The Dutch queen unveils a bell made from Russian weapons to show solidarity with Ukraine
Known as the Bell of Freedom, it was manufactured by the Dutch Royal Eijsbouts bell foundry that used fragments of artillery shells and other weapons fired by Russia against Ukraine.
'This bell has a lot of symbolism in it and it's a very special project for us,' the owner of the bell foundry, Joost Eijsbouts, told the Czech public radio. 'To use material designed for violence and turn it into something peaceful is a good idea.'
The bell will be installed in the tower of the Church of the Holy Saviour in Prague, in place of one of the original bells that were seized by the Austro-Hungarian army and turned into weapons during World War I.
The Czech Republic and the Netherlands support Ukraine in its fight against Russian troops.
The ceremony at the church, attended by Czech President Petr Pavel and his wife Eva, was meant to be one of the highlights of the Dutch royal couple's stay in Prague. But King Willem-Alexander had to cut short the trip and returned home late Wednesday due to the collapse of the Dutch government.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Top Trump aide accuses India of financing Russia's war in Ukraine
By Jasper Ward WASHINGTON (Reuters) -A top aide to President Donald Trump on Sunday accused India of effectively financing Russia's war in Ukraine by purchasing oil from Moscow, after the U.S. leader escalated pressure on New Delhi to stop buying Russian oil. "What he (Trump) said very clearly is that it is not acceptable for India to continue financing this war by purchasing the oil from Russia," said Stephen Miller, deputy chief of staff at the White House and one of Trump's most influential aides. Miller's criticism was some of the strongest yet by the Trump administration about one of the United States' major partners in the Indo-Pacific. "People will be shocked to learn that India is basically tied with China in purchasing Russian oil. That's an astonishing fact," Miller said on Fox News' "Sunday Morning Futures." The Indian Embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Indian government sources told Reuters on Saturday that New Delhi will keep purchasing oil from Moscow despite U.S. threats. A 25% tariff on Indian products went into effect on Friday as a result of its purchase of military equipment and energy from Russia. Trump has also threatened 100% tariffs on U.S. imports from countries that buy Russian oil unless Moscow reaches a major peace deal with Ukraine. Miller tempered his criticism by noting Trump's relationship with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, which he described as "tremendous."
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Could Ukraine's Homegrown Drones Industry Put American Defense Contractors Out of Business?
Key Points Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth wants to equip all U.S. Army units with cheap, first-person view (FPV) military drones. Ukraine has become a leader in the production of cheap, FPV drones. Now, a "mega deal" could be in the works, worth up to $30 billion for Ukraine to sell drones to America in exchange for missiles. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › On July 10, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth announced a sea change in U.S. defense policy. More than a decade ago, America pioneered the wide-scale use of military drones, flying Predator drones first on surveillance, then strike missions in Iraq and Afghanistan. In the decades since, U.S. dominance of this groundbreaking defense technology eroded, to the extent that "global military drone production skyrocketed over the last three years," while the U.S. all but stood still. Now, said the SecDef, it's finally time to "support our industrial base, reform acquisition, and field new technology" to equip the U.S. military "with the lethal small drones the modern battlefield requires." All of which sound like fine ideas. But over the past few days, a new question has emerged: Will our defense base actually get to build these drones -- or might they end up getting built by someone other than American defense contractors? Uncle Sam is looking for a few good drones As a first step to upping America's drone game, Hegseth directed that the Pentagon open a competition to buy 10,000 Purpose-Built, Attritable Systems (also known as kamikaze, one-way attack, first-person view, or FPV drones) for under $2,000 apiece, and to get the purchase done within 12 months. One week later, the Pentagon hosted a demonstration of 18 American-made drone prototypes that might fit the bill. (Or might not. Most American drones manufactured by AeroVironment (NASDAQ: AVAV) and Kratos Defense and Technology (NASDAQ: KTOS), or even Palantir (NASDAQ: PLTR) or still-private defense contractor Anduril, after all, are reported to cost "tens of thousands of dollars" each.) This might complicate Pentagon plans. On the one hand, the Defense Department wants to support American defense contractors. But on the other hand, it wants to buy drones cheap. So what's the solution? While American companies figure out a way to build the number of drones the Pentagon needs, for a price the Pentagon will be willing to pay, another country with hard-won experience manufacturing affordable, expendable FPV drones may be able to step in and fill the gap. I'm talking about Ukraine. "I'll trade you drones for missiles" The past three years have given Ukraine a lot of experience in the development and use of FPV drones in real-world conditions -- and given Ukrainian defense companies a lot of experience