Paris's Unlawful Discriminatory Attitude Against Algerians
The escalating Algerian-French diplomatic crisis reveals the limited cards the French authorities have.
This explains their position to take a dangerous but despicable decision to target the Algerian community residing in France, a move that could escalate the crisis to the level of a rupture.
In the latest development in this regard, French government spokesperson Sophie Primas said on Thursday, May 15, 2025, that 'the Minister of Foreign Affairs, the President of the Republic, and the Prime Minister are working today on other, more important measures, particularly regarding a portion of the Algerian community, to move forward on other issues.' This statement followed a cabinet meeting.
For the first time since the outbreak of the crisis, the French government has spoken openly and without equivocation about targeting the Algerian community residing in France. This position is described as more than cowardly, as it seeks to weaken the Algerian authorities by targeting innocent Algerians who have nothing to do with the ongoing conflict between the two countries.
However, the response to this provocation from members of the Algerian community was quick. In a statement to Echorouk from Marseille, Omar Jalil, president of the Federation of Algerians in Marseille, expressed his rejection of the French government spokesperson's statement, considering it a 'violation of the law and discrimination in the name of the state' against the Algerian community, which numbers millions.
Omar Jalil declared, 'The Algerian community in France supports its country, Algeria, in its diplomatic iron fist with France.' He said, 'At a time when the escalation between the two countries has reached its peak, the Algerian community we represent declares its massive mobilisation to express its unwavering commitment and support for the sovereign positions of the Algerian state, in the face of the interference and provocations of the French far right.'
The Federation mobilised 'a widespread movement on social media of the Algerian community, highlighting the solidarity of millions of Algerians residing in France, Europe, and the world in the face of what we, Algerians residing in France, consider to be unfair and arrogant treatment by the French authorities.'
Omar Jalil affirmed that 'the Federation rejects all forms of guardianship or diplomatic bargaining, and emphasises that the Algerian state is free and sovereign. We also reject France's continued behaviour based on neocolonial reflexes, believing it can impose its dictates on a people liberated by sacrificing their lives.'
The Federation of Algerians in Marseille confirmed that 'French government spokesperson Sophie Primas has crossed an unacceptable level of verbal violence by discriminating between communities and exploiting her position.' Her statements are dangerous and violate the rule of law, confirming what the Federation has condemned for years. They also express an obsession and a desire to criminalise Algerians, whose dignity refuses humiliation.
'Sophie Prima's threats will not silence us, and will only push us to strengthen our unity and our loyalty to Algeria. If the French authorities choose arrogance, contempt, and repression, our people's cohesion and our solidarity with our country's authorities know neither fear nor oblivion. This is because the Algerian community is not a group under guardianship, but rather a community comprising millions of men and women, steadfast in their attachment to their original homeland, Algeria, threatened because of their origins or nationality,' Omar Jalil asserted.
According to Omar Jalil, this crisis will push Algeria to 're-establish a fair partnership between the two countries,' and, in turn, 'put an end to a bilateral relationship based on French dominance. We are ready to assume our responsibilities in France because acts of revenge against the community are on the rise, and we see them daily. We will remain loyal to the nation's principles and will make sacrifices for this.'
For his part, MP Saad Laanani, a representative of the Algerian community in France, told Echorouk that the statement issued by the French government spokesperson was 'a dangerous escalation, demonstrating beyond any doubt its weakness and inability to confront the firm will of the Algerian people, represented by its President Abdelmadjid Tebboune.'
From a legal perspective, the statement is considered 'a threat to Algerian citizens and, at the same time, a blatant provocation against citizens with French citizenship. This constitutes discrimination against them and a serious regression in human and civil rights.'
He said he had informed the relevant parties of these threats, noting that 'their goal is to destabilise Algeria and undermine the unity of its people to exploit its resources, which is the very essence of neo-colonialism.' He added that 'all Algerians, both at home and abroad, must be fully aware of what is being plotted against them and hold fast to the bonds of the homeland.'
