
Hawaii Marines field new weapons in the Philippines
SUBIC BAY, Philippines — A unit of Hawaii Marines is in the Philippines fielding new weapons for the first time amid simmering tensions with China.
The Kaneohe-based 3rd Marine Littoral Regiment, which is in the country for the annual Exercise Balikatan, sent its new Navy-Marine Expeditionary Ship Interdiction System—better known as the NMESIS—on Saturday to the northern Batanes Islands in the Luzon Strait, just south of Taiwan.
Formerly the 3rd Marine Regiment, the unit officially re-designated as the 3rd MLR in 2022 and is the Marine Corps's first littoral regiment, part of the service's Force Design 2030. It's an effort to bring the Marines back to their roots as a naval fighting force focused on island and coastal fighting. The 3rd MLR is serving as the model for the Corps' facelift, and NMESIS, an anti-ship missile system, plays a central role in that vision.
Col. John Lehane, the 3rd MLR's commander, said, 'One of the things we looked at is, if you can control choke points, then you control the commerce that goes through them. And so any place where you find key maritime terrain like that, that's a suitable place to put a weapon system like that. So it's great rehearsal for us and great to help us integrate with what the Filipinos want to do for their archipelagic coastal defense concept.'
The unit has deployed to the Philippines for each iteration of Balikatan since 2022, but this is the first time it actually brought NMESIS—which it received in Hawaii in late 2024—along with other new weapon systems and equipment as the regiment takes shape and puts the concepts behind its creation into practice.
'One thing I've been telling folks, we're not an experimental unit, ' said Lehane. 'We are an initially operational capable element of the fleet Marine force who happens to do some experimentation, but my first and only focus is making these Marines as lethal and as survivable as possible if they're called upon to do something in crisis or conflict for the nation.'
But this year's deployment, with multiple weapons system in the hands of the Hawaii Marines seeing their overseas debut, is a milestone.
'From now on, when you see the MLR … it will have NMESIS with it, and it will have all of the parts and pieces that are exciting because they're new, but to us they're just becoming normal, ' said Lehane. 'These are not experimental systems ; they are fielded and ready to go.'
As the U.S. trains with Philippine forces, the Chinese military is conducting its own operations around the Philippines in close proximity. Last week the Chinese navy's aircraft carrier Shandong sailed into waters claimed by the Philippines and carried out flight deck operations about 123 nautical miles off the coast of Ilocos Norte province April 25.
Over the weekend, the U.S. and Philippine militaries conducted live-fire air defense drills together in the western coastal province of Zambales, where the 3rd MLR used its new Marine Air Defense Integrated System—better known as MADIS—which it first used in February to down drones in an exercise on Hawaii island.
As they did, Chinese state broadcaster CCTV reported that the Chinese coast guard had 'implemented maritime control ' over Sandy Cay, a small sandbank in the disputed Spratly Islands, which both Beijing and Manila claim as their own. Sandy Cay lies near Thitu Island, which has a Philippine military air field and naval station.
Chinese media released photos of Chinese coast guardsmen standing on the small formation holding a Chinese flag. In response, a small group of Philippine Marines, coast guardsmen and police went from Thitu Island to Sandy Cay on Sunday and took photos of themselves holding a Philippine flag.
On Tuesday the Chinese military began a new naval patrol in the South China Sea and released a statement asserting that 'the Philippines has been frequently carrying out maritime infringement provocations, creating disturbances and pulling in countries from outside the region to organise so-called 'joint patrols.''
Island fights Under Force Design 2030, Marine Corps leaders envision a return to the 'island hopping ' operations the service conducted in the Pacific during World War II—but with a 21st-century twist. They envision Marines using high-tech sensors, communication systems, drones and missiles, as they spread out across island chains operating in small groups, that would have the potential to wreak havoc on their opponents.
The service has gotten rid of all of its tanks and has phased out traditional cannon-based artillery on Oahu to replace them with NMESIS, which commanders hope to use to sink enemy ships from missile batteries that Marines would set up on islands and coastlines as they support Navy operations and allied forces. During the development of NMESIS, the U.S. military put a prototype through the paces at the Pacific Missile Range Facility on Kauai in 2021, when it was used to fire on a decommissioned vessel.
