Should You Buy Intuitive Machines Stock While It's Trading Below $8?
Despite a strong growth outlook fueled by several high-profile contracts, shares of Intuitive Machines have cratered at the start of 2025, trading down 60% year to date at the time of this writing amid the broader stock market sell-off.
With the stock now trading below $8, is it a buy? Here's what you need to know.
Intuitive Machines does not launch rockets itself but instead designs, builds, and operates spacecraft, such as its lunar landers. For its groundbreaking February 2024 IM-1 mission, the company's Odysseus Nova-C lander rode a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket -- an approach that allows it to concentrate on its core strengths in payload delivery, lunar surface infrastructure, mobility and robotics, satellite operations, and data communications services.
The company aims to advance its technology steadily, eyeing a space infrastructure market opportunity that experts project will grow to $1.8 trillion by 2035. The early financial results have been impressive. In 2024 (covering the full year ended Dec. 31) Intuitive Machines' total revenue reached $228 million, nearly triple the 2023 result amid multiple contract awards and a close partnership with NASA, ending the year with a $328 million backlog.
Projects fueling Intuitive Machines' growth include the Commercial Lunar Payload Services program, which builds on IM-1's success with IM-2's South Pole landing earlier this year to prospect for water. Two more lunar missions are slated through 2027. There is also the ongoing Omnibus Multidiscipline Engineering Services contract that further supports NASA with broad operational expertise.
For 2025, the company projects revenue of $250 million to $300 million, a solid 20% annual increase. While Intuitive Machines is not yet profitable, management's guidance suggests a positive adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) run rate by the end of the year, and for 2026, an encouraging sign of more sustainable fundamentals. This is backed by a robust balance sheet, with $385 million in cash and zero debt as of March 13, ensuring ample liquidity to drive its ambitions.
One of the attractions of Intuitive Machines as an investment is that, despite uncertainties over the U.S. economy's strength and the looming impact of Trump administration trade tariffs, its business profile and operating tailwinds remain largely insulated from these dynamics. Its multiyear NASA contracts, funded at the federal level, ensure project continuity regardless of how consumer spending or GDP evolves, providing valuable stability in the early stages of a fast-evolving space exploration industry. While a severe economic downturn could pressure NASA to reassess future projects or limit private sector opportunities, it's business as usual for now.
Looking ahead, key catalysts could reignite investor enthusiasm and boost Intuitive Machines' battered stock price. The IM-3 mission, set for early 2026, will launch the first of five data relay satellites under the NASA Near Space Network contract, marking its entry into lucrative high-bandwidth transmission solutions as part of its space infrastructure-as-a-service offerings.
Later in 2025, NASA's decision on the $4.6 billion Lunar Terrain Vehicle Services contract, spanning 15 years through 2040, could be a game-changer for Intuitive Machines, one of three finalists. Additional private sector engagements and deployment announcements would likely further bolster its growth trajectory to lift investor sentiment.
I'm bullish on Intuitive Machines and see the recent stock price weakness as a chance for investors to buy the dip before a potential rebound. With the stock trading approximately 5 times its estimated 2025 revenue, the forward price-to-sales (P/S) ratio highlights compelling value for an industry pioneer with substantial long-term potential. The rally from here may not shoot straight into orbit, but the company has the pieces in place to reward shareholders over the long run. A small position in the stock, built through dollar-cost averaging to manage near-term volatility, could work well within a diversified portfolio.
Before you buy stock in Intuitive Machines, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Intuitive Machines wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $461,558!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $578,035!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 730% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 147% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join .
