EXCLUSIVE 'Greedy' firm tried to fine me £200 for not paying for parking within FIVE minutes… I fought them for two years and finally won - here's how
Angela Haley, 64, had decided against stopping in her usual Derby car park and instead chose to station her car elsewhere after entering from a different route.
Initially she had issues paying due to the machine being out of service on May 4, 2023, but she eventually managed to pay the £3.20 due over the phone before heading into the city for a couple hours of shopping.
Having followed Excel Parking's guidelines she believed all was well, until a PCN (Parking Charge Notice) came through her letter box five months later accusing her of parking without payment.
Steadfast Ms Haley appealed the fine, providing proof including confirmation texts, phone calls to the company, as well as a bank account statement showing she made the payment that day. However, the parking firm denied her request.
She then continued to fight against the ticket via the Independent Appeals Service (IAS), described as 'an alternative dispute resolution service' for tickets handed out by private firms, adamant she had paid the ticket.
Ms Haley continued to show her payments receipts to both IAS and Elms Legal, who previously represented the parking firm, but then the reason for the fine emerged - she had not paid within a five minute window.
She told MailOnline: 'I was in a bit of disbelief, I thought well, I know I would never not pay for parking. It's just not something I'd do.
'I kept getting letters from them, and I said look here's my bank statement.
'I didn't have a physical ticket because the normal routes of payment, which would have been just to tap my debit card, wasn't an option on the day.'
'I kept getting legal letters, and then when I found the receipt on my phone, and emailed them a copy, they said, "Oh, no, that they still want to pursue".
'But now then it was because they claimed I didn't pay within their time period, and I just said, I'm not paying. I've paid once I've. I'm not paying again.'
She added: 'It stressed me out to the point where every time any sort of official envelope addressed to me came through the door.
'But I was also going to fight tooth and nail - I was determined I wasn't paying it. There was no way I was backing down from this.'
The legal firm then offered her a reduced fine to around £200, whilst also giving her the option to pay in monthly instalments of £17.
'I didn't even realise it was that much anyway, so they could offer me whatever they liked. I wasn't not paying it,' she added.
'I just kept writing every time I got a threatening letter I just wrote back and said, "Don't write to me anymore. Just take me to court".'
Eventually a small claims court date was set in Sheffield, around 75 miles away from Ms Haley's home. This combined with clashing events meant she could not attend in person.
However she did send her court bundle, which included an overwhelming amount of documents showing her innocence, and eventually emerged victorious.
And after a year of battling Excel Parking sent a letter to confrim they were discontinuing the claim.
'You only have to look at Trustpilot and Google Reviews to realise how many people this company is pursuing for fines,' Ms Haley said.
'I'm lucky because I'm retired. So I've got loads of time in my hands.
'But I think if I'd have been still working and I used to have a stressful job, I'd have just paid it because I'd have been so stressed out.
'I think that's what a lot of people do They terrorise people into thinking they have to pay this money.
She added: I could have afforded to pay it, it was never about the money it was about the principle.
'It was the fact that I was able to prove that their paperwork was not relevant to the date I parked that was what really keeping me going.'
Recalling the moment she received the letter from the firm, notifying her they were dropping the issue, she said: 'Obviously I was relieved. But there's no we do apologise for any upset or inconvenience.'
'I do feel terrible for those people who may be in be in a different financial position, or more frightened, people could have a nervous breakdown,' she added.
A representative from Excel Parking Services said: 'ELMS Legal Ltd were instructed following the rejection of the Defendant's appeal by the Independent Appeals Service and in accordance with the terms and conditions in effect at the site at the time of the contravention.
'Any further details regarding the instruction of the claim and/or its discontinuance are subject to legal privilege.]
A spokesperson from Elms Legal said: 'ELMS Legal Ltd were instructed by the Claimant following the rejection of the Defendant's appeal by the Independent Appeals Service and in accordance with the terms and conditions in effect at the site at the time of the contravention.
'Any further details regarding the instruction of the claim and/or its discontinuance are subject to legal privilege.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leader Live
4 days ago
- Leader Live
Flintshire County Council warn residents about text scam
Flintshire County Council say they've received reports of a scam in which residents are being sent texts about Penalty Charge Notices. The local authority has confirmed that they do not contact people about parking fines over text, and instead it would be in the post. Residents have been warned not to click on the link in the texts, which reportedly leads to a fake website. MOST READ: Council issue list of roads set to be reverted to 30mph in Flintshire next month Why Wrexham chippy offering free chips to kids all summer has had to change rules Actor and author set to appear at event in Flintshire next week A spokesperson for Flintshire County Council said: "We have received reports of a scam where people are sent a text about paying for a Penalty Charge Notice (PCN), which takes you to a fake website. "We do NOT contact people by text about parking fines. "If you have received a PCN, you will receive all correspondence by post. If you are unsure, visit our website."
