Hawaiʻi's 5 most commonly surrendered dog breeds
We spoke to Brandy Shimabukuro, the communications director for HHS. She reported that from July 2024 through May 2025, certain dog breeds and mixes have been surrendered more frequently than others.
Understanding these patterns can help prospective pet owners make informed decisions and contribute to addressing the shelter capacity crisis.
According to Shimabukuro, the five most commonly surrendered dog breeds or mixes at their Oʻahu campuses are:
Terriers make up 32.9% of surrendered breeds.
Chihuahua short coat constitutes 10.9%.
Pit bull terriers make up 8.7%.
American pit bull terriers make up 6.5%.
Small mixed breeds under 24 pounds constitute 4.7%.
Collectively, terrier-type breeds account for a significant portion of the intake at 50.1%. Additionally, various mixed breed categories by size represent 11.0% of dog surrenders.Shimabukuro explained, 'We see a lot of, for lack of another term, terrier mixes.' This means one out of every three dogs dropped off at HHS shelters is a terrier or a mix of one.
These numbers come directly from pet owners.
'We're relying on information that they give to us,' she said. 'So, the numbers that I pulled, and the statistics that I pull, the percentages that I shared with you, are numbers that were relayed to us from owners or guardians who had to surrender them into our care.'
It's not just one kind of terrier, either.
'Terriers and the label terrier are really diverse. You could think of it as like the umbrella term for a whole host of different breeds,' explained Shimabukuro. 'That could be rat terriers. Fox terriers, Jack Russell terriers. It could be Staffordshire terriers, American pit bull terrier mixes.'
Altogether, terrier-type breeds make up to a little more than 50% of all dog surrenders at the Oʻahu campuses.
The primary reasons for pet surrenders in Hawaiʻi include:
Lack of affordable pet-friendly housing: Many families are unable to find housing that allows pets, leading to difficult decisions.
Financial hardship: Economic challenges make it difficult for some owners to care for their pets.
Relocation: Some families are leaving Hawaiʻi and cannot take their pets with them.
These factors contribute to the high number of surrenders and the ongoing shelter capacity crisis.
Many dogs, especially terriers and pit bulls, need more than just food and shelter. They need training, attention and exercise.
'If you know that you're getting a breed that is a working breed that is used to having a job, is highly intelligent and very active, you're going to have to provide a level of exercise and enrichment that is unique to them,' advised Shimabukuro. 'A dog that is not having their needs met, and I mean physically and mentally, is a dog that's ultimately going to start to have behavioral issues.'
These behaviors can lead to even more surrenders.
People often choose a dog based on how it looks. But that can lead to trouble later on.
'What I'm really hoping people take away from this article is maybe think about what's best for your lifestyle, your home and your living situation,' said Shimabukuro.
Choosing the right dog means thinking about what kind of life you live and whether you have the time and energy to care for a pet properly.
Certain breeds may face challenges that make them more likely to be surrendered:
Terriers: Known for their high energy and strong prey drive, terriers require constant training and stimulation.
Chihuahuas: Despite their small size, Chihuahuas can be assertive and may require experienced handling.
Pit bull terriers: Often subject to breed-specific legislation and public misconceptions, this breed leads to potential challenges in rehoming.
Understanding these breed-specific needs can help potential owners assess compatibility with their lifestyle.
1. Don't choose a dog just because it's cute: A terrier puppy might look adorable; but looks don't tell you anything about energy, behavior or needs. Know the breed's history and whether you can handle it.
2. Do research on dog breeds before you adopt: Learn about the breed's personality, activity level, intelligence and common behavior issues.
'While I don't believe in breed stereotypes, I advocate very strongly against breed stereotypes,' Shimabukuro said. 'I do, however, believe in responsible pet ownership and understanding the role that genetics play with that pet in your home.'
3. Make sure your housing allows pets: This is the number one reason people surrender their animals in Hawaiʻi. If you rent, double-check your lease and talk to your landlord.
4. Be realistic about your time and energy: Dogs need daily exercise and mental activity. This is even more important for high-energy breeds. If your life is too busy to give that, you may need to reconsider getting a dog.
5. Plan for the long-term: Dogs live for many years. Moving, having kids or changing jobs are all common life changes that can affect your ability to care for a pet. Think ahead.
6. Understand that giving up a dog is hard for everyone: Most people who surrender a dog don't want to. It's a painful choice.
'Obviously, we're relying on owners,' said Shimabukuro. 'If they have to make the difficult decision to surrender their pets to us.'
