Timbaland used an independent producer's work to train AI — but without the artist's consent
This isn't the first time that the music producer has gotten into hot water around using AI in his music. But he's not the only big name using the technology to enhance his music. Fans also decried Erykah Badu and the Alchemist for using AI in the cover art of their new single together.
Today on Commotion, guest host Rad Simonpillai speaks with music journalist Dylan Green and veteran music industry insider Michelle Santosuosso to discuss the Timbaland backlash and what protections artists need in the age of AI.
We've included some highlights below, edited for length and clarity. For the full discussion, listen and follow Commotion with Elamin Abdelmahmoud on your favourite podcast player.
WATCH | Today's episode on YouTube:
Rad: Timbaland was claiming that he's not trying to jack this original beat from this producer, he was just trying to demonstrate the ways that AI could be used to remix an already existing composition. Is that right?
Dylan: That's what he claims. But a lot of people, myself included, think it really just borders on straight-up stealing. Generative AI is a whole bag of worms that I'm sure we're going to get into here, just in the sense that this is a computer spitting back out stuff that it's already learned, as opposed to creating anything — which is very, very close to theft, at least in my opinion.
Rad: Dylan, you've written some criticisms about not just Timbaland, but other high profile artists like Erykah Badu and the Alchemist, who've all been receiving their fair share for using AI, with criticisms coming, in large part, from the hip-hop world. What are people saying?
Dylan: People are upset that real artists are being cut out of actual financial opportunities. The fact that these are all people that can afford to put people on, essentially, and they're just not, in a way to save as much money as they can. Being a legacy artist, and a Gen Xer in particular, just trying to get in on the ground floor of what you think is going to be the most popping thing in five years, it just reeks of laziness in so many ways, in my and a lot of people in my circles' opinion.
It starts to feel predatory after a while. Because it's a difference between being on TikTok and listening to people's music and giving criticisms, giving praise and then being like, "Hmm, I like this thing, let me see what happens if I feed it into this thing without telling them." It's an abuse of trust in a lot of ways.
Rad: Michelle, speaking of that abuse of trust, because I think it's interesting that Timbaland is getting all this heat for how he's using AI and how troubling it is from an ethical perspective. But when we talk about the legal perspective, his actions actually seem okay. And that's baffling to me. But tell me, why is that?
Michelle: It's because there's no real legislation around it. Now, using K Fresh's music without consent, that violated Suno's terms of service. But under current law, there's nothing that you need to delete if AI learned from that actual beat, from the ingestion of it. And this is the rub: music and lyrics that are 100 per cent made by AI are ineligible for copyright protection. But the legal complications, I call it the three C's: there are no laws around consent, credit or compensation for artists who generative AI is training on. So while these systems are freely training on both copyrighted material and independent artists — which is the case with this producer — until we get legislation around credit, compensation and consent to use it in the first place, this is, I agree with Dylan, it's mostly going to disenfranchise smaller artists that are trying to come up.
Rad: Ultimately, how are you seeing these tensions — between AI and then human artists and then their fan bases and just the music industry at large — playing out?
Michelle: It's clearly shaping up to be a battle. And unlike streaming's pro-rata royalty problem, which was very confusing for consumers, this subject has successfully hit the radar of the music consumers.
But I want to point something out to people about artists' paycheques. I want to put it out that copyright ownership has a bundle of rights with it, that each of those rights has their own income stream attached to it, and there's five of them: to reproduce the work, to distribute the work, perform the work, make a derivative work, or display it. And each one of those has an income stream attached to it.