Sgt. Christian Chonperez, an artilleryman who spent his career operating traditional cannon artillery, is one of the Hawaii Marines now operating NMESIS in the Philippines. He said that compared with howitzers he originally used, NMESIS has 'way more advanced capabilities compared to that.'
But he said it's been a relatively easy transition for him and his fellow Marines as they work with the new missile launcher, saying, 'The way the system is built is to be very user-friendly towards the operator.'
Unlike the old, which had to be towed by a truck or slung under a helicopter to move to different locations, NMESIS is mounted on a remote-controlled vehicle chassis, allowing Marines to quickly drive it from place to place, quickly moving to new firing positions and using 'shoot and scoot ' tactics to avoid return fire from enemy forces.
Chonperez said that 'a lot of what we're doing right now is very logistical, just so this proves that we can take it wherever we want and put it in any environment, any kind of place. So moving is a lot of what we're doing.'
Force Design 2030 is in many ways tailor-made with the Western Pacific in mind, with a particular focus on the South China Sea—a busy waterway that nearly one-third of all global trade travels through. Beijing claims nearly the entire sea as its exclusive territory over the objections of neighboring countries, and tensions have been mounting over territorial and navigation rights.
In 2016 an international court ruled in favor of the Philippines and found that China's claims have 'no legal ' basis. Beijing rejected the ruling and has doubled down by building bases on disputed islands and reefs. The Chinese military has also harassed and sometimes attacked fishermen and other marine workers from neighboring countries—especially the Philippines.
Tensions have also been ramping up as China has also stepped up military operations around Taiwan, a self-ruled island democracy that Beijing regards as a rogue province. Chinese leader Xi Jinping has vowed to bring Taiwan under Beijing's control, by force if necessary. On April 1 the Philippine military's top commander, Gen. Romeo Brawner, raised eyebrows when he told troops in the northern tip of the country to 'start planning for actions in case there is an invasion of Taiwan.'
Brawner, an alumnus of the Daniel K. Inouye Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies in Waikiki, asserted in his remarks to his troops that 'if something happens to Taiwan, inevitably we will be involved. There are 250, 000 (overseas Filipino workers working in Taiwan, and we will have to rescue them. And it will be the task of Northern Luzon Command to be at the front line of that operation.'
Changing tactics Down in Zambales the MLR's anti-aircraft battalion teamed up with the Philippine air force and U.S. Army as they shot down drones in coastal defense drills where they put their new MADIS system to the test. The system consists of pairs of armored vehicles equipped with a host of advanced cameras and sensors to detect small drone threats and using a mixture of weapons and jamming devices to take them down.
The system was originally inspired by the U.S. military's experiences fighting the Islamic State group in Iraq and Syria, where the militants began using low-cost commercial drones to spy on and in some cases attack local and coalition forces.
Drones have only become more ubiquitous on battlefields around the world, with both sides of the conflict in Ukraine in particular using drones to deadly effect. On April 15 the Philippine navy announced that it had concluded that mysterious underwater drones that had been found by Filipino fishermen likely came from China and were being used to spy in Philippine waters and map the area for submarine operations.
'It's not just adversaries ; it's fishermen, it's (everyday people ). I'm a drone hobbyist. I fly a drone on my own, ' said Lehane. 'They are just becoming part and parcel to everyday life. And so all the more important that we're able to, one, detect them ; two, classify what they are ; three, determine whether or not there's (hostile ) intent ; and then four, if necessary, take them out of the sky.'
The MADIS was tested in Arizona before making its way to Marines in Hawaii. The armored trucks operating the system are still painted desert tan for Middle Eastern operations rather than the tropical Pacific environments the Corps largely envisions the MLR operating in. It's a visible reminder of the long legacy of two decades of costly, bloody warfare in the Middle East that still casts a long shadow over U.S. military operations today.
