
Glamorous Sydney mum Monica Aoun scolded by judge over appalling driving record
Monica Aoun, 36, who also goes by her married name Monica Hannoun, faced Sutherland Local Court on Tuesday after pleading guilty to driving with a suspended licence for a second time.
She was issued with a court notice on May 8 this year after police caught her driving her Tesla through Blakehurst, in Sydney's south, to drop her children to school.
Her lawyer told the court she had completed the three-month suspension but was stung on a 'technicality' as she had not gone to Roads and Maritime Services to renew her licence.
He said Aoun was a 'full-time mum' who assists her builder husband, who has also lost his licence, and their inability to use their cars was a 'strain' on them.
'She is not getting much assistance from the family,' he said.
But Magistrate Philip Stewart reiterated that she was driving while suspended.
'She's on her P-plates (and) has been on them since 2015. This is her sixth suspension,' he said.
'This offence occurred on the 8th of May 2025. Her record on page one (shows) she was suspended (and) has racked up further offences during the time she was suspended.
'She is fortunate to not have been charged on each of those occasions.'
Aoun's lawyer told the court he understood all of the negatives of his client's driving history, but there was an extenuating situation with her needing to care for her children and her husband losing his licence.
Asked by Stewart when Aoun's husband was due to get his licence back, the lawyer said 'not for a while'.
'On rare occasions you see cases that are astounding,' Stewart said.
'This is one of those records.'
Stewart told the court Aoun got her leaner's permit in 2006, before losing it in 2009.
Her licence was suspended in 2014 before she obtained her P1 licence in 2015.
Stewart said her P2 licence was issued in 2017, before she was pulled over the following year for a speeding matter and not having P-plates on the car, which was 'consistent' with her previously found to not be using L-plates.
In 2019, she was caught speeding without P-plates, then busted the following year for driving while suspended.
Stewart said she was then nabbed speeding numerous times in 2022 and put off the road for the fourth time.
The court heard she was given another suspension in 2024 and taken off the road after being caught speeding and parking in a disabled spot, while suspended.
Stewart said Aoun was before the court because she had not completed the Traffic Offenders Program.
'It's not the worst driving record I have seen, but not many would top that,' Stewart told Aoun.
'You should be thoroughly ashamed.
'If you can't drive, don't hold a licence.'
Stewart told Aoun he would not give her a conviction, but cautioned that further offending could result in serious penalties, including jail time.
He placed her on a Conditional Release Order for two years, which will expire on July 28, 2027.
Under the order, she must not commit any further offences while subject to the CRO, must appear before court if called upon to do so, and cannot drive unless her licence is valid.
According to court documents obtained by 7NEWS.com.au, Aoun was driving north along West Street at Blakehurst about 8.35am on May 8 this year when police automatic number plate recognition software picked up that her registration was expired due to a fine default.
She was pulled over and showed officers her digital driver's licence, which indicated that her licence was both expired and suspended.
Police checks identified that her licence was suspended from September 24, 2024 until December 23, 2024 for loss of demerit points, but the period was extended because she had not passed the increased Traffic Offender Knowledge Test.
Aoun told police she knew she was suspended but 'has no choice' but to drive because she needs to get her kids to school.
According to the documents, she further told police: 'My husband said something to me, like you need to call and sort it out, and then times goes by and I haven't sorted it out.'
Further court records obtained by 7NEWS.com.au show Aoun's husband, Joseph Hannoun, was convicted of driving with a cancelled licence for a second time or more on May 13 this year.
He was fined $750 and disqualified from holding a driver's licence for six months (until November 13, 2025).
However, he was busted driving again and pleaded guilty in July to driving a motor vehicle during a disqualification period second offence.
He is due to be sentenced in Bankstown Local Court later this week.
Other records show he was also before the courts multiple times in 2023 for driving offences.
In March, he was fine $750 and disqualified from holding a driver's licence for three months after driving while suspended.
Six months later, in September, he was convicted of driving a motor vehicle during a disqualification period second offence and for larceny.
For the driving offence, he was sentenced to a community correction order for a year and disqualified from driving for six months.
In relation to the larceny, Hannoun was fined $500 and ordered to pay Bunnings Rockdale $699.
It is not the first time the couple have made headlines, with their extravagant Bali resort wedding splashed on the cover of a magazine in 2014.
The luxurious event — organised by celebrity wedding planner Diane Khoury — featured Anoun walking along a Perspex aisle on a pool, perched on a cliff with views overlooking the ocean.
According to an interview the couple gave at the time, Aoun's wedding designer wedding dress by J'Aton Couture cost $30,000 and her engagement ring and two wedding bands feature a total of six three-carat diamonds.
In Australia, three-carat diamonds range in price from around $10,00 to more than $100,000 each depending on their unique characteristics.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

