MPs back the Mirror's campaign for a monument to honour UK terror victims
MPs have backed the Mirror's campaign for a monument to honour all UK terror victims. Labour's Kim Leadbeater, Lucy Powell, Andrew Gwynne and Graham Stringer all support our fight for a lasting touchstone. Last night Kim, whose sister Jo Cox MP was murdered by a white supremacist, said: "We should never forget the people we have lost to terrorism and I congratulate the Mirror on their 'Place to Remember' campaign which I am proud to support. 'Too many people have lost their lives to terrorism and extremist violence in our country and too many families have been left having to deal with their loss." The Spen Valley MP, 49, added: "We know that people grieve in different ways, but for some people having a special place to go to remember their loved ones could provide great comfort. A memorial would also serve to remind us of the life-changing impact of the actions of those who use violence to seek to divide us."
The Mirror-backed Place to Remember Campaign is calling on the government to erect a monument honouring all those affected by terror attacks in the UK. We are also demanding that calls for a National Remembrance Day for Victims and Survivors of Terrorism be urgently listened to. March, Security Minister Dan Jarvis launched a consultation for a day of remembrance, which is due to close next month, but this does not include plans for a shrine. For Lucy Powell, MP for Manchester Central, the catastrophic impact of terrorism is all too familiar, having worked closely with victims of the Manchester Arena attack. Backing our campaign, she said: "As a constituency MP for Manchester Central I have seen first-hand the utter devastation and lasting trauma that terrorism causes. In Manchester, we pulled together as a city after the arena attack in 2017, and the Glade of Light memorial has provided a fitting space for remembrance and reflection in the city.
'However, a national monument to honour all those affected in the UK is perhaps overdue and would provide a central united space for remembrance. As such I support this and calls for a National Remembrance Day for victims and survivors of terrorism which would provide an opportunity for the nation to come together to remember those lost and affected.' Greater Manchester MPs Andrew Gwynne, who represents Gorton and Denton, and Graham Stringer, of Blackley and Middleton South, are also pleased to support our fight. Both leaders were heavily involved in the aftermath of Salman Abedi's blast at Manchester Arena on May 22, 2017, which left 22 dead and thousands more injured.
Jo Cox, MP for Batley and Spen, was fatally shot and stabbed outside a library in Birstall, West Yorks, where she was about to hold a constituency surgery on June 16, 2016. Attacker Thomas Mair, a white supremacist who was obsessed with Nazis and apartheid-era South Africa, was handed a whole-life tariff and will likely die in prison. Jo's widower Brendan Cox, who co-founded terror victim Network Survivors Against Terror after her death, has also backed our campaign for a physical memorial.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
40 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Kate Forbes says she may return to politics at 2046 election
Speaking to the BBC's Good Morning Scotland on Tuesday, the 35‑year‑old said it was on her mind that her three‑year‑old daughter would start school during the next parliamentary term. READ MORE She said: "You either face the prospect of waving goodbye on a Monday morning and returning home on a Friday night every week for five years, or you move the whole family down to Edinburgh, and that was not something I was willing to do. "I do not think it is fair on everybody in my family. I have three stepdaughters, I have a husband who has a job, and so when you outline it like that over recess, it is a difficult decision, but it suddenly becomes a lot clearer." Pressed on whether she might return to frontline politics, Ms Forbes replied: "Maybe." "I do not know if you will still be around in 20 years' time," she told the programme's host, Gary Robertson, "but maybe we will be having a conversation at this point." If Holyrood sticks to the normal five‑year election cycle, that could mean Ms Forbes back on the ballot for the 2046 vote. Ms Forbes also used the interview to criticise Holyrood's limited childcare provision, pointing out that its crèche facility is restricted to three hours per day. She said the SNP's Gail Ross and Aileen Campbell, Labour's Jenny Marra, and former Scottish Conservative leader Ruth Davidson had all left parliament, in part because of a lack of support for young families. "I am not the first, and unless anything changes, I am unlikely to be the last. So many parents know the pressures and the guilt of balancing all of this, and I am totally in the same camp as them. "We have the added dimension of an eight‑hour return trip to my place of work at Holyrood, or a minimum of three to four hours' drive across the constituency before the day even begins. And that adds a particular dimension, because you are not going to be able to get home every night. "But there are some areas I think the Parliament could do more and do better. There is a crèche facility I have long been campaigning about because it is limited to three hours per day, and I do not know anybody who only works three hours per day, so that does not make sense. "I am certainly not advocating for the job to be any less demanding or any less all‑consuming — it has to be, by its very nature of representing people — but if we cannot even get some of the basic support right, then it will always be difficult for mums and dads." She warned that without better support "very able people" would be put off standing for election. READ MORE Ms Forbes denied claims her departure reflected a lack of support within the [[SNP]], insisting she would campaign "shoulder to shoulder" with First Minister John Swinney and the party ahead of 2026, and that her "support for Scotland to become an independent nation remains undimmed". Asked about the bitter leadership contest that saw her criticised by SNP colleagues, Ms Forbes said: "That is all in the past, as far as I am concerned, and I have to say how much I continue to support the SNP. "I will be campaigning for the SNP over the next nine months to return them to government. I am hugely, hugely supportive of John Swinney. I have such great admiration and respect for him, and seeing him work up close, his care, his compassion, his work ethic are second to none, and my support for Scotland to become an independent nation remains undimmed as well. "So I will be campaigning shoulder to shoulder with my party. I will be campaigning the breadth of the country, side by side with very able candidates across the country standing for elections. "As far as I am concerned, I have outlined my reasons for why I have come to the decision that I have come to. My last point would be, if there were alternative reasons, I might have made other decisions earlier, and the decision I am making now is looking ahead to the next election and beyond." Appearing on the programme later, Education Secretary Jenny Gilruth said she recognised the "challenges around childcare" faced by parents in politics and agreed "we will be poorer without those people in our parliament".