Understanding the weight of that decision can lead to more compassion—and fewer surrenders in the future.
You can click to learn more.
The Hawaiian Humane Society continues to advocate for responsible pet ownership and encourages prospective pet owners to consider factors beyond appearance when choosing a breed.
Get news on the go with KHON 2GO, KHON's morning podcast, every morning at 8
Ensuring compatibility with one's lifestyle and living situation is crucial for a successful and lasting pet-owner relationship.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
9 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Planned Parenthood wins partial victory in legal fight with Trump administration over funding cuts
BOSTON (AP) — Planned Parenthood won a partial victory Monday in a legal fight with President Donald Trump's administration over efforts to defund the organization in his signature tax legislation. A provision in that bill ends Medicaid payments for one year to abortion providers that received more than $800,000 from Medicaid in 2023, even to those like Planned Parenthood that also offer things like contraception, pregnancy tests and STD testing. But U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani in Boston granted a preliminary injunction Monday that, for now, blocks the government from cutting Medicaid payments to Planned Parenthood member organizations that either don't provide abortion care or didn't meet a threshold of at least $800,000 in Medicaid reimbursements in a given year. It wasn't immediately clear how many Planned Parenthood organizations and clinics would continue to get Medicaid reimbursements under that decision and how many might not. Planned Parenthood said in a statement after the injunction that it's thankful the court recognized 'the harm' caused by the bill. But it said it's disappointed that some of its members will lose this funding, 'risking chaos, confusion, and harm for patients who could now be turned away when seeking lifesaving reproductive health care.' 'The court has not yet ruled on whether it will grant preliminary injunctive relief to other members,' the statement added. "We remain hopeful that the court will grant this relief. There will be nothing short of a public health crisis if Planned Parenthood members are allowed to be 'defunded.'' The lawsuit was filed earlier this month against Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. by Planned Parenthood Federation of America and its member organizations in Massachusetts and Utah. Planned Parenthood argued that allowing the provision to take effect would have devastating consequences nationwide, including increased rates of undiagnosed and untreated sexually transmitted diseases and cancer. 'With no reason other than plain animus, the law will prevent Planned Parenthood Members from providing vital — indeed, lifesaving — care to more than one million patients,' they wrote. 'This statute is unconstitutional and will inflict irreparable harm on Planned Parenthood Members and their patients." Lawyers for the government argued in court documents that the bill 'stops federal subsidies for Big Abortion.' 'All three democratically elected components of the Federal Government collaborated to enact that provision consistent with their electoral mandates from the American people as to how they want their hard-earned taxpayer dollars spent,' the government wrote in its opposition to the motion. The government added that the plaintiffs 'now want this Court to reject that judgment and supplant duly enacted legislation with their own policy preferences. ... That request is legally groundless.'
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
HHS says it will begin reforms of organ donation system after federal investigation finds ‘horrifying' problems
The US Department of Health and Human Services said Monday that it's undertaking an initiative to reform the country's organ donation system, after a federal investigation found that one organization in the Kentucky region began the process to take organs from people who may not have been dead. A House subcommittee is holding a hearing Tuesday on organ donation safety lapses and how procurement and transplant organizations intend to improve the system, to regain the trust of donors and their families. That trust is essential because the US organ donation system relies on people to volunteer to donate, often when they get a driver's license. As of 2022, about 170 million people in the US have signed up to donate their organs when they die, but there is always more demand for organs than what is available. Last year, there were more than 48,000 transplants in the US, but more than 103,000 people were on waiting lists. About 13 people in the United States die every day waiting for a transplant, according to the federal Health Resources and Services Administration. HHS says the reform initiative was launched after an investigation by the Health Resources and Services Administration found problems with dozens of cases involving incomplete donations – when an organization started the process to take someone's organs but, for some reason, the donation never happened. According to a report on the federal investigation, as well as a memo prepared ahead of the House subcommittee hearing, the cases were managed by Kentucky Organ Donor Affiliates, a procurement organization that handles donations in Kentucky and parts of Ohio and West Virginia, which has merged with another group and is now called Network for Hope. Of the 351 cases in the investigation, more than 100 had 'concerning features, including 73 patients with neurological signs incompatible with organ donation,' HHS said in a news release Monday. At least 28 cases involved patients who may not have been deceased at the time the organ procurement process began, raising 'serious ethical and legal questions.' 