11 years after WV chemical spill, advocates speak out against bill to rollback water protections
London Donahoe, a sophomore at Huntington High School, said he was 6 years old when the 2014 Elk River chemical leak unfolded in central West Virginia. That January, 4-methylcychohexanemethanol (MCHM) — a chemical used in processing coal — leaked from an aboveground storage tank owned by Freedom Industries into the Elk River, contaminating the drinking water for about 300,000 people in nine counties.
The West Virginia Legislature was convened for its regular session at the time of the spill, though took a few days off as an immediate response as efforts were underway. When they returned — and in direct response to the chemical leak — lawmakers unanimously passed Senate Bill 373, which established the Aboveground Storage Tank Act and implemented myriad other water protection measures to, hopefully, prevent future disasters.
Donahoe doesn't remember much from that time. He does know one thing, though: because of that action by the Legislature, he was able to grow up under policies that ultimately meant he was healthier and better protected from potential disasters.
But now, 11 years after the chemical leak, lawmakers are seriously considering a bill that would cut back on the mitigation efforts that were implemented in its wake.
Senate Bill 592 has already passed the Senate and is now pending consideration in the House Energy and Public Works Committee. Under the proposed legislation, more than 1,000 oil, gas and coal tanks nearest to drinking water intakes — the same tanks that were responsible for the 2014 chemical leak — would be exempt from mandated third party inspections that currently ensure they aren't at risk of leaking.
On Monday, Donahoe was one of 13 residents who participated in an unofficial public hearing hosted by multiple progressive and environmental organizations speaking out against SB 592 during Environmental Day at the Capitol.
'History makes it clear: the protections put in place [in 2014] were not just necessary — they were life saving,' Donahoe told those in attendance. 'Now, the Legislature is threatening to undo these protections and put everyone in this room at risk. Water should be a basic human right, yet SB 592 prioritizes industry lobbyists and the wealthy elite over the health and safety of West Virginians … we cannot allow that.'
Other speakers against the legislation included environmental activists who have returned to the Capitol year after year to try and ensure the protections put in place 11 years ago remain there. Honey May, an environmental organizer who became involved in the work due to the 2014 water crisis, said it's impossible to ignore how ingrained coal, oil and natural gas industry lobbyists have become in the West Virginia Legislature.
May said it's difficult not to feel left out of the process when industry-backed and -created bills like SB 592 begin to circulate. Year after year, she's helped get people connected with their lawmakers or bussed to the Capitol to speak out against such bills. She's seen the rotunda filled with people concerned about their environmental health and safety. She knows how that kind of outpouring can affect legislators' votes.
But, she said, it shouldn't have to take that kind of effort for those in power to listen to their constituents' concerns and see common sense in measures that exist to protect them. This is especially relevant now, May said, as this is the first legislative session without a public hearing process for the full House. The hearing on Monday — dubbed 'the People's Public Hearing' by organizers — served as an alternative kind of hearing than those currently held in committees.
'Now, you have to create your own public hearing. We have to create our own ways of reaching our legislators, because they've determined that they just don't have the time to hear from us … and [now] they think we can do whatever they want, but we say, 'no',' May said. 'We're going to stand here. We're going to tell you how we feel, and it's not radical; it's clean drinking water. We all drink it, so please contact your legislators. It's the only thing that works. The people's power is the only thing that keeps the relentless pursuit of profits at bay.'
Other speakers on Monday included more people who remember the 2014 chemical spill all too well. Some said they were still hesitant to drink the region's tap water. Others remembered how difficult and frustrating it was to get information as the event unfolded.
Every speaker shared the fears they hold about something like that happening again and their disappointment in seeing protections to stop that rolled back.
While too young to remember much from the events in 2014 himself, Donahoe and his Huntington High classmate Kaili Anderson have started their own organizing around protecting West Virginia's environment and they want the state's lawmakers to listen.
Both serve as officers of their school's Sunrise Movement student hub, a local chapter of a national organization built around young people fighting and organizing against the ongoing climate crisis.
Both Anderson and Donahoe said they're frustrated with the state Legislature's focus on social issues that seek to harm already marginalized people while lawmakers seem to ignore multiple ongoing crises — undrinkable water, the drug and overdose epidemic and poverty, among many others — and leave the most vulnerable in the state without support or help.
