logo
Anorexia is the deadliest mental health condition. We are treating it completely wrong

Anorexia is the deadliest mental health condition. We are treating it completely wrong

A disturbing reality De Cicco Carr learned while seeking treatment in the public hospital system was that unless her body weight was considered dangerously low, she had great difficulty accessing physical or mental health care for anorexia.
Loading
'I refer to it as the 'sick Olympics': eating disorders are quite competitive [with one's own, mental ill-health ideals] by nature, and are fuelled by the healthcare system that is supposed to be there, but is only there to help the people who are the most physically unwell with eating disorders,' she says.
And even then, she found the emphasis to be on physical weight improvement, and not on quality mental healthcare for the underlying causes. Thankfully, after three months in private residential treatment, De Cicco Carr has achieved recovery stable enough to have conceived her first child and be well into a healthy pregnancy.
Anorexia nervosa is considered the mental health condition with the highest mortality rate, in part because only about half of patients respond to treatment methods developed decades ago.
Up to 10 per cent of those with the disease lose their lives to it within 10 years of getting it, and up to 20 per cent will pass away because of it within 20 years.
In Australia, 1.1 million people live with an eating disorder, and 1273 people died of them in 2023, a higher toll than those killed on the roads.
Data provided by Orygen the National Centre of Excellence for Youth Mental Health shows that since 2012, the incidence of eating disorders among those under 19 has increased by 86 per cent.
Meanwhile, progress towards more effective treatments has been hindered by stigma, including the mistaken belief that anorexia nervosa affects only 'young, affluent white females', according to a paper to be published on Thursday in the journal, JAMA Psychiatry.
Associate Professor Andrea Phillipou, a co-author and principal research fellow in eating disorders at Orygen and the Centre for Youth Mental Health at the University of Melbourne, describes anorexia as 'an unbelievably under-funded area of research – a lot of it is [down to] stigma associated with eating disorders: they are still seen as a trivial thing that only affects young, white affluent women'.
Loading
Despite some promising developments, current treatment outcomes are 'unacceptably poor', and a narrow focus on weight restoration is a key reason medical understanding and effective treatment lags.
'Anorexia can be and is life-threatening in a lot of circumstances, and weight restoration is usually the main outcome [of current treatments]; we want to stabilise people and get the weight restored, but this has taken away from the fact this is a psychological condition,' Phillipou says.
'We need to also focus on the psychological aspect driving the eating disorder.'
Because anorexia is one of the few mental illnesses to also require a physical diagnosis, its treatment and research into better approaches has been 'siloed' and held back decades.
Loading
Phillipou describes the paper, co-authored with global experts from King's College, London, and Harvard Medical School, as a call to action for research that treats anorexia holistically, as a physical and as a mental health condition. She says that approach will boost understanding of what causes the condition and in turn promote more modern and effective treatments.
'Recovery rates haven't budged in about 50 years, we're still getting the same poor responses to treatments ... and that's on the treatments, it's not the individual or the family's fault,' she says. 'It's been decades since we've had any innovation in treatments.'
Clinical psychologist Sarah Cox, manager of the Butterfly Foundation National Helpline, agrees with the paper, Anorexia Nervosa—Facts, Frustrations, and the Future, that treatments and research have been stymied by bias and misconceptions.
'A lot of people still believe [anorexia] is a lifestyle choice, but eating disorders are very serious mental illnesses; people can't just make a choice to turn that on or off, they need the right treatment support and compassion,' Cox says.
Loading
On World Eating Disorders Action Day, on Monday, the Butterfly Foundation released statistics stating that one in seven people believe those with eating disorders could 'snap out of it', and one in six people 'perceive eating disorders as a sign of weakness'.
Cox said these ideas must be challenged because they could contribute to patients missing out on early intervention, which could be vital to prevent the illnesses progressing to a life-threatening stage.
She said clinical experience backed up the claim in Phillipou's JAMA paper that anorexia patients were 'often falling in the gap between physical and mental healthcare'.
'Something we hear from people we support is people can slip through the cracks because they might be considered not being of a low enough weight for some treatment options, and being of too low a weight for others,' Cox said.
'Sometimes they are hitting that crisis point before they can join the public or private systems.'
She described the paper demanding a rethink in anorexia research and treatment as a powerful and important step in highlighting reasons that progress for patients had been so slow, 'and trying to point to possible solutions to correct it'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Shunned for competing, Moscow 1980 Olympians welcomed home at last
Shunned for competing, Moscow 1980 Olympians welcomed home at last

