Syria Wants Russia ‘By our Side', FM Said in Official Visit to Moscow
Al-Shaibani's visit to Moscow serves as the first official engagement between the two nations since the fall of former President Bashar Al-Assad – a move that ended almost five decades of Assad family rule.
During the visit, Al-Shaibani held a significant meeting with his Russian Counterpart Sergey Lavrov at the Russian Foreign Ministry's Guest House.
He unveiled Syria's keenness to build a 'correct and sound relationship' with Moscow based on 'cooperation and mutual respect.'
Moreover, he underscored that the new government represents a vision of unity and reconstruction for Syria, which has suffered long years of conflict and instability.
'We are here today to represent the new Syria, and we have worked since December 8th to fill the political, civil, and service vacuum. We have preserved civil institutions and are working to reunite Syrians at home and abroad,' Al-Shaibani said. Russia's Interest in Backing Syria
Meanwhile, Lavrov emphasized Russia's interest in supporting Syria during its transitional phase.
'We are closely following the ongoing events in Syria. We sincerely hope the friendly Syrian people, with whom we have historically cooperative relations, will overcome current challenges,' he said.
Lavrov also expressed hope that Syria's President Ahmad Al-Sharaa would attend the first Russian-Arab summit on October 15th. Current Challenges
Crucially, uncertainty still lingers over the future of Russia's military presence in Syria. The naval base in Tartus and the air base at Hmeimim—Moscow's only official military outposts beyond the former Soviet Union—are now in question. It is still unclear whether the new Syrian government will permit their continued operation.
Al-Shaibani acknowledged these challenges. However, he called the moment an opportunity to 'build a united and strong Syria,' expressing hope that Moscow would support Damascus in this endeavor.
'The current period is full of various challenges and threats, but it is also an opportunity to build a united and strong Syria. And, of course, we are interested in having Russia by our side on this path,' Al-Shaibani said.
Related Topics:
Saudi Arabia, Syria Boost Energy Cooperation
High-level Saudi Delegation Eyes Investment Opportunities in Syria
Syria, US and France Hold Frank, Productive Talks in Paris
Short link :
Post Views: 11
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Saudi Gazette
2 hours ago
- Saudi Gazette
Poland extends border controls with Germany, Lithuania until October 4 over migration concerns
WARSAW — Poland will maintain temporary border controls with Germany and Lithuania until Oct. 4 amid ongoing concerns about irregular migration, Interior Minister Marcin Kierwinski said Sunday. The decision follows a high-level security meeting with provincial governors and border service officials. Kierwinski said the regulation has been submitted to the European Commission for formal notification. He noted mounting pressure on Poland's eastern frontier, saying that measures to block migration routes through Belarus and Russia have shifted migrant movement toward other parts of the European Union. 'The 98% tightness of our barrier means that the Belarusian and Russian services and illegal migration are moving to other sections,' Kierwinski said. 'Today, the main task, not only for us but also for our partners in the European Union, is to close, if I may use that word, the route to Lithuania and Latvia.' Poland reinstated checks at its internal Schengen borders last year over migration and security concerns. The latest extension will keep the controls in place for another two months. — Agencies
Leaders
7 hours ago
- Leaders
When Will Arabs Form Deterrent Force to Protect Themselves?
By: Dr. Atef Al-Shabrawy International Expert in Development and Social Economy In 1966, the classic theorist Thomas Schelling introduced a novel concept at the time: 'deterrence.' After World War II, military strategy shifted away from what was known as 'military victory' and began to rely on the art of coercion, intimidation, and deterrence. Schelling argued that the ability to inflict harm on another state is a threatening factor that influences the behavior of that state, compelling it to refrain from aggressive actions. In response to a question from French television in 1974 about whether Iran planned to acquire nuclear weapons, the Shah of Iran cleverly replied, 'My country has signed a non-proliferation treaty. If we trust the major nuclear powers because they are responsible, we wonder: what would happen if there were a 'frivolous' state in the region seeking to acquire such weapons, and who would it attack?' The Concept of Deterrence This approach was echoed by France in the same year when it announced its possession of what President de Gaulle termed 'nuclear deterrence.' This weapon was developed independently by France to avoid reliance on the United States, allowing it to leave NATO. De Gaulle himself, using similar justifications, provided Israel with nuclear weapons under the pretext of protecting it from the Arab threat. In a jab at President Nasser for supporting the Algerian revolution, French diplomat Stéphane Hessel wrote in his memoirs in 2011: 'Helping Israel acquire nuclear weapons is a mandatory task; we created Israel, and we must protect it from a dangerous Arab world that opposes it.' Nuclear Experiments Researcher Dominique Schnapper noted in her 2021 book 'De Gaulle in the Eyes of the Jews' that between 1960 and 1966, France conducted dozens of nuclear tests, some of which were attended by Israeli experts. Consequently, Israel did not need to conduct its own nuclear tests, as France shared the results of its experiments, effectively granting Israel entry into the nuclear club. Mordechai Vanunu Exposes