Prince William advances homelessness campaign on Princess Diana's birthday
Prince William will travel to Sheffield on July 1, the day that would have marked Princess Diana's 64th birthday, to highlight the two‑year progress of his homelessness campaign, Homewards. Launched in the third quarter of 2023, Homewards aims to make homelessness 'rare, brief and unrepeated.' The initiative reflects Prince William's commitment to carrying forward Princess Diana's legacy in social compassion and advocacy.The campaign has engaged six pilot regions across the UK: Sheffield, Newport in South Wales, Aberdeen in Scotland, Northern Ireland, Bournemouth–Christchurch–Poole, and Lambeth in London. Each area is now in what Prince William's open letter describes as 'delivery mode' in implementing locally tailored strategies for homelessness prevention and intervention.
Also read: Royal insiders hint Kate Middleton may never fully recover — but a bold new chapter with Prince William loHomewards has launched more than 100 projects across the six pilot regions. A significant milestone came with a $50 million financing agreement from Lloyds Bank, intended to support the construction and refurbishment of affordable housing. Homewards describes the investment as a 'groundbreaking moment' that may unlock additional funding streams from public and private institutions.In a letter to participating local authorities, Prince William praised their efforts:'Your experiences are what makes Homewards unique and powerful... I am immensely proud to say that your collective effort has already allowed us to achieve lasting impact.'
He emphasized the need for continued focus, adding:'I am confident we can lead and inspire understanding, empathy and optimism that homelessness can be ended.'Also read: Prince William turns 43: Royals share new puppy photo for his birthday celebrationExperts from the homelessness and charitable sectors have endorsed Homewards' approach. Lydia Stazen, former executive director of the Institute of Global Homelessness and a member of Homewards' advisory board, noted:'The networks have been built...[and] we are seeing really concrete outcomes.'Polly Neate, former CEO of Shelter and Women's Aid, highlighted Homewards' focus on prevention:'We need to get out of this idea that crisis intervention is going to end homelessness... What Homewards is doing...is demonstrating how those systems can work differently.'Stazen attributed the campaign's rapid progress to Prince William's involvement:'His leadership brings 'a particular type of figure'... capable of convening, inspiring and motivating action.'
Prince William's visible endorsement and active participation have helped distinguish Homewards from earlier efforts that focused primarily on crisis response. During his visit to Sheffield, Prince William will tour a local school to view an early intervention initiative known as Upstream, modeled on Australia's Geelong Project. The program, which reached a 40 per cent reduction in youth homelessness and a 20 per cent decline in early school leaving, identifies and supports young people at risk before they enter homelessness.
William's itinerary also includes visiting Sheffield's Innovative Housing Project, where the first residents are moving into newly developed or refurbished homes funded through Homewards. The project represents a tangible outcome from the campaign's Lloyds Bank financing and local partnerships. Prince William anchored Homewards in Princess Diana's humanitarian influence. He and his brother Prince Harry visited homelessness shelters as children, a formative experience that guided William's continued advocacy. He now serves as patron of organizations that Diana once supported, including Centrepoint and The Passage.
Also read: 'He despises them': Furious Prince William to axe Harry's children from royal lineup when he's king Ahead of the Sheffield visit, William wrote that local teams had:'identified the groups particularly at risk of homelessness in your locations to drive solutions that show it is possible to prevent their homelessness.'