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Labour has ‘lost control of our borders' & ‘one in, one out' migrant deal ‘won't make any difference'
LABOUR'S "one-in-one-out" migrant deal is a hopeless "gimmick" that will "make no difference whatsoever", the Shadow Home Secretary blasted today. The trial, which starts today, sees up to 50 Channel migrants a week sent back to France while the UK will take in the same number via a legal route. 2 2 Detentions are expected to begin within days and removals could start in weeks. But the plan has already been slammed as "weak" and a "gimmick which won't work". Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said: "The government's plan being signed today to return just 50 illegal channel immigrants a week, and probably less, will make no difference whatsoever. "This amounts to only 6 per cent of illegal arrivals. Allowing 94 per cent to stay in the UK will be no deterrent at all. "This is a gimmick which won't work." Mr Philp added: "Only removing all illegal immigrants upon arrival will provide the necessary deterrent to stop the crossings. "This is the Conservative plan, but Labour is too weak to implement it and as a result they have lost control of our borders." Under a wider attempted crackdown at illegal migration, charity visa routes are also being tightened as a Nigerian YouTuber boasted about using them to get into the UK. And ministers plan to stop universities taking foreign students if they do not prevent courses being used to claim asylum. The Home Secretary this morning refused to put a number on the overall amount of illegal arrivals who will be sent packing to France under the scheme. She said: "We are not putting an overall figure on this programme. "Of course, it will start will lower numbers and then build, but we want to be able to expand it. We want to be able to increase the number of people returned through this programme." She added: "We will provide regular updates, people will be able to see how many people are being detained, how many people are being returned, and it is right that we should be transparent around that. "But we're not setting the numbers in advance, firstly because there is no fixed number in terms of the overall number of people to come through this system, and secondly because we're not going to provide (gangs) with that operational information." The first small boat migrants set to be booted back to France under the new 'one in, one out' returns deal will be rounded up by the end of the week, the Home Office confirmed. The scheme, which has now been signed off by the European Commission, kicks in today and marks the first major returns agreement with an EU state since Brexit. Border Force officers are on standby to start picking out who'll be sent packing, with dozens of beds already cleared at immigration removal centres across the UK. Under the rules, any adult arriving illegally by small boat could face deportation. For every one sent back, Britain will take in a "genuine asylum seeker" from France — but only if they've got family ties here or come from a country with a high level of successful asylum claims, such as Afghanistan, Iran or Eritrea. The pilot will run for nearly a year. While the Home Office hasn't confirmed exact numbers, insiders say around 50 migrants a week will be deported. The figure equates to just one in 17 arrivals, based on current crossing levels. Top officials say the people smugglers' business model will only collapse if up to 85 per cent of crossings are stopped. The deal is part of Sir Keir Starmer's wider vow to 'smash the gangs'. But channel crossings have hit record highs, with a whopping 25,436 people making the journey this year alone, up nearly 50 per cent on 2024.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Pushing airport expansion while rail travel languishes – so much for Labour's green agenda
August is peak flying time, and airports are on many minds. The government has signalled its support for colossal expansions, whose extra flights would bust its carbon pledges. The excuse is that supertechnology will magic away the extra CO2 pumped into the atmosphere, though it must know that clean, green flying is still futurology. Here's the pity of it: until now this government has rightly boasted of its green credentials, making massive investments in sustainable energy and retro-insulating cold homes. Expanding air travel is not on any green agenda. Heathrow has just submitted proposals for a £50bn third runway, as approved by Labour in 2009 and the Tories who voted it through parliament in 2018. Covid applied the brakes but now Heathrow is back with gold-plated, 'shovel-ready' plans. Its owners, including Qatar, Singapore and Saudi Arabia, expect the planning bill to prevent newts or judicial reviews blocking the runway. Their pitch to an investment-hungry government is that expanding Europe's busiest airport would create 100,000 new jobs, propelling growth with 750 extra daily flights. Flying gets a green light from the