Actor Ahmed Benhassir, who resides in France, also condemned Sophie Prima's statement. Speaking to Echorouk from France, he said, 'I condemn the statements made by the French government spokesperson attacking the Algerian community in France.'
He emphasised that 'Algeria is an independent and sovereign state, and we stand behind President Tebboune, who has honoured us worldwide. As an artist and like other artists, I stand with my country, Algeria.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
El Chorouk
an hour ago
- El Chorouk
President Boumediene's Widow Combating Hate Speech in France
Anissa Boumediene, the widow of the late President Houari Boumediene, is being subjected to a racist smear campaign in France for expressing her position on the imprisonment of Franco-Algerian writer Boualem Sansal, who is accused of targeting Algeria's territorial integrity. This was stated in press releases made to a far-right platform. The widow of the late President Boumediene was asked if she supported those calling for the release of writer Boualem Sansal, including Yasmina Khadra. She expressed her categorical refusal to release him, responding firmly, 'No, not at all.' Although the media outlet that interviewed her, Africa Radio, is unknown, this statement sparked a fierce campaign against the former first lady of Algeria. Anissa Boumediene justified her firm stance by saying, 'For me, Boualem Sansal doesn't like Algeria.' She added, denouncingly, 'Boualem Sansal said that Tlemcen and other cities are not Algerian… For me, that's very serious,' before addressing her interviewer, 'Imagine if the people of Nice (a city in southeastern France) or the Corsicans (named after the island of Corsica) said they would have preferred to remain with the Italians rather than the French.' The former first lady's stance came less than a week before the Algiers Judicial Council issued its ruling in the appeals hearing in the case of the Franco-Algerian writer. This decision caused panic among those who supported and demanded Sansal's release in France. This is because the position of a figure working in the field of law (Anissa holds a law degree from the Sorbonne University in Paris), as well as being an icon in the Algerian society as the widow of a national president beloved by Algerians, the late Houari Boumediene, could impact the case of the imprisoned writer in the eyes of those who attack her. Therefore, these French circles quickly emerged from their dens, harshly criticising Anissa. What's striking is that those launching this attack claim to defend freedom of expression, led by the Goncourt Prize winner and fugitive from Algerian justice, Kamel Daoud, who posted on X, 'I was asked if I supported the release of Boualem Sansal. She replied: 'Absolutely not. She lives in France, the country where she enjoys freedom.' Kamel Daoud followed this with a series of tweets supporting the Franco-Algerian writer, one of which read: 'If you want to help yourself, defend your freedoms, believe without kneeling, dream without sleeping, listen without prejudice, and travel with the mere movement of your index finger across the page, read Sansal.' Despite the undeclared truce in the French media toward Algeria, hoping to de-escalate tensions and pave the way for a pardon for the Franco-Algerian writer, media outlets known for their right-wing leanings have not failed to target the widow of the late president, such as Le Journal du Dimanche and Valeurs Actuelles. The Journal du Dimanche headlined its article on Anissa Boumediene as follows: 'She lives in France and is free: Algeria's former first lady's opinion on Boualem Sansal sparks controversy.' In it, it paused on what Anissa Boumediene had said, writing: 'The former first lady of Algeria and lawyer does not call for the release of the writer Boualem Sansal, who has been detained in Algerian prisons since November. She believes that his dangerous statements threaten the country's unity and justify his fate'. Meanwhile, the other newspaper, Valeurs Actuelles, titled its provocative article against Anissa Boumediene: 'His statements are very serious: Algeria's former first lady does not want the release of Boualem Sansal.' The article commented: 'After several months without mentioning the case of Boualem Sansal, the Franco-Algerian writer imprisoned since November 2024 in Algeria, Anissa Boumediene confirmed that she does not want the release of the writer, whose case is a symbol of tensions between Paris and Algiers.' In contrast, Anissa Boumediene found her defender in France, represented by the locally elected Salim Djellab, of Algerian origins, who responded to Kamel Daoud in a tweet: 'Mentioning that Anissa Boumediene 'lives in France' amounts to publicly exposing her, while also insinuating a dissident who must be punished. However, under international law, each state is sovereign in the exercise of its justice. If Boualem Sansal was convicted under Algerian criminal law, one can appeal for a measure of clemency (presidential pardon), but certainly not challenge the jurisdiction of a third state.