Sydney Morning Herald

time2 hours ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Shunned for competing, Moscow 1980 Olympians welcomed home at last

'One hundred and twenty-one Australians chose to compete under the Olympic flag. Others chose to join the boycott. Some who had won selection never even had the chance to choose because their sport made the decision for them.' The world was deep in the Cold War when the Soviet Union, due to host the Olympics in some seven months, invaded Afghanistan. US president Jimmy Carter announced America would boycott the Games, sending shockwaves around the world and prompting other nations to follow suit. In all, more than 45 countries withdrew in protest. Then Australian prime minister Malcolm Fraser called on the Australian Olympic Federation to join the boycott, despite continuing to trade with Soviet government. Although the AOF (now the Australian Olympic Committee) voted 6-5 to reject such a move, the Fraser government pressed on with a campaign that pressured athletes to make the decision themselves, offering individuals $6000 payments to stay home. 'How many lives is a medal worth?' Fraser asked at the time. 'How many people have to be killed by Soviet armies before we will have total unity in this country on whether or not to compete in Moscow?' Some did stay home, finding the pressure all too much, while the entire hockey and equestrian teams withdrew. The 121 athletes remaining from the original team of 273 were effectively smuggled out of the country. 'We were like thieves trying to get away, not [even] allowed to tell our parents,' says Ford. 'We became political pawns in this game, and I think that weighed heavily because we didn't know what the game was.' Ron McKeon, the swimmer and father of Australia's most decorated Olympian Emma McKeon, was 19 and contesting his first Olympics. 'A lot of us were kids, and trying to fathom and navigate our way through that was certainly difficult,' he recalls. 'People started to take sides politically. There were protests … it was confusing. But I think back and it was like, well, it would be un-Australian not to fight to go.' Emma says her dad's Olympic experience was 'extremely different' from her own, and that she and siblings David and Kaitlin never heard the in-depth story about what happened – a deliberate move by Ron to keep his children's view of the Olympic movement positive. '[I'm] very proud,' Emma said. 'We've always been inspired by the fact that he went to the Olympics and we wanted to do the same thing. It's something that's so special.' The Australians returned home from Moscow with nine medals and Max Metzker, the team's flagbearer, likened the experience of being ostracised to that of returning Vietnam veterans. Loading Ford joined fellow athletes Metzker and Peter Hadfield in lobbying for Wednesday's recognition in Canberra, which was attended by 50 Moscow Olympians, their families, team officials and coaches. For some, the past remained too painful even to go. 'The returning athletes were met at a nearby cold silence or cruel comments,' Albanese acknowledged. 'Today we fix that. Today, on the 45th anniversary, we recognise all that you have achieved and acknowledge all that you have overcome. 'Take pride in both. You are Olympians. You are Australians and you have earned your place in the history of the game and our nation. Welcome to parliament and welcome home.'

Shunned for competing, Moscow 1980 Olympians welcomed home at last
Shunned for competing, Moscow 1980 Olympians welcomed home at last