As Homewards enters its third year, Prince William's role continues to be central in uniting charitable efforts, public funding, and local innovation. By spotlighting early intervention, housing solutions, and community collaboration, the campaign aligns with research-based strategies aimed at systemic change.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
6 days ago
- Time of India
'Unpopular' Meghan Markle & Prince Harry's Netflix deal ends, content 'tone deaf' and 'unlovable'; what it means for British royalty
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle 's reported $100 million Netflix deal, signed in 2020 when they stepped back from royal duties, is set to conclude in September 2025 and will not be renewed, the streaming giant has reportedly decided. Their partnership delivered a huge hit in 2022 with the documentary series Harry & Meghan, which drew blockbuster numbers. But their follow-up projects failed to resonate: With Love, Meghan earned just 5.3 million global views and ranked 383rd among Netflix shows, while Harry's polo docuseries Polo drew a mere half-million viewers. Critics and audiences have called the couple's content 'basic,' 'tone‑deaf,' and 'unlovable' . Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Project Management Design Thinking Operations Management Data Analytics Technology Digital Marketing Cybersecurity others Data Science Others Product Management CXO Leadership PGDM Data Science Degree Public Policy Management MBA Finance MCA healthcare Healthcare Artificial Intelligence Skills you'll gain: Portfolio Management Project Planning & Risk Analysis Strategic Project/Portfolio Selection Adaptive & Agile Project Management Duration: 6 Months IIT Delhi Certificate Programme in Project Management Starts on May 30, 2024 Get Details Skills you'll gain: Project Planning & Governance Agile Software Development Practices Project Management Tools & Software Techniques Scrum Framework Duration: 12 Weeks Indian School of Business Certificate Programme in IT Project Management Starts on Jun 20, 2024 Get Details Despite the deal's end, there's a chance the Sussexes could continue with Netflix via a project‑based or 'first‑look' agreement, a model increasingly favored by the platform over large exclusive partnerships. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Audiologists: New £80 German Hearing Device Sweeping the UK Top Trending Today Learn More Undo Season 2 of With Love, Meghan is still scheduled for fall 2025, and Meghan's lifestyle brand As Ever remains partnered with Netflix's consumer products division. Industry insiders suggest the end of this deal reflects the decline in the couple's U.S. popularity. After the Oprah interview and the documentary, support for Harry and Meghan has waned among American audiences, with critics noting their continued push for relevance may now feel calculated rather than authentic. Live Events Royal commentators warn the end of the Netflix contract could equate to a substantial financial blow, especially since Spotify dropped their podcast deal in 2023. Meghan's brand remains a potential revenue source, but durability of their media influence remains in question. What it means for Netflix U.S. audiences: Netflix is stepping back from long-term exclusive deals, opting for flexible partnerships instead. While Harry and Meghan's initial documentary did well, but later offerings didn't keep up the momentum with viewers or critics. Future projects may still come via Netflix, but likely under different, more modest arrangements. Their brand leverage in the U.S. is softening, with experts pointing to waning public sentiment and marketing fatigue.
Mint
15-07-2025
- Mint
AI is killing the web. Can anything save it?
Around the beginning of last year, Matthew Prince started receiving worried calls from the chief executives of large media companies. They told Mr Prince, whose firm, Cloudflare, provides security infrastructure to about a fifth of the web, that their businesses faced a grave new online threat. 'I said, 'What, is it the North Koreans?'," he recalls. 'And they said, 'No. It's AI'." Those executives had spotted the early signs of a trend that has since become clear: artificial intelligence is transforming the way that people navigate the web. As users pose their queries to chatbots rather than conventional search engines, they are given answers, rather than links to follow. The result is that 'content" publishers, from news providers and online forums to reference sites such as Wikipedia, are seeing alarming drops in their traffic. As AI changes how people browse, it is altering the economic bargain at the heart of the internet. Human traffic has long been monetised using online advertising; now that traffic is drying up. Content producers are urgently trying to find new ways to make AI companies pay them for information. If they cannot, the open web may evolve into something very different. Since the launch of ChatGPT in late 2022, people have embraced a new way to seek information online. OpenAI, maker of ChatGPT, says that around 800m people use the chatbot. It is the most popular download on the iPhone app store. Apple said that conventional searches in its Safari web browser had fallen for the first time in April, as people posed their questions to AI instead. OpenAI is soon expected to