'Our findings show that hospitals allowed the organ procurement process to begin when patients showed signs of life, and this is horrifying,' HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said in the release. 'The organ procurement organizations that coordinate access to transplants will be held accountable. The entire system must be fixed to ensure that every potential donor's life is treated with the sanctity it deserves.' Network for Hope has not responded to CNN's request for comment, but it says on its website that it is 'fully committed to transparency' and is in full compliance with all requirements of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, which regulates organ donation organizations. 'Our goal has always been and will remain to meet the highest ethical and medical standards in donation and transplantation.' The investigation found patterns such as failures to follow professional best practices, to respect family wishes, to collaborate with a patient's primary medical team, and to recognize neurological function, suggesting 'organizational dysfunction and poor quality and safety assurance culture' in the Kentucky-area organization, according to a report from the Health Resources and Services Administration. The investigation also found that the Kentucky-area organization and the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network, which oversees the local groups, failed to 'adequately recognize and respond to poor patient care and quality practices,' the report says. The organ procurement organization in Kentucky is one of 55 in the US, and since the federal review, the Health Resources and Services Administration said, it has received reports of 'similar patterns' of high-risk procurement practices at other organizations. The agency is mandating system-level changes to safeguard potential organ donors across the US and said the Kentucky-area organization needed to conduct a 'full root cause analysis of its failures to follow internal protocols.' It also said the organization must adopt a formal procedure to halt a donation process if there are safety concerns. Network for Hope says on its website: 'We are equally committed to addressing the recent guidance from the HRSA and we are already evaluating whether any updates to our current practices are needed.' The federal investigation was launched after one case in Kentucky came to light during a congressional hearing in September. In 2021, 33-year-old TJ Hoover was hospitalized after a drug overdose. He woke up in the operating room to find people shaving his chest, bathing his body in surgical solution and talking about harvesting his organs. Earlier that day, a doctor had declared him brain-dead, according to his medical records, even though he seemed to be reacting to stimuli, making eye contact and shaking his head. Former staffers of the organ procurement organization who were involved in Hoover's case raised concerns that he wasn't brain-dead and should not have been on the operating table. The concerns were ignored, according to the federal investigation. Staff told CNN that the procedure to take Hoover's organs stopped after a surgeon saw his reaction to stimuli. The Kentucky procurement organization told CNN last fall that it had reviewed the case and 'remains confident that accepted practices and approved protocols were followed.' Hoover now lives with his sister in Richmond, Kentucky, and is undergoing extensive physical therapy and treatment, much of which is shared on TikTok in an effort to inspire others. Congress has been investigating the nation's organ donation system for years. Tuesday's hearing is intended to determine what lessons could be learned from the investigation, what changes are necessary to make the system better and what challenges lie ahead. One issue involves organs procured from patients who aren't brain-dead. Although most donations in the US come from people who are brain-dead, there are other circumstances in which a patient may become an organ donor. It's called donation after circulatory death, or DCD, and it has become much more common in recent years, although some experts question the ethics of the practice. A donation after brain death is defined by the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network as 'the organ recovery process that may occur following death by irreversible cessation of cerebral and brain stem function; characterized by absence of electrical activity in the brain, blood flow to the brain, and brain function as determined by clinical assessment of responses.' DCD, by comparison, is when 'you've got somebody with essentially devastating illness or injury, and their family's decided to withdraw life support,' Dr. Robert Cannon, an associate professor of surgery and surgical director of the liver transplant program at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, told CNN last year after Hoover's case came to light. Cannon was not involved in Hoover's case but was familiar with it because he testified about lapses in the organ procurement system at the House Energy and Commerce Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee hearing where the case came to light in September. 'Certainly, we have potential DCD donors with lots of reflexes,' Cannon said. 'But as long as the family knows this is what's happening with their loved one, this process is considered ethical and standard.'
