'…One of the Long-Term AI Winners in Software': Microsoft Stock (NASDAQ:MSFT) Notches Up With Oppenheimer Praise
Don't Miss TipRanks' Half-Year Sale
Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence.
Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week.
The word came from Oppenheimer analyst Brian Schwartz, who has a five-star rating on TipRanks. Schwartz upgraded Microsoft from Perform to Outperform, and also set a $600 price target on Microsoft stock. That implied a roughly 21% upside potential against the closing price on Tuesday. The biggest reason for this is that Microsoft stands to gain substantially from artificial intelligence (AI) thanks to its current partnership with OpenAI, parent of ChatGPT. Microsoft also has its own AI system, Copilot, which should also help.
But Schwartz notes that it is not just AI that will drive Microsoft forward. Its growth in Azure is also likely to remain strong, serving as a potent competitor to Amazon (AMZN) and its Amazon Web Services ecosystem. Moreover, Schwartz notes, the sheer power of Microsoft's growth in this sector is not yet fully reflected in the share price, so there is a substantial potential win afoot.
Game Pass is Too Profitable!
Yesterday, we had a report come in that noted that Microsoft's Game Pass was 'unsustainable.' Not everyone, however, agrees with that assessment. In fact, depending on how you look at the numbers—and what numbers you refuse to look at—Game Pass might actually be profitable. Reports noted that Microsoft has specifically said it does not factor in 'first-party sales cannibalization.'
This means, essentially, that games made available on Game Pass are basically hurting game sales. Fewer people are opting to buy the games directly when they can simply play said games through Game Pass for the monthly subscription fee instead. Indeed, Microsoft noted that, for Doom: The Dark Ages, it reached the three million player mark fully seven times faster than Doom Eternal did. This suggests some cannibalization at work, as Doom: The Dark Ages ' numbers on Steam were less than inspiring. However, reports note that Microsoft has some noteworthy accounting tricks for how it factors in that cannibalization, which make Game Pass look better for Microsoft.
Is Microsoft a Buy, Hold or Sell?
Turning to Wall Street, analysts have a Strong Buy consensus rating on MSFT stock based on 31 Buys and three Holds assigned in the past three months, as indicated by the graphic below. After a 6.51% rally in its share price over the past year, the average MSFT price target of $527.37 per share implies 5.21% upside potential.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nvidia Becomes First Company Ever to Reach $4 Trillion Market Cap. Could the Growth Stock Have Even More Room to Run?
Nvidia surpassed $4 trillion in market cap on Wednesday, becoming the first company ever to do so. The investment thesis is backed by measurable results. Nvidia's success largely depends on its top customers converting AI spending into earnings growth. 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia › On the morning of July 9, Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) became the first company to surpass $4 trillion in market cap -- an achievement still out of reach for tech giants Microsoft and Apple. The accomplishment is even more impressive considering it has been just two years since Nvidia passed $1 trillion in market cap. Apple and Amazon reached $1 trillion in 2018 and Microsoft followed suit in 2019. Here's why Nvidia has emerged as the most valuable company in the world, why real results support the narrative, and why the growth stock could have more room to run for patient investors. The simplest reason as to why Nvidia is up nearly 15-fold in just five years is that the company's business model has transformed from being largely dependent on end markets like gaming and professional visualization (digital content and computer-aided design) to selling graphics processing units (GPUs) for high-performance computing and cloud infrastructure. Artificial intelligence (AI) workloads are demanding more from data centers. Central processing units (CPUs) are ideally suited for processing sequential tasks, like basic calculations and internet browsing. GPUs are better at parallel processing, which involves handling massive amounts of information from large datasets and achieving higher throughput. GPUs have become the backbone of training AI models, so cloud computing hyperscalers are investing substantial capital expenditures in purchasing GPUs. In addition to the hardware, Nvidia develops software and associated infrastructure, providing an AI ecosystem for data centers. Nvidia's Compute Unified Device Architecture (CUDA) software platform, high-speed interconnects and switching chips, storage solutions, and cooling systems are examples of products and services that complement its GPUs. All together, these solutions combine to form what Nvidia calls AI factories, which are specialized data centers purpose-built for AI rather than traditional computing tasks. In a figurative sense, Nvidia is a steelmaker at the dawn of the age of skyscrapers. Data center construction evolved from wood, stone, and bricks to concrete and steel. And Nvidia is the top supplier in town, designing extremely complex GPUs and AI systems. Since Nvidia has little competition and its products are in high demand, it can afford to charge a premium price that its hyperscale customers, with deep pockets, are more than willing to pay, as they have the cash to spend. Top