logo
Are You Missing Out on These 2 Dividend Raises From Famous Companies?

Are You Missing Out on These 2 Dividend Raises From Famous Companies?

Globe and Mail15 hours ago

Early summer isn't typically a hot period for dividend raises, and this year's version is no exception. Lately, income investors have had to be satisfied collecting payouts that were fixed several quarters -- or even years -- ago.
Over the past few days, there emerged two major exceptions to this trend -- monster retailer Target (NYSE: TGT) and Darden Restaurants (NYSE: DRI), owner and operator of well-known dining chains such as Olive Garden, Ruth's Chris Steak House, and The Capital Grille. Here's a little more about both payout pumps.
Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue »
1. Target
Of the two dividend raises, Target's was the more predictable. That's because the company is a Dividend King, meaning it's one of the very select group of S&P 500 component stocks that has upped its payout at least once annually for a minimum of 50 years running. In mid-June, the company extended this streak to 54 years with a nearly 2% bump in its quarterly payout to $1.14 per share.
This particular dividend raise might be more necessary than previous lifts. A once-popular stock, Target has fallen out of favor, on the back of recent drops in certain fundamentals and other factors such as its poorly received retreat from diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) strategies. The uncertain future of President Trump's tariffs isn't helping either.
Target's latest quarterly earnings release didn't exactly inspire confidence in the market. First-quarter net sales fell by 3% year over year to a little under $24 billion on comparable sales that dipped nearly 4%, rare declines for a company that typically improves those metrics. Non-GAAP (generally accepted accounting principles) adjusted net earnings also headed south, falling a steep 36% to $1.30 per share.
To right the ship, management has created what's essentially a task force with its so-called " enterprise acceleration office." This unit is responsible for slimming the company's operations and making them more efficient, hence better positioned for (hopefully) a return to growth.
I'd give Target a better-than-average chance of this initiative succeeding. In its long life, it's gotten past many challenges, and besides, it's actually doing quite well in certain corners of its business. For example, there's online comparable sales, which even in this Age of Digital are continuing to grow at admirable rates -- nearly 5% in quarter one.
Meanwhile, in terms of valuations, the stock is now cheap, with a PEG ratio barely treading water at a bit over 1. This makes me feel Target is a potentially strong recovery story trading at a generous discount now.
The company's dividend raise takes effect in a few months; the new payout will be dispensed on Sept. 1 to investors of record as of Aug. 13. At the current share price, its yield would be a very appealing 4.7%.
2. Darden Restaurants
Elsewhere in the consumer goods sector, Darden also enacted a dividend raise in June. In contrast to Target, the hike was fairly generous, at 7% over its predecessor. The new quarterly dividend is $1.50 per share.
Darden isn't a Dividend King like Target, but it's been a regular payer since 1995 and a frequent raiser. It did cut its payout during the pandemic -- hardly a shocking move, as the restaurant industry was badly affected by the near-disappearance of in-person dining. Since then, though, Darden has come roaring back, with the company paying out more than it did in the pre-COVID days.
Another appealing draw of being a Darden shareholder is the company's frequent stock buybacks. Also in June, its board of directors authorized a new repurchase initiative of up to $1 billion for its common stock. The company is rarely shy to spend its capital this way, as in its latest reported quarter it expended $51 million on buybacks.
Speaking of that period -- Darden's fiscal fourth quarter of 2025 -- total sales rose by 11% year over year (although this was skewed by the addition of the 103-restaurant strong Chuy's Tex Mex chain, a 2024 acquisition). The more revealing same-restaurant sales metric was up comfortingly, though, with a nearly 5% increase.
As for profitability, non-GAAP (adjusted) net income grew 9% to over $400 million. Both that figure and the revenue line were slightly higher than the consensus analyst estimates.
Fiscal 2026 might see lower growth, as Darden is guiding for a 7% to 8% rise in total sales for the year, on a foundation of 2% to 3.5% same-restaurant sales improvement. Net income should land at $10.50 to $10.70 per share, which is just short -- although not worryingly so -- of the average pundit estimate of $10.75.
All this tells me that Darden is well positioned now, and I'd fully expect the company to at least come close to its growth targets. Continued profitability will provide money for more dividend raises and new stock buyback initiatives. As such, this stock feels like a solid investment to me.
Darden is to hand out its raised dividend on Aug. 1 to stockholders of record as of July 10. It would yield almost 2.8% at the most recent closing price.
Should you invest $1,000 in Target right now?
Before you buy stock in Target, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Target wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $704,676!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $950,198!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is1,048% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to175%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Robert W. Baird Keeps Their Hold Rating on Tesla (TSLA)
Robert W. Baird Keeps Their Hold Rating on Tesla (TSLA)

Globe and Mail

time21 minutes ago

  • Globe and Mail

Robert W. Baird Keeps Their Hold Rating on Tesla (TSLA)

In a report released today, Ben Kallo from Robert W. Baird reiterated a Hold rating on Tesla (TSLA – Research Report), with a price target of $320.00. The company's shares opened today at $342.70. Confident Investing Starts Here: Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter According to TipRanks, Kallo is an analyst with an average return of -1.6% and a 43.26% success rate. Kallo covers the Consumer Cyclical sector, focusing on stocks such as Tesla, Rivian Automotive, and QuantumScape. Tesla has an analyst consensus of Hold, with a price target consensus of $287.00, which is a -16.25% downside from current levels. In a report released on June 20, Barclays also maintained a Hold rating on the stock with a $275.00 price target. TSLA market cap is currently $1121.5B and has a P/E ratio of 187.24. Based on the recent corporate insider activity of 51 insiders, corporate insider sentiment is neutral on the stock. Earlier this month, Xiaotong Zhu, the SVP, APAC of TSLA sold 15,000.00 shares for a total of $4,857,000.00.