So the tech oligarchy is going to continue to try to normalize copyright theft. If you look at how music has been devalued in the digital age already — and I'm saying from filesharing Napster, company that I actually worked at — it's upwards of 90 per cent from the sales area, in terms of the devaluation of music. So we have to compensate people for the artistic endeavors that they make. And that piece is not part of law.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
2 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Ancient Stone Art Reimagined: Author Edward Thompson Launches 'The Precious Metal Stone Ninjas' and 'The Crystal Birth' Novel Series on Amazon
United States-based publisher The Crystal Birth Novels announces the release of two imaginative volumes by Edward Thompson—The Precious Metal Stone Ninjas Vol. 1 and The Crystal Birth: Jade Stone Woman & Sapphire Man—now available on Amazon Kindle. United States - July 3, 2025 - Author Edward Thompson brings a bold new vision to life in the form of his fantasy-action novel series, blending mythology, crystal symbolism, and futuristic themes. Under the publishing banner The Crystal Birth Novels, the first two volumes of his literary universe— Precious Metal Stone Ninjas Vol. 1 and The Crystal Birth: Jade Stone Woman & Sapphire Man —are now available as eBooks on Amazon Kindle. Inspired by ancient elements and contemporary storytelling, the series explores an alternative world where stone-powered warriors, mythical machines, and crystal-infused heroes face off in epic car races and battles. Edward Thompson's works celebrate character evolution and personal transformation, placing bold female and male protagonists at the forefront of each volume. The books are part of a larger creative franchise that includes graphic storytelling, animation-influenced visuals, and cross-media concepts. The vivid artwork and stylized characters, prominently featured in the cover illustrations, reflect a commitment to blending traditional storytelling with modern aesthetic appeal. Volume 1, titled Precious Metal Stone Ninjas, introduces readers to a new generation of characters empowered by ancient crystal technology. Volume 2, The Crystal Birth: Jade Stone Woman & Sapphire Man, expands on this narrative through high-stakes races and symbolic transformation arcs. The Crystal Birth Novels are also supported by a dedicated website and YouTube channel, offering behind-the-scenes development insights and visual adaptations of the storyline. As Thompson continues to build his narrative world, fans can expect future volumes and additional characters to be released. Readers and collectors interested in unique visual storytelling grounded in stone mythology can find the books on Amazon through the following links: Volume 1 – Precious Metal Stone Ninjas Vol. 1: Volume 2 – The Crystal Birth Vol. 2: About the Author Edward Thompson is the creator of The Crystal Birth Novels, a conceptual book series rooted in symbolic lore, visual fantasy, and futuristic world-building. Based in the United States, Thompson combines storytelling, graphic art, and multimedia content to bring new worlds to readers and digital audiences. Media Contact Company Name: The Crystal Birth Novels Contact Person: Edward Thompson Email: Send Email Country: United States Website:
National Post
2 hours ago
- National Post
Diddy's sex-trafficking acquittal marks death of #metoo
There is little question that Diddy — the mono-monikered rapper and producer whose trial for sex crimes concluded in New York yesterday — is a violent and despicable man. One look, which is all any decent person can stomach, at the 2016 video of him assaulting his then-girlfriend Cassie Ventura and Diddy's innate odiousness becomes impossible to deny. Article content But the trial of Sean 'Diddy' Combs wasn't merely about determining whether the man was distasteful or deplorable — but whether he had broken the law. And which laws, exactly? A jury found him guilty on two lesser charges related to prostitution, but failed to convict him on the far more serious allegations of sex trafficking which could have sent Combs to prison for life. Instead, say sentencing experts, he will probably serve just a handful of years behind bars — possibly even less — most likely at some sort of minimum-security facility, much like convicted securities felon Martha Stewart more than two decades ago. Article content Article content Article content Of course, Diddy is no Martha Stewart, the goddess of expertly curated elevated living who has managed to remain relevant for nearly half a century through shrewd business moves, cleverly-calculated reinvention and sheer hard work. Article content Article content Diddy, too, has been a master of reinvention, literally renaming himself — from Sean to Puffy to P. Diddy and finally just Diddy — as he aged out of conventional pop culture coolness. But this is where the similarities to Stewart end. As his trial so luridly detailed, every stage of Diddy's public persona masked a parallel existence laden with the most extreme intersections of sex, drugs, money and often violence. Fueled by power and wealth — and the impunity both afford without measure — Diddy raped and beat, and bought libidinous satisfaction with craven disregard for compassion or consequence. But again, we know all this — we've known it for years. After all, Diddy's crime-adjacent rap sheet is decades long; remember the infamous New York City nightclub shooting during his Jennifer Lopez-period back in 1999. Lopez, then equally shrewd and famous, summarily dropped Diddy after the gun shots quieted — one of the few lucky enough to escape his orbit. Article content Article content But as Diddy's acquittal of the most severe charge illustrates, a lack of luck isn't necessarily criminal. Particularly when so much of Diddy's deviousness was known for so long — and by so many. The botched — or at least bungled — trial of Diddy confirms yet again that you can't litigate morality and good behavior. Or in this case, a clear lack of both. Article content This was essentially what the #metoo movement tried to accomplish — a very public reckoning of often very private misdeeds. And as we saw this week in a Manhattan courtroom, yet again such efforts have failed. True, Harvey Weinstein — #metoo's most-infamous predator — remains behind bars, as he should, for life. But nearly 20 years after it first entered the public consciousness, the Diddy trial could mark the end of #metoo, or at least its ability to manifest in the courtroom. Article content So much of the Diddy trial focused on the performer's distinct sexual depravity — most notably those lotion-filled 'freak-offs' described in nauseating ad nauseam. But this was a case equally defined by a pathological consumption of drugs. Indeed, as the proceedings revealed, Diddy had a constant supply of narcotics on hand: marijuana, ecstasy, Klonopin — which he fed to girlfriends like Cassie and their revolving door of hired and acquired paramours.
