Newsom vows legal fight as Trump admin pulls $4 billion from high-speed rail project
The rail system, whose first USD 10 billion bond issue was approved by California voters in 2008, has built more than 50 major railway structures, including bridges, overpasses and viaducts, and completed more than 60 miles (97 km) of guideway.State Attorney General Rob Bonta told reporters on Thursday he was "poised to take imminent action" on the issue, indicating the dispute would end up in court."California is putting all options on the table to fight this illegal action," Newsom said in a statement.The funding cancellation marked the latest confrontation between the Republican president and a Democratic governor widely viewed as a leading contender for his party's 2028 White House nomination.The two men have clashed over issues from transgender athletes and electric car rules to the use of National Guard troops during Los Angeles protests and even egg prices.'LEGALLY BINDING AGREEMENTS'Ian Choudri, chief executive officer of the California High Speed Rail Authority, said that canceling the federal rail grants "without cause isn't just wrong, it's illegal.""These are legally binding agreements, and the authority has met every obligation, as confirmed by repeated federal reviews, as recently as February 2025," Choudri said, adding that the program has created some 15,500 jobs.The Federal Railroad Administration issued a 315-page report last month finding the project was plagued by missed deadlines, budget shortfalls and questionable ridership projections.Choudri's rail authority has called those conclusions "misguided," saying they failed to reflect "substantial progress made to deliver high-speed rail in California."Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy chided the project for having failed to lay a single mile of track after spending USD 15 billion over 16 years. But Choudri said installing track is a final step after land acquisition, environmental clearances and construction of supporting structures.Still, the project has faced its share of setbacks.The San Francisco-to-Los Angeles route was initially supposed to be completed by 2020 for USD 33 billion. But the projected cost has since risen to USD 89 billion to USD 128 billion, and the start of service is estimated no sooner than 2030.advertisementAs designed, the system would feature electric locomotives traveling at up to 220 miles per hour (354 kph), powered entirely by renewable energy. Planners said it would eliminate 200 million miles driven by vehicles on highways.'WE HAVE TO PULL THE PLUG'A second phase of the project called for extending the rail line north to Sacramento and south to San Diego. A separate project plans to link Los Angeles and Las Vegas with high-speed rail.Duffy said on Thursday that he was confident the Trump administration will defeat any lawsuit challenging the department's move."We have to pull the plug," he told reporters outside the department's headquarters.In 2021, Democratic President Joe Biden restored a USD 929 million grant for the project that Trump revoked in 2019 during his first term in office after calling the project a "disaster."State Assembly member Corey Jackson, a Southern California Democrat who has questioned the project's soaring costs, said Newsom's call to fight the funding cut could galvanize support for Democrats from organized labor and voters in the area where the first railway jobs would be created despite its Republican leanings.advertisement"The people of San Joaquin Valley will now know that their economic engine is coming from the Democratic Party," Jackson said. "This is also a message to our labor friends. Democrats continue to deliver these high-paying jobs. Republicans continue to try to kill them."Rufus Jeffris, senior vice president of the Bay Area Council, a business-sponsored policy group in the San Francisco area, pointed to economic benefits associated with high-speed rail and called the funding cut unfortunate.- Ends
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
US Justice Department official meets with Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein's imprisoned ex-girlfriend
The Justice Department's No. 2 official met Thursday with Ghislaine Maxwell, the imprisoned former girlfriend of financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The meeting in Florida, which Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said he worked to arrange, is part of an ongoing Justice Department effort to cast itself as transparent following fierce backlash from parts of President Donald Trump's base over an earlier refusal to release additional records in the Epstein investigation. 