Israel Despite this, Israel continued to deny possessing nuclear weapons until its project engineer, Mordechai Vanunu, leaked classified information and photographs from the Dimona reactor to the British press in 1986, revealing the 'Israeli nuclear ambiguity' that had persisted for decades. Israeli-Iranian Bombardment During the 12 days of mutual Israeli-Iranian bombardment, it became evident that the struggle for control over the Middle East and its resources involves preventing certain countries from acquiring any deterrent capabilities, monitoring and stifling their attempts, and even destroying them. Iraq was destroyed under the pretext of possessing fictitious weapons of mass destruction, and similar arguments were used against Iran, as if nuclear weapons were the exclusive domain of major powers and their allies. In May 1998, India announced that it had become a nuclear power following secret tests that went undetected by American satellites. Shortly thereafter, its historical rival, Pakistan, declared its entry into the nuclear club, becoming the only Muslim nation to achieve this feat while the major powers were distracted. Dr. Abdul Qadeer Khan, the father of the Pakistani bomb, conducted tests in the Baluchistan mountains before being arrested for allegedly assisting Iran, Libya, and North Korea in developing nuclear technology. He was forced to make a televised apology but remained under house arrest until his death in 2021. Ballistic Missiles The intense Iranian bombardment of Israel highlighted the fact that nuclear technology is not the only deterrent weapon; ballistic and hypersonic missiles can also serve as strategic deterrents. The world witnessed their use in Iranian attacks on Israeli cities, which caused global panic and compelled major powers to intervene. These missiles effectively deterred and broke the aggressor, and the brief conflict, which aimed to divert attention from the ethnic cleansing in Gaza, appeared to be a test of weapons and technologies in preparation for a larger battle whose participants we do not yet know, but we do know its location. Extreme Democracy With the cessation of bombardment, a new dimension of nuclear and strategic deterrence emerged, particularly for Arab nations in the region. The alarming increase in economic exchanges and investments between regional countries and the West seems to have provided us with no negotiating advantage or satisfaction regarding our positions and orientations. It has not erased the cultural and ideological divisions among us, nor the greed for our resources. There is now a tangible threat from the 'Western democracy' that once brought forth Hitler as a symbol of the extremism produced by the ballot box. Recently, 'democratic' extremist leaders have emerged in the United States, Israel, and most European countries, with increasing possibilities of future leadership that may be even more extreme and violent, potentially unleashing bloodier wars. NATO has decided to raise member contributions to military spending from 2% to 5% of GDP by 2035. Enormous Military Budgets It is worth imagining that the 32 NATO countries do not spend more on defense than they do on healthcare or education. Nevertheless, adopting a 5% contribution means these countries will allocate more to their militaries than to education. These enormous budgets could become a more aggressive and extreme force, potentially turning against any friendly nations. The Future of Arabs The future of Arabs is now at the mercy of existential threats that require us all to form an independent intellectual, scientific, and material force, seeking a 'entity' that achieves the strategic deterrence necessary to prevent future generations from suffering and being destroyed by a new right-wing extremist. I recall the words of Saudi writer Othman Al-Omeir: 'We are heading into the future with the people of the future.' I doubt that the 'people of the future' he referred to will take us along with them, given our weaknesses. It is perhaps better to say: 'We are heading into the future with our strength; for strength secures us a place among the people of the future.' Short link : Post Views: 3
Saudi Gazette
8 hours ago
- Saudi Gazette
Zelenskyy says Ukraine preparing list for new prisoner swap with Russia
KYIV — Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Sunday that Kyiv is compiling a list of prisoners to be exchanged with Russia, following an agreement reached during the latest round of peace talks in Istanbul last month. The announcement came after Zelenskyy met with National Security and Defense Council Secretary Rustem Umerov and Presidential Office head Andriy Yermak to discuss the implementation of agreements made during the July 23 talks in Türkiye — the third round of renewed negotiations between Moscow and Kyiv. 'Among the key issues is the continuation of POW exchanges. There is an agreement to exchange 1,200 people, and work on the lists is ongoing,' Zelenskyy said in a post on X. He added that Umerov, who led Ukraine's delegation in Istanbul, had updated him on communications with the Russian side. Zelenskyy also said Ukraine is working to secure the release of detained civilians, verifying information on each case. Vladimir Medinsky, head of Russia's delegation, confirmed after the July talks that both sides had completed a previous exchange of 1,200 prisoners each and had agreed to conduct another swap in the same format. The Ukrainian leader said Yermak briefed him on coordination with international partners, particularly the United States, to support Kyiv's diplomatic initiatives. Prior to the July meeting, two earlier rounds of talks in Türkiye — on May 16 and June 2 — had restarted peace negotiations stalled since March 2022, when the last formal discussions also took place in Istanbul. — Agencies
