20 states sue after the Trump administration releases private Medicaid data to deportation officials
Health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr .'s advisers ordered the release of a dataset that includes the private health information of people living in California, Illinois, Washington state, and Washington, D.C., to the Department of Homeland Security last month, The Associated Press first reported last month. All of those states allow non-U.S. citizens to enroll in Medicaid programs that pay for their expenses using only state taxpayer dollars.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Atlantic
2 hours ago
- Atlantic
The Reality My Medicaid Patients Face
The bus smashed into him last month, when he was crossing the street with his wheelchair. By the time he made it to the public hospital in California where I work as a doctor, two quarts of blood had hemorrhaged into one of his thighs, where a tender football-shaped bulge distorted the skin. He remembered his view of the windshield as the bus bore down, then, as he toppled, of the vehicle's dirty underbelly. He was convinced he'd die. He didn't. Trauma surgeons and orthopedists consulted on his case. He got CT scans, X-rays, and a blood transfusion. Social workers visited him, as did a nutritionist—he was underweight. Antibiotics mopped up the pneumonia he'd contracted from inhaling saliva when he'd passed out. He remained hospitalized for more than a week. This patient, fortunately, had Medicaid, which meant not only that his care was covered but also that he could see a primary-care doctor after discharge. The public hospital where I'm an internist would have treated him comprehensively regardless of his ability to pay. But in many places, uninsured patients might receive only emergency stabilization at the hospital, face bankrupting bills, and, unless they can pay out of pocket, be denied care at outpatient clinics. And because of work requirements that Congress just passed to restrict Medicaid, the number of uninsured people will quickly grow in the coming months and years. On the face of it, the requirement that Medicaid beneficiaries submit proof of employment shouldn't worry people like my patient. Over the course of his life, scoliosis has curved his spine so much that his shoulders hover a couple of feet in front of his legs when he stands, and he's relied on a wheelchair for more than a decade. His medical condition should exempt him. But he told our team that he lives in shelters, so he lacks a fixed address. He doesn't have a cellphone. He could access government websites at a public library, except that his request for a power wheelchair, which Medicaid will cover, hasn't been approved yet, and navigating the city in a standard one exhausts him. Plus, every time he leaves his stuff behind at the shelter to go somewhere, he told me, it's stolen. At present, he doesn't even own an official ID card. As a doctor in a hospital that serves the urban poor, I see patients who already face such a gantlet of obstacles that modest barriers to accessing government programs can effectively screen them out. The White House's stated aim with the changes is to reduce waste, fraud, and abuse. But according to projections from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, nearly 12 million Americans will lose insurance by 2034 because of the impacts of the new legislation on Medicaid enrollment and restrictions on Affordable Care Act marketplaces. The safety-net institutions that serve many of the country's poorest residents cannot make up for the gap. Some hospitals will undoubtedly face financial disaster and close, especially in rural areas—leaving patients with even less ability to get treatment. Here's a representative sample of patients on Medicaid I've treated recently: a father bleeding into his brain who speaks a Chinese-minority dialect that required multiple conversations with interpreters to identify. A middle-aged man with type 1 diabetes who suffered a stroke that resulted in such severe memory deficits that he can't reliably remember to inject insulin. A day laborer with liver inflammation who works long hours in construction, often seven days a week, and who's paid in cash. A young woman with a fentanyl addiction who was too weak and exhausted from malnourishment to enroll in a drug-rehabilitation program. A patient with a dog bite and a skin infection who has ricocheted between low-wage restaurant jobs. Some of my patients are employed, as are more than two-thirds of adult Medicaid beneficiaries under age 65 without a disability. Others aren't—and within that group, every one of them would meet criteria for exemption from work requirements, among them medical inability to work, pregnancy, caretaking duties, enrollment in a substance-use treatment program, or at least half-time-student status. But whether because of language barriers, physical or cognitive disability, lack of internet or phone, or job instability, for all of these patients, overcoming additional bureaucratic barriers would be burdensome at best. For many of them, it would be nearly impossible. There's little reason to doubt that, with work requirements in place, many patients like mine will be removed from Medicaid even though they should qualify. After Arkansas deployed work requirements for Medicaid in 2018, for instance, more than two-thirds of the roughly 18,000 people who were disenrolled still should have qualified, according to one estimate. What The Atlantic 's Annie Lowery has called the time tax—'a levy of paperwork, aggravation, and mental effort imposed on citizens in exchange for benefits that putatively exist to help them'—falls disproportionately on those least likely to possess the connections, education, or resources to cut through an endless slog of canned hold music, pages that fail to load, and automated mazes of bureaucracy that dead-end before the caller can connect to a human. The time tax of proving employment will act as a gatekeeping