launch a browser of its own. Its rise is so dramatic that a Hollywood adaptation is in the works. As OpenAI and other upstarts have soared, Google, which has about 90% of the conventional search market in America, has added AI features to its own search engine in a bid to keep up. Last year it began preceding some search results with AI-generated 'overviews", which have since become ubiquitous. In May it launched 'AI mode", a chatbot-like version of its search engine. The company promises that, with AI, users can 'let Google do the Googling for you". Yet as Google does the Googling, humans no longer visit the websites from which the information is gleaned. Similarweb, which measures traffic to more than 100m web domains, estimates that worldwide search traffic (by humans) fell by about 15% in the year to June. Although some categories, such as hobbyists' sites, are doing fine, others have been hit hard (see chart). Many of the most affected are just the kind that might have commonly answered search queries. Science and education sites have lost 10% of their visitors. Reference sites have lost 15%. Health sites have lost 31%. For companies that sell advertising or subscriptions, lost visitors means lost revenue. 'We had a very positive relationship with Google for a long time…They broke the deal," says Neil Vogel, head of Dotdash Meredith, which owns titles such as People and Food & Wine. Three years ago its sites got more than 60% of their traffic from Google. Now the figure is in the mid-30s. 'They are stealing our content to compete with us," says Mr Vogel. Google has insisted that its use of others' content is fair. But since it launched its AI overviews, the share of news-related searches resulting in no onward clicks has risen from 56% to 69%, estimates Similarweb. In other words, seven in ten people get their answer without visiting the page that supplied it. 'The nature of the internet has completely changed," says Prashanth Chandrasekar, chief executive of Stack Overflow, best known as an online forum for coders. 'AI is basically choking off traffic to most content sites," he says. With fewer visitors, Stack Overflow is seeing fewer questions posted on its message boards. Wikipedia, also powered by enthusiasts, warns that AI-generated summaries without attribution 'block pathways for people to access…and contribute to" the site. To keep the traffic and the money coming, many big content producers have negotiated licensing deals with AI companies, backed up by legal threats: what Robert Thomson, chief executive of News Corp, has dubbed 'wooing and suing".His company, which owns theWall Street Journalandthe New York Post, among other titles, has struck a deal with OpenAI. Two of its subsidiaries are suing Perplexity, another AI answer engine. TheNew York Timeshas done a deal with Amazon while suing OpenAI. Plenty of other transactions and lawsuits are going on. (The Economist's parent company has not taken a public position on whether it will license our work.) Yet this approach has limits. For one thing, judges so far seem minded to side with AI companies: last month two separate copyright cases in California went in favour of their defendants, Meta and Anthropic, both of which argued that training their models on others' content amounted to fair use. President Donald Trump seems to acceptSilicon Valley's argument that it must be allowed to get on with developing the technology of the future before China can. He has appointed tech boosters as advisers on AI, and sacked the head of the US Copyright Office soon after she argued that training AI on copyrighted material was not always legal. AI companies are more willing to pay for continuing access to information than training data. But the deals done so far are hardly stellar. Reddit, an online forum, has licensed its user-generated content to Google for a reported $60m a year. Yet its market value fell by more than half—over $20bn—after it reported slower user-growth than expected in February, owing to wobbles in search traffic. (Growth has since picked up and Reddit's share price has recovered some lost ground.) The bigger problem, however, is that most of the internet's hundreds of millions of domains are too small to either woo or sue the tech giants. Their content may be collectively essential to AI firms, but each site is individually dispensable. Even if they could join forces to bargain collectively, antitrust law would forbid it. They could block AI crawlers, and some do. But that means no search visibility at all. Software providers may be able to help. All of Cloudflare's new customers will now be asked if they want to allow AI companies' bots to scrape their site, and for what purpose. Cloudflare's scale gives it a better chance than most of enabling something like a collective response by content sites that want to force AI firms to cough up. It is testing a pay-as-you-crawl system that would let sites charge bots an entry fee. 