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
HHS says it will begin reforms of organ donation system after federal investigation finds ‘horrifying' problems
Federal agenciesFacebookTweetLink Follow The US Department of Health and Human Services said Monday that it's undertaking an initiative to reform the country's organ donation system, after a federal investigation found that one organization in the Kentucky region began the process to take organs from people who may not have been dead. A House subcommittee is holding a hearing Tuesday on organ donation safety lapses and how procurement and transplant organizations intend to improve the system, to regain the trust of donors and their families. That trust is essential because the US organ donation system relies on people to volunteer to donate, often when they get a driver's license. As of 2022, about 170 million people in the US have signed up to donate their organs when they die, but there is always more demand for organs than what is available. Last year, there were more than 48,000 transplants in the US, but more than 103,000 people were on waiting lists. About 13 people in the United States die every day waiting for a transplant, according to the federal Health Resources and Services Administration. HHS says the reform initiative was launched after an investigation by the Health Resources and Services Administration found problems with dozens of cases involving incomplete donations – when an organization started the process to take someone's organs but, for some reason, the donation never happened. According to a report on the federal investigation, as well as a memo prepared ahead of the House subcommittee hearing, the cases were managed by Kentucky Organ Donor Affiliates, a procurement organization that handles donations in Kentucky and parts of Ohio and West Virginia, which has merged with another group and is now called Network for Hope. Of the 351 cases in the investigation, more than 100 had 'concerning features, including 73 patients with neurological signs incompatible with organ donation,' HHS said in a news release Monday. At least 28 cases involved patients who may not have been deceased at the time the organ procurement process began, raising 'serious ethical and legal questions.' 'Our findings show that hospitals allowed the organ procurement process to begin when patients showed signs of life, and this is horrifying,' HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said in the release. 'The organ procurement organizations that coordinate access to transplants will be held accountable. The entire system must be fixed to ensure that every potential donor's life is treated with the sanctity it deserves.' Network for Hope has not responded to CNN's request for comment, but it says on its website that it is 'fully committed to transparency' and is in full compliance with all requirements of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, which regulates organ donation organizations. 'Our goal has always been and will remain to meet the highest ethical and medical standards in donation and transplantation.' The investigation found patterns such as failures to follow professional best practices, to respect family wishes, to collaborate with a patient's primary medical team, and to recognize neurological function, suggesting 'organizational dysfunction and poor quality and safety assurance culture' in the Kentucky-area organization, according to a report from the Health Resources and Services Administration. The investigation also found that the Kentucky-area organization and the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network, which oversees the local groups, failed to 'adequately recognize and respond to poor patient care and quality practices,' the report says. The organ procurement organization in Kentucky is one of 55 in the US, and since the federal review, the Health Resources and Services Administration said, it has received reports of 'similar patterns' of high-risk procurement practices at other organizations. The agency is mandating system-level changes to safeguard potential organ donors across the US and said the Kentucky-area organization needed to conduct a 'full root cause analysis of its failures to follow internal protocols.' It also said the organization must adopt a formal procedure to halt a donation process if there are safety concerns. Network for Hope says on its website: 'We are equally committed to addressing the recent guidance from the HRSA and we are already evaluating whether any updates to our current practices are needed.' The federal investigation was launched after one case in Kentucky came to light during a congressional hearing in September. In 2021, 33-year-old TJ Hoover was hospitalized after a drug overdose. He woke up in the operating room to find people shaving his chest, bathing his body in surgical solution and talking about harvesting his organs. Earlier that day, a doctor had declared him brain-dead, according to his medical records, even though he seemed to be reacting to stimuli, making eye contact and shaking his head. Former staffers of the organ procurement organization who were involved in Hoover's case raised concerns that he wasn't brain-dead and should not have been on the operating table. The concerns were ignored, according to the federal investigation. Staff told CNN that the procedure to take Hoover's organs stopped after a surgeon saw his reaction to stimuli. The Kentucky procurement organization told CNN last fall that it had reviewed the case and 'remains confident that accepted practices and approved protocols were followed.' Hoover now lives with his sister in Richmond, Kentucky, and is undergoing extensive physical therapy and treatment, much of which is shared on TikTok in an effort to inspire others. Congress has been investigating the nation's organ donation system for years. Tuesday's hearing is intended to determine what lessons could be learned from the investigation, what changes are necessary to make the system better and what challenges lie ahead. One issue involves organs procured from patients who aren't brain-dead. Although most donations in the US come from people who are brain-dead, there are other circumstances in which a patient may become an organ donor. It's called donation after circulatory death, or DCD, and it has become much more common in recent years, although some experts question the ethics of the practice. A donation after brain death is defined by the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network as 'the organ recovery process that may occur following death by irreversible cessation of cerebral and brain stem function; characterized by absence of electrical activity in the brain, blood flow to the brain, and brain function as determined by clinical assessment of responses.' DCD, by comparison, is when 'you've got somebody with essentially devastating illness or injury, and their family's decided to withdraw life support,' Dr. Robert Cannon, an associate professor of surgery and surgical director of the liver transplant program at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, told CNN last year after Hoover's case came to light. Cannon was not involved in Hoover's case but was familiar with it because he testified about lapses in the organ procurement system at the House Energy and Commerce Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee hearing where the case came to light in September. 'Certainly, we have potential DCD donors with lots of reflexes,' Cannon said. 'But as long as the family knows this is what's happening with their loved one, this process is considered ethical and standard.'