'What if we just forced people to buy stuff?': The imagined thoughts of the Canadian EV mandate
'What if we just forced people to buy stuff?': The imagined thoughts of the Canadian EV mandate

National Post

timean hour ago

  • National Post

'What if we just forced people to buy stuff?': The imagined thoughts of the Canadian EV mandate

Article content The Carney government is under growing pressure to drop what is known as the 'EV mandate.' This is a policy first introduced in 2022 wherein Canadian auto manufacturers will be mandated to sell a minimum quantity of EVs each year until 2035, when the sale of new gas-powered cars will be banned entirely. Article content The singular problem with the mandate is that nobody wants to buy EVs. Even with Canada having the highest fuel prices in the hemisphere, sales of EVs have only ever peaked at about 20 per cent of new vehicle sales. And even that has been in freefall in recent months. Article content In Dear Diary, the National Post satirically re-imagines a week in the life of a newsmaker. This week, Tristin Hopper takes a journey inside the thoughts of the EV mandate. Article content Monday Article content One of the most pressing challenges of modern governance is how to compel ones' citizenry to meet a rote, inconsistent and often contradictory picture of ideal behaviour. We have identified the perfect Canadian life: The specific pattern of development milestones, core values and consumer choices that will yield a citizen best attuned to the interests of the collective. Article content The only problem is to how to take this average Canadian — a scared, superstitious and mostly obese bipedal primate — and mould them into the rational, inclusive, evidence-based form that we have decreed for them. Article content Because it is here where we are weakest. I need not remind you that China is nipping at our heels. If we are to stay competitive, I'm afraid that we risk too much by sticking to archaic models of 'letting people buy the vehicles they would like to buy.' Article content I admit the EV mandate may look draconian in isolation. If presented as a stark dichotomy of 'freedom' versus 'compulsion,' a sentimental public will naturally favour the former. Article content But if we start from the premise that the Canadian public must obviously be compelled to cease purchasing internal combustion engines within 10 years, then the only question is how to go about it. Article content My sober and reasonable offer is that private businesses be obliged to meet an objective, and the details are left to them … as would be expected of any free society. Article content Would a better solution be to incarcerate the owners of gas-powered cars? To mandate gasoline additives that prematurely wear the engines of ICE vehicles? To make highways more dangerous to facilitate higher attrition of the existing vehicle fleet? I think you'll agree that mine is the most humane and inobtrusive option. Article content Wednesday Article content In this line of work, one quickly grows weary of the bottomless mendacity of the auto sector. Their chief criticism of the EV mandate, to my read, is that it stands in defiance of 'consumer preferences.' They say the Canadian auto buyer does not want to purchase EVs at the 'arbitrary' rates we are setting, and thus the program is unworkable. Article content I find their lack of imagination insulting, if not traitorous. These are companies that routinely convince chartered accountants that their daily driver needs to be a Ford F-350. Or that a 700-horsepower sedan is an appropriate vehicle to pick up their kids from school. There are people out there driving Cybertrucks, Pontiac Azteks and Hummer H2s, all of them brainwashed by clever marketing into thinking that they made a smart decision. Article content Tell the public that the gas cars cause impotence. Shoot a couple commercials with Jason Statham. Offer the cars with a free Spotify subscription. It's not my fault you're not trying hard enough to sell EVs. Article content The public has an unfortunate habit of obsessing over the alleged downsides of green policy. This came up often in regards to carbon pricing. Joe and Sally Taxpayer would complain endlessly about the extra $10 or $20 at their fill-up, without a thought as to how their government had won the acclaim of closing plenary delegates at multiple U.N. climate change summits. Article content But these boors miss the opportunity inherent in the mandate. Remember when we made it unbelievably difficult to build houses, thus causing a housing shortage that caused the existing housing stock to perpetually skyrocket in value? In a world with no new gas-powered cars, your 2009 Jetta could become a luxury commodity sooner than you think. Article content The worst thing about all this current controversy is that when the policy is inevitably a smashing success, all of today's critics will pretend they supported it all along. But any cursory reading of history reveals that true progress comes only from government telling private firms the precise share of their sales that should be filled by a politically desirable consumer product. Article content Did the fisherman not swap out row boats for motor vessels because a government told him to? Did we not transition from VHS to DVDs based on the sage yet mandatory advice of a centralized bureaucracy? Forcing people to purchase things is the Canadian way. Article content

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store