Lt. Col. Matthew Sladek, commander of 3rd MLR's anti-aircraft battalion, said the military's equipment-testing organizations' focus 'has all been desert, desert, desert, because that's where we've fought for the last 20 years.' He explained that the MADIS trucks the Marines are using in Balikatan 'are the first ones out the door, fielded by the program office. When these guys go back to Hawaii, these trucks will actually make their way back to Charleston, South Carolina, and then we'll get replaced with full rate production trucks, which will come back here.'
One of the major tests is how new systems actually fare in the humid, tropical coasts and islands in the South China Sea. Sladek said that while the weapons themselves have been fine, the hot, moist air poses challenges for advanced sensors and computer systems and that 'there's some things we got to work through.'
The dramatic transformation of the Marine Corps has been controversial, with many retired Marine officers expressing skepticism and in some cases dismay at the radical changes. They charge that getting rid of tanks and other equipment to focus on unproven high-tech systems is wrong and that Chinese forces would obliterate them in a real confrontation.
Lehane said several critics have come to Marine Corps Base Hawaii to question him and see for themselves, and that many have softened their criticism. He told the Honolulu Star-Advertiser, 'When you get a look at it from the outside, maybe you don't understand all the facts or the arrangements, or what intel is driving us to do the things that we're doing, but none of it is haphazard.'
Among the concerns is that the focus on missile batteries, drone and high-tech gadgets takes away the focus on infantrymen and will erode their fighting skills. But Lehane says the infantry remains central and that 'the focus on the regiment, the focus of the battalion and company commanders, is all back on the basics. You know, are you physically fit ? When you squeeze the trigger on a rifle, can you strike the target the first time and every time ? Do you know your orders ? Do you know how to patrol ?'
Lehane added that 'no matter how amazing all of this equipment is—newest radar, coolest air defense thing, best anti-ship missile—all of that is mildly interesting if you can't do the basics.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Politico
3 hours ago
- Politico
‘Kill shot:' GOP megabill targets solar, wind projects with new tax
Senate Republicans stepped up their attacks on U.S. solar and wind energy projects by quietly adding a provision to their megabill that would penalize future developments with a new tax. That new tax measure was tucked into the more than 900-page document released late Friday that also would sharply cut the tax credits in the Inflation Reduction Act for solar and wind projects. Those cuts to the IRA credits were added after a late-stage push by President Donald Trump to crack down further on the incentives by requiring generation projects be placed in service by the end of 2027 to qualify. The new excise tax is another blow to the fastest-growing sources of power production in the United States, and would be a massive setback to the wind and solar energy industries since it would apply even to projects not receiving any credits. 'It's a kill shot. This new excise tax on wind and solar is designed to fully kill the industry,' said Adrian Deveny, founder and president of policy advisory firm Climate Vision, who helped craft the climate law as a former policy director for Democratic Senate Leader Chuck Schumer. Analysts at the Rhodium Group said in an email the new tax would push up the costs of wind and solar projects by 10 to 20 percent — on top of the cost increases from losing the credits. 'Combined with the likely onerous administrative reporting burden this provision puts in place, these cost increases will lead to even lower wind and solar installations. The impacts of this tax would also flow through to consumers in the form of higher electricity rates,' Rhodium said. The provision as written appears to add an additional tax for any wind and solar project placed into service after 2027 — when its eligibility for the investment and production tax credits ends — if a certain percentage of the value of the project's components are sourced from prohibited foreign entities, like China. It would apply to all projects that began construction after June 16 of this year. The language would require wind and solar projects, even those not receiving credits, to navigate complex and potentially unworkable requirements that prohibit sourcing from foreign entities of concern — a move designed to promote domestic production and crack down on Chinese materials. In keeping with GOP support for the fossil fuel industry, the updated bill creates a new production tax credit for metallurgical coal, which is used in steelmaking.


The Hill
4 hours ago
- The Hill
Does your business have a Plan B for the Trump tariffs?