The Age

time2 hours ago

  • The Age

Shunned for competing, Moscow 1980 Olympians welcomed home at last

'One hundred and twenty-one Australians chose to compete under the Olympic flag. Others chose to join the boycott. Some who had won selection never even had the chance to choose because their sport made the decision for them.' The world was deep in the Cold War when the Soviet Union, due to host the Olympics in some seven months, invaded Afghanistan. US president Jimmy Carter announced America would boycott the Games, sending shockwaves around the world and prompting other nations to follow suit. In all, more than 45 countries withdrew in protest. Then Australian prime minister Malcolm Fraser called on the Australian Olympic Federation to join the boycott, despite continuing to trade with Soviet government. Although the AOF (now the Australian Olympic Committee) voted 6-5 to reject such a move, the Fraser government pressed on with a campaign that pressured athletes to make the decision themselves, offering individuals $6000 payments to stay home. 'How many lives is a medal worth?' Fraser asked at the time. 'How many people have to be killed by Soviet armies before we will have total unity in this country on whether or not to compete in Moscow?' Some did stay home, finding the pressure all too much, while the entire hockey and equestrian teams withdrew. The 121 athletes remaining from the original team of 273 were effectively smuggled out of the country. 'We were like thieves trying to get away, not [even] allowed to tell our parents,' says Ford. 'We became political pawns in this game, and I think that weighed heavily because we didn't know what the game was.' Ron McKeon, the swimmer and father of Australia's most decorated Olympian Emma McKeon, was 19 and contesting his first Olympics. 'A lot of us were kids, and trying to fathom and navigate our way through that was certainly difficult,' he recalls. 'People started to take sides politically. There were protests … it was confusing. But I think back and it was like, well, it would be un-Australian not to fight to go.' Emma says her dad's Olympic experience was 'extremely different' from her own, and that she and siblings David and Kaitlin never heard the in-depth story about what happened – a deliberate move by Ron to keep his children's view of the Olympic movement positive. '[I'm] very proud,' Emma said. 'We've always been inspired by the fact that he went to the Olympics and we wanted to do the same thing. It's something that's so special.' The Australians returned home from Moscow with nine medals and Max Metzker, the team's flagbearer, likened the experience of being ostracised to that of returning Vietnam veterans. Loading Ford joined fellow athletes Metzker and Peter Hadfield in lobbying for Wednesday's recognition in Canberra, which was attended by 50 Moscow Olympians, their families, team officials and coaches. For some, the past remained too painful even to go. 'The returning athletes were met at a nearby cold silence or cruel comments,' Albanese acknowledged. 'Today we fix that. Today, on the 45th anniversary, we recognise all that you have achieved and acknowledge all that you have overcome. 'Take pride in both. You are Olympians. You are Australians and you have earned your place in the history of the game and our nation. Welcome to parliament and welcome home.'

Meghan Markle ‘calculating' next move against royal family ahead of expected return to UK for 2027 Invictus Games
Meghan Markle ‘calculating' next move against royal family ahead of expected return to UK for 2027 Invictus Games

Sky News AU

time3 hours ago

  • Sky News AU

Meghan Markle ‘calculating' next move against royal family ahead of expected return to UK for 2027 Invictus Games

Meghan Markle is planning to use the upcoming 2027 Invictus Games in Birmingham as her 'trump card' against the monarchy, a royal expert has said. The next edition of the Invictus Games will mark the event's return to Harry's native United Kingdom for the first time since the inaugural London games. Reportedly, Markle has not been directly involved in the recent 'peace summit' negotiations between Prince Harry and King Charles and Meghan has noticeably refused to visit the United Kingdom since 2022. Nevertheless, it is believed the Duchess of Sussex could make a grand return to the country where she is still a royal Duchess in 2027 for the Invictus Games. According to royal insider Richard Fitzwilliams, the Duchess of Sussex has her sights set on a major public comeback in the UK in 2027. "(Meghan) will, of course, be expected to attend in Birmingham, not to do so would be a public humiliation,' he told the Daily Express on Tuesday. 'However, the Invictus Games is Meghan's trump cards and she is likely to play it ruthlessly. 'This involves approving moves towards 'reconciliation'. 'Meghan will calculate that this could lead to useful PR in Birmingham which she rather obviously needs.' Speculation the rift between Prince Harry and King Charles is finally starting to mend has ramped up in recent weeks after five years of public betrayals by the Sussexes. A fortnight ago, Harry's new chief communications officer Meredith Maines and UK-based PR rep Liam Maguire were photographed meeting with the King's top aide, Communications Secretary Tobyn Andreae, near Clarence House. The meeting, first revealed by The Mail on Sunday, reportedly had "no formal agenda" but there were "things both sides wanted to talk about". According to a palace insider, the Sussexes agreed to provide more details to Clarence House about their plans to avoid overshadowing royal occasions. The gesture was seen as a major 'olive branch' from Harry and came days after an Invictus spokesperson appeared to hint that the Duke hoped to invite the monarchy to the 2027 Games. The Duke of Sussex helped set up Invictus in 2014 as an Olympics-style international sporting event for injured and wounded servicemen and women across the globe. The first ever winter edition of the Invictus Games took place in Whistler and Vancouver in February this year and featured athletes from 23 different countries.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store