building drones on a budget. The country's expertise in drone warfare became especially evident in June, when a Ukrainian operation dubbed Operation Spiderweb saw 117 FPV drones deployed within Russia to damage or destroy dozens of high-value Russian military aircraft on the ground. It was both a military and a PR coup for Ukraine, and probably instrumental in the latest development in this drone saga, reported just last week: According to the Kyiv Independent newspaper, President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky are currently discussing a "mega deal" that would see Ukraine trade FPV drones (which it's good at producing) for long-range missiles (which it struggles to produce). And the price should certainly be right. Reliable sources have Ukraine building basic FPV drones for as little as $400 -- and much more advanced "fixed-wing interceptor" drones for air defense for just a fraction of the cost of even the cheapest American military drones: $5,000. Details of the mega deal remain in flux. It might be a straight trade of Ukrainian drones for American missiles. Or the deal could take the form of offsetting purchases, with Ukraine spending money to buy U.S. missiles, and the U.S. turning around and using some of that money to buy Ukrainian drones. An even more intriguing option, suggests The Independent, would be for Ukraine to "share its drone expertise [and technology] with the U.S.," helping teach American defense companies to produce effective FPV drones on the cheap, and perhaps taking a license fee in exchange. This might take the form of joint ventures with American defense giants as well. As an example, Zelensky announced Thursday last week that Ukraine has inked a "50/50 partnership" with the Danish government to produce Ukrainian drones in Denmark. And here's the real kicker: Zelensky says a similar agreement with the U.S. is already "in place," and could be worth anywhere from $10 billion to $30 billion in total value. What this means for investors Thirty billion dollars sounds like a big deal, albeit it's not clear how the math would work. Are we talking $30 billion in missile sales to Ukraine, and another $30 billion in drone sales to the U.S.? Or $10 billion in missile sales, offset by $20 billion in drone sales? Vice versa? Or something entirely different? The one thing that is clear, is that if this deal is "in place," it's a deal a lot of big U.S. defense contractors will be interested in, and in all sorts of ways. Beyond drone-focused contractors like AeroVironment and Kratos, many of the larger defense contractors, which have struggled to break into the drones business in a big way, might welcome finding a side door into the business through licensing technology from Ukraine. And even those that don't could benefit financially on the other side of the exchange, building U.S. missiles for sale to Ukraine in exchange for Ukrainian drones. With potentially tens of billions of dollars up for grabs, this is a "mega deal" worth watching closely. Trump's Tariffs Could Create $1.5 Trillion AI Gold Rush The Motley Fool's analysts are tracking a massive shift in U.S. tech. Over $1.5 trillion is already flowing into infrastructure, AI, and advanced manufacturing… and the number keeps climbing. Following a major tariff policy shift, a new AI Gold Rush is taking shape, and we think . It builds the tech infrastructure that Apple, OpenAI, and others suddenly can't live without. We just released a full write-up on this under-the-radar stock — and why now might be the exact moment to move. Continue » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 29, 2025 Rich Smith has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends AeroVironment and Palantir Technologies. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Could Ukraine's Homegrown Drones Industry Put American Defense Contractors Out of Business? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Wall Street Journal
5 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
Ukrainians' Anticorruption Victory
Ukraine passed a law Thursday to restore the independence of two key anticorruption institutions, which is a positive end for the country's biggest political crisis since Russia invaded in 2022. Breathe a sigh of relief and give credit to the Ukrainian people for a public outcry that forced President Volodymyr Zelensky and parliament to reverse course. Lawmakers voted on July 22 to give a presidential appointee control over Ukraine's anticorruption prosecutor's office and the National Anticorruption Bureau. Mr. Zelensky argued he was trying to clear out Russian influence. Yet Ukraine has made meaningful strides against graft over the past decade, and one reason is that these anticorruption bodies were shielded from political interference. The Ukrainian public saw the danger. If safeguards against corruption are seen as faltering, Western partners will be less inclined to send weapons for the front lines and provide financing for domestic Ukrainian arms production. Backsliding on good governance would also jeopardize Ukraine's hope of eventual European Union accession. Allegations of wartime corruption are politically corrosive, and Ukrainians knew the Kremlin would try to exploit the change to sow division. That's why thousands of people in cities across Ukraine peacefully protested the law, forcing the government to backtrack last week. Their stand shows a reassuring cultural shift toward zero tolerance for corruption. Mr. Zelensky's quick signing of the reversal also illustrates that even under martial law Ukraine's leaders are accountable to its people.