'We have to set the rules of the road," says Mr Prince, who says his preferred outcome is 'a world where humans get content for free, and bots pay a tonne for it". An alternative is offered by Tollbit, which bills itself as a paywall for bots. It allows content sites to charge AI crawlers varying rates: for instance, a magazine could charge more for new stories than old ones. In the first quarter of this year Tollbit processed 15m micro-transactions of this sort, for 2,000 content producers including the Associated Pressand Newsweek. Toshit Panigrahi, its chief executive, points out that whereas traditional search engines incentivise samey content—'What time does the Super Bowl start?", for example—charging for access incentivises uniqueness. One of Tollbit's highest per-crawl rates is charged by a local newspaper. Another model is being put forward by ProRata, a startup led by Bill Gross, a pioneer in the 1990s of the pay-as-you-click online ads that have powered much of the web ever since. He proposes that money from ads placed alongside AI-generated answers should be redistributed to sites in proportion to how much their content contributed to the answer. ProRata has its own answer engine, which shares ad revenue with its 500-plus partners, which include theFinancial Timesand theAtlantic. It is currently more of an exemplar than a serious threat to Google: Mr Gross says his main aim is to 'show a fair business model that other people eventually copy". Meanwhile, content producers are rethinking their business models. 'The future of the internet is not all about traffic," says Mr Chandrasekar, who has built up Stack Overflow's private, enterprise-oriented subscription product, Stack Internal. News publishers are planning for 'Google zero", deploying newsletters and apps to reach customers who no longer come to them via search, and moving their content behind paywalls or to live events. Audio and video are proving legally and technically harder for AI engines to summarise than text. The site to which answer engines refer search traffic most often, by far, is YouTube, according to Similarweb. Not everyone thinks the web is in decline—on the contrary, it is in 'an incredibly expansionary moment", argues Robby Stein of Google. As AI makes it easier to create content, the number of sites is growing: Google's bots report that the web has expanded by 45% in the past two years. AI search lets people ask questions in new ways—for instance, taking a photo of their bookshelf and asking for recommendations on what to read next—which could increase traffic. With AI queries, more sites than ever are being 'read", even if not with human eyes. An answer engine may scan hundreds of pages to deliver an answer, drawing on a more diverse range of sources than human readers would. As for the idea that Google is disseminating less human traffic than before, Mr Stein says the company has not noticed a dramatic decline in the number of outbound clicks, though it declines to make the number public. There are other reasons besides AI why people may be visiting sites less. Maybe they are scrolling social media. Maybe they are listening to podcasts. The death of the web has been predicted before—at the hands of social networks, then smartphone apps—and not come to pass. But AI may pose the biggest threat to it yet. If the web is to continue in something close to its current form, sites will have to find new ways to get paid for content. 'There's no question that people prefer AI search," says Mr Gross. 'And to make the internet survive, to make democracy survive, to make content creators survive, AI search has to share revenue with creators."
Time of India
11-07-2025
- Time of India
Cloudflare CEO Matthew Prince wants Google to block AI crawlers without affecting search results; says ‘We will get Google to…'
Cloudflare CEO Matthew Prince wants to offer improved tools to block AI crawlers . Joining a discussion on this topic on the social media platform X (earlier Twitter), he said that Google's chatbot Gemini is blocked within Cloudflare's system. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now He emphasised that significant progress against unregulated AI data scraping requires cooperation from major AI companies. The cybersecurity company recently introduced a "pay-per-crawl" system, which is designed to counter AI companies that scrape the open web without compensation. Prince believes that the very companies performing the crawling should support this initiative. What Cloudflare CEO Matthew Prince said about blocking Gemini In his X post, Prince wrote: 'Gemini is blocked by default. We will get Google to provide ways to block Answer Box and AI Overview , without blocking classic search indexing, as well.' Prince asserted that it is feasible to block Google's AI crawlers without affecting standard web indexing. He added that Cloudflare is working on a solution to simplify this separation for site owners. The rise of what is called the " Zero Click Internet " is seen as a potential threat to the balance established by traditional content indexing. Later on, Prince joined another discussion on this topic on X to say: 'Worst case we'll pass a law somewhere that requires them to break out their crawlers and then announce all routes to their crawlers from there. And that wouldn't be hard. But I'm hopeful it won't need to come to that.' Replying to Prince, one user wrote: 'Yeah hopefully we don't have to come to that and they'll just respect and work with content creators on a shared spec.' In the same thread, Prince replied: 'I'm encouraged from conversations with them. But that very viable option we have many legislators in many jurisdictions lined up to pass if they don't.'