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of April 5, 2025
Dan Victor has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Should You Buy Intuitive Machines Stock While It's Trading Below $8? was originally published by The Motley Fool
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Top Copper Nation Chile Sweats on Details of Trump's 50% Tariff
(Bloomberg) -- Chile, by far the biggest shipper of copper into the US, is waiting for details to emerge following President's Donald Trump's bombshell comments on tariffs. Are Tourists Ruining Europe? How Locals Are Pushing Back Can Americans Just Stop Building New Highways? Denver City Hall Takes a Page From NASA Philadelphia Trash Piles Up as Garbage Workers' Strike Drags On Trump sent shock-waves through the global copper industry on Tuesday by telling reporters that he would be slapping a 50% levy on copper imports — much higher than previously thought. Chile — and particularly state-owned Codelco — would be the most affected producer given the country accounts for about 500,000 metric tons of the total of 700,000 tons of refined metal that the US imports a year. Of that, Codelco alone ships about 350,000 tons. Asked about the 50% remarks, Chile's Foreign Ministry pointed out that there's still no executive order regarding a Commerce Department investigation into copper tariffs, and that Chile is yet to receive notification of any decision. Similarly, Codelco Chairman Maximo Pacheco said it's too soon to draw conclusions. Two major unknowns are whether there'll be country exemptions and whether the tariff will apply to both semi-fabricated copper products as well as refined metal, Pacheco said. The US needs that copper and Chile will continue to be ready to supply it, he said. Chilean officials participated in public consultations in the framework of the Commerce Department investigation. 'We remain in contact and engaged in discussions on this and other matters with the relevant authorities and technical teams,' Chile's Foreign Ministry said in a written response. Will Trade War Make South India the Next Manufacturing Hub? 'Telecom Is the New Tequila': Behind the Celebrity Wireless Boom SNAP Cuts in Big Tax Bill Will Hit a Lot of Trump Voters Too Pistachios Are Everywhere Right Now, Not Just in Dubai Chocolate For Brazil's Criminals, Coffee Beans Are the Target ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Miami Herald
13 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Sanctions, currency collapse fan fear of hyperinflation surge in Venezuela
Venezuela is spiraling once more into an inflationary storm as new data warns that price increases could skyrocket to 530% in 2025, fueled by a collapsing currency, oil export disruptions and mounting political and economic isolation. After two years of relative calm and moderate economic stabilization, inflation has returned with a vengeance. According to Bank of America Global Research, monthly inflation hit 26% in May, up from 18% in April—marking the fastest pace in years and triggering fears of a return to full-blown hyperinflation. 'Fears of hyperinflation have returned,' said Sebastián Rondeau, an economist at Bank of America. 'The deterioration in price stability is severe and accelerating.' The sharp surge in inflation follows a perfect storm of structural vulnerabilities and renewed external pressures, most notably the reimposition of U.S. sanctions on Venezuela's oil industry earlier this year and a concurrent fall in oil production. Venezuela's annual inflation reached 229% in April, up dramatically from a year-over-year average of 94% in 2024. If current trends persist, Bank of America projects an inflation rate of 530% for 2025 — potentially Venezuela's worst economic year since the infamous hyperinflation cycle of 2017–2019. Much of the inflationary pressure stems from Venezuela's crippled oil sector, one of the country's key lifelines for foreign currency and government revenue. Bank of America and Bloomberg report that oil production fell to 870,000 barrels per day in April, down from 980,000 in March—a drop that analysts say is directly tied to the U.S. decision to let key operating licenses for American and international companies expire. In late May, the Trump administration declined to renew the license that had allowed Chevron and several European firms to operate in Venezuela under sanctions waivers. As a result, Chevron was forced to halt the export of nearly five million barrels of oil, a significant loss for the cash-strapped socialist regime. To make matters worse, other foreign oil operators such as ENI and Maurel & Prom also had their licenses suspended. These policy shifts have led to a sharp decline in oil shipments and a loss of crucial hard currency inflows. Adding fuel to the fire, President Donald Trump announced in March that his administration would impose a 25% tariff on countries importing Venezuelan oil and a 15% tariff on direct imports from Venezuela. The sanctions and oil export cuts have placed enormous pressure on the already weakened bolívar, which has been depreciating at an average of 13% per month this year. That rapid decline follows a brief period of currency stability in 2024, during which the Caracas regime tried to maintain a controlled exchange rate using Central Bank interventions and limited dollar reserves. But those reserves have all but dried up. With declining oil exports, the government is struggling to get foreign currency and is once again resorting to monetary financing—printing bolívars to cover spending gaps. As a result, prices for basic goods have soared. A kilogram of beef now sells for $7 to $8 on the black market, compared to $4 just a few months ago. Public workers are reporting real wage declines of over 70% since the start of the year, and strikes are spreading among healthcare workers, teachers and pensioners. Failing to stop the economic firestorm, the socialist regime has turned its sights on those who dare to publicize the collapse. In recent weeks, authorities have detained economists, analysts and digital platform operators who publish independent financial data, intensifying a campaign of repression aimed at concealing Venezuela's worsening economic crisis. The arrests followed the publication of alarming inflation data by the independent Venezuelan Finance Observatory, which reported an annualized inflation rate of 229% as of May. The Central Bank of Venezuela, controlled by Maduro loyalists, stopped releasing official inflation figures in October 2024, when prices began surging again. 'The government wants to eliminate the parallel market without supplying enough dollars — and that's impossible,' said exiled economist José Guerra, who heads the observatory. 'They're trying to control inflation while printing money without backing. Monetary liquidity increased 250% through May alone. That inevitably fuels more inflation.' The government's sweeping effort to silence dissent has also extended to popular platforms like Monitor Dólar, which published unofficial exchange rates crucial for businesses and consumers in a country plagued by currency instability. The site stopped updating on May 27. Soon after, authorities detained around 20 people linked to the platform. The cryptocurrency exchange El Dorado — often used as a benchmark for Monitor Dólar — also shut down operations in Venezuela following the arrests. Now, many informal currency exchanges are being routed through platforms like Binance in an effort to avoid digital surveillance and government crackdowns. With the cost in bolivars of buying a U.S. dollar more than doubling since January, the regime has responded not with economic reform, but with political persecution.