National Post
2 hours ago
- National Post
Diddy's acquittals herald the death of #metoo
There is little question that Diddy — the mono-monikered rapper and producer whose trial for sex crimes concluded in New York yesterday — is a violent and despicable man. One look, which is all any decent person can stomach, at the 2016 video of him assaulting his then-girlfriend Cassie Ventura and Diddy's innate odiousness becomes impossible to deny. Article content But the trial of Sean 'Diddy' Combs wasn't merely about determining whether the man was distasteful or deplorable — but whether he had broken the law. And which laws, exactly? A jury found him guilty on two lesser charges related to prostitution, but failed to convict him on the far more serious allegations of sex trafficking which could have sent Combs to prison for life. Instead, say sentencing experts, he will probably serve just a handful of years behind bars — possibly even less — most likely at some sort of minimum-security facility, much like convicted securities felon Martha Stewart more than two decades ago. Article content Article content Article content Of course, Diddy is no Martha Stewart, the goddess of expertly curated elevated living who has managed to remain relevant for nearly half a century through shrewd business moves, cleverly-calculated reinvention and sheer hard work. Article content Diddy, too, has been a master of reinvention, literally renaming himself — from Sean to Puffy to P. Diddy and finally just Diddy — as he aged out of conventional pop culture coolness. But this is where the similarities to Stewart end. As his trial so luridly detailed, every stage of Diddy's public persona masked a parallel existence laden with the most extreme intersections of sex, drugs, money and often violence. Fueled by power and wealth — and the impunity both afford without measure — Diddy raped and beat, and bought libidinous satisfaction with craven disregard for compassion or consequence. Article content But again, we know all this — we've known it for years. After all, Diddy's crime-adjacent rap sheet is decades long; remember the infamous New York City nightclub shooting during his Jennifer Lopez-period back in 1999. Lopez, then equally shrewd and famous, summarily dropped Diddy after the gun shots quieted — one of the few lucky enough to escape his orbit. Article content Article content But as Diddy's acquittal of the most severe charge illustrates, a lack of luck isn't necessarily criminal. Particularly when so much of Diddy's deviousness was known for so long — and by so many. The botched — or at least bungled — trial of Diddy confirms yet again that you can't litigate morality and good behavior. Or in this case, a clear lack of both. Article content This was essentially what the #metoo movement tried to accomplish — a very public reckoning of often very private misdeeds. And as we saw this week in a Manhattan courtroom, yet again such efforts have failed. True, Harvey Weinstein — #metoo's most-infamous predator — remains behind bars, as he should, for life. But nearly 20 years after it first entered the public consciousness, the Diddy trial could mark the end of #metoo, or at least its ability to manifest in the courtroom. Article content So much of the Diddy trial focused on the performer's distinct sexual depravity — most notably those lotion-filled 'freak-offs' described in nauseating ad nauseam. But this was a case equally defined by a pathological consumption of drugs. Indeed, as the proceedings revealed, Diddy had a constant supply of narcotics on hand: marijuana, ecstasy, Klonopin — which he fed to girlfriends like Cassie and their revolving door of hired and acquired paramours. Article content Drugs complicate, well, everything and they complicated the Diddy case even as they took a backseat to sex. So much of the proceedings — along with the roots of #metoo — were wrapped up in consent, and nothing warps consent more than days-long binges of narcotics. This helps explain why Combs was exonerated on the most serious charges of 'sex trafficking' and racketeering conspiracy. His defense claimed the debauchery — the freak offs — were merely amped-up versions of old-fashioned swingerism, set — much like with Weinstein — against a backdrop of luxury yachts and five star hotels. Article content Despite observers who insist there can never be consent when abuse is involved, Diddy's lawyers reiterated that consent was ever-present and implied. Folks freaked-off because they were being loved or paid — whether in cash or via career boost. Such combustible overlaps shadow many of the highest-profile #metoo-styled cases, which is why so few of them have resulted in actual jail time. Indeed, Weinstein is a rare movement outlier — imprisoned likely for life when men like Kevin Spacey, Matt Lauer and Charlie Rose merely languish behind the bars of ruinous disgrace and irrelevance. Article content Article content Such a future is unlikely to await Diddy, who as the New York Post noted on Wednesday could emerge from the trial as a 'martyr.' And why not (besides his clear cravenness)? In the near year since his arrest, article after article has appeared detailing some former friend, colleague, or interviewer recounting Diddy's alleged sexism or hypocrisy or penchant for violence. Article content Yet besides Cassie, almost no one stepped forward. Many, as in many other #metoo cases, claimed fear — of his power, his proximity to guns and those who use them. Only Shyne, the Belize-born rapper who served nearly a decade in jail for that infamous 1999 nightclub shooting, had the guts to speak out. And perhaps only because he is now back in Belize serving as the Opposition Leader of its House of Representatives. Article content As they say on billboards across New York City's subway system — 'if you see something — say something.' But when it came to Sean 'Diddy' Combs, almost no one said anything. For years, decades even. And the results speak for themselves: Diddy is likely to walk free, exonerated by a soft-on-crime New York City judicial system failing their soft-on-crime citizens. Article content Article content Social justice movements like #metoo are rooted in accountability — particularly from the alleged perpetrators. But accountability also extends to those who remained silent — or stoned or paid — at the sidelines. Because without their willingness to also demand justice, the actual justice system can only go so far. As Diddy prepares for likely bail and, ultimately, release, his trial may not officially kill #metoo off. But its already dwindling momentum is unlikely to ever recover. Article content