El Chorouk
a day ago
- El Chorouk
How Did Paris Transform a Dead Draft Resolution Into a Message of Appeasement?
Less than a week before the Algiers Judicial Council issued its final decision in the case of Franco-Algerian writer Boualem Sansal, the French side sent flirtatious messages to the Algerian authorities, in line with the appeasement language adopted by French President Emmanuel Macron, who avoided provocative positions. In a surprising move, the French National Assembly withdrew a draft resolution to abolish the 1968 immigration agreement between Algeria and France. The resolution was proposed by the parliamentary group of a small right-wing party led by Eric Ciotti, leader of Les Républicains (The Republicans), who was expelled from the party following his surprise alliance with the far-right, led by Marine Le Pen, in the recent legislative elections. The draft resolution was scheduled to be discussed last Thursday, but it was suddenly announced that it had been withdrawn under mysterious circumstances. This appeared to be a token of appeasement to the Algerian side, as the French feared an escalation that would not serve their interests in Algeria. Does this parliamentary action amount to a valid initiative to de-escalate tensions between the two countries? The parliamentary group that submitted the draft resolution has only 16 members and belongs to a fledgling party, the Union of the Right for the Republic (UDR), which is less than a year old, and was founded by Eric Ciotti after he was ousted last summer from the leadership of the right-wing Republicans party. The current Interior Minister, Bruno Retailleau, became its leader in May. This party is considered very close to the far-right National Rally, led by Marine Le Pen and her assistant Jordan Bardella. It ranked third in the recent legislative elections, behind the left-wing movement, or the New National Front, which won a parliamentary majority, and Macron's Renaissance, which ranked second. This means that the gamble of Eric Ciotti's group, which pushed for this project, remains a losing one from the start, even if the far right supports it, given the level of representation in the lower house of parliament. The draft resolution claims that the 1968 agreement grants Algerians exceptional privileges, unlike other members of the Maghreb and African communities, in the areas of housing, residence, education, and the practice of liberal professions. The draft resolution states that 'it is time to adapt our legal arsenal regarding immigration to the development of our relationship with Algeria,' and calls for 'the restoration of the state's legal means to limit the granting of visas to Algerians, and to suspend them when necessary.' This draft was preceded by similar initiatives targeting the 1968 migration agreement between Algeria and France, but they failed due to a lack of the required votes. This indicates that the Eric Ciotti Group's draft resolution was not intended to overturn this long-standing agreement, but rather to pursue political and diplomatic objectives through its introduction and subsequent withdrawal. French President Emmanuel Macron has previously intervened on more than one occasion to confirm that he does not intend to unilaterally abrogate the 1968 agreement. He has clashed repeatedly with his Interior Minister, Bruno Retailleau, regarding the latter's continued interference in Algerian relations, asserting that this remains the exclusive prerogative of the Élysée Palace and the Quai d'Orsay (Ministry of Foreign Affairs). All this data indicates that the French lower house's continued progress on the draft resolution would have led nowhere, given the lack of chances of its passage. However, its withdrawal at the last minute transformed the initiative into a courtship of the Algerian side, adding to the recent rapprochement efforts between the two capitals following months of unprecedented escalation. The Minister Delegate for Foreign Trade and French Living Abroad, Laurent Saint-Martin, took advantage of this situation to praise the MPs, considering the decision to send a calming message that would help reduce the tensions that characterise Algerian-French relations.