I have a client in New Jersey who manufactures industrial films. A big source of their supply comes from two Chinese companies. You would think with President Trump's tariffs they would be suffering, right? Luckily, the owner of the company (and her partner) paid attention. Going all the way back to 2023 they knew — like we all knew — that the presidential election would be tight. By mid-2024 it got even tighter. And what was then-candidate Trump saying back then? He was promising significant tax cuts but providing no answers as to how they would be funded. He was promising to overturn many of the Biden administration's regulations, from environmental to DEI to overtime pay. He was promising to deport millions of undocumented immigrants. But more importantly to my client, Trump was planning on handing down big tariffs, especially targeted at China. And they took him seriously. They're not Trump supporters, but they are pragmatists. So back in 2023 they started searching for alternative suppliers. They reached out to nonprofits like the World Trade Center Association and Small Business Development Centers, and they got help from the International Trade Administration. They traveled to India, Malaysia and Brazil. They realized that if Trump was elected, their main source of supply would be seriously threatened. They also understood that the Biden administration was no big fan of China either. You can't run a business that's dependent on such a precarious source of supply that it could be seriously disrupted by a single politician. So they took action. Unfortunately, some business owners didn't. The media has been reporting about small businesses that are now suffering because of Trump's tariffs. A steel products manufacturer in Salt Lake City says his company could be 'devastated.' A flower shop owner in California that buys products from South America laments the significant increase in her costs. Two Iowa business owners, who buy 75-80 percent of their products from overseas, are looking at a 'nightmare' holiday season. According to a CNN report, a high-end electronics manufacturer has had to cut employee hours, and a guitar seller fears the 'mass extinction' of small businesses. I feel bad for these business owners, but life isn't fair. And history repeats itself. Businesses, regardless of their size, are always at the mercy of government interventions. Today is no different. Which is why my client and her partner, having read history, took Trump's tariff warnings seriously. They're smart. And like the many other smart business people I have met, they share one common characteristic: They're always looking ahead. They always have a Plan B. They diversify. Investors know that too much reliance on one party creates risk. There's a reason the SEC requires that companies disclose in their financial statements when a customer represents more than 10 percent of their business. The flower-seller, guitar maker and electronics manufacturer all relied too heavily on foreign supply for their businesses. Fair enough — this model has, until now, worked well for them. But it's a risky model when you rely too much on one source of supply for your livelihood — particularly when you have new leaders telling you that they're going to take actions that will put that source of supply in jeopardy. Of course that's easier said than done. But, like my New Jersey client, those small-business owners should also have been looking ahead and mitigating their potential risk. My client saw the writing on the wall two years ago and took steps to prepare. And they weren't the only ones. The chief strategy officer for a robotics company, for example, said he always 'plans ahead 9-12 months' and had a 'plan B' to produce necessary hardware outside of China, where it was operating before. 'Maybe this is also a good time to say, 'Let's not put all the eggs in one basket,'' he told CNN, 'and, you know, start looking on other kind of territories that will reduce the risk for us going forward.' According to an NPR report, a Maryland business owner — a former Marine (no surprise) — has been stockpiling products for months in advance of looming tariffs, admitting that his 'warehouse was bursting.' But then there are the countless other small-business owners who just like to keep their fingers crossed and hope against hope that nothing bad will happen. That's no way to run a business, especially when there are employees with families who are relying on your decisions. So do I feel bad for those business owners suffering under Trump's tariffs? I do. But this is the game you play when you run a business. You take risks, you reap rewards. And if you don't plan ahead and diversify, you suffer the consequences. Gene Marks is founder of The Marks Group, a small-business consulting firm.