'Ms. Maxwell answered every single question. She never stopped, she never invoked a privilege, she never declined to answer. She answered all the questions truthfully, honestly and to the best of her ability,' attorney David Oscar Markus told reporters outside the federal courthouse in Tallahassee, where Maxwell met with Blanche. In a social media post Tuesday, Blanche said that Trump 'has told us to release all credible evidence' and that if Maxwell has information about anyone who has committed crimes against victims, the FBI and the Justice Department 'will hear what she has to say.' Markus said his team was 'thankful' the deputy attorney general came to question Maxwell, calling it a 'good day.' Today, I met with Ghislaine Maxwell, and I will continue my interview of her tomorrow. The Department of Justice will share additional information about what we learned at the appropriate time. — Todd Blanche (@DAGToddBlanche) July 24, 2025 Asked if his client could potentially receive a pardon or see her prison term reduced, Markus said: 'There's no promises yet. So she's just answering questions for now.' Blanche said Thursday in a social media post that he met with Maxwell and the interview will continue on Friday. 'The Department of Justice will share additional information about what we learned at the appropriate time,' he said in a post on X, formerly Twitter. The House Committee on Oversight issued a subpoena Wednesday for Maxwell to testify before committee officials in August. Maxwell is serving a 20-year sentence and is housed at a low-security federal prison in Tallahassee, Florida. She was sentenced three years ago after being convicted of helping Epstein sexually abuse underage girls. Officials have said Epstein killed himself in his New York jail cell while awaiting trial in 2019, but his case has generated endless attention and conspiracy theories because of his and Maxwell's links to famous people, including royals, presidents and billionaires. Earlier this month, the Justice Department said it would not release more files related to the Epstein investigation, despite promises that claimed otherwise from Attorney General Pam Bondi. The department also said an Epstein client list does not exist. The Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday that Bondi told Trump in May that his name was among high-profile people mentioned in government files of Epstein, though the mention does not imply wrongdoing. Trump, a Republican, has said that he once thought Epstein was a 'terrific guy' but that they later had a falling out. A subcommittee on Wednesday also voted to subpoena the Justice Department for documents related to Epstein. And senators in both major political parties have expressed openness to holding hearings on the matter after Congress' August recess. Rep. Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican, has introduced legislation with bipartisan support that would require the Justice Department to 'make publicly available in a searchable and downloadable format all unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials' related to Epstein and his associates. House Speaker Mike Johnson and the Republican majority leader, Rep. Steve Scalise, both of Louisiana, have said they will address whatever outstanding Epstein-related issues are in Congress when they return from recess. Epstein, under a 2008 non-prosecution agreement, pleaded guilty in Florida to state charges of soliciting and procuring a minor for prostitution. That allowed him to avert a possible life sentence, instead serving 13 months in a work release program. He was required to make payments to victims and register as a sex offender. In 2019, Epstein was charged by federal prosecutors in Manhattan for nearly identical allegations.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Trump Decries 'Democrat Con Job' Amid Epstein Files Row: 'Another Russia, Russia, Russia Hoax'
Last Updated: Trump accused "Radical Left Democrats" of distracting people from a successful six months of his presidency with the latest controversy on the Epstein files. US President Donald Trump on Thursday (local time) sought to deflect the growing row over the files related to disgraced sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, which has become a major threat to his presidency, by dismissing it as a 'scam" and calling it a 'Democrat con job." Trump said that 'Radical Left Democrats" were doing everything possible to distract people from an exceptionally successful six months of his presidency and said they had gone 'absolutely CRAZY" with the latest political attack on Epstein files. 'The Radical Left Democrats are doing everything in their power to distract and obfuscate from our GREAT six months of service to America, results of which many are saying is the BEST six months in Presidential history. They have gone absolutely CRAZY, and are playing another Russia, Russia, Russia Hoax but, this time, under the guise of what we will call the Jeffrey Epstein SCAM," he said on his Truth Social platform. 'As things are revealed and, I hope will take place quickly, you will see that it is yet another Democrat CON JOB. Hopefully, the Grand Jury Files will put an end to this HOAX. Everyone should see what is there, but people who are innocent should not be hurt. