Domestic cement manufacturing to be fuelled by plastic waste
Operating since 1913 it is the country's only domestic cement manufacturer.
Previously run on coal the company has spent $200 million since the early 2000s to convert to other fuel sources - and is now 60 percent powered through waste streams such as wood and construction. old car tyres, and at one stage expired RAT tests, face masks and PPE following the outbreak of Covid-19.
It aims to increase that proportion to 80 percent with the introduction of hard-to recycle plastics, which Fletcher Building says is a win for the "here and now" problem of such plastics that have no end of life option other than the landfill.
Ben Marsh is general manager of Golden Bay Cement.
Photo:
Supplied by Fletcher Building
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Supreme Court dismisses appeal application by convicted insider trader Peter Huljich
Peter Huljich was convicted in August 2023 in a case brought by the Financial Markets Authority. Photo: Supplied The Supreme Court has dismissed an application for leave to appeal by a businessman found guilty of insider trading. Peter Huljich was convicted for insider trading over his sale of Pushpay Holdings shares in 2018. The Financial Markets brought the criminal case against Huljich three years ago, and he was found guilty in August 2023. Last year, Huljich appealed the conviction and the High Court's decision to refuse name suppression, but lost both appeals earlier this year. The Crown also appealed the sentence of six months' community detention and fine of $100,000. The Court of Appeal increased the fine to $200,000. Following the Court of Appeal decision, Huljich continued to maintain his innocence and signalled he would seek leave to appeal to the Supreme Court, which was dismissed on Wednesday. "The proper approach to the offence of insider conduct under the Financial Markets Conduct Act may be a matter of general or public importance and general commercial significance," the Supreme Court said in its judgement. "However, we are not sufficiently persuaded on these facts that the Court of Appeal might have erred in its approach to evaluating the materiality of information." Huljich is part of the Auckland rich lister Huljich family, and is the son of Christopher Huljich. He and his father founded Huljich Wealth Management, which was later sold to Fisher Funds. In April 2018, Pushpay co-founder Eliot Crowther, who held about 9 percent of Pushpay's shares, told Huljich he was thinking of leaving and selling his shares. They were sold in June at $4.04 via a book build. But between the time that Crowther told Huljich of his intentions and before Crowther's departure and share sale, a trust that held Pushpay shares sold those shares on the NZX at an average price of $4.21. It was alleged by the Crown that Huljich advised or encouraged the trust to do so because he expected the sale of Crowther's shares would have an impact on the Pushpay share price. Huljich said he had not encouraged the trust's principal beneficiary or the trustees of the trust to sell the shares but was just passing on the principal beneficiary's instructions. He said Crowther's departure and share sale was not insider information because a reasonable investor would not expect this information to have a material effect on the share price. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Soaring demand sparks change at Invercargill's Total Mobility
A spike in the use of transport service Total Mobility has prompted a southern council to take action. Photo: LDR / Matthew Rosenberg Budget blowouts have forced Invercargill City Council to propose changes to its subsidised travel programme for those living with impairments. Total Mobility is a nationwide service that has existed since the 1980s, providing transport options for eligible users. But use of Invercargill's offering has spiked in recent years putting financial strain on the council. A report prepared for a meeting this week said costs were unsustainable with budgets being overspent to the tune of $80,000 - $100,000 every month. The problem began when government increased the trip subsidy to 75 percent during Covid, prompting some taxi firms to absorb the remaining 25 percent of the fare. Trip numbers doubled as a result with some patrons taking up to 225 a month. A series of proposed steps aim to address that issue, beginning with a change to operator contracts so that the remaining 25 percent of the fare is always charged. If that doesn't work, the council will limit the number of trips to 30 per month before dropping the subsidy to 50 percent - dependent on technological possibility. Council manager strategic asset planning Doug Rodgers said changes would be brought in at three-month staging because time was of the essence. "I'm loathed to make it any longer for the pure reason that we could get six months into this programme without any changes and essentially the bucket will be empty," he said. "And that is a pretty severe impact on the user." Rodgers said a combination of increased subsidy and operators not charging had resulted in a free service: "and who's not going to take that up?" The reason it was hitting ratepayers in the pocket was because the original 50 percent subsidy was made up of 60 percent funding from the National Land Transport Fund and 40 percent from the council. The 25 percent top-up subsidy from Covid times was funded by the Crown. Steady growth in the service meant the cost to council was forecast to jump from around $1.46 million in 2024/25 to around $2.1m for 2025/26. Elected members shared a range of views during discussion. Councillor Alex Crackett said it was important to find a happy medium or compromise, while Lesley Soper said a partial contribution from users had always been a part of the scheme's equity. Mayor Nobby Clark feared proposed changes could create hardship for people who used the service to access employment, get groceries, attend appointments and go to the pool. The subsidy for each Total Mobility trip is capped at an upper limit which varies between regions. Not all southern users clocked up high trip numbers, with the report saying 63 percent used the service less than 10 times a month. A back-up plan if technology doesn't support a scaled subsidy approach is to introduce a hard cap of 30 trips per month. A last resort, once all options have been tried, is to bring a report back to committee proposing the subsidy be returned to 50/50 for all trips. Proposed changes are yet to be approved at full council. LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.

RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Fish farming sector's biggest opportunity, Oceans and Fisheries Minister says
Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones at the 2025 Seafood NZ conference in Nelson. Photo: RNZ / Samantha Gee The Oceans and Fisheries Minister says he does want to see more fish caught if they can be sustainably harvested and that the biggest opportunity for growth in the sector is in farming more fish, including freshwater species. Shane Jones on Thursday announced the most significant Fisheries Act reforms in decades , which include allowing for greater catch limits when fish stocks are abundant and preventing on-board camera footage being made public. The seafood industry has welcomed the proposed overhaul of the rules, saying they will allow for sustainable growth in the sector, despite concerns the changes will further threaten already-fragile marine environments. "This is a once in a lifetime shot to change the rules and regulations in this particular industry and to ensure that it is fit for purpose given the range of challenges our economy is facing, but in particular have been a long time coming," Jones said at the annual Seafood NZ conference in Nelson. Jones told attendees they should "get involved in shepherding these reform options through" if they wanted better certainty, investment and job security. "Please do not buy into this fountain of mistruth that what I am doing on behalf of our government represents a mortal threat to every other critter in the ocean." He said the fishing industry was "not the sole reason why the hoiho penguin has got problems". Jones said he supported the industry working smarter and taking more responsibility, with quota owners delivering more, but he did not support the "dystopian view that somehow I've handed over state control". The nation was facing grave economic challenges and change in the sector was long overdue, he said. Annual seafood industry exports, across wild capture and aquaculture, are currently worth around $2.2 billion, with the government wanting that to grow that to $3b in annual revenue by 2035. "I want to say to my opponents, we are facing inordinately high levels of unemployment, our export percentage GDP-wise has declined, the need for new ways of extracting value out of our natural resources sector has actually increased in importance, not decreased," Jones said. That meant catching more fish - if it could be sustainably harvested - and exploring options for farming more fish, including freshwater species like trout and grass carp, which required further regulatory changes. Shane Jones says he wants to see more fish caught if they can be sustainably harvested Photo: 123RF Seafood NZ chief executive Lisa Futschek said the industry group supported the proposed reforms, which would bolster seafood exports in a sustainable way. "We are able to make more responsive management decisions around the 642 stocks that sit within the quota management system, now that might mean in cases where the science shows us that there is abundance, that we increase the catch limit, but in other cases it might mean where that stock is under pressure, we decrease it." Sealord chief executive Doug Paulin said the changes would allow for better fisheries management and offer more flexibility. With hundreds of different fish stocks and only a small number reviewed each year, he said catch limits were either set too low, or too high and often didn't align with what skippers were seeing in real time. "They'll be the first ones to say, we aren't finding the level of abundance that we expected to find, therefore we want the limit to be dropped, this has happened a number of times at Sealord where our skippers have actually said, we believe this fishery actually needs to have a cut, but unfortunately the ministry aren't due to look at it for another three or four years and lo and behold, we [later] find out that actually the abundance of that species is well below where it was purported to be, whereas under these rules, we could have actually dropped the catch limit much earlier. He did not think the proposed changes would increase overfishing. "The only way we have a fishing industry is to look after the fish stocks and the environment that we fish in, so it makes no sense to catch so many fish that you're not going to have a business in three, four, five years so we'll be the first ones to say we believe we should take a cut and we should take it now in order to have abundance in the future." Doug Paulin says the changes would allow for better fisheries management. Photo: Supplied / Sealord Labour's oceans and fisheries spokesperson Rachel Boyack said sustainable growth in the seafood sector was crucial, but the proposed carry forward of quota from year to year was concerning. "If quota is underused for two or three years and then gets added up and can be used for one large season, that could have the potential to decimate that particular fishery stock and I think we need to be really cautious about making such a change. "It is true that we don't have good enough data to be able to make those kinds of decisions and I think that is where the efforts should be." Ngāti Manuhiri Settlement Trust chief executive Nicola Rata-MacDonald said it was disappointing to see commercial interests being put ahead of sustainability and conservation principles. "We know that regeneration is key to a thriving fisheries sector - that's why we've welcomed previous moves by the government to close tipa (scallop) fisheries, remove kina barrens, and reduce take limits on other fish species to allow stocks to replenish." Rata-MacDonald said allowing for intensified fishing in the future, alongside changes to landing and discard rules, just made overfishing easier. "Commercial fishers failing to catch their annual entitlement isn't caused by some adverse event or special individual circumstances, it's caused by the depletion of already-vulnerable fish stocks." Greenpeace oceans campaigner Ellie Hooper said the reforms would weaken transparency in the fishing sector, which she said was already data deficient. "This year the orange roughy stock on the Chatham Rise has collapsed, the commercial fishing industry have fished it down to 8 percent, it looks like, of the original population, they are meant to manage that resource sustainably, but they haven't." LegaSea chief executive Sam Woolford said the proposed changes showed the government was ignoring the interests of everyday New Zealanders. "The reality of fishing, both recreational, non-commercial, customary is that we need a healthy, abundant, vibrant, ecosystem, we need fish in the water and these changes, yes they are going to expedite processes and remove regulations but at the cost of the environment." An amendment bill will be introduced to Parliament later this year, and people will be able to give feedback on the proposed reforms during the select committee process. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.