device, excluding people from Medicaid while foisting the blame onto their shoulders. It is, in effect, engineered to save money with systems onerous enough to disenfranchise people from what they're entitled to. The bill will slash approximately $1 trillion from Medicaid by 2034, $325 billion of that because of work requirements, according to the latest Congressional Budget Office cost estimates. It will also waste a colossal amount of money creating the mechanisms to deny people care: Though Congress has allocated only $200 million in federal funding for implementing work requirements, the true cost of setting up and administering these systems will likely be many times more, perhaps as much as $4.9 billion, based on one estimate that drew from states that have tried to put in place such requirements. These cuts will play out differently in each state, and even within states. They'll gut rural health care in some locales, hurt dense urban neighborhoods in others, and hit the working poor everywhere. Their effects will be modulated by how cumbersome or efficient work-verification systems are, by the availability of insurance-eligibility workers, and by community outreach or lack thereof. But in every state, patients will suffer. That's the predictable consequence of legislation that saves money by letting Americans get sick.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Which strength training method is best for you? Experts break down the options
When it comes to weight-resistance exercise, you can choose free weights such as dumbbells or barbells. Or weight machines, which are often driven by cables or levers. You can use resistance bands or tubes to build strength. Or try pushups and pullups — old standbys that create muscle overload by using your own body weight. These four basic options for strength training present fitness possibilities for young or old or beginners. And they offer flexibility for use in the gym, your home or in a hotel room during travel. You'll probably wind up using a combination of the four, and they all have their pros and cons. They are appropriate for all ages and can be augmented with aerobic exercises like walking or running — or even climbing stairs. Let's let Dr. Rafael Escamilla, a biomechanist and physical therapist at Sacramento State University in California, and Dr. Michael Stone, a sports scientist at East Tennessee State University, walk us through the possibilities and their pluses and minuses, depending on your age, your motivation and your goals. Both are internationally recognized experts, college professors and former competitive weightlifters who still work out almost daily. Both suggest a medical check if you're just starting out and the guidance of a trainer at the beginning. Most suggest strength training two or three times per week. Dumbbells and barbells We're talking primarily about dumbbells, barbells, kettlebells and medicine balls. 'If you're relatively healthy, free weights are the way to go,' Stone told The Associated Press. 'They have more carryover to daily life — to lifting things. It transfers better. In daily life you pick up your grandchildren, pick up the groceries.' Free weights are also more versatile, accommodating natural movements that a machine will not allow. Free weights require the user to focus on balance, activating additional muscle groups than simply those targeted. Stone reminded that you need not use much weight. Just a pound, or a kilo or two, will do it. Start slowly and increase the weight gradually. 'I would also strongly suggest that if you've never lifted weights before, go find somebody who knows something about it,' Stone added. Weight machines This is probably the least intimidating option for the beginner. The machines offer stability and a fixed pattern of movement and they give beginners a chance to get familiar with the movements involved in strength training. 'Machines are a good way to start,' Escamilla told The Associated Press. 'They're safe and easy and you don't need a lot of technique or skill to do them.' Escamilla pointed out they also reduce the risk of injury, isolate muscles and help build confidence as you're starting out. The machines also are more time effective. 'Start here and then you can gravitate to free weight and other options,' Escamilla said. Resistance bands and tubes These are the most portable options. They can help to build muscle, improve flexibility and balance, and avoid the need to sign up for a gym membership. The bands or tubes are made of elastic and come in a variety of sizes and resistance levels — how far they stretch and how difficult it is to stretch them. Bands also come in fabric models. 'They take up no room to pack and they're supercheap,' Escamilla said. 'You can take them with you as you travel — just throw them in your suitcase.' You can use them to work your legs, arms, back, chest and shoulders and other muscle groups. They can be used in many configurations and may be less intimidating than dumbbells or barbells. 'The bands won't cut it for a 300-pound (140-kilo) football player,' Escamilla added. 'But they're good for your average person — your average adult.' Bodyweight resistance The idea with every weight-resistance exercise is to overload the muscles. Your own bodyweight can be used to do this. Exercises like pushups, pullups, squats, lunges and planks and others fall into this category. 'Your body weight can be used as a form of resistance,' Escamilla said. 'You can get a good workout doing these and you need almost no equipment.' No matter the option, Stone emphasized the need to vary your exercises — both the types and the number of repetitions. You can also vary locations, perhaps choosing an outdoor gym for your workouts. Outdoor gyms are often found on beaches like the one at the popular Barceloneta beach in Barcelona, Spain. 'You can't do the same number of sets and repetitions all the time and expect to get better results," Stone said. 'You get stale and monotony can set in.'