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!" Trump is facing a dire crisis as his MAGA base is angered over the White House's handling of the so-called 'Epstein files," viewing it as a betrayal by the Republican and his allies who have long championed the unfounded theory that powerful elites orchestrated a massive child sex trafficking cover-up. Trump, who had campaigned on the promise of releasing the Epstein files, has now attempted to downplay the matter and calling it a 'hoax" promoted by Democrats. His Justice Department and the FBI have said there is no evidence that Epstein kept a client list or was blackmailing powerful figures, angering MAGA supporters. Trump Informed His Name Was In Epstein Files Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal reported that Trump was informed that his name had appeared multiple times in the files of the Jeffrey Epstein sex-trafficking investigation. The information to Trump was reportedly passed on by Attorney General Pam Bondi and her deputy, during a meeting at the White House. However, the White House said the conversation between two administration officials was a 'routine briefing" that covered the scope of the Justice Department's findings. 'The White House is not surprised by this. Trump's name was present in the binders that Bondi produced and handed out," a White House official told CNN. The WSJ report stated Trump was also told that senior Justice Department officials didn't plan to release any more Epstein documents, because the material contained child pornography and victims' personal information. The report also mentioned that both Epstein and Trump said years ago that they had a falling out. Trump said their friendship ended before the financier was indicted for soliciting prostitution in 2006. Epstein later pleaded guilty to procuring a minor for prostitution in 2008, served time in a Florida jail and registered as a sex offender. First Published: July 25, 2025, 07:59 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
US clears way for $8 billion Paramount-Skydance merger
The $8.4 billion merger between Paramount Global and Skydance Media won approval from U.S. regulators on Thursday, clearing the way for a sale that evolved into a clash over press freedom in the era of President Donald Trump. The deal will put well-known entertainment properties including the CBS broadcast television network, Paramount Pictures, and the Nickelodeon cable channel under the ownership of tech scion David Ellison. Paramount this month paid $16 million in a controversial move to settle a lawsuit Trump filed against the company and CBS News, sparking accusations it effectively had paid for approval of the merger. The Federal Communications Commission approved the deal in a partisan 2-1 vote that allows the transfer of CBS television stations. FCC Chairman Brendan Carr, an appointee of Republican Trump, said the agency had received assurances from the incoming owners that they were committed to unbiased journalism. Democrat Anna Gomez, the FCC's dissenter, accused Paramount of 'cowardly capitulation' to the Trump administration. She also said the FCC was imposing 'never-before-seen controls over newsroom decisions.' CBS News was one of several news organizations Trump attacked for what he viewed as unfavourable coverage. Paramount paid Trump to end a lawsuit he filed over CBS' editing of a '60 Minutes' interview with his Democratic opponent, Kamala Harris. Trump, who often accuses media outlets of liberal bias and 'fake news', argued that the editing was designed to make Harris look good. First Amendment lawyers said the suit was without merit. Carr has said the agency's review of the proposed merger was not connected to the lawsuit. Senators Edward Markey of Massachusetts and Ben Ray Luján of New Mexico said the merger 'reeks of the worst form of corruption', coming on the heels of Paramount's settlement. The commission received pledges from Skydance that it would appoint an ombudsman to evaluate complaints of editorial bias or other concerns about CBS. Skydance also told the FCC it would not establish any diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, which Trump believes are discriminatory. 'These commitments, if implemented, would enable CBS to operate in the public interest,' Carr said, who also hailed 'another step forward in the FCC's efforts to eliminate invidious forms of DEI discrimination'. 'The Late Show' host Stephen Colbert had called Paramount's settlement 'a big fat bribe'. His show was cancelled days later in what Paramount called a financial decision unrelated to politics. It marks the end of an era for the family of the late Sumner Redstone, who transformed the family's chain of drive-in movie theatres into a media empire that once spanned broadcast and cable television, film, radio and publishing. His daughter Shari Redstone became chair of Paramount in 2019. At the time, she hoped to better position the company to compete with the world's entertainment giants. Paramount has since shed billions of dollars in market valuation as it struggled to navigate an entertainment business upended by the streaming video revolution. The FCC approved the transaction after a review of more than 250 days, longer than the commission's target of completing such reviews within 180 days. Skydance CEO David Ellison, son of Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison, is poised to become chair and chief executive of the new Paramount. Jeff Shell, former chief executive of Comcast's NBCUniversal, will be its new president. Chris McCarthy, one of Paramount's current trio of CEOs has decided to depart the company once the merger is completed, a source with knowledge of the matter said. Paramount's stock rose about 1.4% in after-hours trading to $13.45.