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Better "Magnificent Seven" Stock: Apple or Amazon?
Apple and Amazon both have relatively slow growth rates. Amazon's high-growth segments are causing strong profit growth. Apple's profit and revenue growth are closely linked. 10 stocks we like better than Amazon › Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL) and Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) are two of the largest companies in the world and are both members of the "Magnificent Seven" group of stocks. Both companies have delivered excellent long-term returns for shareholders, but does either investment stand out as a better one to buy right now? Let's take a look at both companies and see which one is the best buy today. Amazon and Apple aren't the pinnacle of growth for big tech. Each company has posted fairly mundane growth rates over the past few quarters, which might cause investors to wonder why they want to own either stock. With each stock growing less than 10% during its most recent quarter, I wouldn't blame anyone for questioning whether these two could be named growth stocks. However, when you dig into each company, it's clear one still deserves the growth stock adjective. Apple's lack of growth stems from a few issues. First, Apple hasn't released any innovative products or features for multiple years. They are a clear example of a company riding on prior success and are still succeeding with that model. One area where this has become abundantly clear is AI, as Apple is behind nearly every smartphone company in terms of AI features. Another area Apple has been harmed is the lengthening smartphone turnover cycle. A decade ago, each iteration of the iPhone brought massive innovations and must-have features. Now, the phone purchased today isn't all that different from a two- or three-year-old phone. This innovation slowdown has caused consumers to upgrade phones less frequently, which has harmed Apple's growth rate. Amazon is a completely different story. Most people recognize Amazon for its e-commerce platform, which generates the lion's share of revenue. In Q1, online stores and third-party seller services generated $94 billion in sales. Considering Amazon generated $143 billion in total revenue in Q1, that's a significant portion of its total revenue. These two segments were also the slowest-growing of all of Amazon's segments, which dragged down the overall growth rate. However, Amazon still had some strong performers, with Amazon Web Services (AWS) and advertising services rising 17% and 18%, respectively, in Q1. The strong quarter for both of these segments is hidden within Amazon's total revenue growth rate; however, the impact that these two have on Amazon's profit margins is undeniable. Despite AWS accounting for only 19% of total sales in Q1, it generated 63% of operating profits. While Amazon doesn't break out advertising operating margins, it's safe to assume they are incredibly high, especially when advertising-focused companies like Meta Platforms (NASDAQ: META) deliver operating margins of 40% or greater. It's highly likely that a large chunk of Amazon's profits from the commerce business come from this segment, although there's no way to know for sure. Still, because Amazon's high-margin businesses are growing at a high-teens rate, that means its profits are also rapidly increasing. In Q1, Amazon's operating profits increased 20% year over year, marking an excellent result. Compared to Apple, whose operating profits grew only 6%, this is a significantly better result. Apple doesn't have the same catalyst for expanding profit margins as Amazon does, so its margins are closely tied to its revenue growth rate. On the other hand, Amazon's profits are growing substantially faster than Apple's and are likely to continue doing so with its strong-performing advertising and AWS business segments. As a result, I think Amazon is a far better buy right now, as it has an earnings growth catalyst that Apple doesn't have. Before you buy stock in Amazon, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Amazon wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $695,481!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $969,935!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,053% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 179% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 7, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Randi Zuckerberg, a former director of market development and spokeswoman for Facebook and sister to Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Keithen Drury has positions in Amazon and Meta Platforms. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon, Apple, and Meta Platforms. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Better "Magnificent Seven" Stock: Apple or Amazon? was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio
