raw, emotional weight. This cognitive offloading, while efficient for certain tasks, can inadvertently diminish our direct engagement with human suffering. We become excited about AI's potential to map refugee movements or optimize aid logistics, yet the fundamental blockades to aid delivery or the root causes of conflict remain unaddressed by human will. Systemic Blind Spots: The Overlooked Human Element Our focus on quantifiable outputs and technological solutions often leads us to overlook the essential humanistic component — the very fabric of a thriving society. In a world obsessed with metrics, how do we measure the value of a child's laughter, the dignity of a family unit, or the profound peace of a community free from fear? These are the immeasurable currencies of human flourishing, often relegated to the sidelines in strategic planning. Micro, meso, macro and meta - everything is connected. The Gaza crisis is not an isolated incident but an outcome of interconnected political, economic, and psychological systems. When these systems prioritize power, resource control, or ideological purity over human well-being, suffering becomes an inevitable byproduct. The paradox is that we possess the collective intelligence and resources to alleviate much of this suffering, yet our current systemic configurations, driven by fragmented human intentions, prevent it. This calls for a re-evaluation of our priorities and the ethical frameworks guiding our actions. The Golden Rule: Ancient Compass For A Modern World Perhaps the most potent instrument at our disposal is not a new algorithm or a larger budget, but a return to an ancient, universal principle: the Golden Rule. "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." This simple ethical compass is found in virtually every major spiritual and philosophical tradition, from Confucianism to Christianity, Islam to Hinduism. It is a testament to a universal human understanding of reciprocity and empathy. In the context of Gaza, applying the Golden Rule means asking: Would I want my family to starve? Would I want my home destroyed? Would I want to live in constant fear? The answer is unequivocally no. This principle bypasses complex geopolitical narratives and cuts straight to the heart of shared humanity. It suggests that compassion, a deeply human trait, must precede and guide any technological or financial intervention. Without this ethical grounding, even the most advanced AI could be weaponized or simply fail to address the core human needs it purports to serve. It's a call for "more compassion, less compute" in our fundamental approach to global challenges. ProSocial AI – AI-systems that are tailored, trained, tested and targeted to bring out the best in and for people and planet, is possible – but it starts with natural intelligence, human minds and hearts. Harnessing Our Treasures For Humanity: AI Guided By NI This is not to say that technology has no role. Far from it. Our unique range of technological assets, including AI, can be powerful instruments for good, if guided by a truly human and humane mindset. If our natural intelligence remains shackled by self-interest and division, then the logical, compassionate actions of AI, unburdened by human interests, political agendas and personal flaws, might be preferable. This is a desperate thought, a challenge to humanity to rise to its ethical potential before ceding moral agency to machines. Healing Humanity: A Holistic Imperative To truly help humans, hinder future harm and heal humanity, we need a holistic understanding of ourselves, the societies we inhabit and the planet we are part of. This means recognizing the interconnectedness of conflict, poverty, environmental degradation and psychological well-being. It requires moving beyond siloed solutions to embrace a systemic approach where technological innovation is always subservient to human values. Healing humanity demands more than just patching wounds; it requires addressing the root causes of suffering. This involves fostering empathy, promoting dialogue, challenging dehumanizing narratives, and building resilient communities. It necessitates a mindset that is both human (acknowledging our complexities and vulnerabilities) and humane (driven by compassion and a commitment to dignity for all). Our technological treasures, particularly AI, must be harnessed as extensions of this humane intent, amplifying our capacity for good, rather than becoming instruments of further division or indifference. Practical Takeaway: Cultivating Compassionate Algorithms The practical takeaway is not to reject technology, but to infuse it with conscious ethical intent. We must cultivate "compassionate algorithms" within ourselves and our organizations: Awareness: Regularly engage in self-reflection. How do your actions, even small ones, align with the Golden Rule? How can you consciously cultivate empathy for those suffering, even if geographically distant? Appreciation: Demand and support the ethical development and deployment of AI. Question the algorithms: Are they designed to promote well-being, reduce bias, and foster equitable access? Advocate for transparency and accountability in AI systems, especially those impacting vulnerable populations. Acceptance: Actively seek out diverse perspectives and challenge your own echo chambers. Use technology to connect with, rather than isolate from, those with different experiences. Support initiatives that use AI for peacebuilding, intergroup dialogue, and humanitarian aid. Accountability: When faced with complex problems, prioritize solutions that place human dignity, well-being, and agency at their core. Technology should serve humanity, not the other way around. The situation in Gaza today, July 26th, 2025, is a painful reminder of our collective responsibility. We possess the intelligence, the tools and the ancient wisdom to create a world where peace and food are possible for all. The ultimate test of our technological prowess will be whether it helps us reclaim our deepest human values, or merely accelerates our detachment from them.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
At least 25 people killed by Israeli gunshots and strikes in Gaza, some while seeking aid
Israel Palestinians Gaza DEIR AL-BALAH, Gaza Strip (AP) — At least 25 people were killed by Israeli airstrikes and gunshots overnight, according to health officials and the ambulance service on Saturday, as ceasefire talks appear to have stalled and Palestinians in Gaza face famine. The majority of victims were killed by gunfire as they waited for aid trucks close to the Zikim crossing with Israel, said staff at Shifa hospital, where the bodies were brought. Israel's army didn't respond to request for comments about the latest shootings. Those killed in strikes include four people in an apartment building in Gaza City among others, hospital staff and the ambulance service said. The strikes come as ceasefire talks between Israel and Hamas have hit a standstill after the U.S and Israel recalled their negotiating teams on Thursday, throwing the future of the talks into further uncertainty. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Friday his government was considering 'alternative options' to ceasefire talks with Hamas. His comments came as a Hamas official said negotiations were expected to resume next week and portrayed the recall of the Israeli and American delegations as a pressure tactic. Egypt and Qatar, which are mediating the talks alongside the United States, said the pause was only temporary and that talks would resume, though they did not say when. For desperate Palestinians a ceasefire can't come soon enough. The United Nations and experts say that Palestinians in Gaza are at risk of famine, with reports of increasing numbers of people dying from causes related to malnutrition. While Israel's army says it's allowing aid into the enclave with no limit on the number of trucks that can enter, the U.N. says it is hampered by Israeli military restrictions on its movements and incidents of criminal looting. The Zikim crossing shootings come days after at least 79 Palestinians were killed trying to reach aid entering through the same crossing. Israel's military said at the time its soldiers shot at a gathering of thousands of Palestinians who posed a threat, and that it was aware of some casualties. Israel is facing increased international pressure to alleviate the catastrophic humanitarian crisis in Gaza. More then two dozen Western-aligned countries and more than 100 charity and human rights groups have called for an end to the war, harshly criticizing Israel's blockade and a new aid delivery model it has rolled out. The charities and rights groups said even their own staff were struggling to get enough food For the first time in months Israel said it is allowing airdrops, requested by Jordan. A Jordanian official said the airdrops will mainly be food and milk formula. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer wrote in a newspaper article on Saturday that the U.K. was 'working urgently' with Jordan to get British aid into Gaza. Aid group the World Central Kitchen said on Friday that it was resuming limited cooking operations in Deir al-Balah after being forced to halt due to a lack of food supplies. It said it's trying to serve 60,000 meals daily through its field kitchen and partner community kitchens, less than half of what it's cooked over the previous month. ———————— Magdy reported from Cairo, Egypt Solve the daily Crossword