Daily Mail
12-07-2025
- Daily Mail
TONY HETHERINGTON: I was hit with £100 fine while queuing to leave a car park
Tony Hetherington is Financial Mail on Sunday's ace investigator, fighting readers corners, revealing the truth that lies behind closed doors and winning victories for those who have been left out-of-pocket. Find out how to contact him below. P.T writes: We attended an event at the theatre in Nottingham and parked in the Euro Car Parks facility on Upper Parliament Street. Instructions on the payment machine said to pay on exit. At the end of the evening I queued at the machine, typed in my car registration, and was asked to pay £7.20, which I did. Some days later, however, I received a Parking Charge Notice (PCN), demanding £100. Tony Hetherington replies: According to the PCN, your car spent three hours and 12 minutes in the car park, but your £7.20 only paid for three hours. The explanation was simple. When the theatre performance ended, lots of people wanted to exit the car park at the same time, resulting in a queue. And this was made worse because of roadworks that restricted the flow of traffic outside the car park. You appealed against the £100 penalty, but Euro Car Parks (ECP) rejected your explanation. However, its rejection letter is nonsense! It says: 'Signage is clear – drivers must purchase a valid pay and display ticket for the full duration of their stay.' Absurdly, ECP backed up its demand by sending you a photo of the signage – which does not say that drivers must purchase a valid pay and display ticket. It says: 'Payment to be made at the end of your stay. To pay at the pay machine, please enter full vehicle registration via the key pad.' In short, you obeyed the instructions. You did what you were told to do. You paid the fee that ECP's machine demanded. ECP then ignored its own instructions and demanded £100 from you for doing exactly what it told you to do. And when you appealed, it issued what must be an automated reply turning you down. I say it must be automated because it is hard to believe that any human being would consider your appeal and then believe that the rejection letter and photo you received made an atom of sense. ECP's rejection explained that it belongs to POPLA, the Parking on Private Land Appeals organisation used by car park operators. Sneakily, though, using POPLA is a gamble. ECP said it would settle for £60 if you paid up immediately, but if you went to POPLA and lost, then ECP demanded the whole £100. I am sure lots of drivers pay up to be sure of saving £40, rather than gamble on an industry organisation upholding an appeal, but you decided you would see whether POPLA saw sense where ECP could not. And you also contacted me. I then contacted ECP. I asked, what was the correct procedure in the circumstances you described? Should you have left your car blocking the exit queue and gone back to the machine? If so, how could you get the machine to recalculate the fee for the extra minutes? And, I asked, how many other motorists in the same queue were also penalised that night? As well as putting all these questions to ECP, I put them to Barry Tucker, the multi-millionaire lawyer who is the boss of the money machine that is ECP. The company's most recent accounts show a profit for 2023 of over £12 million, so it is no surprise that he owns an £8 million home in north London. Neither Mr Tucker nor ECP offered any comment, any explanation or any answers. But you suddenly received an email, telling you that ECP 'has reviewed your appeal and chosen to cancel the parking charge'. No one can reasonably object to paying a fee to park, but when parking firms set out to fleece the public they should be held to account instead of being paid off like some racketeer. Successive governments have promised a fairer deal for drivers, but none have delivered on their promises. Shame on them. EE is out of line J.G writes: I terminated my account with EE in July last year and returned all the kit – the broadband hub, TV box and mini hubs. But I continue to receive bills. Despite numerous calls and emails to the company, which remain unanswered, its latest demand is for £1,085. Tony Hetherington replies: You cancelled your EE account and not long after that you moved house. On June 3 EE sent an email, saying: 'You haven't paid your final broadband bill of £1,085 yet. Please arrange for this to be paid as soon as possible.' If you still did not pay, there would be late payment charges and you could find yourself listed as a bad payer in credit agency records. I asked EE to comment, and a day later a senior staff member contacted you. He told you that all charges were being scrapped, and a cheque for £45 was on its way to you to make up for the poor service. EE explained there had been a problem internally which meant that the charges had been applied by mistake.
Glasgow Times
02-07-2025
- Glasgow Times
Glasgow City Council cyber incident still not resolved
Early in the morning of Thursday, June 19, the council's ICT supplier CGI discovered malicious activity on servers managed by a third-party supplier. The local authority said an investigation into the incident was continuing, alongside Police Scotland, the Scottish Cyber Coordination Centre (SC3) and the National Cyber Security Centre. They are still unable to say whether residents' data has been stolen, but have contacted the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) on the presumption that it has. No council financial systems have been affected in the attack, they said, and they were able to say that no details of bank accounts or credit/debit cards processed by those systems have been compromised. The affected systems include the council's planning portal, making online access to planning applications is unavailable. They are unable to take online payments for penalty charge notices, and drivers are also unable to submit online appeals. And citizens are unable to book revenue and benefits callback appointments online. READ MORE: Warning as data at risk as Glasgow City Council hit by cyber attack The cyber attack, and work to secure the council's systems in the wake of it, have also left people unable to access birth, death and marriage certificates; comments and complaints; FOI requests; planning enforcement; public procession applications; the Glasgow Film Office location library; the council's bin collection calendar; taxi complaint forms; the diary of council meetings; and forms to organise commercial bulk uplifts. Security specialists reviewing the incident have confirmed that it was not caused by email, and the council has urged residents to be particularly cautious about any contact claiming to be from them. Residents have also been targeted by scam messaging asking recipients to pay outstanding parking fines online. At this stage, the council can't totally discount that this scam involves stolen data but they are confident that it doesn't, with early indications suggesting it is far more likely to be the work of either opportunistic criminals, trying to exploit the disruption to normal online services, or a more widespread scam. The local authority has been reassuring customers that it doesn't use text messages to chase payment of parking fines and parking penalties can be paid by calling the number displayed on the PCN. READ MORE: Send us photos of your June newborn to appear in Glasgow Times A spokesman for the council said: 'We are aware of what appear to be scam text messages, directing recipients to pay outstanding parking fines online. 'The suspicious messages do not mention Glasgow, or any other location – however, we do know they have been received by at least some people in the city and elsewhere in the city region. 'The city council is currently being impacted by a cyber security incident, which has forced us to take some of our digital and online customer services offline – including the payment of parking penalties. 'We are investigating as a matter of urgency and details of the suspicious messages have been shared with police and national cyber security teams that are assisting us. 'We will never call, email or message you asking for banking details – and, if you do need to pay a parking penalty, you can do so by calling the number displayed on the PCN.' The council urges those contacted by someone claiming to have their data to contact Police Scotland on 101.