Nvidia customers, like Microsoft Cloud, Amazon Web Services, Alphabet's Google Cloud, and Meta Platforms, have impeccable balance sheets and high margins. So they can afford to pay top dollar for Nvidia's AI solutions. Nvidia's impeccable results come from rising AI demand and the company's ability to convert such a massive amount of its revenue into earnings. In fact, Nvidia converts more than $0.50 of every dollar in revenue into net profit. Nvidia's stock price has surged because its margins have remained high while it has grown revenue exponentially. Nvidia not only has the largest market cap of any company in the world, but it also generates the fourth-most net income -- behind only Alphabet, Apple, and Microsoft. So while the stock isn't as inexpensive as some of its peers, Nvidia isn't purely valued on future results. The company is already making a ton of money. Its growth could slow, but it will still likely grow its net income faster than Alphabet, Apple, and Microsoft, becoming the most profitable company in the world in the next few years. Nvidia's results speak for themselves, but the future is largely dependent on sustained AI spending from key Nvidia customers. Nvidia's top customers need to prove to their investors that spending on AI is leading to measurable results. Meaningful earnings growth must follow high capital expenditures, or there may be pressure to pull back on spending. In other words, Nvidia is selling the picks and shovels, but its customers must continue striking gold or they will no longer need its tools. Investors should only approach the stock if they have a high risk tolerance, a long-term investment horizon, and are willing to endure potential fluctuations in the company's results. It wouldn't be surprising to see an eventual cooldown in AI spending once hyperscalers complete their foundational buildouts. It remains to be seen how Nvidia will perform once the market matures and if competition eventually catches up. But for now, the company is well positioned to maintain its lead over the competition because it can pour cash generated from the business into research and development for new technologies. Given its inherent advantages, it would take nothing short of a breakthrough for a competitor to take a meaningful slice out of Nvidia's AI market share pie. With a 37.9 forward price-to-earnings ratio, at the time of this writing, Nvidia isn't the dirt cheap no-brainer buy it once was, but it is still a fair value for investors who believe in at least modest AI growth over time. Nvidia is a good example of a company that looks overvalued if you just glance at the stock's price action, but is actually more reasonably valued once you account for the strength of the underlying business and the clear runway for future earnings growth. Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $674,432!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,005,854!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,049% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 7, 2025 Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Randi Zuckerberg, a former director of market development and spokeswoman for Facebook and sister to Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Daniel Foelber has positions in Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Nvidia Becomes First Company Ever to Reach $4 Trillion Market Cap. Could the Growth Stock Have Even More Room to Run? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
AI coding tools made some experienced software engineers less productive in a recent study
AI coding assistants decreased experienced software developers' productivity by 19%, a new METR study suggests. The study found developers were overconfident in the AI tools, expecting a 20% productivity boost even after using them. Critics caution that AI code editors have advanced since the February study period and that the results are site-specific. AI code editors have quickly become a mainstay of software development, employed by tech giants such as Amazon, Microsoft, and Google. In an interesting twist, a new study suggests AI tools made some developers less productive. Experienced developers using AI coding tools took 19% longer to complete issues than those not using generative AI assistance, according to a new study from Model Evaluation & Threat Research (METR). Even after completing the tasks, participants couldn't accurately gauge their own productivity, the study said: The average AI-assisted developers still thought their productivity had gained by 20%. METR's study recruited 16 developers with large, open-source repositories that they had worked on for years. The developers were randomly assigned into two groups: Those allowed to use AI coding assistance and those who weren't. The AI-assisted coders could choose which vibe-coding tool they used. Most chose Cursor with Claude 3.5/3.7 Sonnet. Business Insider reached out to Cursor for comment. Developers without AI spent over 10% more time actively coding, the study said. The AI-assisted coders spent over 20% more time reviewing AI outputs, prompting AI, waiting on AI, or being idle. METR researcher Nate Rush told BI he uses an AI code editor every day. While he didn't make a formal prediction about the study's results, Rush said he jotted down positive productivity figures he expected the study to reach. He remains surprised by the negative end result — and cautions against taking it out of context. "Much of what we see is the specificity of our setting," Rush said, explaining that developers without