Boston Globe
5 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Hundreds of thousands mourn top Iranian military commanders and scientists killed in Israeli strikes
State media reported more than 1 million people turned out for the funeral procession, which was impossible to independently confirm, but the dense crowd packed the main Tehran thoroughfare along the entire 4.5 kilometer (nearly 3 mile) route. There was no immediate sign of Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, in the state broadcast of the funeral. Khamenei, who has not made a public appearance since before the outbreak of the war, has in past funerals held prayers for fallen commanders over their caskets before the open ceremonies, later aired on state television. Advertisement Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi was on hand, and state television reported that Gen. Esmail Qaani, who heads the foreign wing of the Revolutionary Guard, the Quds Force, and Gen. Ali Shamkhani were also among the mourners. Shamkhani, an adviser to Khamenei who was wounded in the first round of Israel's attack and hospitalized, was shown in a civilian suit leaning on a cane in an image distributed on state television's Telegram channel. Advertisement Later on Saturday night, state TV showed Shamkhani saying he and other generals knew they would be targets before Israel initiated the war earlier this month. The morning of the strike on his residence, he said he woke up for dawn prayer when suddenly everything around him had become ruins. He initially thought that an earthquake had taken place, and it took search and rescue teams at least three hours to find him in the rubble. Shamkhani said most of his injuries were internal, including a chest fracture. Iran's Revolutionary Guard was created after its 1979 Islamic Revolution. Since it was established, it has evolved from a paramilitary, domestic security force to a transnational force that has come to the aid of Tehran's allies in the Middle East, from Syria and Lebanon to Iraq. It operates in parallel to the country's existing armed forces and controls Iran's arsenal of ballistic missiles, which it has used to attack Israel twice during the Israel-Hamas war in the Gaza Strip. Over 12 days before a ceasefire was declared on Tuesday, Israel claimed it killed around 30 Iranian commanders and 11 nuclear scientists, while hitting eight nuclear-related facilities and more than 720 military infrastructure sites. More than 1,000 people were killed, including at least 417 civilians, according to the Washington-based Human Rights Activists group. Iran fired more than 550 ballistic missiles at Israel, most of which were intercepted, but those that got through caused damage in many areas and killed 28 people. Saturday's ceremonies were the first public funerals for top commanders since the ceasefire, and Iranian state television reported that they were for 60 people in total, including four women and four children. Advertisement Authorities closed government offices to allow public servants to attend the ceremonies. Many in the crowd expressed feelings of anger and defiance. 'This is not a ceasefire, this is just a pause,' said 43-year-old Ahmad Mousapoor, waving an Iranian flag. 'Whatever they do, we will definitely give a crushing response.' State media published images of an open grave plot at Tehran's sprawling Behesht-e-Zahra cemetery where army chief of staff, Gen. Mohammad Bagheri, who was killed on the first day of the war, was to be buried beside his brother, a Guards commander killed during the 1980s Iran-Iraq war. Many of the others were to be buried in their hometowns. The Iranian judiciary's Mizan news agency confirmed that the top prosecutor at the notorious Evin prison had been killed in an Israeli strike on Monday. It reported that Ali Ghanaatkar, whose prosecution of dissidents, including Nobel Peace Prize winner Narges Mohammadi, led to widespread criticism by human rights groups, would be buried at a shrine in Qom. Iran has always insisted its nuclear program is only for peaceful purposes. But Israel views it as an existential threat and said its military campaign was necessary to prevent Iran from building an atomic weapon. Khamenei's last public appearance was June 11, two days before hostilities with Israel broke out, when he met with Iranian parliamentarians. On Thursday, however, he released a pre-recorded video, in his first message since the end of the war, filled with warnings and threats directed toward the United States and Israel, the Islamic Republic's longtime adversaries. Advertisement The 86-year-old downplayed U.S. strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites as having not achieved 'anything significant' and claimed victory over Israel. The head of the United Nations nuclear watchdog agency, Rafael Grossi, has characterized the damage done by American bunker-buster bombs to Iran's Fordo nuclear site, which was built into a mountain, as 'very, very, very considerable.' U.S. President Donald Trump has said that he expects Iran to open itself to international inspection to verify it doesn't restart its nuclear program, and White House officials have said they expect to restart talks soon with Iran, though nothing has been scheduled. Iran's parliament has voted to suspend collaboration with Grossi's International Atomic Energy Agency for the time being. In a post on X on Saturday, Araghchi indicated that Iran might be open to talks, but criticized Trump's remarks from Friday in which the president scoffed at a warning from Khamenei against further U.S. attacks, saying Iran 'got beat to hell.' 'If President Trump is genuine about wanting a deal, he should put aside the disrespectful and unacceptable tone towards Iran's Supreme Leader, Grand Ayatollah Khamenei and stop hurting his millions of heartfelt followers,' Araghchi wrote.