AU Financial Review
4 hours ago
- AU Financial Review
Tesla ordered by Florida jury to pay $375m in fatal Autopilot crash
Miami | A Florida jury found Tesla liable in the 2019 fatal crash of an Autopilot equipped Model S and ordered Elon Musk's automaker to pay $US243 million ($375 million) to the family of a deceased woman and an injured survivor. Jurors in Miami federal court awarded the estate of Naibel Benavides Leon and her former boyfriend Dillon Angulo $US129 million in compensatory damages, of which Tesla is responsible for 33 per cent, plus $US200 million in punitive damages, according to a verdict sheet. Reuters

News.com.au
5 hours ago
- News.com.au
Tesla ordered to pay $US242 million in Autopilot death
A Florida jury on Friday ordered Tesla to pay hundreds of millions of dollars to plaintiffs who blamed a deadly 2019 crash on the company's 'Autopilot' driver assistance technology. The jury found Tesla's system partly responsible for a crash in Key Largo that killed Naibel Benavides Leon and injured her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo, according to attorney Darren Jeffrey Rousso, a partner at the law firm that represented Angulo and Leon's family. The plaintiffs had alleged that Autopilot was to blame when driver George McGee's Tesla careened into a Chevrolet sport utility vehicle, killing Leon and injuring Angulo. The jury awarded $US200 million ($309 million) in punitive damages, plus $US59 million ($91 million) in compensatory damages to Leon's family and $US70 million ($108 million) in damages to Angulo, according to court records. Since the jury assigned one-third of the blame to Tesla, the compensatory damages will be reduced, Rousso said, with the total impact of the jury award totalling $US242 million ($374 million) after these reductions. 'Justice was done,' Mr Rousso said. 'The jury heard all the evidence and came up with a fair and just verdict on behalf of our clients.' Tesla will appeal the decision, according to its defense attorneys. 'Today's verdict is wrong and only works to set back automotive safety and jeapordise Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement lifesaving technology,' Tesla said through its legal team. 'The evidence has always shown that this driver was solely at fault because he was speeding, with his foot on the accelerator — which overrode Autopilot — as he rummaged for his dropped phone without his eyes on the road. 'To be clear, no car in 2019, and none today, would have prevented this crash. This was never about Autopilot.'

Sydney Morning Herald
7 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Tesla ordered to pay more than $US200m in Autopilot crash case
Miami: A Miami jury decided that Elon Musk's car company Tesla was partly responsible for a deadly crash in Florida involving its Autopilot driver assist technology and must pay the victims more than $US200 million in punitive damages. The federal jury held that Tesla bore significant responsibility because its technology failed and that not all the blame can be put on a reckless driver, even one who admitted he was distracted by his cell phone before hitting a young couple out gazing at the stars. The decision comes as Musk seeks to convince Americans his cars are safe enough to drive on their own as he plans to roll out a driverless taxi service in several cities in the coming months. The decision ends a four-year-long case remarkable not just in its outcome but that it even made it to trial. Many similar cases against Tesla have been dismissed and, when that didn't happen, settled by the company to avoid the spotlight of a trial. 'This will open the floodgates,' said Miguel Custodio, a car crash lawyer not involved in the Tesla case. 'It will embolden a lot of people to come to court.' The case also included startling charges by lawyers for the family of the deceased, 22-year-old, Naibel Benavides Leon, and for her injured boyfriend, Dillon Angulo. They claimed Tesla either hid or lost key evidence, including data and video recorded seconds before the accident. Tesla has previously faced criticism that it is slow to cough up crucial data by relatives of other victims in Tesla crashes, accusations that the car company has denied. In this case, the plaintiffs showed Tesla had the evidence all along, despite its repeated denials, by hiring a forensic data expert who dug it up. Tesla said it made a mistake after being shown the evidence and honestly hadn't thought it was there. 'Today's verdict is wrong,' Teslas lawyers said in a statement, 'and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardise Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement life-saving technology,' They said the plaintiffs concocted a story 'blaming the car when the driver – from day one – admitted and accepted responsibility.' The lawyers said Tesla plans to appeal.