Ministry urges Harvard hopefuls to check enrolment updates
At this time, the ministry reported that there are no issues related to the Student Exchange Visa Program or the cancellation of visas.
This follows the US State Department's directive to consulates globally to restart the processing of visa applications for international students accepted into Harvard.
The ministry noted that this development is a relief for the nearly 7,000 foreign students enrolled at the Ivy League institution.
The ministry is closely monitoring developments through its Education Malaysia Washington DC (EMWDC) office.
Currently, there are 54 Malaysian students at the university, of which 16 are scholarship holders and 38 are self-funded.
'This decision allows international students, including Malaysian students, to continue their studies without disruption to their visa status for now. The ministry and EMWDC office have contacted the relevant sponsors and US education authorities,' it said in a statement yesterday.
The ministry also expressed appreciation for the commitment of these parties to working together to provide updated information regarding the optional practical training programme and address immigration matters.
Malaysia believes that cross-border higher education is the best platform for talent development, knowledge exchange and strategic cooperation among nations.
It also urged all parties to remain calm and act based on true information.
On June 6, the US State Department instructed consulates worldwide to resume processing visa applications for international students admitted to Harvard University, reversing guidance issued a day earlier ordering such requests to be rejected.
The new directive rescinded one issued a day earlier, less than an hour before a judge blocked the Trump administration from restricting international students from entering the country to attend Harvard.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
40 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
Papering over strains, US and allies prep for Taiwan war
AS they kicked off the largest joint military exercises in Australia's history with a press conference in Sydney earlier this month, US commanders gave a simple explanation for why 35,000 troops from 19 nations were simulating high-tech warfare. In the words of US Lieutenant General Joel Vowell, deputy commander of the US Army in the Pacific, exercise TALISMAN SABRE was intended to build the ability of the US and its allies to respond to any crisis in the Pacific – and in doing so, act as a "deterrent mechanism" to prevent a future conflict. Already, 2025 has witnessed a series of the largest and most sophisticated military drills held in the Pacific since the end of World War Two, a sign of growing nervousness over a rising China. But along with other US-led activity around the region, the drills also have a much more focused goal. They are to persuade Beijing that if it goes ahead with what are now believed to be increasingly advanced plans for an invasion of Taiwan, it risks finding itself at war not just with the US but a powerful and well-armed de facto alliance. Behind the scenes, however, sits clear diplomatic awkwardness, caused by Pacific frustrations over US President Donald Trump's tariff salvoes and trade war as well as strategic uncertainty over the US and its future global role. Unlike with its Nato allies in Europe or its main Pacific partners such as Australia, the US has no binding treaty obligations to defend Taiwan if it is attacked. Nor do Australia, the Philippines and other major players in the region. This month, the Financial Times reported that US officials were exerting mounting pressure on Australia and Japan to agree to intervene militarily if China moved against Taiwan. Under terms of the Taiwan Relations Act of 1979, successive US administrations have been committed to ensuring plans and military resources are in place to protect the island against whatever Chinese menace it faces. But that does not extend to a commitment to use that force in the event of an attack. Indeed, there is a clear division of views within the Trump administration and its supporters on the wisdom of such action, as well as over how much support Washington should offer to the government in Taipei. That means America's regional allies find themselves taking a similar position. The result is a situation rather different from what the Trump administration expected to find when it entered office in January complaining loudly about a European failure to invest properly in defending their own continent and pledging to switch America's focus to confronting China. But while European Nato nations have now committed to significant spending increases – 3.5 per cent of gross domestic product on defence with an additional 1.5 per cent on defence related infrastructure, America's Pacific allies have held back. Under hefty US pressure, Taiwan itself is working to get its defence budget to 2.5 per cent of GDP, motivated by US warnings that it might be abandoned if it does not step up its efforts. Japan spent only 1.8 per cent of GDP on defence in 2025, rising to 2 per cent by 2027 – and its prime minister Shigeru Ishida was widely suspected of skipping the Nato summit in The Hague last month to avoid pressure to do more. Japan, New Zealand, Australia and South Korea are not Nato members, but often attend large alliance meetings to discuss global and Pacific security matters. "It's hard to believe, a little bit ..., but thanks to President Trump, Asian allies should look to countries in Europe as a new-found example," US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said at the Shangri-La Security Dialogue in Singapore in May. Hegseth also warned that the Chinese threat to Taiwan was "imminent" and that Beijing viewed its capture as a key step on the road to regional domination. Since Trump took office in January, however, America's Asian allies have found themselves profoundly uncertain by the administration's cool treatment of Ukraine in the country's battle against Russian invasion. They are suddenly worried that they might similarly find themselves deprived of US arms and forced towards a deal by a future US government. Trump's tariffs and trade war rhetoric have only made such matters worse.