Young people, Anderson said, aren't being involved in conversations about the state's priorities. If they were, she continued, those priorities would certainly change and more young people would be looking toward a future in the state instead of one where they feel they have to leave it behind.
'If young people had a seat at the table, they'd be more likely to stay here, especially if they were being listened to,' Donahoe said. 'Instead we hear all this focus feeding into culture wars, attacking trans people and that's not helping anyone … Our voice and perspectives are being ignored and we need to become a force to push elected officials and remind them that we are here and our voices matter.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Hearing held, no recall election date of Jackson County Executive set
KANSAS CITY, Mo. — A Jackson County judge wants to take the weekend to review testimony and other cases mentioned in arguments Friday, before coming to a decision, about a potential recall election date of Jackson County Executive Frank White Jr. Recently, two lawsuits seeking different outcomes were consolidated. One lawsuit demands the election be held at the end of this month, or as early as possible. The other, filed by two election offices, argues it's best to wait until November, such as November 4, since it's already a set election date. Kansas City air deemed 'unhealthy' as wildfire smoke casts haze across skies 'I think that all the parties agreed today, except for the County Executive. I don't think that he's going to agree with this, but I think one thing we all walked out knowing that there is going to be an election,' Attorney Phil LeVota shared with FOX4 Friday. Different perspectives and arguments surround when a recall election of Jackson County's Executive Frank White Jr. should take place if it were set to happen. 'My clients, the (Jackson County) citizens, are lock step with the Jackson County Legislature that it should be as soon as possible,' LeVota added. Friday, evidence was presented, and testimony was given. The election boards say they are committed to conducting a fair election and have no position on the recall, and add, in compliance with law, the next election date this could happen is November 4. They claim not enough time is given for alerting and securing polling locations, or finding an adequate number of polling judges, among other things. Council for County Executive Frank White Jr. says the process should be fair. White Jr. had no comment for FOX4 on Friday. 'My taxes went up 341%. I want the man gone. Gone from the county. Our people can't handle this. He has to go. The sooner, the better. People are being rooted out of their homes by Frank White,' Mark Anthony Jones, a Jackson County resident, said. Jones, a plaintiff, was unknowingly called to the stand on Friday. 'I am one of those 60,000 people who still haven't got our tax assessment figured out for 2023,' Jones added. OSHA investigating deadly collapse at Family Dollar in Kansas City One side argues the charter states it should take place within 60 days of receiving the signatures, or the next feasible date. Another says it's still an election and should fall on an already set election date, such as November 4. 'If that 10 weeks is an issue, that date could be September 30 or October 7. We don't believe we should fall back on, 'Well, there's one in November just waiting.' The people want a recall election. They want it expediently done. They want it quick,' LeVota shared. Others say there's harm in waiting and understand a recall election is rare. 'If they want to recall someone, they want to vote to take someone out of office. They don't want them to sit around for four more months still doing things that they don't think they should be doing,' LeVota added. A potential recall election date is anticipated for Monday or Tuesday of the coming week. LeVota is confident a date will likely be set soon. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword

Boston Globe
13 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Mass. Governor: All shelters are closed, state of emergency for shelter system is over
Advertisement 'We're saving taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars and putting families on a path to self-sustainability,' she said. In addition to the closure of hotel shelters, shelters located at the former Bay State Correctional Center and the Chelsea Rapid Shelter site have also closed. Three families were using the hotel shelter system, a Massachusetts experienced a surge of immigrants arriving here beginning in the At the same time, the Advertisement After Healey took office in January 2023, officials drastically expanded the emergency shelter system to house thousands of homeless and migrant families For decades, homeless families have been guaranteed a roof over their heads under to help families at hotels access medical care, find transportation, and enroll their children in school. With costs skyrocketing, Healey and legislators repeatedly sought to tighten eligibility, including by requiring homeless families to prove lawful immigration status, show they have lived in Massachusetts for at least six months, and undergo The number of families in emergency shelter has fallen to Just last month, however, state officials had the cap set by the Legislature, the state still was not able to keep up with the demand. Healey officials say they issued the declaration specifically so they can continue to impose restrictions on shelters, such as limiting who gets priority for beds and how long they can stay. Advertisement Massachusetts Housing Secretary Ed Augustus wrote in The extended declaration is supposed to last until Nov. 9, which is required under rules set out by the Legislature in a 2023 spending bill. It can be extended again if Augustus determines it's necessary. Former MBTA executive Brian Shortsleeve, who is running in the GOP primary for governor, criticized Healey's comments Friday. He slammed the use of public dollars to fund the state's HomeBase program, which provides rental assistance for families transitioning into permanent housing and is credited with helping reduce the emergency shelter population. Shortsleeve said Healey's claim of saving taxpayer dollars has 'got to go done [sic] in the Guinness Book of Records as the biggest lie ever told by a politician,' 'As the next governor, I will stop the flow of our tax dollars to the migrants,' he said. Samantha J. Gross can be reached at


San Francisco Chronicle
13 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Democrats cry foul as Republicans push to redraw Texas electoral maps to gain US House seats
AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — Democratic lawmakers tried to build a case Friday that Republicans in Texas have engineered a rushed and unfair process for redrawing the state's congressional districts in response to a push by President Donald Trump to win more GOP seats that Democrats fear will spread to other states. Democrats in the Republican-controlled Texas Legislature delayed the start of public testimony during a hearing of a state House Committee on Redistricting by peppering its chair with pointed questions about how quickly GOP lawmakers planned to move and whether the public is getting enough of an opportunity to weigh in. The Republican proposal would give the GOP five more winnable seats in next year's elections, which would make it easier for the party to keep its slim U.S. House majority. Chair Cody Vasut told the committee that he expected it to vote later Friday or Saturday on the bill, which Republicans unveiled Wednesday. He said he expected the full state House to debate the measure Tuesday. Republican Gov. Greg Abbott called the Legislature into a 30-day special session and put congressional redistricting on the agenda after Trump called for Texas to redraw lines that Republicans approved in 2021. Republicans hold 25 of the state's seats, to 13 for Democrats, and the plan would create 30 districts that Trump would have carried by at least 10 percentage points had they been in place in 2024. Democratic state Rep. Jon Rosenthal called the public redistricting hearings 'a sham.' The committee quietly released the plan after several public hearings that drew hours of public testimony and scrutiny from residents concerned about new maps they hadn't seen. 'Does the leadership of the state truly think the people of Texas are that stupid?' Rosenthal asked, to which Vasut did not reply. Democrats appear to have few ways to stop the GOP's plans. Some have talked about boycotting the special session to prevent either chamber or both from having a quorum to take action until the special session ends. But Abbott could call another. Republican state Rep. Todd Hunter, the bill's author, dismissed concerns about how quickly lawmakers are moving. He said they've have been discussing the possibility for months. 'Don't be surprised,' he said. 'The topic has been there.' Hunter acknowledged that the lines were being redrawn 'for partisan purposes,' which he said is allowed by the U.S. Supreme Court. He said a law firm was consulted as the map was being drawn. 'I'm telling you,' he said. 'I'm not beating around the bush.' Democrats argue that if Republicans succeed in redrawing the districts in Texas, Trump will push other states to redraw theirs before they'd normally do so, which would be in 2031 or 2032, after the next nationwide census. States are required to adjust the lines at least once every 10 years to keep the districts as equal in population as possible after population shifts. That's led Democrats in California and New York to consider redrawing their states' lines to help Democrats, though each state has an independent commission for drawing the lines. Texas might have no competitive districts Under the exiting lines, which were in place for the 2022 and 2024 elections, Republicans won all of the seats in districts carried by Trump by at least 10 percentage points, and Democrats won all 11 districts carried by Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris. In the other two districts, Trump won by less than 10 percentage points, but Democrats won the House seats. Under the new map, there would be no districts won by Trump by less than 10 points. In Austin, a liberal bastion, parts of two districts represented by Democrats would be combined into one that favored Democrats even more strongly. One of the three other districts would include a slice of the city and extend 340 miles (547 kilometers) to the west, to take in the oil city of Midland. 'Some people like it, and some people don't, and that's the nature of redistricting," Hunter said. ___ Hanna reported from Topeka, Kansas.