transport secretary, Heidi Alexander: she agreed to double the size of Luton airport, favours Gatwick's second runway for 100,000 more flights and gives Stansted's expansion a fair wind. These allow a 70% increase in flights above 2018 levels, and cancel out all the carbon savings from the government's clean power plan. Rachel Reeves promised to be 'Britain's first green chancellor', but her plans live or die on growth, so billions in private investment is hard to resist. But beyond construction, the growth-potential claims for extra flights look highly dubious. The promised global 'connectivity' imagines business people zipping into Britain with briefcases full of contracts. But that's not who these extra flyers will be. Most will be frequent flyers flying more frequently, not for business but for leisure, according to the New Economics Foundation and Possible, the climate campaign. National Travel and Civil Aviation Authority passenger surveys show only one in 14 UK passengers are business travellers. The pandemic showed that meeting online saves money and time; business travel has already peaked. Would extra flights bring in tourist income? No, 70% of flights are British tourists off abroad to spend vastly more than foreigners spend here. Of extra flights in 20 years, 83% were taken by already frequent flyers, mostly for leisure. Growth will not be from more families taking an annual holiday: half the population doesn't fly in any year, while just 15% consume 70% of flights. Nearly a third are 'ultra-frequent flyers' taking six or more journeys a year. Instead of these heaviest users paying more for their pollution, airlines reward frequent flyers. The Flying Fair report from the New Economics Foundation suggests imposing a high levy on those flying six or more times a year, not added to ticket prices but raised in tax returns. That makes the cost of their excessive air travel highly visible, and could raise £6bn a year, while cutting aviation CO2 by 28%. Newly nationalised trains would gain from disincentivising flight. But UK prices are a bizarre deterrent. I'm planning to go to Edinburgh next week – a train journey I love. Checking prices, I found a £29.99 flight each way, while LNER costs £181.69 return. France has banned domestic flights where trains can do the journey in less than two and a half hours and so should we: start by banning airlines charging less than rail. Switch the 39m domestic journeys being made annually by plane to train. The good news is the extra potential capacity in the Channel tunnel, which could be realised with a little investment. Twelve trains an hour run each way, but the tunnel could run 2.5 times more, and prices would fall. That's where investment should go, instead of to airports, as new European routes open up. Yes, it takes longer. It means adding train time to the concept of a holiday. But if it were cheaper, what luxury it would be compared with the hell of holiday airports and flights that don't land you in city centres. Climate damage is the real cost of avoidable flying. The chancellor says: 'Expansion must be delivered in line with UK's legal, environmental and climate obligations.' But the Climate Change Committee (CCC), the government's statutory adviser, warns that airport expansion would breach UK carbon budgets for net zero emissions by 2050. The aviation industry and government claim that wonder technology will deliver carbon-free flying with electric planes, sustainable aviation fuels (SAFs) and carbon capture. None is anywhere near available, says the CCC, which expects 17% SAFs by 2040. It advises no extra flying before 2030, and only 2% more by 2035, to allow time for new technology to be developed. Let's hope clean flight arrives soon, but it's not here yet: currently, suppliers must only guarantee that SAFs comprises 2% of the total. Here's the honesty test for those claiming carbon-neutral flight is imminent: agree to no extra flying until it arrives. The government's mood music is all pro-flying, not urging climate-conscious travel. To change habits and attitudes, it should start by banning frequent flyer bonuses. Why allow private jets? Seat for seat they are 30 times more polluting, paying less tax as a proportion of ticket price, as was exposed by Possible's Jetting away with it report. The government's airport policy will reveal its seriousness on the climate crisis. Politically, it shows whether Labour is sufficiently alarmed by serious threats from the left, from Greens, Liberal Democrats and Jeremy Corbyn revivalists pledged to invest in trains, not airports. But refusing airport expansion allows Tories and Faragistes to add those lost foreign billions to their dishonest tally of net zero costs. A YouGov poll found that 61% of people regard airport expansion as the wrong priority, alongside mayors Andy Burnham and Sadiq Khan. But the Treasury's dilemma is obvious: climate or cash? Its answer should also be clear: just call a moratorium until green flying arrives. Polly Toynbee is a Guardian columnist