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
US-China set to meet with extension of tariff pause on the cards
STOCKHOLM/WASHINGTON: Top economic officials from the United States and China are set to renew negotiations Monday (July 28) -- with an extension of lower tariff levels on the cards -- as President Donald Trump's trade policy enters a critical week. Talks between the world's top two economies are slated to happen over two days in the Swedish capital Stockholm, and they come as other countries are also rushing to finalise deals with Washington. For dozens of trading partners, failing to strike an agreement in the coming days means they could face significant tariff hikes on exports to the United States come Friday, Aug 1. The steeper rates, threatened against partners like Brazil and India, would raise the duties their products face from a "baseline" of 10 per cent now to levels up to 50 per cent. Tariffs imposed by the Trump administration have already effectively raised duties on US imports to levels not seen since the 1930s, according to data from The Budget Lab research centre at Yale University. For now, all eyes are on discussions between Washington and Beijing as a delegation including US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent meets a Chinese team led by Vice Premier He Lifeng in Sweden. While both countries in April imposed tariffs on each other's products that reached triple-digit levels, US duties this year have temporarily been lowered to 30 per cent and China's countermeasures slashed to 10 per cent. But the 90-day truce, instituted after talks in Geneva in May, is set to expire on Aug 12. Since the Geneva meeting, the two sides have convened in London to iron out disagreements. "There seems to have been a fairly significant shift in (US) administration thinking on China since particularly the London talks," said Emily Benson, head of strategy at Minerva Technology Futures. "The mood now is much more focused on what's possible to achieve, on warming relations where possible and restraining any factors that could increase tensions," she told AFP. Talks with China have not produced a deal but Benson said both countries have made progress, with certain rare earth and semiconductor flows restarting. "Secretary Bessent has also signalled that he thinks a concrete outcome will be to delay the 90-day tariff pause," she said. "That's also promising, because it indicates that something potentially more substantive is on the horizon." The South China Morning Post, citing sources on both sides, reported Sunday that Washington and Beijing are expected to extend their tariff pause by another 90 days. Trump has announced pacts so far with the European Union, Britain, Vietnam, Japan, Indonesia and the Philippines, although details have been sparse. An extension of the US-China deal to keep tariffs at reduced levels "would show that both sides see value in continuing talks", said Thibault Denamiel, a fellow at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies. US-China Business Council President Sean Stein said the market is not anticipating a detailed readout from Stockholm: "What's more important is the atmosphere coming out." "The business community is optimistic that the two presidents will meet later this year, hopefully in Beijing," he told AFP. "It's clear that on both sides, the final decision-maker is going to be the president." Sweden's Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson said both countries' willingness to meet was a "positive development". For others, the prospect of higher US tariffs and few details from fresh trade deals mark "a far cry from the ideal scenario", said Denamiel. But they show some progress, particularly with partners Washington has signalled are on its priority list like the EU, Japan, the Philippines and South Korea. The EU unveiled a pact with Washington on Sunday while Seoul is rushing to strike an agreement, after Japan and the Philippines already reached the outlines of deals. Breakthroughs have been patchy since Washington promised a flurry of agreements after unveiling, and then swiftly postponing, tariff hikes targeting dozens of economies in April. Denamiel warned of overlooking countries that fall outside Washington's priority list. Solid partnerships are needed, he said, if Washington wants to diversify supply chains, enforce advanced technology controls, and tackle excess Chinese capacity. - Reuters
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Europe braces for US troop withdrawals amid NATO uncertainty
BRUSSELS: After securing NATO's defence spending pledge to appease Donald Trump, Europe now awaits a crucial US decision on troop withdrawals. Washington is reviewing global military deployments, with reductions in Europe expected in the coming months. The move has unnerved allies, particularly amid fears that Russia may target a NATO member if the Ukraine war subsides. However, recent talks have eased tensions, with US officials assuring no sudden disruptions. 'We've agreed to no surprises and no gaps in the strategic framework of Europe,' said Matthew Whitaker, US ambassador to NATO. He expects the review to conclude by late summer or early fall. While past US administrations considered scaling back in Europe to focus on China, Trump has pushed harder for the continent to bolster its own defence. Analysts see withdrawals as inevitable but debate the pace. 'There's every reason to expect a withdrawal from Europe,' said Marta Mucznik from the International Crisis Group. 'The question is not whether it's going to happen, but how fast.' The Pentagon reports nearly 85,000 US troops in Europe, fluctuating since Russia's 2022 invasion. Officials anticipate gradual reductions rather than abrupt cuts, though key capabilities like air defences remain irreplaceable for now. Trump may first withdraw residual forces deployed by Biden after Russia's Ukraine invasion. While manageable, deeper cuts or base closures could trigger alarm. 'The kinds of defence investments by Europe may only be felt in real capability terms over many years,' said Ian Lesser from the German Marshall Fund. 'So the question of timing really does matter.' Despite Trump's tougher stance on Russia, analysts question the timing of any drawdown. Previous attempts to pull troops from Germany failed due to logistical and political hurdles. European diplomats remain cautiously optimistic but acknowledge unpredictability. Trade disputes or shifting priorities could still strain transatlantic ties. 'It seems positive for now,' said one diplomat. 'But what if we are all wrong and a force decrease starts in 2026? To be honest, there isn't much to go on at this stage.' - AFP