Associated Press
2 hours ago
- Associated Press
Which strength training method is best for you? Experts break down the options
When it comes to weight-resistance exercise, you can choose free weights such as dumbbells or barbells. Or weight machines, which are often driven by cables or levers. You can use resistance bands or tubes to build strength. Or try pushups and pullups — old standbys that create muscle overload by using your own body weight. These four basic options for strength training present fitness possibilities for young or old or beginners. And they offer flexibility for use in the gym, your home or in a hotel room during travel. You'll probably wind up using a combination of the four, and they all have their pros and cons. They are appropriate for all ages and can be augmented with aerobic exercises like walking or running — or even climbing stairs. Let's let Dr. Rafael Escamilla, a biomechanist and physical therapist at Sacramento State University in California, and Dr. Michael Stone, a sports scientist at East Tennessee State University, walk us through the possibilities and their pluses and minuses, depending on your age, your motivation and your goals. Both are internationally recognized experts, college professors and former competitive weightlifters who still work out almost daily. Both suggest a medical check if you're just starting out and the guidance of a trainer at the beginning. Most suggest strength training two or three times per week. Dumbbells and barbells We're talking primarily about dumbbells, barbells, kettlebells and medicine balls. 'If you're relatively healthy, free weights are the way to go,' Stone told The Associated Press. 'They have more carryover to daily life — to lifting things. It transfers better. In daily life you pick up your grandchildren, pick up the groceries.' Free weights are also more versatile, accommodating natural movements that a machine will not allow. Free weights require the user to focus on balance, activating additional muscle groups than simply those targeted. Stone reminded that you need not use much weight. Just a pound, or a kilo or two, will do it. Start slowly and increase the weight gradually. 'I would also strongly suggest that if you've never lifted weights before, go find somebody who knows something about it,' Stone added. Weight machines This is probably the least intimidating option for the beginner. The machines offer stability and a fixed pattern of movement and they give beginners a chance to get familiar with the movements involved in strength training. 'Machines are a good way to start,' Escamilla told The Associated Press. 'They're safe and easy and you don't need a lot of technique or skill to do them.' Escamilla pointed out they also reduce the risk of injury, isolate muscles and help build confidence as you're starting out. The machines also are more time effective. 'Start here and then you can gravitate to free weight and other options,' Escamilla said. Resistance bands and tubes These are the most portable options. They can help to build muscle, improve flexibility and balance, and avoid the need to sign up for a gym membership. The bands or tubes are made of elastic and come in a variety of sizes and resistance levels — how far they stretch and how difficult it is to stretch them. Bands also come in fabric models. 'They take up no room to pack and they're supercheap,' Escamilla said. 'You can take them with you as you travel — just throw them in your suitcase.' You can use them to work your legs, arms, back, chest and shoulders and other muscle groups. They can be used in many configurations and may be less intimidating than dumbbells or barbells. 'The bands won't cut it for a 300-pound (140-kilo) football player,' Escamilla added. 'But they're good for your average person — your average adult.' Bodyweight resistance The idea with every weight-resistance exercise is to overload the muscles. Your own bodyweight can be used to do this. Exercises like pushups, pullups, squats, lunges and planks and others fall into this category. 'Your body weight can be used as a form of resistance,' Escamilla said. 'You can get a good workout doing these and you need almost no equipment.' No matter the option, Stone emphasized the need to vary your exercises — both the types and the number of repetitions. You can also vary locations, perhaps choosing an outdoor gym for your workouts. Outdoor gyms are often found on beaches like the one at the popular Barceloneta beach in Barcelona, Spain. 'You can't do the same number of sets and repetitions all the time and expect to get better results,' Stone said. 'You get stale and monotony can set in.'