the participants' 5-10 years of expertise would likely see different results. "But the fact that we found any slowdown at all was really surprising." Steve Newman, serial entrepreneur and cofounder of Google Docs, described the findings in a Substack post as "too bad to be true," but after more careful analysis of the study and its methodology, he found the study credible. "This study doesn't expose AI coding tools as a fraud, but it does remind us that they have important limitations (for now, at least)," Newman wrote. The METR researchers said they found evidence for multiple contributors to the productivity slowdown. Over-optimism was one likely factor: Before completing the tasks, developers predicted AI would decrease implementation time by 24%. For skilled developers, it may still be quicker to do what you know well. The METR study found that AI-assisted participants slowed down on the issues they were more familiar with. They also reported that their level of experience made it more difficult for AI to help them. AI also may not be reliable enough yet to produce clean and accurate code. AI-assisted developers in the study accepted less than 44% of the generated code, and spent 9% of their time cleaning AI outputs. Ruben Bloom, one of the study's developers, posted a reaction thread on X. Coding assistants have developed considerably since he participated in February. "I think if the result is valid at this point in time, that's one thing, I think if people are citing in another 3 months' time, they'll be making a mistake," Bloom wrote. METR's Rush acknowledges that the 19% slowdown is a "point-in-time measurement" and that he'd like to study the figure over time. Rush stands by the study's takeaway that AI productivity gains may be more individualized than expected. "A number of developers told me this really interesting anecdote, which is, 'Knowing this information, I feel this desire to use AI more judiciously,'" Rush said. "On an individual level, these developers know their actual productivity impact. They can make more informed decisions." Read the original article on Business Insider
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Zillow's CEO Says 3-Word Phrase Was The Secret To His Career Success
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. Saying "yes to opportunity" is the three-word phrase that Zillow Group (NASDAQ:Z) CEO Jeremy Wacksman credits for his rise from a marketing role at Microsoft to leading a $17 billion real estate tech company, according to Fortune. He said accepting responsibilities outside his official role helped define his career at Zillow. Wacksman joined Zillow in 2009 as vice president of marketing and product during one of the worst downturns in U.S. housing history. "Back in early 2009, for those that remember, [it] was not a fantastic real estate market," he told Fortune. Don't Miss: Warren Buffett once said, "If you don't find a way to make money while you sleep, you will work until you die." Here's , starting today. $100k+ in investable assets? – no cost, no obligation. At the time, the startup was struggling, and his decision to leave a stable job at Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) raised eyebrows. "I remember talking to friends and family [that] I was going to leave a job at Microsoft... And they were like, 'Why are you going to go work for this money-losing real estate startup? Real estate's a terrible market,'" Wacksman told Fortune. Still, the opportunity to make a lasting impact through consumer-facing products is what drew him. "It's what led me to Zillow, and it's honestly what keeps me at Zillow," he said. Trending: The secret weapon in billionaire investor portfolios that you almost certainly don't own yet. Wacksman joined Zillow in early 2009, shortly after Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) launched the App Store. That move reshaped Zillow's future. "Six months after I got here, Steve Jobs launched the App Store on the iPhone, and it became clear that this company that had 100-plus people and was a great desktop website needed to go into mobile," he said. "Mobile was going to be the future." According to Fortune, Wacksman's prior experience with mobile projects at Microsoft made him a natural choice to lead Zillow's shift to mobile, despite it falling outside his original job description. "I wasn't hired to [help the company go mobile], I was hired to work on the product and marketing efforts. But mobile was new, and I said yes," he "yes" became a recurring theme. He said being open to new challenges—even outside his scope—was key to rising through Zillow's leadership. "And in many ways, my career was just 15 years of saying yes to the next thing," he said. Wacksman took on roles across marketing, product, operations, and leadership. Over time, he moved up the ladder—becoming chief marketing officer, then president, then chief operating officer, and finally CEO last August, according to Zillow. Reflecting on his path, Wacksman said those "yes" moments led to growth, even when projects didn't go as planned. "You'll throw yourself into something and it'll work, or you'll throw yourself into something and it won't work," he told Fortune. "You'll have to pivot, but you'll have learned something." Read Next: Over the last five years, the price of gold has increased by approximately 83% — Investors like Bill O'Reilly and Rudy Giuliani are . Image: Shutterstock This article Zillow's CEO Says 3-Word Phrase Was The Secret To His Career Success originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