El Chorouk
3 days ago
- El Chorouk
Lawsuit to Remove Statue of Criminal Marcel Bigeard in France
The case of the statue of the French war criminal, General Marcel Bigeard, has reached the courts after local authorities in northeastern France insisted on rejecting popular demands to remove the bronze statue erected in his memory. The statue symbolises the systematic torture of Bigeard during his time as an officer in the French army in colonised Algeria. On Tuesday, June 24, local associations and anti-torture activists in the Meurthe-et-Moselle region, the birthplace of the notorious general, filed a lawsuit with the Administrative Court, accompanied by a petition signed by residents of the area. They demanded that local authorities remove the protested memorial, which was considered a 'spit in the face' of torture victims in Algeria, according to the newspaper Mediapart. This controversial memorial was erected in October 2024, sparking a social and historical debate in the city of Toul, dividing local elected officials between supporters and opponents of the statue. Since then, protests and pressure to remove the statue have continued. However, efforts have reached a dead end, and it was finally decided to resort to the administrative judiciary to decide the case. The lawsuit was filed before the Nancy Administrative Court, demanding the removal of the controversial monument. The lawsuit asserted that its continued presence would 'disturb public order' and 'disrupt the neutrality of the public service.' Defenders of General Marcel Bigeard's crimes argue that he was a French resistance fighter who confronted Nazi Germany's occupation in World War II. Opponents, however, argue that he was involved in torture in Algeria during the Algerian Revolution (1954-1962) and even defended those involved in torturing them. General Bigeard appears in this statue wearing the uniform of a paratrooper, a group that Algerians hold infamous. They waged an unprecedented campaign of repression in Algeria and were implicated in extrajudicial killings and liquidations during the 'Battle of Algiers' at the end of 1956 and 1957. They are responsible for the kidnapping and assassination of the Algerian Revolutionary activist Maurice Audin, the heroic martyr Larbi Ben Mhidi, and the activist Ali Boumendjel. They also tortured the three beautiful women: Djamila Bouhired, Djamila Bouazza, Djamila Boupacha, Zohra Drif, and the freedom fighter Louisa Ighilahriz. Testimonies from historians and surviving victims revealed that General Bigeard, who died in 2010, participated in field executions on behalf of the French army. He would plunge his victims' feet into concrete before throwing them into the sea from helicopters. Algerians dubbed this dirty technique 'Bigeard's shrimp.' This practice prompted anti-torture activists to create the 'Toul Group,' whose slogan is 'History and Memory with Respect for Human Rights,' in protest against the erection of the statue. This issue has taken on a dimension beyond France's borders, with a Belgian activist denouncing torture, writing: 'I am extremely angry. How can a general known to historians for his teaching and practice of torture be honoured by France, the nation of human rights? Isn't your nation's motto merely a decoration on the facades of municipal buildings? Aren't 'liberty, equality, fraternity' supposed to represent the fundamental values of your republic? Is this last word also devoid of any moral meaning? No.' In a contribution to the aforementioned newspaper, he explained: 'Statues of former colonialists can remain in public places, as long as a critical apparatus informs passersby of historical facts and glorifies these figures, which is, at the very least, disputed. But the fact that such a monument—which represents an apology for torture—was erected in 2024 astonishes me! I sincerely hope this mistake is attributed to ignorance; otherwise, I would consider it reprehensible negligence, or even complicity with hateful far-right racists.' 'Let us remember the fate of those poor Algerians who also yearned for freedom, whose feet sank in a concrete pool before being thrown from a helicopter into the Mediterranean, and whose bloated bodies were sometimes found washed up on beaches. These young men, whose lives were so brutally snatched away in this way, were dubbed, with all the inhuman contempt inherent in the colonial spirit, 'Bigeard shrimp,' in honour of the general who instigated these crimes and whom you are honouring today,' he added.
